| Literature DB >> 32854291 |
Arin A Balalian1, Xinhua Liu2, Eva Laura Siegel1, Julie Beth Herbstman3, Virginia Rauh3,4, Ronald Wapner5, Pam Factor-Litvak1, Robin Whyatt3.
Abstract
Our study aimed to investigate dietary and non-dietary predictors of exposure to pyrethroids, organophosphates pesticides and 2,4-D herbicide in two cohorts of pregnant women in New York City: 153 women from the Thyroid Disruption and Infant Development (TDID) cohort and 121 from the Sibling/Hermanos Cohort(S/H). Baseline data on predictors were collected from the women at time of recruitment. We used three different modeling strategies to address missing data due to biomarker values below the limit of detection (<LOD): (1) logistic regression models with biomarkers categorized as (<median, ≥median); (2) linear regression models, imputing the <LOD values with (LOD/√2); (3) regression models, considering <LOD values as left-censored. Generally, all three models identified similar predictors of exposure. We found that ethnicity, higher income and education predicted higher concentrations of most of the biomarkers in both cohorts. Mothers who consumed processed meat in the TDID cohort, and broiled, barbequed food or burgers in the S/H cohort, tended to have lower concentrations of organophosphates and 2,4-D. The choice of modeling led to a few different predictors identified, and the selection of modeling strategy should be based on the study question.Entities:
Keywords: limit of detection; modeling strategies; organophosphate; pesticides; predictors; pyrethroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32854291 PMCID: PMC7504694 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Basic Demographic comparison between Thyroid Disruption and Infant Development (TDID) and Sibling/Hermanos (S/H) cohort.
| S/H Cohort ( | TDID Cohort ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Not Completed High School | 25 (20.7) | 22 (14.4) | 0.49 |
| 4yr college | 32 (26.4) | 40 (26.1) | |
| 4 + yr college | 29 (24.0) | 37 (24.2) | |
| Completed High School | 35 (28.9) | 54 (35.3) | |
|
| |||
| Never Married | 41 (33.9) | 47 (30.7) | 0.09 |
| Married/Lived with same partner > 7yrs | 67 (55.4) | 99 (64.7) | |
| Divorced/Widowed/Separated | 13 (10.7) | 7 (4.6) | |
|
| |||
| Less than or = 10,000 | 21 (16.4) | 63 (49.7) | 0.0001 |
| 10,001–50,000 | 76 (62.8) | 37(24.2) | |
| >50,000 | 22 (18.2) | 40 (26.1) | |
| Missing | 2 | 13 | |
|
| |||
| Smoker | 6 (5.0) | 3(2.0) | 0.16 |
| Non-smoker | 115 (95.0) | 150 (98.0) | |
|
| |||
| Employed | 68 (56.2) | 85 (55.6) | 0.91 |
| Unemployed | 53 (43.8) | 68 (44.4) | |
|
| |||
| White-nonHispanic | NA | 28 (18.3) | NA * |
| African American-Non-Hispanic | 52 (43.0) | 10(6.5) | |
| Asian-nonHispanic | NA | 8 (5.2) | |
| Hispanic | 69 (57.0) | 107 (69.9) | |
|
|
| ||
|
| 27.2 (6.1) | 25.0 (6.4) | 0.002 |
|
| 31.2 (4.4) | 28.9 (5.5) | 0.0006 |
* As TDID and S/H cohort were inherently different and had distinct inclusion criteria based on neighborhood in New York City, this value is not applicable for ethnicity and race. p-values were from Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-square test to detect differences between cohorts in continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Pesticide Exposure descriptive statistics in TDID and S/H Cohorts.
| Biomarker Name | Mean (SD) (µg/g Creatinine) a | Geometric Mean (95%CI) (µg/g Creatinine) | Median (µg/g Creatinine) a | LOD (µg/L) | # of Values > LOD | # of Values < LOD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| IMPY | 0.3 (0.4) | NC b | 0.2 | 0.1 | 62 | 91 (59.5%) |
| 2,4-D | 0.6(1.5) | NC b | 0.3 | 0.15 | 89 | 64 (41.8%) |
| TCPy | 1.6 (1.2) | 1.1 (1.0,1.3) | 1.2 | 0.1 | 135 | 18 (11.8%) |
| 3-PBA | 0.9 (3.1) | 0.4 (0.3,0.4) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 113 | 40 (26.1%) |
|
| ||||||
| IMPY | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.1 (0.1,0.2) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 78 | 43 (35.5%) |
| 2,4-D | 0.2 (0.3) | 0.2 (0.2,0.2) | 0.2 | 0.15 | 90 | 31 (25.6%) |
| TCPy | 1.1 (0.9) | 0.8 (0.7,1.0) | 0.9 | 0.1 | 108 | 13 (10.7%) |
| 3-PBA | 0.7 (1.8) | 0.3 (0.2,0.3) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 89 | 32 (26.4%) |
a Calculated for all the observations and divided by urinary creatinine levels to adjust for urinary dilution. b Geometric means are not calculated when the detection frequency is <60% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019).
Figure 1Comparison of concentrations of four metabolites of organophosphate, pyrethroid pesticides and 2,4-D herbicide by cohort.
Figure 2Comparison of four metabolites, 2,4-D, 3-PBA, IMPy, and TCPy, by cohort and by baseline sociodemographic characteristics of TDID and S/H cohort participants. (A) Comparing concentrations of 2,4-D, 3-PBA, IMPy and TCPy in the S/H and TDID cohorts in terms of employment status. (B) Comparing concentrations of 2,4-D, 3-PBA, IMPy and TCPy in the S/H and TDID cohorts in terms of maternal education. (C) Comparing concentrations of 2,4-D, 3-PBA, IMPy and TCPy in the S/H and TDID cohorts in terms of household income. (D) Comparing concentrations of 2,4-D, 3-PBA, IMPy and TCPy in the S/H and TDID cohorts in terms of marital status.
Figure 3(A). Predictors of Concentrations of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in TDID cohort identified with logistic models (≥median vs.
Figure 4(A). Predictors of Concentrations of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in S/H cohort identified with logistic models (≥median vs.