| Literature DB >> 25861095 |
Asa Bradman1, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Rosemary Castorina, Raul Aguilar Schall, Jose Camacho, Nina T Holland, Dana Boyd Barr, Brenda Eskenazi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent organic diet intervention studies suggest that diet is a significant source of pesticide exposure in young children. These studies have focused on children living in suburban communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25861095 PMCID: PMC4590750 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Study activities by day.
Summary of precursor compounds, including reported usage by county, and measured metabolites in urine.
| Chemical class and precursor compounds | Metabolite measured (abbreviation) | Precursor compound use in 2006 (kg) | LOD (ng/mL) | Overall analyte DF (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monterey | Alameda | ||||
| Organophosphorus insecticides | |||||
| Coumaphos | 3-Chloro-4-methyl-7-hydroxycoumarin (CMH) | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 23 |
| Diazinon | 2-Isopropyl-4-methyl-6-hydroxyprimidin (IMPY) | 65,813 | 5 | 0.1 | 23 |
| Isazophos | 5-Chloro-1,2-dihydro-1-isopropyl-[3H]-1 (CIT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| Malathion | Malathion dicarboxylic acid (MDA) | 16,940 | 8 | 0.05 | 38 |
| Pirimiphos-methyl | 2-Diethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-ol (DPY) | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 4 |
| Azinphos-methyl, chlorpyrifos-methyl, dichlorvos, dicrotophos, dimethoate, fenitrothion, fenthion, isazofos-methyl, malathion, methidathion, methyl parathion, naled, oxydemeton-methyl, phosmet, pirimiphos-methyl, temephos, tetrachlorvinphos, trichlorfon | Total dimethylphosphates (total DMs = DMP + DMTP + DMDTP) | 75,447 | 624 | DMP: 0.6 DMTP: 0.2 DMDTP: 0.1 | 92 |
| Chlorethoxyphos, chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, diazinon, disulfoton, ethion, parathion, phorate, sulfotepp, terbufos | Total diethylphosphates (total DEs = DEP + DETP + DEDTP) | 95,812 | 73 | DEP: 0.2 DETP: 0.1 DEDTP: 0.1 | 74 |
| Totals | Total dialkylphosphates (total DAPs = total DMs + total DEs) | 171,259 | 697 | — | 95 |
| Pyrethrin and pyrethrin insecticides | |||||
| Cyfluthrin | 4-Fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid (4FP) | 84 | 392 | 0.12 | 29 |
| Deltamethrin | 17 | 67 | 0.3 | 0.8 | |
| Allethrin, phenothrin, prallethrin, pyrethrins, resmethrin, tetramethrin | Chrysanthemum dicarboxylic acid (CDCA) | 112 | 27 | 0.21 | ND |
| Allethrin, cyhalothrin, cypermethrin deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, permethrin, tralomethrin | 3-Phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) | 15,631 | 1,008 | 0.2 | 82 |
| 13,180 | 1,287 | 0.3 | 0.8 | ||
| 13,180 | 1,287 | 0.3 | 7 | ||
| Herbicides | |||||
| 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid | 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 90 |
| 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid | 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 23 |
| Acetochlor | Acetochlor mercapturate (ACE) | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 7 |
| Alachlor | Alachlor mercapturate (ALA) | 46 | 0 | 0.3 | 25 |
| Atrazine | Atrazine mercapturate (ATZ) | 65 | 0 | 0.27 | ND |
| Metolachlor | Metolachlor mercapturate (MET) | 1,550 | 0 | 0.1 | 72 |
| Abbreviations: DF, detection frequency; LOD, limit of detection; ND, not detected. | |||||
Estimated effect of an organic diet (vs. conventional) on the geometric mean for frequently detected metabolites.
| Children | Total DEs | Total DMs | Total DAPs | MET | 2,4-D | 3-PBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | ||||||
| Percent change (95% CI) | –1.2 (–35.3, 51.0) | –48.7 (–65.7, –23.2) | –39.9 (–58.6, –12.6) | –6.4 (–18.6, 7.5) | –25.2 (–38.0, –9.7) | –13.3 (–28.9, 5.8) |
| 0.957 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.350 | 0.002 | 0.159 | |
| Oakland ( | ||||||
| Percent change (95% CI) | 36.4 (–29.0, 162.0) | — | — | — | — | –32.7 (–48.8, –11.7) |
| 0.352 | 0.004 | |||||
| Salinas ( | ||||||
| Percent change (95% CI) | –28.1 (–58.0, 23.1) | — | — | — | — | 21.5 (–8.9, 62.0) |
| 0.229 | 0.185 | |||||
| 0.137 | 0.393 | 0.229 | 0.498 | 0.209 | 0.003 | |
| Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. | ||||||
Figure 2Estimated marginal adjusted GMs and 95% CIs for select urinary metabolites based on diet followed after fitting of linear mixed-effects models. All models were adjusted for type of void (first morning void vs. random spot sample). Models for “All children” were also adjusted for location (Oakland vs. Salinas); an interaction term for location and diet was included in these models for total DEs and 3-PBA (pinteraction ≤ 0.20). p-Values reported in the figure indicate whether there were significant differences observed in metabolite concentrations between diet phases by location. p-Values reported in the x-axis indicate significance for the difference in metabolite concentrations between locations regardless of diet.