Literature DB >> 27303446

Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from childhood diarrhea in Beijing, China (2010-2014).

Mei Qu1, Bing Lv1, Xin Zhang1, Hanqiu Yan1, Ying Huang1, Haikun Qian1, Bo Pang2, Lei Jia1, Biao Kan2, Quanyi Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality among children less than 5 years of age worldwide, and its causes vary by region. This study aimed to determine the etiologic spectrum, prevalent characteristics and antimicrobial resistance patterns of common enteropathogenic bacteria from diarrheagenic children in Beijing, the capital of China.
METHODS: Stool samples were collected from 2524 outpatients who were aged 0-5 years in Beijing, China during 2010-2014. Microbiological methods, real-time PCR and antimicrobial susceptibility test were used to identify the bacterial causes and antimicrobial resistance patterns in the isolates.
RESULTS: Of the 2524 patients screened, we identified the causes of 269 cases (10.7 %) as follows: diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (4.6 %), Salmonella (4.3 %), Shigella (1.4 %) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (0.4 %). Atypical EPEC, Salmonella enteritidis, Shigella sonnei and serotype O3:K6 were the most common serogroups or serotypes of the four etiological bacteria. The prevalence of pathogens was correlated with age, season and clinical symptoms. The highest proportion of all causative bacteria was found in children aged 3-5 years and in summer. The clinical symptoms associated with specific bacterial infection, such as fever; abdominal pain; vomiting; and watery, mucus, and bloody stool, were observed frequently in diarrheal patients. Salmonella showed moderate rates of resistance (40-60 %) to ampicillin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin and sulfisoxazole. Resistance to at least three antimicrobials was found in 50 % of isolates. Of the top three serotypes in Salmonella, high-level antimicrobial resistance to single and multiple antibiotics was more common among Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:- than among S. enteritidis. More than 90 % of Shigella isolates showed more alarming resistance to most antibiotics, with a widened spectrum compared to Salmonella.
CONCLUSION: Constant antibiotic surveillance is warranted because the bacteria were highly resistant to various antimicrobials. Our study contributes to the strengthening of the existing surveillance system and provides aid for effective prevention and control strategies for childhood diarrhea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Children; Diarrhea surveillance; Diarrheagenic bacteria

Year:  2016        PMID: 27303446      PMCID: PMC4906916          DOI: 10.1186/s13099-016-0116-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut Pathog        ISSN: 1757-4749            Impact factor:   4.181


Background

Diarrheal disease continues to be one of the foremost public health issues worldwide, with more than 1.5 million deaths each year, mostly in children under 5 years of age in industrializing countries. The average diarrheal disease incidence is an average of 2–3 episodes per child per year [1, 2]. In China, approximately 40,000 children suffer from diarrhea annually, especially during the first 2 years of life, and China remains one of the highest incidence countries [3]. Although diarrhea-associated mortality has roughly halved in the past 20 years, there is no indication that disease morbidity has decreased [4]. Moreover, there has been an alarming increase in the rate of resistance to commonly used antimicrobials. Therefore, acute diarrhea represents an important childhood ailment requiring treatment and prevention in China. Recently, several specific diarrhea surveillance projects were conducted to explore the prevalence and etiology of bacterial infectious diseases in different regions in China [5-7]. Starting in April 2010, we established a real-time web-based diarrheal disease surveillance system based on sentinel hospitals for an unselected population of outpatients, which focused on common enteropathogenic bacteria accompanying clinical features, epidemiological information and laboratory confirmation in Beijing, China [8]. Through 5-year surveillance efforts and data accumulation, we aimed to identify the prevalence of the etiological spectrum, temporal distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of bacterial pathogens associated with childhood diarrhea.

Results and discussion

Demography of enrolled subjects

From April 2010 to December 2014, 2524 stool specimens from outpatient children aged 0–5 years with acute diarrhea were collected and tested for bacterial pathogens. The outpatients comprised 1616 males and 908 females (male:female ratio = 1.8:1 and mean age 1.2 ± 1.1 years). Male children had a higher diarrheal incidence than female children, which was similar to the findings of other studies, despite the unknown explanation [9-11]. The age distribution showed that more than 90 % of children suffering from diarrhea were less than 2 years old (n = 2341, 92.7 %), and prevalence progressively decreased as age increased, in agreement with previous studies [11, 12]. This difference in prevalence may be due to the gradual reduction in protective antibodies from the mother before the children have developed mature nervous and immune response against various infections [13]. Childhood acute diarrhea was more frequent in the summer than in other seasons. Of the 2524 enrolled subjects with an average frequency of diarrhea of 4.9 ± 2.4, 68.3 % presented with mucus stool, 30.0 % with watery stool and 2.5 % with bloody stool. The other clinical symptoms were not obvious, such as fever, accounting for 7.2 % of the total, vomiting (6.5 %) and abdominal pain (4.4 %). However, 20.1 % of the diarrheal children had a history of antibiotic use prior to admission (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic and illness characteristics of bacterial pathogens associated with childhood diarrhea in Beijing

