| Literature DB >> 31719832 |
Michal Kudlacek1, Karel Fromel1,2, Dorota Groffik2.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore differences in rates of achieving the weekly physical activity (PA) recommendation between adolescents who preferred fitness PA and those who did not. Furthermore, we investigated the types of PA practiced by adolescents. In total, 9513 participants from the Czech Republic and Poland, aged 15-18 years took part in the study between 2009 and 2016. Out of this source sample, 4977 self-reported their weekly PA using the IPAQ-Long Form, and 1348 objectively monitored their weekly PA using pedometers and recorded the type of PA. Boys ranked fitness PA third, after team and individual sports. For girls, the preference for fitness PA grew at the expense of dance and outdoor PA. Among Czech and Polish boys as well as Czech girls, those who preferred fitness PA were more likely to achieve the recommended weekly PA level than those who did not prefer fitness PA. We did not find a significant difference in other types of PA and rates of achieving the recommendation of 11,000 steps/day. Preference for fitness PA was associated with an increased likelihood (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.12-1.52; p < 0.001) of achieving the recommendation for PA. When promoting adolescents' PA, it is necessary to consider preferred PA types. The PA recommendation was met by almost 33% of adolescents who indicated a preference for fitness PA, but only by 22% of those not preferring fitness activities. Organized PA is also important for meeting PA recommendations.Entities:
Keywords: IPAQ-Long; Monitoring; Pedometer; Preferences; Recommendation; Step count
Year: 2019 PMID: 31719832 PMCID: PMC6835003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2019.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Sci Fit ISSN: 1728-869X Impact factor: 3.103
Fig. 1Design of research on physical activity preferences with Czech (CZ) and Polish (PL) boys and girls.
Czech and Polish adolescents’ preferences for fitness physical activity.
| Physical activity | Boys CZ (n = 2365) | Boys PL (n = 1623) | Girls CZ (n = 3645) | Girls PL (n = 1890) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranking | Average points (based on ranking) | Ranking | Average points (based on ranking) | Ranking | Average points (based on ranking) | Ranking | Average points (based on ranking) | |
| Teams sports | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.6 | 1 | 3.3 | 1 | 3.1 |
| Individual sports | 2 | 2.9 | 2 | 2.9 | 2 | 3.3 | 2 | 3.1 |
| Fitness activities | 3 | 3.9 | 3 | 4.1 | 5 | 4.2 | 6 | 4.4 |
| Outdoor activities | 4 | 4.2 | 4 | 4.4 | 3 | 3.9 | 4 | 4.1 |
| Martial arts | 5 | 4.6 | 5 | 4.5 | 7 | 5.5 | 7 | 5.4 |
| Water activities | 6 | 5.0 | 6 | 4.8 | 6 | 4.6 | 5 | 4.3 |
| Dancing | 7 | 5.6 | 7 | 5.5 | 4 | 3.9 | 3 | 4.0 |
CZ = Czech Republic, PL = Poland.
Fig. 2Preference of fitness PA between 2009 and 2016.
Most frequently performed physical activity in boys.
| Type of PA | Preference for fitness PA in Czech boys | Preference for fitness PA in Polish boys | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (rank/n/%) | Middle (rank/n/%)< | Low (rank/n/%) | High (rank/n/%) | Middle (rank/n/%) | Low (rank/n/%) | |
| Football | ||||||
| Bodybuilding | 7/19/3.4 | 11/15/2.0 | 7/9/2.3 | 8/14/2.4 | ||
| Running | 4/20/5.1 | 6/24/3.8 | ||||
| Floorball | 4/28/7.2 | 15/1/0.4 | 11/2/0.6 | 11/3/0.51 | ||
| Volleyball | 5/14/3.6 | 4/26/4.7 | 6-7/22/2.9 | 4/17/7.3 | ||
| Tennis | 6/12/3.1 | 9/14/2.5 | 10/18/2.4 | 12/2/0.9 | 9/8/2.0 | 12/9/1.5 |
| Ice hockey | 7/12/3.1 | 6/19/3.4 | 8/21/2.8 | 15/1/0.4 | 12/1/0.3 | 10/1/0.2 |
| Swimming | 8/11/2.8 | 5/23/4.1 | 5/34/4.5 | 6/13/5.1 | 4/20/5.1 | |
| Cycling | 9/10/2.6 | 10/12/2.1 | 6-7/22/2.9 | 8/7/3.0 | 7/9/2.3 | 5/23/3.9 |
| Basketball | 10/9/2.3 | 8/16/2.9 | 4/41/5.5 | 7/8/3.4 | 4/27/4.6 | |
| Artistic gymnastics | 13/7/1.8 | 18/4/0.7 | −/−/- | 5/13/5.6 | 6/11/2.8 | 7/21/3.6 |
| Table tennis | 21/2/0.5 | 13/10/1.8 | 9/19/2.5 | 8/7/3.0 | 9/8/2.0 | 9/13/2.2 |
Bold text refers to favorite organized physical activities.
