Literature DB >> 21520475

Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.

L Valentin1, L Ameye, L Savelli, R Fruscio, F P G Leone, A Czekierdowski, A A Lissoni, D Fischerova, S Guerriero, C Van Holsbeke, S Van Huffel, D Timmerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI).
METHODS: We used data from the 3511 patients with an adnexal mass included in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies. All patients had been examined using transvaginal gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound following a standardized research protocol carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner using a high-end ultrasound system. In addition to prospectively collecting information on > 40 clinical and ultrasound variables, the ultrasound examiner classified each mass as certainly or probably benign, unclassifiable, or certainly or probably malignant. A logistic regression model to discriminate between benignity and malignancy was developed for the unclassifiable masses (n = 244, i.e. 7% of all tumors) using a training set (160 tumors, 45 malignancies) and then tested on a test set (84 tumors, 28 malignancies). The gold standard was the histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal mass. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were used to describe diagnostic performance and were compared between subjective assessment, CA 125, the RMI and the logistic regression model created.
RESULTS: One variable was retained in the logistic regression model: the largest diameter (in mm) of the largest solid component of the tumor (odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06). The model had an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.78) on the training set and an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.78) on the test set. On the test set, a cut-off of 25% probability of malignancy (corresponding to the largest diameter of the largest solid component of 23 mm) resulted in a sensitivity of 64% (18/28), a specificity of 55% (31/56), an LR+ of 1.44 and an LR- of 0.65. The corresponding values for subjective assessment were 68% (19/28), 59% (33/56), 1.65 and 0.55. On the test set of patients with available CA 125 results, the LR+ and LR- of the logistic regression model (cut-off = 25% probability of malignancy) were 1.29 and 0.73, of subjective assessment were 1.45 and 0.63, of CA 125 (cut-off = 35 U/mL) were 1.24 and 0.84 and of RMI (cut-off = 200) were 1.21 and 0.92.
CONCLUSIONS: About 7% of adnexal masses that are considered appropriate for surgical removal cannot be classified as benign or malignant by experienced ultrasound examiners using subjective assessment. Logistic regression models to estimate the risk of malignancy, CA 125 measurements and the RMI are not helpful in these masses.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520475     DOI: 10.1002/uog.9030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

2.  Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kanane Shimada; Koji Matsumoto; Takashi Mimura; Tetsuya Ishikawa; Jiro Munechika; Yoshimitsu Ohgiya; Miki Kushima; Yusuke Hirose; Yuka Asami; Chiaki Iitsuka; Shingo Miyamoto; Mamiko Onuki; Hajime Tsunoda; Ryu Matsuoka; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Akihiko Sekizawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Towards an evidence-based approach for diagnosis and management of adnexal masses: findings of the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) studies.

Authors:  J Kaijser
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

Review 5.  The characteristic ultrasound features of specific types of ovarian pathology (review).

Authors:  Ahmad Sayasneh; Christine Ekechi; Laura Ferrara; Jeroen Kaijser; Catriona Stalder; Shyamaly Sur; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 6.  Key findings from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) study: an approach to the optimal ultrasound based characterisation of adnexal pathology.

Authors:  Jeroen Kaijser; Tom Bourne; Sylvie De Rijdt; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Ahmad Sayasneh; Lil Valentin; Ben Van Calster; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Usefulness of the HE4 biomarker as a second-line test in the assessment of suspicious ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Rafal Moszynski; Sebastian Szubert; Dariusz Szpurek; Slawomir Michalak; Joanna Krygowska; Stefan Sajdak
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 8.  Update on Imaging of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rosemarie Forstner; Matthias Meissnitzer; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-04-09

9.  Pelvic mass, ascites, hydrothorax: a malignant or benign condition? Meigs syndrome with high levels of CA 125.

Authors:  Guglielmo Stabile; Giulia Zinicola; Federico Romano; Antonio Simone Laganà; Chiara Dal Pozzolo; Giuseppe Ricci
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2021-05-25

10.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Le Qian; Qinwen Du; Meijiao Jiang; Fei Yuan; Hui Chen; Weiwei Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.