CharacteristicAll enrolled subjects (n = 2524) Diarrheagenic E. coli (n = 117)a Salmonella spp. (n = 109) Shigella spp. (n = 37) V. parahaemolyticus (n = 10)Total of all pathogens (n = 269)
Age (years), n (%)
 <11497 (59.3)53 (3.5)44 (2.9)5 (0.3)6 (0.4)107 (7.1)
 1–2844 (33.4)58 (6.9)52 (6.2)16 (1.9)4 (0.5)127 15.0)
 3–4131 (5.2)5 (3.8)11 (8.4)9 (6.9)0 (0.0)25 (19.1)
 =552 (2.1)1 (1.9)2 (3.8)7 (13.5)0 (0.0)10 (19.2)
 Mean age ± SD1.2 (1.1)1.3 (1.0)1.5 (1.1)2.9 (1.8)1.1 (0.7)1.6 (1.3)
 P value0.002<0.001<0.0010.836<0.001
Sex, n (%)
 Male1616 (64.0)70 (4.3)71 (4.4)26 (1.6)3 (0.2)170 (10.5)
 Female908 (36.0)47 (5.2)38 (4.2)11 (1.2)7 (0.8)99 (10.9)
 P value0.3330.5170.3020.0250.765
Seasons, n (%)
 Spring (Mar–May)584 (23.1)22 (3.8)28 (4.8)0 (0.0)1 (0.1)50 (8.6)
 Summer (Jun–Aug)1029 (40.8)62 (6.0)50 (4.9)31 (3.0)6 (0.6)146 (14.2)
 Autumn (Sep–Nov)615 (24.4)27 (4.4)25 (4.1)6 (0.9)3 (0.5)61 (9.9)
 Winter (Dec–Feb)296 (11.7)6 (5.1)6 (5.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)12 (2.0)
 P value0.0170.229<0.0010.397<0.001
Symptom, n (%)
 Fever (>38 °C)181 (7.2)3 (2.6)b 21 (19.3)b 14 (37.8)b 0 (0.0)38 (14.1)b
 Abdominal pain112 (4.4)4 (3.4)8 (7.3)7 (18.9)b 0 (0.0)19 (7.1)b
 Vomiting165 (6.5)6 (5.1)5 (4.6)9 (24.3)b 0 (0.0)20 (7.4)
 Dehydration11 (0.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
 Watery diarrhea758 (30.0)38 (32.5)20 (18.3)b 8 (21.6)1 (10.0)66 (24.5)b
 Mucus diarrhea1724 (68.3)76 (65.0)87 (79.8)b 26 (70.3)8 (80.0)193 (71.7)
 Bloody diarrhea63 (2.5)2 (1.7)7 (6.4)b 3 (8.1)b 1(10.0)13 (4.8)b
 Meandiarrhea frequency ± SD4.9 (2.4)4.3 (2.3)5.7 (2.6)6.9 (3.6)4.1 (1.6)5.2 (2.8)
 Antibiotic consumption507 (20.1)25 (21.4)28 (25.7)23 (62.2)5 (50.0)79 (29.4)

aOne specimen was identified by mixed infection of EPEC and EAEC, therefore n = 117; SD standard deviation

bChi square test was calculated by each symptomdue to different pathogen, all significant P values below 0.05 was noted

Demographic and illness characteristics of bacterial pathogens associated with childhood diarrhea in Beijing aOne specimen was identified by mixed infection of EPEC and EAEC, therefore n = 117; SD standard deviation bChi square test was calculated by each symptomdue to different pathogen, all significant P values below 0.05 was noted

