Literature DB >> 32853459

Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

P Sladkevicius1,2, L Jokubkiene1,2, D Timmerman3,4, D Fischerova5, C Van Holsbeke6, D Franchi7, L Savelli8, E Epstein9, R Fruscio10, J Kaijser11, A Czekierdowski12, S Guerriero13, M A Pascual14, A C Testa15, L Ameye3,16, L Valentin1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasound improves discrimination between benignity and malignancy if used as a second-stage test in adnexal masses that are difficult to classify.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational international multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Consecutive patients with an adnexal mass underwent standardized transvaginal two-dimensional (2D) grayscale and color or power Doppler and 3D power Doppler ultrasound examination by an experienced examiner, and those with a 'difficult' tumor were included in the current analysis. A difficult tumor was defined as one in which the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) logistic regression model-1 (LR-1) yielded an ambiguous result (risk of malignancy, 8.3% to 25.5%), or as one in which the ultrasound examiner was uncertain regarding classification as benign or malignant when using subjective assessment. Even when the ultrasound examiner was uncertain, he/she was obliged to classify the tumor as most probably benign or most probably malignant. For each difficult tumor, one researcher created a 360° rotating 3D power Doppler image of the vessel tree in the whole tumor and another of the vessel tree in a 5-cm3 spherical volume selected from the most vascularized part of the tumor. Two other researchers, blinded to the patient's history, 2D ultrasound findings and histological diagnosis, independently described the vessel tree using predetermined vessel features. Their agreed classification was used. The reference standard was the histological diagnosis of the mass. The sensitivity of each test for discriminating between benign and malignant difficult tumors was plotted against 1 - specificity on a receiver-operating-characteristics diagram, and the test with the point furthest from the reference line was considered to have the best diagnostic ability.
RESULTS: Of 2403 women with an adnexal mass, 376 (16%) had a difficult mass. Ultrasound volumes were available for 138 of these cases. In 79/138 masses, the ultrasound examiner was uncertain about the diagnosis based on subjective assessment, in 87/138, IOTA LR-1 yielded an ambiguous result and, in 28/138, both methods gave an uncertain result. Of the masses, 38/138 (28%) were malignant. Among tumors that were difficult to classify as benign or malignant by subjective assessment, the vessel feature 'densely packed vessels' had the best discriminative ability (sensitivity 67% (18/27), specificity 83% (43/52)) and was slightly superior to subjective assessment (sensitivity 74% (20/27), specificity 60% (31/52)). In tumors in which IOTA LR-1 yielded an ambiguous result, subjective assessment (sensitivity 82% (14/17), specificity 79% (55/70)) was superior to the best vascular feature, i.e. changes in the diameter of vessels in the whole tumor volume (sensitivity 71% (12/17), specificity 69% (48/70)).
CONCLUSION: Vessel morphology depicted by 3D power Doppler ultrasound may slightly improve discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify by subjective ultrasound assessment. For tumors in which the IOTA LR-1 model yields an ambiguous result, subjective assessment is superior to vessel morphology as a second-stage test.
© 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; ovarian neoplasm; three-dimensional ultrasound; ultrasonography; vascular morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32853459      PMCID: PMC7898332          DOI: 10.1002/uog.22191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  20 in total

1.  Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.

Authors:  D Timmerman; B Van Calster; A C Testa; S Guerriero; D Fischerova; A A Lissoni; C Van Holsbeke; R Fruscio; A Czekierdowski; D Jurkovic; L Savelli; I Vergote; T Bourne; S Van Huffel; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

Authors:  P Brennan; A Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

3.  Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?

Authors:  L Jokubkiene; P Sladkevicius; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Imaging techniques for the pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours.

Authors:  Jeroen Kaijser; Vincent Vandecaveye; Christophe M Deroose; Andrea Rockall; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Tom Bourne; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.237

5.  Improving the performance of IOTA simple rules: sonographic assessment of adnexal masses with resource-effective use of a magnetic resonance scoring (ADNEX MR scoring system).

Authors:  Patrick Nunes Pereira; Luís Otavio Sarian; Adriana Yoshida; Karla Galvão Araújo; Ana Carolina Baião Silva; Ricardo Hoelz de Oliveira Barros; Rodrigo Menezes Jales; Sophie Derchain
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10

Review 6.  Imaging in gynecology.

Authors:  Lil Valentin
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 5.237

7.  Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; Antonia C Testa; Tom Bourne; Enrico Ferrazzi; Lieveke Ameye; Maja L Konstantinovic; Ben Van Calster; William P Collins; Ignace Vergote; Sabine Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.

Authors:  L Valentin; L Ameye; L Savelli; R Fruscio; F P G Leone; A Czekierdowski; A A Lissoni; D Fischerova; S Guerriero; C Van Holsbeke; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?

Authors:  L Valentin; L Ameye; D Jurkovic; U Metzger; F Lécuru; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Daniël A Korevaar; Douglas G Altman; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Lotty Hooft; Les Irwig; Deborah Levine; Johannes B Reitsma; Henrica C W de Vet; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

2.  Diagnostic Value of Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Gulina Shahai; Hui Liu; Yuling Feng; Hong Xiang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  4D Doppler Ultrasound in High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Vascularity Evaluation-Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Marek Jerzy Kudla; Michal Zikan; Daniela Fischerova; Mateusz Stolecki; Juan Luis Alcazar
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.