Most frequently performed physical activity in girls.
| Type of PA | Preference for fitness PA in Czech girls | Preference for fitness PA in Polish girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (rank/n/%) | Middle (rank/n/%) | Low (rank/n/%) | High (rank/n/%) | Middle (rank/n/%) | Low (rank/n/%) | |
| Dance | 1/75/13.1 | 1/118/18.3 | 1/217//20.6 | 2/22/9.9 | 2/38/13.5 | 2/93/11.4 |
| Volleyball | 4/62/10.9 | 2/90/13.9 | 2/158/15.0 | 1/30/13.5 | 1/61/21.6 | 1/183/22.6 |
| Running (track and field) | 3/67/11.7 | 3/59/9.1 | 3/123/11.7 | 2/22/9.9 | 3/26/9.2 | 6/36/4.4 |
| Bodybuilding | 2/73/12.8 | 8-9/24/3.7 | 15/17/1.6 | 5/15/6.8 | 10/8/2.8 | 13/7/0.9 |
| Aerobic | 5/50/8.8 | 4/48/7.4 | 4/56/5.3 | 6/14/6.3 | 5/15/5.3 | 10/21/2.6 |
| Swimming | 6/25/4.4 | 5/41/6.3 | 6/47/4.5 | 13/5/2.3 | 6/14/5.0 | 4/77/9.5 |
| Floorball | 8/20/3.5 | 12/19/2.9 | 8/36/3.4 | 16/1/0.5 | 13/2/0.7 | 15/2/0.2 |
| Cycling | 7/24/4.2 | 10/22/3.4 | 11/25/2.0 | 14/4/1.8 | 14/3/1.1 | 11/18/2.2 |
| Basketball | 9/17/3.0 | 7/25/3.9 | 7/43/4.1 | 6/14/6.3 | 4/20/7.1 | 3/81/10.0 |
| Handball | 9/17/3.0 | 8-9/24/3.7 | 9/30/2.8 | 9/7/3.2 | 8/11/3.9 | 8/22/2.7 |
| Horse riding | 17/5/0.9 | 6/26/4.0 | 5/50/4.7 | 16/1/0,5 | 9/9/3.2 | 7/28/3.5 |
| Tennis | 12/15/2.6 | 11/21/3.3 | 10/26/2.5 | 12/6/2.7 | 11/7/2.5 | 12/13/1.6 |
| Artistic gymnastics | 16/6/1.1 | 13/9/1.4 | 16/16/1.5 | 4/21/9.5 | 7/13/4.6 | 5/50/6.2 |
| Badminton | 21/4/0.7 | 14/8/1.2 | 17/14/1.3 | 8/12/5.4 | 12/5/1.8 | 8/22/2.7 |
| Health exercise | 14/11/1.9 | 15/7/1.1 | 28/5/0.5 | 9/7/3-2 | 13/4/1.4 | 13/7/0.9 |
Fig. 3Achievement of physical activity recommendation (3 × 20 min of vigorous physical activity and 5 × 60 min of physical activity) among Czech (CZ; n = 829) and Polish (PL; n = 504) boys, and Czech (n = 1505) and Polish (n = 710) girls according to preference for fitness physical activities (high/moderate/low).
Achievement of the recommendation of 3 × 20 min of vigorous physical activity and 5 × 60 min of physical activity in adolescents (n = 4977).