Distribution of pathogenic bacteria by species and serotype

At least one enteric pathogenic bacteria was isolated from 269 (10.7 %) of the 2524 stool specimens, with a total of 274 isolates. The prevalence of different bacteria is shown in Table 2. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) was the most common pathogen, isolated in 118 specimens (43.1 %, 118/274), followed by Salmonella in 109 (39.8 %), Shigella in 37 (13.5 %) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in 10 (3.6 %). Among samples containing pathogenic bacteria (n = 269), single infections were observed in 264 (99.1 %) cases, and the remaining five cases of mixed infections had two pathogens, including DEC and Salmonella (n = 3), DEC and Shigella (n = 1), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) (n = 1).
Table 2

Distribution of different enteropathogenic bacteria(n = 274) isolated from diarrheal patients

Any simple pathogenNo. of isolates (%)
Diarrheagenic E.coli (n = 118, 5 serogroups)118 (43.1)
 EPEC
  Atypical (eae+ , bfpA−)58 (49.2)
  Typical (eae+ , bfpA +)9 (7.6)
 EAEC
  aggR+28 (23.7)
 ETEC
  est+9 (7.6)
  elt+6 (5.1)
  Both+2 (1.7)
 EIEC (ipaH +)5(4.2)
 STEC (eae + , stx1 +)a 1 (0.8)
Salmonella spp. (n = 109, 33 serotypes)109 (39.8)
 S. enteritidis 35 (32.1)
 S. typhimurium 15 (13.8)
 Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:-13 (11.9)
 S. agona 10 (9.2)
 S. paratyphi C 4 (3.7)
 S. infantis 3 (2.8)
 S. braenderup 2 (1.8)
 S. tennessee 2 (1.8)
 Other serotypesb 25 (22.5)
Shigella spp. (n = 37, 4 serotypes)37 (13.5)
 S. sonnei 32 (86.5)
 S. flexneri 2a2 (5.4)
 S. flexneri 4c2 (5.4)
 S. dysenteriae 21 (2.7)
V. parahaemolyticus (n = 10, 3 serotypes)10 (3.6)
 V. parahaemolyticus O3:K68 (80)
 V. parahaemolyticus O3:KUT1 (10)
 V. parahaemolyticus O1:KUT1 (10)
Total274 (100)
Mixed infections (n = 5)
 EPEC/Salmonella (S. enteritidis)1
 EPEC/Salmonella (S. infantis) 1
 EAEC/Salmonella (S. typhimurium)1
 EPEC/Shigella (S. sonnei)1
 EPEC/EAEC1

aThe serotype of STEC is O26:K60

bThe sum of the other serotypes excluding the top 8 serotypeslisted above

Distribution of different enteropathogenic bacteria(n = 274) isolated from diarrheal patients aThe serotype of STEC is O26:K60 bThe sum of the other serotypes excluding the top 8 serotypeslisted above The prevalence pattern of serogroup and serotype by region is diverse in different studies. DEC is an important etiologic agent of diarrhea in developing countries [14]. In this study, 118 DEC isolates were detected from nine virulence genes. The most prevalent category was EPEC, followed by EAEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). Among the 67 EPEC strains, 58 strains carrying the eae gene only were grouped as atypical EPEC, and the other nine strains harboring the bfpA and eae genes were typical EPEC. The atypical EPEC were more prevalent than typical EPEC (49.2 vs. 7.6 %), which is an emerging trend in developing and developed countries [15, 16]. Although the etiologic role of this sub-pathotype of EPEC in diarrhea has not been definitively established [17], this finding underscores the emergence of atypical EPEC worldwide. EAEC (23.7 %) was the second most abundant E. coli, although it was the most prevalent in previous studies [7, 12, 18, 19]. This observed rate is in sharp contrast with the reported low and high detection rates of 17.4 and 31.8 % in two previous studies from China [6, 7]. In the 17 ETEC strains, the est and elt genes were detected in 9 and 6 strains, respectively, and both est and elt positive were found in two strains. Five EIEC strains produced ipaH gene, and the only STEC isolate positive for stx1 and eae was O26:K60. The low prevalence of STEC and EIEC strains in this study is in agreement with the previous studies in China [6, 7] but differs from those in Iran and Tunisia, with high isolation rates [12, 20]. As the four most prevalent serovars of Salmonella isolates, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonellatyphimurium, Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:- and Salmonellaagona represented 32.1, 13.8, 11.9 and 9.2 %, respectively. Other isolates belonged to 29 different serotypes, anyone of which was present in less than 5 %. Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:-, a monophasic variant of S. typhimurium, has increased considerably since the mid-1990s and currently represents one of the most common serotypes causing infection in many countries and Guangdong Province in China [21, 22]. As the third most prevalent serotype, Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:- highlighted the importance associated with childhood diarrheal disease in this study. Of the 37 Shigella isolates, Shigella sonnei was the most prevalent species, accounting for 86.5 %. Four Shigella flexneri isolates were represented by serotypes 2a and 4c, and only one Shigella dysenteriae strain was detected. The clear predominance of S. sonnei differs from that found in the studies of other provinces in China and many developing countries [6, 7, 12, 23]; however, several Asian countries have recently experienced a transition from S. flexneri to S. sonnei, probably due to improvement of overall nutritional status, sanitation and socioeconomic status [24-26]. The dominant serotype of V. parahaemolyticus was O3:K6, accounting for 80 %. Two types of K untypeable (KUT), namely, O1:KUT and O3:KUT, accounted for 10 %, respectively.

Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria associated with era, season, age and clinical symptoms

Over a period of five consecutive years, the overall isolation rate of enteric bacteria showed a gradual decrease from 15.1 % in 2010 to 10.7 % in 2014, with occasional interannual variation (Fig. 1). This isolation rate was much lower than the reported range of 28.0–55.1 % in other works [12, 27], taking into account the variation pertaining to geographical area, the types of enteric pathogens, diagnostic methods and social and educational conditions. In fact, recent studies have also shown lower incidence of infections in economically developed regions, such as Shanghai, in China [7, 28] because the progress of sanitary conditions has reduced the risk factors of diarrhea. In this study, different pathogens showed various change patterns over time. DEC was identified (with an isolation rate of 4.6 %) as the most prevalent pathogen, with an increased trend during the past 5 years. Salmonella, with an isolation rate of 4.3 %, has remained fairly constant in the past decade in China [5, 7, 21, 29, 30] but is much higher than in Bangladesh (0.78 %) [31] and lower than in Brazil (38.4 %) [9]. The present study also showed a significant decrease in diarrhea caused by Shigella (1.4 %) and V. parahaemolyticus (0.4 %). Although these results were consistent with multicenter data throughout China [6, 7], due to the limited data covering only a few years, it could not be established whether this trend will be maintained or vary in subsequent years. Further studies in the same area are necessary to definitively confirm these trends and to verify whether they truly correspond to an epidemiologic change or are just a response to exceptional situations.
Fig. 1

Isolated rate of enteropathogens per month in Beijing during 2010–2014

Isolated rate of enteropathogens per month in Beijing during 2010–2014 The etiologic bacteria were isolated throughout the year, with a seasonal peak in summer (June–August) (Fig. 1; Table 1), which was also observed in other studies and is strongly associated with environmental factors [32], such as ambient temperature, precipitation and humidity. Beijing, with a high population density, is located in Northeastern China in the northern warm zone. In summer, the hot and humid climate facilitates microbial breeding, and food is more vulnerable to bacterial contamination, which may influence the survival and transmission of pathogens. This study showed that Shigella-caused diarrhea had a distinct peak in August. V. parahaemolyticus prevalence presented no remarkable seasonal trend because of the limited number of isolates. Salmonella and DEC were detected throughout the year with seasonal fluctuation. The prevalence of pathogen categories was correlated with outpatient age (Table 1). The proportion of all causative bacteria was highest in children aged 3–5 years (19.1 %, P < 0.001). Shigella infection was the highest in the age group of 5 years (13.5 %, P < 0.001). Salmonella-caused diarrhea was most common at the age of 3–4 years (8.4 %, P < 0.001), whereas DEC infection in the group of 3–4 years (3.8 %) was secondary to the group of 1–2 years (6.9 %) (P = 0.002). V. parahaemolyticus showed no variation with age. Therefore, continuous surveillance targeting high-risk groups is needed to monitor the variation of etiology and epidemiological features. The prevalence of clinical symptoms was also correlated with the distribution of pathogen categories (Table 1). Fever was the most common in all bacterial infections, except V. parahaemolyticus (P < 0.001). Abdominal pain and vomiting were the highest in Shigella infection (18.9 and 24.3 %, respectively, P < 0.001). Salmonella infection caused mucus stool, watery stool and bloody stool in 79.8, 18.3 and 6.4 % of cases, respectively (all P < 0.05), whereas Shigella infection was significantly associated with only bloody stool (8.1 %, P = 0.024).

Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and Shigella

Antimicrobial drug testing was performed on 109 Salmonella isolates and 37 Shigella isolates (Table 3). For the Salmonella isolates, resistance to nalidixic acid (NAL) was most common (56.0 %), followed by resistance to sulfisoxazole (SUL) (55.0 %), ampicillin (AMP) (46.8 %), streptomycin (STR) (44.0 %), tetracycline (TET) (29.4 %) and chloramphenicol (CHL) (16.5 %). The resistance profiles differed among different serotypes. S. typhimurium and Salmonella 1, 4, [5], 12:i:- isolates showed significantly higher resistance to most antibiotics than S. enteritidis isolates, similarly to previous studies [6, 21, 33]. Overall, the resistance of other serotypes was relatively lower than that of the top three dominant serotypes. Approximately 50 % of Salmonella isolates were resistant to at least three antimicrobials, 41.3 % were resistant to four, 22.9 % were resistant to five and 12.8 % were resistant to six. Many different patterns of resistance were observed with two predominant resistance patterns: AMP-STR-SUL-TET (n = 7, 6.4 %) and AMP-STR-SUL-NAL (n = 6, 5.5 %).
Table 3

Antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella and Shigella isolates by serovars

AntimicrobialNo. (%) resistance of Salmonella species No. (%) resistance of Shigella species
S. enteritidis (n = 35) S. typhimurium (n = 15)1, 4, [5], 12:i:- (n = 13) S. agona (n = 10)Overall (n = 109) S. sonnei (n = 32) S. flexneri (n = 4) S. dysenteriae (n = 1)Overall (n = 37)
AMP21 (60.0)12 (80.0)11 (84.6)1 (10.0)51 (46.8)31 (96.9)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)35 (94.6)
CHL3 (8.6)8 (53.3)4 (30.8)1 (10.0)18 (16.5)2 (6.3)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)6 (16.2)
CIP1 (2.9)6 (40.0)3 (23.1)0 (0.0)10 (9.2)0 (0.0)1 (25.0)0 (0.0)1 (2.7)
CRO7 (20.0)0 (0.0)2 (15.4)0 (0.0)10 (9.2)10 (31.3)1 (25.0)0 (0.0)11 (29.7)
GEN3 (8.6)7 (46.7)3 (23.1)1 (10.0)14 (12.8)30 (93.8)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)30 (81.1)
NAL34 (97.1)9 (60.0)5 (38.5)1 (10.0)61 (56.0)32 (100.0)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)36 (97.3)
STR15 (42.9)10 (66.7)12 (92.3)2 (20.0)48 (44.0)32 (100.0)4 (100.0)1 (100.0)37 (100.0)
SUL19 (54.3)12 (80.0)9 (69.2)2 (20.0)60 (55.0)32 (100.0)1 (25.0)1 (100.0)34 (91.9)
TET7 (20.0)10 (66.7)10 (76.9)1 (10.0)32 (29.4)12 (37.5)4 (100.0)1 (100.0)17 (45.9)
Multidrug-resistance (MDR)
 MDR322 (62.9)12 (80.0)11 (84.6)1 (10.0)54 (50.0)32 (100)4 (100.0)1 (100)37 (100)
 MDR417 (48.6)12 (80.0)9 (69.2)1 (10.0)45 (41.3)31 (96.9)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)35 (94.6)
 MDR57 (20.0)10 (66.7)5 (38.5)1 (10.0)25 (22.9)31 (96.9)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)35 (94.6)
 MDR62 (5.7)7 (46.7)4 (30.8)1 (10.0)14 (12.8)18 (56.3)3 (75.0)0 (0.0)21 (56.8)

For 109 Salmonella isolates, two dominant resistance patterns are AMP-STR-SUL-TET (n = 7, 6.4 %) and AMP-STR-SUL-NAL (n = 6, 5.5 %)

For 37 Shigella isolates, two dominant resistant patternsare AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL (n = 12, 32.4 %) and AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL-TET (n = 8, 21.6 %)

AMP ampicillin, CRO ceftriaxone, CIP ciprofloxacin, NAL nalidixic acid, TET tetracycline, GEN gentamicin, CHL chloramphenicol, SUL sulfisoxazole, STR streptomycin, MDR3 resistance to any three antibiotics, MDR4 resistance to any four antibiotics and so on

Antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella and Shigella isolates by serovars For 109 Salmonella isolates, two dominant resistance patterns are AMP-STR-SUL-TET (n = 7, 6.4 %) and AMP-STR-SUL-NAL (n = 6, 5.5 %) For 37 Shigella isolates, two dominant resistant patternsare AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL (n = 12, 32.4 %) and AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL-TET (n = 8, 21.6 %) AMP ampicillin, CRO ceftriaxone, CIP ciprofloxacin, NAL nalidixic acid, TET tetracycline, GEN gentamicin, CHL chloramphenicol, SUL sulfisoxazole, STR streptomycin, MDR3 resistance to any three antibiotics, MDR4 resistance to any four antibiotics and so on The resistance of Shigella to nearly all antimicrobials was much more obvious than Salmonella, except CHL and ciprofloxacin (CIP). Of the 37 Shigella isolates, resistance to STR was most common (100 %), followed by resistance to NAL (97.3 %), AMP (94.6 %), SUL (91.9 %) and gentamicin (GEN) (81.1 %). Moderate resistance to TET (45.9 %) and ceftriaxone (CRO) (29.7 %) was also observed; however, resistance to CHL and CIP was relatively low (16.2 and 2.7 %, respectively). All Shigella isolates were resistant to at least three antimicrobials, 94.6 % of isolates were resistant to four or five antimicrobials and 56.8 % were resistant to six. The two dominant antimicrobial resistant profiles were AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL (n = 12, 32.4 %) and AMP-GEN-NAL-STR-SUL-TET (n = 8, 21.6 %). S. sonnei isolates were resistant to five (96.9 %) and six (56.3 %) antimicrobials, and of the four S. flexneri isolates, 100 and 75 %, respectively, were resistant to five and six antimicrobials. Although a similar pattern of resistance was reported in China and other Asian countries [6, 34, 35], the frequency of resistance reported here is higher, and the trend of multidrug resistance is more pronounced. According to the WHO guidelines for the treatment of diarrhea, antimicrobials should not be used routinely, particularly for unknown causative agents. Antimicrobials are reliably helpful only for children with bloody diarrhea (probable shigellosis), suspected cholera with severe dehydration and serious non-intestinal infections, such as pneumonia [36]. Because the proportion of isolates resistant to AMP, CHL, SUL, STR, GEN and TET has increased substantially among Shigella isolates worldwide in the past decade, these drugs are no longer recommended as empirical therapy for shigellosis by the WHO. Cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones are two popular acceptable options to treat severe gastrointestinal infections caused by pathogenic bacteria. As the third generation of the above two kinds of antibiotics, CRO and CIP are the drugs of choice for all patients with bloody diarrhea according to the WHO, irrespective age [36]. However, the 9.3 and 29.7 % prevalence of resistance to CRO in Salmonella and Shigella isolates from diarrheal children was noteworthy in Beijing. Additionally, our study showed, respectively, 9.2 and 2.7 % resistance rates to CIP in Salmonella and Shigella isolates, which is an alarming development that may also exist in other regions, such as Shanghai and Anhui in China [37, 38]. Antibiotic use outside hospitals without a medical prescription is very common, and most patients (65 %) with a diarrheal illness in China are treated with antibiotics without identification of the causative pathogen [39]. In this study, 20.1 % of children had taken antibiotics prior to admission, whereas only 2.5 % had bloody diarrhea. The widespread use of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of infections is responsible for the alarming rate of increase of multiple antimicrobial resistance and poses a great challenge. Serious constraints should be imposed on the antibiotics available for treatment of diarrhea among pediatricians. Even for therapy, antimicrobial treatment strategies must be designed to ensure safety and efficacy based on current resistance patterns.

Conclusion

The current surveillance system can identify only the common bacterial pathogens without understanding the patterns of viral and parasitic infection, which should be included to make the findings of the study more complete and valuable. To date, we can characterize only the resistance patterns for Salmonella and Shigella. As the active surveillance continues, we will further explore the etiologic spectrum and variation trends in antimicrobial resistance so that we can execute earlier and proper intervention to decrease the financial load on the patient and on health care.

