Literature DB >> 32845827

Virulence genes and previously unexplored gene clusters in four commensal Neisseria spp. isolated from the human throat expand the neisserial gene repertoire.

Alan Calder1, Chukwuma Jude Menkiti1, Aylin Çağdaş1, Jefferson Lisboa Santos1, Ricarda Streich1, Alice Wong1, Amir H Avini1, Ebrima Bojang1, Karththeepan Yogamanoharan1, Nivetha Sivanesan1, Besma Ali1, Mariam Ashrafi1, Abdirizak Issa1, Tajinder Kaur1, Aisha Latif1, Hani A Sheik Mohamed1, Atifa Maqsood1, Laxmi Tamang1, Emily Swager1, Alex J Stringer1, Lori A S Snyder1.   

Abstract

Commensal non-pathogenic Neisseria spp. live within the human host alongside the pathogenic Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae and due to natural competence, horizontal gene transfer within the genus is possible and has been observed. Four distinct Neisseria spp. isolates taken from the throats of two human volunteers have been assessed here using a combination of microbiological and bioinformatics techniques. Three of the isolates have been identified as Neisseria subflava biovar perflava and one as Neisseria cinerea. Specific gene clusters have been identified within these commensal isolate genome sequences that are believed to encode a Type VI Secretion System, a newly identified CRISPR system, a Type IV Secretion System unlike that in other Neisseria spp., a hemin transporter, and a haem acquisition and utilization system. This investigation is the first to investigate these systems in either the non-pathogenic or pathogenic Neisseria spp. In addition, the N. subflava biovar perflava possess previously unreported capsule loci and sequences have been identified in all four isolates that are similar to genes seen within the pathogens that are associated with virulence. These data from the four commensal isolates provide further evidence for a Neisseria spp. gene pool and highlight the presence of systems within the commensals with functions still to be explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neisseria cinerea; Neisseria subflava; T6SS; bacterial capsule; natural competence for transformation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32845827      PMCID: PMC7643975          DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Genom        ISSN: 2057-5858


Data Summary

Sequence data for commensal spp. investigated are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: strains M18660 (NZ_CP031251; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP031251.1); ATCC 49275 (NZ_CP039887; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP039887.1); NJ9703 (NZ_ACEO00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_ACEO00000000.2); C2012011976 (NZ_POXP00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXP00000000.1); C2011004960 (NZ_POXK00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXK00000000.1); C2009010520 (NZ_POXD00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXD00000000.1); C2011020198 (NZ_POXM00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXM00000000.1); C2005001510 (NZ_POWU00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POWU00000000.1); C2014021188 (NZ_POYB00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POYB00000000.1); C2011020199 (NZ_POXN00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXN00000000.1); C2011033015 (NZ_POXO00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXO00000000.1); C2008002238 (NZ_POXC00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXC00000000.1); C2011009653 (NZ_POXL00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXL00000000.1); C2007002879 (NZ_POWV00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POWV00000000.1); C2008001664 (NZ_POXB00000000; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_POXB00000000.1); strain FDAARGOS_260 (NZ_CP020452; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP020452.2); Neisseria flavescens ATCC 13120 (NZ_CP039886; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_CP039886.1); strain NCTC10294 (NZ_LS483369; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_LS483369.1). Sequence data for strains investigated are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: MC58 (AE002098.2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AE002098.2); FAM18 (NC_008767.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_008767.1); Z2491 (AL157959.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AL157959.1). Sequence data for strains investigated are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: FA1090 (AEOO4969.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AE004969.1); NCCP11945 (CP001050.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP001050.1). Sequence data for strains investigated are available in GenBank under the following accession numbers: 020–06 (NC_014752.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_014752.1). The authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. To date, most research into spp. has focused on the pathogens and , but many commensal non-pathogens of this genus contain gene repertoires that are worthy of investigation, including those associated with virulence in the pathogens. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has been demonstrated between spp. The sequences revealed in this investigation are therefore potential sources of genetic material for the pathogens via HGT. Acquisition of the capsule genes described here by could result in capsule switching and enable circumvention of serogroup-specific vaccines. In combination with alleles for vaccine targets fHbp and NadA, potential exists for vaccine escape via HGT from these commensal genomes and other sequences in the circulating gene pool. The data presented here provide further evidence for a wide and varied spp. gene pool and emphasize the presence of numerous ‘virulence genes’ within the commensal species, requiring the functions of these to be re-evaluated. This research additionally highlights the presence of previously unexplored systems within the commensal spp. with functions still to be explored, which may lead to the development of novel therapeutic interventions with regard to pathogen-related infections.

