Literature DB >> 20647299

The association between radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee symptoms, function and quality of life 10-15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

B E Oiestad1, I Holm, L Engebretsen, M A Risberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the association between radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) and symptoms and function in subjects with previous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. AIM: To investigate the associations between radiographic tibiofemoral knee OA and knee pain, symptoms, function and knee-related quality of life (QOL) 10-15 years after ACL reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 258 subjects were consecutively included at the time of ACL reconstruction and followed up prospectively. The authors included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score to evaluate knee pain, other symptoms (symptoms), activities of daily living and sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and QOL. The subjects underwent standing radiographs 10-15 years after the ACL reconstruction. The radiographs were graded with the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) classification (grade 0-4).
RESULTS: 210 subjects (81%) consented to participate in the 10-15-year follow-up. Radiographic knee OA (K&L ≥ grade 2) was detected in 71%, and 24% showed moderate or severe radiographic knee OA (K&L grades 3 and 4). No significant associations were detected between radiographic knee OA (K&L grade ≥ 2) and pain, function or QOL, respectively, but subjects with radiographic knee OA showed significantly increased symptoms. Severe radiographic knee OA (K&L grade 4) was significantly associated with more pain, symptoms, impaired Sport/Rec and reduced QOL.
CONCLUSION: Subjects with radiographic knee OA showed significantly more symptoms than those without OA, and subjects with severe radiographic knee OA had significantly more pain, impaired function and reduced quality of life than those without radiographic knee OA 10-15 years after ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647299     DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  45 in total

Review 1.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Incidence and Predictors of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Primary Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Dosage effects of neuromuscular training intervention to reduce anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: meta- and sub-group analyses.

Authors:  Dai Sugimoto; Gregory D Myer; Kim D Barber Foss; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  ABCs of Evidence-based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Strategies in Female Athletes.

Authors:  Dai Sugimoto; Gregory D Myer; Lyle J Micheli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2015-03-01

5.  Return to sport.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Influence of an unloader brace on lower limb electromyographic activity in individuals with predominant lateral osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Harvi F Hart; Matthew Holt; Adam I Semciw; Natalie J Collins; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patient-Reported Outcomes One to Five Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Effect of Combined Injury and Associations With Osteoarthritis Features Defined on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  No negative effect on patient-reported outcome of concomitant cartilage lesions 5-9 years after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Svend Ulstein; Karin Bredland; Asbjørn Årøen; Lars Engebretsen; Jan Harald Røtterud
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.