| Variables | Achieving PA recommendation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total n (%) | No n (%) | Yes n (%) | χ | P-value | w | |
| Preference for fitness PA | ||||||
| Low | 1145 (23.0) | 1886 (78.5) | 517 (21.5) | 53.8 | 0.001 | 0.10* |
| Middle | 1429 (28.7) | 1053 (73.7) | 376 (26.3) | |||
| High | 2403 (48.3) | 768 (67.1) | 377 (32.9) | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Boys | 1959 (39.4) | 1333 (68.0) | 626 (32.0) | 70.5 | <0.001 | 0.12* |
| Girls | 3018 (60.6) | 2374 (78.7) | 644 (21.3) | |||
| Age | ||||||
| 15 | 1246 (25.0) | 920 (73.2) | 334 (26.8) | 3.1 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
| 16 | 1795 (36.1) | 1362 (75.9) | 433 (24.1) | |||
| 17 | 1936 (38.9) | 1433 (74.0) | 503 (26.0) | |||
| BMI | ||||||
| <25 | 4502 (90.5) | 3347 (74.3) | 1155 (25.7) | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.009 |
| ≥25 | 475 (9.5) | 360 (75.8) | 115 (24.2)< | |||
| Country | ||||||
| Czech Republic | 3334 (67.0 | 2549 (76.4) | 785 (23.6) | 20.7 | <0.001 | 0.06 |
| Poland | 1643 (33.0) | 1158 (70.5) | 485 (29.5) | |||
| City (inhabitants) | ||||||
| ˂1000 | 1118 (22.5) | 873 (78.1) | 245 (21.9) | 31.2 | <0.001 | 0.08 |
| 1000–29,999 | 1699 (34.1) | 1307 (76.9) | 392 (23.1) | |||
| 30,000–100,000 | 807 (16.2) | 584 (72.4) | 223 (27.6) | |||
| ˃100,000 | 1353 (27.2) | 943 (69.7) | 410 (30.3) | |||
| Home | ||||||
| Flat | 2155 (43.3) | 1590 (73.8) | 565 (26.2) | 0.98 | 0.32 | 0.01 |
| House | 2822 (56.7) | 2117 (75.0) | 705 (25.0) | |||
| Ownership of a dog | ||||||
| No | 2499 (50.2) | 1874 (75.0) | 625 (25.0) | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.01 |
| Yes | 2478 (49.8) | 1833 (74.0) | 645 (26.0) | |||
| Ownership of a car | ||||||
| No | 2022 (40.6) | 1491 (73.7) | 531 (26.3) | 0.99 | 0.32 | 0.01 |
| Yes | 2955 (59.4) | 2216 (75.0) | 739 (25.0) | |||
| Ownership of a cottage | ||||||
| No | 3454 (69.4) | 2601 (75.3) | 853 (24.7) | 4.0 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Yes | 1523 (30.6) | 1106 (72.6) | 417 (27.4) | |||
| Participation in organized PA | ||||||
| No | 1378 (27.7) | 1172 (85.1) | 206 (14.9) | 112.0 | <0.001 | 0.15* |
| Yes | 3599 (72.3) | 2535 (70.4) | 1064 (29.6) | |||
χ2 = Pearson’s chi-square; p = statistical significance; w = Cohen’s effect size index; *p < 0.05; PA = physical activity.
Odds ratio for meeting the weekly physical activity recommendation according to preference for fitness physical activity (high/middle/low) (N = 4977).
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Preference for fitness PA (reference category: Low) | ||||||
| Middle | 1.30 (1.12–1.52) | 0.001 | 1.25 (1.07–1.46) | 0.005 | 1.22 (1.05–1.43) | 0.01 |
| High | 1.79 (1.53–2.1) | <0.001 | 1.75 (1.50–2.05) | <0.001 | 1.77 (1.51–2.08) | <0.001 |
| Gender (reference category: Female) | 1.71 (1.50–1.95) | <0.001 | 1.64 (1.43–1.87) | <0.001 | ||
| BMI (reference category: ˂25) | 0.88 (0.71–1.10) | 0.27 | 0.94 (0.75–1.18) | 0.60 | ||
| Age (reference category: Age 15) | 0.87 (0.74–1.03) | 0.12 | 0.88 (0.75–1.05) | 0.17 | ||
| Age 17 | 0.96 (0.81–1.13) | 0.59 | 1.07 (0.90–1.27) | 0.44 | ||
| Country (reference category: CZ) Poland | 1.27 (1.07–1.49) | 0.01 | ||||
| City (reference category: ˂1000) 1000–29,999 | 1.02 (0.84–1.24) | 0.85 | ||||
| 30,000–100,000 | 1.22 (0.96–1.55) | 0.10 | ||||
| ˃100,000) | 1.32 (1.05–1.66) | 0.02 | ||||
| House (reference category: House) Flat | 0.95 (0.81–1.11) | 0.50 | ||||
| Ownership of dog (reference category: Yes) | 0.89 (0.78–1.02) | 0.11 | ||||
| Ownership of car (reference category: Yes) | 0.97 (0.86–1.13) | 0.84 | ||||
| Cottage (reference category: No) | 0.87 (0.75–1.01) | 0.06 | ||||
| Organized PA (reference category: No) | 2.27 (1.92–2.69) | <0.001 | ||||
PA = physical activity; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; Model 1 = agreement between preferred and actually performed PA; Model 2 = Adjusted for gender, BMI, and age; Model 3 = Further adjusted for country, city, house, ownership of dog, and ownership of car.
Fig. 4Conceptual model of “Health through Sport”.