Methods

Study design and population

The active surveillance program, the Enterobacterial Communicable Disease Surveillance (ECDS), was conducted from April 2010 to December 2014 in Beijing, the capital of China. Seventeen sentinel hospitals affiliated with six districts with different geographical and socioeconomic situation enrolled outpatients with acute diarrhea on two random days per week. A total of 2524 children under 5 years of age who were admitted with acute diarrhea diseases were included in this study. Clinical examination of each patient by a physician was followed by treatment and monitoring. The clinical and epidemiological information was recorded through the electronic gastrointestinal clinic surveillance and reporting system. Enrollment was subject to obtaining informed verbal consent from the parent or guardian who accompanied the child. All specimens were collected on the day of presentation by rectal swabs in Cary-Blair transport media and were immediately transported to the laboratory of Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) for processing within 24 h.

Detection of bacteria

All specimens were processed by routine microbiologic and biochemical tests to identify different enteropathogenic bacteria. Each stool specimen was cultured by streaking on xylose-lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar and Salmonella-Shigella agar (Becton–Dickinson Co., Sparks, MD, USA) for Shigella spp., and Salmonella spp., respectively, and incubating at 37 °C for 16–24 h. For S. typhi, swabs were enriched in Selenite brilliant-green broth (Becton–Dickinson Co., Sparks, MD, USA) at 37 °C overnight, followed by sub-culturing on the media described above. For selective enrichment of Vibrio spp., swabs were inoculated on peptone water containing 3 % NaCl, pH 8, were incubated at 37 °C overnight, inoculated on CHROMagar Vibrio media (CHROMagar Co., Paris, France), and incubated for 16–24 h. After culturing, at least five colonies morphologically resembling specific species were selected for further identification by biochemical testing according to standard methods. For other enteropathogenic bacteria, the systematic identification was confirmed with a VITEK 2 Compact instrument (bioMérieux, Marcyl’Etoile, France). Finally, serotyping was performed by slide agglutination test using commercially available antisera (Salmonella antisera from State Serum SSI Diagnostica, Denmark, Shigella and Vibrio antisera from Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan).

Real-time PCR assay for diarrheagenic E. coli

Pathotypes of DEC were identified by real-time PCR, including EAEC, EIEC, EPEC, ETEC and STEC. E. coli-like and other gram-negative colonies growing on MacConkey agar were tested for the presence of virulence genes using seven sets of primers targeting aggR, stx1, stx2, ipaH, bfpA, eae, elt and est (Additional file 1). The real-time PCR assay was performed using the TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System. The reaction mixture consisted of 2X PCR Master Mix, 200 nM of forward and reverse primers, and 200 nM of TaqMan probe. The amplification profile consisted of heat activation at 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing, extension, and fluorogenic signal detection at 60 °C for 1 min. The assay was considered positive when the number of cycles to detection was 35 or less with the standard S curve.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The antibiotic resistance of the bacterial isolates was tested using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2010). E. coli (ATCC 25922) was included in the test for quality control. The disk concentrations of 9 antimicrobial agents (Oxide, UK) were as follows: 10 μg AMP, 30 μg CRO, 5 μg CIP, 30 μg NAL, 30 μg TET, 10 μg GEN, 30 μg CHL, 300 μg SUL, and 10 μg STR. Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to at least three classes of antibiotics.

Statistical analysis

All data were entered in an Excel database (Additional file 2) (Microsoft Corporation, USA). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS/11.5 software (SPSS Inc., USA). Comparison of proportions and statistical significance were calculated using a two-tailed Chi square test or Fisher’s exact test with a P < 0.05 considered significant.
  37 in total

1.  Seasonality in six enterically transmitted diseases and ambient temperature.

Authors:  E N Naumova; J S Jagai; B Matyas; A DeMaria; I B MacNeill; J K Griffiths
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Etiology of diarrhea among children under the age five in China: Results from a five-year surveillance.

Authors:  Jianxing Yu; Huaiqi Jing; Shengjie Lai; Wenbo Xu; Mengfeng Li; Jianguo Wu; Wei Liu; Zhenghong Yuan; Yu Chen; Shiwen Zhao; Xinhua Wang; Zhuo Zhao; Lu Ran; Shuyu Wu; John D Klena; Luzhao Feng; Fu Li; Xianfei Ye; Yanzi Qiu; Xin Wang; Hongjie Yu; Zhongjie Li; Weizhong Yang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 6.072

3.  Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli infection in Baltimore, Maryland, and New Haven, Connecticut.

Authors:  James P Nataro; Volker Mai; Judith Johnson; William C Blackwelder; Robert Heimer; Shirley Tirrell; Stephen C Edberg; Christopher R Braden; J Glenn Morris; Jon Mark Hirshon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  [Analysis of reported infectious diarrhea (other than cholera, dysentery, typhoid and paratyphoid) in China in 2011].

