| Literature DB >> 32850298 |
Sasikumar Murugan1, Divya Purusothaman1, Edwin Jothie Richard1, Nehru Sai Suresh Chalichem1, Bharathi Bethapudi1, Prasanna Raja Chandrasekaran1, Chandrasekaran Chinampudur Velusami1, Prashanth D'Souza1, Deepak Mundkinajeddu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed to study anti-diarrhoeal activity of a polyherbal formulation (PHF) in rats and elucidate its mechanism of action.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-diarrhoea; Anti-secretory; Camp; Castor oil; Diarrhoeal drop; Enterotoxin; Stodi
Year: 2020 PMID: 32850298 PMCID: PMC7430962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1Schematic representation-extraction procedure of PHF for cAMP inhibition assay against forsokolin induction in HT29 cell
Effect of PHF on castor oil induced diarrhoea in rat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHF (300 mg/kg, | 69.17±13.30# | 3.50±1.37# | 4.52±1.92# | 60.38 |
| Diarrhoea control | 36.00±4.14 | 8.83±0.75 | 11.17±1.80 | NA |
| Loperamide hydrochloride (5 mg/kg, | NA | 0.00±0.00# | NA | 100.00 |
| PHF (75 mg/kg, | 47.83±5.45 | 5.00±1.26# | 7.37±0.67# | 43.40 |
| PHF (150 mg/kg, | 59.17±14.24# | 3.67±1.03# | 5.58±0.96# | 58.49 |
NA–Not applicable. Data was represented as mean±SD. #denotes the significance difference at p≤0.05
Effect of PHF on small intestinal transit
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PHF (300 mg/kg, | 51.50±10.55# | 38.66 |
| Normal control | 56.77±4.50 | NA |
| Diarrhoea control | 83.95±11.50* | NA |
| Loperamide hydrochloride (5 mg/kg, | 45.59±5.63# | 45.69 |
| PHF (75 mg/kg, | 71.51±14.50 | 14.82 |
| PHF (150 mg/kg, | 57.48±18.32# | 31.53 |
NA–Not applicable
Values were expressed as mean±SD (n=5-6). Analysis was performed by One-Way ANOVA using SPSS. Loperamide group and Test doses (75, 150 and 300 mg/kg) were compared to diarrhoea control group to denote the treatment efficacy (#p≤0.05)and diarrhoea control group was compared to normal control group to check the intensity of induction (*p≤0.05).
Effect of PHF on fluid accumulation in enteropooling
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PHF (300 mg/kg, | 2.22±0.37 | 2.26±0.40# | 28.54 |
| Normal control | 1.08±0.17 | 1.27±0.31 | NA |
| Diarrhoea control | 3.18±0.56* | 3.16±0.53* | NA |
| Loperamide hydrochloride (5 mg/kg, | 1.40±0.34# | 1.43±0.15# | 54.68 |
| PHF (75 mg/kg, | 2.58±0.28 | 2.47±0.26 | 21.71 |
| PHF (150 mg/kg, | 2.32±0.77 | 2.22±0.71# | 29.81 |
NA–Not applicable
Values were expressed as mean±SD (n=5-6). Analysis was performed by One-Way ANOVA followed by Dunnett T3. All the diarrhoeal control group parameters were compared to normal control (*p≤0.05) and treatment groups were compared to diarrhoeal control group (#p≤0.05).
Effect of PHF on fluid accumulation in enterotoxin induced diarrhoea
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PHF (5 mg/ml) | 39.0±4.0 | 61 | 18±7.9 | 82 |
| Normal control | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Enterotoxin (10 µg) | 100.0±1.4 | --- | 100±22 | --- |
Effect of PHF on cAMP inhibition
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHF | + | 12.5 | 77.4±2.81* | 23 |
| 25 | 76.8±7.13* | 23 | ||
| 50 | 77.8±2.94* | 22 | ||
| 100 | 80.2±3.19* | 20 | ||
| DMSO | 0.1% | 100.0±2.72 | --- | |
*p<0.05 vs DMSO
Effect of PHF on ileal contractions
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Acetylcholine chloride (300 nM) | 2.11 | 2.92 | 3.28 | 2.77 | - |
| PHF (10 µg/ml) | 2.13 | 2.95 | 3.25 | 2.78 | - |
| PHF (30 µg/ml) | 1.98 | 2.81 | 3.48 | 2.76 | - |
| PHF (100 µg/ml) | 1.91 | 2.75 | 3.60 | 2.75 | - |
| PHF (300 µg/ml) | 1.39 | 2.13 | 2.65 | 2.06 | 22.7 |
| Acetylcholine chloride (300 nM) | 1.82 | 2.50 | 3.67 | 2.66 | - |
| PHF (1000 µg/ml) | 1.12 | 1.87 | 1.88 | 1.62 | 26.5 |
| Acetylcholine chloride (300 nM) | 1.68 | 2.35 | 2.61 | 2.21 | - |