| Literature DB >> 32847040 |
Hyun-Chul Jeong1, Eui-Jae Lee2, Hyun-Su Youn3, Wi-Young So4.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a physical education fitness program for adolescents to counteract the declining physical activity levels caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to investigate the program's effect. This mixed-methods study developed and implemented a five-component "Music Beeps" (MB) program to promote adolescents' physical fitness. A total of 240 students from two high schools in South Korea-divided into experimental and control groups-participated in 32 sessions over 16 weeks. The changes in students' fitness were analyzed, and the educational effects were examined via inductive analysis of the observation logs and group and in-depth interviews. The results demonstrated that, whereas the comparison group demonstrated no statistically significant changes in power, muscular strength and endurance, or cardiopulmonary endurance, the experimental group showed changes in all these variables, along with changes in flexibility. Further, the MB program had significant educational effects. First, students reported that musical cues enhanced their fitness motivation and sense of responsibility. Second, record-keeping and active participation contributed to self-led fitness management. Third, activity in a small space with few pieces of equipment led to the positive perception that the program was efficient and enabled regular exercise regardless of climate conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Physical Activity Promotion System; fitness promotion; high school students; music beeps (MP); physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32847040 PMCID: PMC7503806 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the study population.
| Group | Number of Participants (Male, Female) |
|---|---|
| Experimental group | 30 male, 30 female students from a national high school |
| 30 male, 30 female students from a public high school | |
| Comparison group | 30 male, 30 female students from a national high school |
| 30 male, 30 female students from a public high school |
Characteristics of deep-focused interview participants.
| Student | Sex | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Student A | Male | His average PAPS rating is 3, which is similar to the class average. He has been interested in the fitness promotion program even before beginning the program, and he has shown vast interest in and actively participated in the program. |
| Student B | Female | Her average PAPS rating is 3, which is similar to the class average. She was not interested in the fitness promotion program before beginning the program but began to develop interest and actively participate in the program throughout the program. |
| Student C | Male | His average PAPS rating is 1 (highest level of fitness), and he has shown much interest in improving his fitness. |
| Student D | Female | Her average PAPS rating is 5 (low fitness), but she actively participates in PE class. |
PAPS, physical activity promotion system; PE, physical education.
Name of music file by exercise and meaning.
| Component | Grade 1 (Excellent Fitness) | Grade 2 (Good Fitness) | Grade 3 (Moderate Fitness) | Grade 4 (Basic Fitness) | Grade 5 (Low Fitness) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power (plyometric training) | P1 5_50_10 | P2 5_40_10 | P3 5_30_10 | P4 5_20_10 | P5 5_10_10 |
| Muscular strength and endurance (Tabata) Planks | M1 5_50_10 | M2 5_45_10 | M3 5_40_10 | M4 5_35_10 | M5 5_30_10 |
| Flexibility | S1 5_35_10 | S2 5_30_10 | S3 5_25_10 | S4 5_20_10 | S5 5_15_10 |
| Cardiopulmonary endurance (Jump ropes) | C1 5_70_10 | C2 5_60_10 | C3 5_50_10 | C4 5_40_10 | C5 5_30_10 |
PAPS fitness component evaluation for the experimental and comparison groups (n = 240).
| Factor |
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Mean | Standard Deviation | |||||
| Comparison group | Power | 120 | 9.053 | 1.374 | 9.036 | 1.371 | 1.936 | 0.055 |
| Muscular strength and endurance | 120 | 41.041 | 18.990 | 41.341 | 18.784 | −1.500 | 0.136 | |
| Flexibility | 120 | 8.757 | 6.331 | 8.837 | 6.192 | −2.125 | 0.036 * | |
| Cardiopulmonary endurance | 120 | 41.708 | 16.418 | 42.041 | 16.015 | −1.609 | 0.110 | |
| Experimental group | Power | 120 | 9.041 | 1.341 | 8.886 | 1.346 | 12.053 | <0.001 *** |
| Muscular strength and endurance | 120 | 41.016 | 19.913 | 45.550 | 21.327 | −13.281 | <0.001 *** | |
| Flexibility | 120 | 8.764 | 5.786 | 9.595 | 5.449 | −9.256 | <0.001 *** | |
| Cardiopulmonary endurance | 120 | 41.800 | 16.421 | 45.250 | 16.234 | −12.299 | <0.001 *** | |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001; tested by paired sample t-test.