Introduction

The human oral, nasal, and pharyngeal cavities are inhabited by hundreds of different bacterial species, with the throat possessing a greater number than any other body site [1]. The most common isolates from this site in humans belong to the phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Spirochaetes, and Proteobacteria, with Proteobacteria contributing to around 17 % of the overall microbiome [2]. Of the β-Proteobacteria, the family comprise Gram-negative coccoid bacteria with a preference for colonizing mucosal surfaces within the nasopharyngeal and oral cavities of humans [3]. These micro-organisms are considered to be a major constituent of the core microbiome of the oral cavity [2] and contribute significantly to the normal flora at these sites [3]. Overall the genus is composed of a number of species, including two pathogens, and , and non-pathogenic species such as , , , , , , , , , , , , , Neisseria shayeganii, and biovars flava, perflava, and subflava [4]. Commensal are normally harmless, although some have been identified as opportunistic pathogens and have caused rare cases of sepsis and meningitis [3, 5]. Virulence in is mediated by a number of factors, including the expression of a range of adhesins, lipooligosaccharide endotoxins (LOS), a polysaccharide capsule for evasion of the host immune response, and iron acquisition systems [6]. While capsule genes are often associated with , they have also been identified within the non-pathogenic spp. [7]. Despite iron being essential [8], iron acquisition within a host is considered to be a major virulence determinant and vital to pathogenesis in and [9]. Low iron levels are known to exert a bacteriostatic effect over most invading bacteria and the human host exploits this by maintaining low concentrations of free iron within serum and its secretions via iron-binding proteins [10]. Many micro-organisms have evolved to overcome the selective pressure of iron-limited environments and spp. are known to possess a wide range of mechanisms for its acquisition [11]. It is believed that diversity in iron uptake genes aids colonization of different spp. within the same niche, where host antibodies are targeted towards a variety of iron acquisition components from different bacterial species [12]. While some strains of have an invasive capacity [13], invasive, disseminated infections are rare. Pathogenic are most often associated with their own niche environments, with being associated with infections of the mucosa within the genital tract and being associated with the nasopharynx. Despite this being the case, site of infection does not provide an accurate way to identify spp. [14]. Over the past few decades, cases of isolated from the genital tract mucosa have increased [14, 15] and similarly, cases of isolated from the oropharynx have increased [16, 17]. Indeed, several recent cases of difficult to treat extensively drug resistant (XDR) gonococcal infections, included pharyngeal infection [18, 19]. With regards to the nasopharyngeal and oral cavities in humans, commensal have been isolated co-colonizing alongside the pathogens and . It is believed that through co-colonization and a natural competence for transformation [20], many of the pathogenic and commensal now share a significant pool of genetic material with one another and many commensals can be identified as containing most of the virulence genes associated with the pathogens [21]. The pathogenic and commensal spp. occupy the same niches and as a result of their common ancestry, in combination with sharing of genetic material, possess high levels of similarity across their genomes [22, 23]. An analysis across commensal and pathogenic neisserial genomes carried out by Maiden and Harrison [24] highlighted these similarities, with and being found to share a set of core genes that contribute to around 60 % of their overall genome size. In addition, widespread horizontal genetic transfer between human species has been seen through comparative genomic analysis [12], and pili in commensal have been demonstrated to be involved in interspecies gene transfer with [25]. Current molecular identification techniques often struggle to distinguish clearly between different bacterial groups in this genus [26], although identification to the level of genus can be achieved through the examination of specific genes or groups of genes. Ribosomal genes are often chosen for identification as they tend to be highly conserved throughout evolution. While phylogenetic grouping using 16S rRNA gene sequences can aid in species identification, issues have arisen when using this method alone due to different species, including spp., possessing very similar or identical 16S rRNA genes [24]. Analysis of a set of core genes found across all bacteria through Ribosomal Multilocus Sequence Typing (rMLST) has been shown to be a more efficient and rapid method than 16S rRNA typing for bacterial species identification [24]. In this study, four spp. were isolated from the throats of human volunteers. These were classified using microbiological techniques and their genome sequences were compared against other commensal and pathogenic . The genomic sequences of these four isolates display a high level of similarity to commensal spp., although analysis of their genomic sequences has highlighted the presence of sequences classified as virulence genes when present in the pathogens, including capsule, pilus, and LOS, as well as a number of non-pilus adhesins more commonly associated with pathogenic spp. Specific gene clusters have also been identified that are believed to encode a newly identified CRISPR system, a type VI secretion system, a type IV secretion system different from that in the Gonococcal Genetic Island [27, 28], a hemin transporter, and a haem acquisition and utilization system. The data presented in this study provide further evidence for a diverse and varied gene pool within spp. and highlight the presence of gene clusters within these isolates with functions still to be explored.

