Literature DB >> 15953668

Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia.

Milica Markovic1, Vesna Kesic, Lidija Topic, Bojana Matejic.   

Abstract

Serbia employs opportunistic approaches to cervical cancer screening, leading to inequitable health care access. To better understand the health care needs of women, we investigated their knowledge of and perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening. Data reported in the paper arise from nine focus group discussions with 62 women from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. They were recruited in two cities with contrasting social settings, Belgrade, the Serbian capital, and a regional town, Smederevo. Thematic analysis identified that the interplay of social and personal barriers influenced women's poor presentation for screening. Inadequate public health education, lack of patient-friendly health services, socio-cultural health beliefs, gender roles, and personal difficulties were the most salient barriers to screening. We suggest how within the context of opportunistic screening patient education may be employed. The introduction of compulsory cervical cancer screening, suggested by some participants, is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953668     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  30 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Beliefs about cervical cancer screening among Turkish married women.

Authors:  Melek Nihal Esin; Serap Bulduk; Aysun Ardic
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Participation rates in cervical cancer screening: experience in rural Northern Greece.

Authors:  A Vakfari; M Gavana; S Giannakopoulos; E Smyrnakis; A Benos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Cervical cancer worry and screening among appalachian women.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Nancy Schoenberg; Tomorrow D Wilson; Elvonna Atkins; Stephanie Dickinson; Electra Paskett
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Cancer Screening Perception Scale: Development and Construct Validation.

Authors:  Mohd Ihsani Mahmood; Shamsul Azhar Shah; Norfazilah Ahmad; Norazman Mohd Rosli
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  'I do not need to... I do not want to... I do not give it priority...'--why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Marie G Oscarsson; Barbro E Wijma; Eva G Benzein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  A cross-sectional study to assess HPV knowledge and HPV vaccine acceptability in Mali.

Authors:  Danielle N Poole; J Kathleen Tracy; Lauren Levitz; Mali Rochas; Kotou Sangare; Shahla Yekta; Karamoko Tounkara; Ben Aboubacar; Ousmane Koita; Mark Lurie; Anne S De Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Uptake and safety of community-based "screen-and-treat" with thermal ablation preventive therapy for cervical cancer prevention in rural Lilongwe, Malawi.

Authors:  Lameck Chinula; Hillary M Topazian; Clement Mapanje; Amanda Varela; John Chapola; Laura Limarzi; Christopher Stanley; Mina Hosseinipour; Satish Gopal; Jennifer H Tang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 7.316

9.  A qualitative exploration of Malaysian cancer patients' perceptions of cancer screening.

Authors:  Maryam Farooqui; Mohamed Azmi Hassali; Aishah Knight; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Muhammad Aslam Farooqui; Fahad Saleem; Noman-ul Haq; Hisham Aljadhey
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Influences on uptake of reproductive health services in Nsangi community of Uganda and their implications for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Twaha Mutyaba; Elisabeth Faxelid; Florence Mirembe; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.