Authors:  Hai-xia Liu; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2013-04

5.  Etiology of acute diarrhea in children and adults in Tunis, Tunisia, with emphasis on diarrheagenic Escherichia coli: prevalence, phenotyping, and molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Nazek Al-Gallas; Olfa Bahri; Aida Bouratbeen; Assia Ben Haasen; Ridha Ben Aissa
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Clinical study of acute childhood diarrhoea caused by bacterial enteropathogens.

Authors:  Vyas Kumar Rathaur; Monika Pathania; Aparna Jayara; Neeraj Yadav
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000.

Authors:  Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Nikhil Thapar; Ian R Sanderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Age specific aetiological agents of diarrhoea in hospitalized children aged less than five years in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Sabrina J Moyo; Njolstad Gro; Mecky I Matee; Jesse Kitundu; Helge Myrmel; Haima Mylvaganam; Samuel Y Maselle; Nina Langeland
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among Shigella species isolated in China during the 7-year period of 2005-2011.

Authors:  Haifei Yang; Guosheng Chen; Yulin Zhu; Yanyan Liu; Jun Cheng; Lifen Hu; Ying Ye; Jiabin Li
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  23 in total

1.  Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella serotypes in Iran: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farzad Khademi; Hamid Vaez; Fahimeh Ghanbari; Mohsen Arzanlou; Jafar Mohammadshahi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Epidemiological Study on Prevalence, Serovar Diversity, Multidrug Resistance, and CTX-M-Type Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases of Salmonella spp. from Patients with Diarrhea, Food of Animal Origin, and Pets in Several Provinces of China.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Li Zhao; Yujie Hu; Tania Dottorini; Séamus Fanning; Jin Xu; Fengqin Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Anti-diarrhoeal activity of a polyherbal formulation in rats and elucidation of its cellular mechanisms.

Authors:  Sasikumar Murugan; Divya Purusothaman; Edwin Jothie Richard; Nehru Sai Suresh Chalichem; Bharathi Bethapudi; Prasanna Raja Chandrasekaran; Chandrasekaran Chinampudur Velusami; Prashanth D'Souza; Deepak Mundkinajeddu
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

4.  Identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial enteropathogens from children aged 0-59 months at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia: a prospective cross sectional study.

Authors:  Harriet Chiyangi; John B Muma; Sydney Malama; Joel Manyahi; Ahmed Abade; Geoffrey Kwenda; Mecky I Matee
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Antibacterial and detoxifying activity of NZ17074 analogues with multi-layers of selective antimicrobial actions against Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis.

Authors:  Na Yang; Xuehui Liu; Da Teng; Zhanzhan Li; Xiumin Wang; Ruoyu Mao; Xiao Wang; Ya Hao; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella strains isolated from infections in Southwest China.

Authors:  Shun-Xian Zhang; Yong-Ming Zhou; Li-Guang Tian; Jia-Xu Chen; Rita Tinoco-Torres; Emmanuel Serrano; Shi-Zhu Li; Shao-Hong Chen; Lin Ai; Jun-Hu Chen; Shang Xia; Yan Lu; Shan Lv; Xue-Jiao Teng; Wen Xu; Wen-Peng Gu; Si-Tang Gong; Xiao-Nong Zhou; Lan-Lan Geng; Wei Hu
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.520

7.  Prevalence and risk factors for antibiotic utilization in Chinese children.

Authors:  Shasha Guo; Qiang Sun; Xinyang Zhao; Liyan Shen; Xuemei Zhen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Characterization of Salmonella serotypes prevalent in asymptomatic people and patients.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Weibing Zhang; Kai Zhang; Yue Zhang; Zhenyu Wang; Wei Zhang; Yang Li; Qiuchun Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  A Novel Method to Mask the Bitter Taste of Berberine Hydrochloride: Powder Surface Modification.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Dingkun Zhang; Jing He; Xue Han; Junzhi Lin; Yang Lan; Xi Xiong; Lingying Yu; Ming Yang; Li Han
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.085

10.  Escherichia coli pathotypes and Shigella sero-groups in diarrheic children in Nairobi city, Kenya.

Authors:  Peter Lokamar Nyanga; Jackson Onyuka; Mark Kilongosi Webale; Tom Were; Valentine Budambula
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.