Methods

Bacterial isolation

Isolates were obtained by sweeping the back of the throat with a sterile cotton tipped swab and then plating immediately onto GC agar (Oxoid) with Kellogg’s [29] and 5 % Fe(NO3)3 supplements. Shortly after collection, plates were incubated at 37 °C in a candle tin overnight. KU isolates came from sampling 64 student volunteers on 3 separate occasions in the Spring of 2012. RH isolates came from sampling six student volunteers on four separate occasions from October 2012 to January 2013. From the mixed bacterial cultures obtained, replica plates were taken using a Scienceware replica plater and sterile velveteen. Two replica plates were taken, one to create a freezer stock and one to select individual colonies for isolation. These were incubated overnight at 37 °C in a candle tin. The following day, all growth from one plate was frozen at −80 °C and from the other plate individual colonies were picked onto fresh GC agar with supplements for individual isolation. After overnight growth, cultures were Gram-stained and tested for catalase and oxidase activity. Gram-negative, oxidase-positive, catalase-positive cultures were archived at −80 °C locally and at the National Collection of Industrial Food and Marine Bacteria (NCIMB, Aberdeen).

Identification of species

Four suspected spp. isolates were grown on GC agar plates (Oxoid) with Kellogg’s [29] and 5 % Fe(NO3)3 supplements at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. Control species for India ink staining, and , were grown on nutrient agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C. Blood agar (Oxoid) included 7 % defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid) to test for haemolytic activity. API NH strips (bioMérieux) to identify the species were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Nitrate Reduction Test (Sigma) was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions to identify samples capable of reducing nitrates.

Genome sequencing

DNA was extracted from the four isolates by scraping the growth from a GC agar plate into 500 µl of GC broth and extracting the DNA using the Puregene Yeast/Bacterial kit (Qiagen). This extracted DNA was dried down and sent to the MicrobesNG service (microbesng.uk) for Illumina sequencing. The sequence data were processed through SPAdes [30] to generate de novo-assembled contigs that were automatically annotated using Prokka [31] according to the standard MicrobesNG pipeline. The contigs were also submitted to RAST [32-34] and to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [35] (software revision 3.3). These automated annotations were compared in Artemis [36] and the NCBI annotation was chosen for use and submission to GenBank: KU1003-01 [37]; KU1003-02 [38]; RH3002v2f [39]; RH3002v2g [40]. Genome sequence data were analysed using rMLST [41], the NCBI 16S blast tool (blastn against the 16S ribosomal RNA sequences database) [42], CRISPRminer [43], CRISPRFinder [44], nucleotide blast [42], clustal Omega [45], and SecRet6 [46].

Genome sequence analysis

The PubMLST Genome Comparator tool v2.6.2 [47] was used to compare 38 completed spp. genome sequences and those of KU1003-01, KU1003-02, RH3002v2f, and RH3002v2g. In total, 3023 loci were compared across all genomes, with the following parameters: minimum 70 % identity, minimum 50 % alignment, blastn word size 20, and 80 % core threshold. The resulting distance matrix output was loaded into SplitsTree4 [48] in nexus format to generate a neighbour-joining cladogram. Virulence genes [21] within the genome sequences of the four isolates were identified using progressive Mauve v2.3.1 at default settings [49]. The NCBI-generated annotation files containing the DNA sequence of each of the isolate’s contigs were aligned against strain M18660 [50], strain FDAARGOS_260 [51], strain ATCC 13120 [52], strain NCTC10294 [53], strains MC58 [54], FAM18 [55], and Z2491 [56], strains FA 1090 [57] and NCCP11945 [58], and strain 020–06 [59]. Virulence genes from the pathogen genome sequences were identified in Mauve using the sequence navigator and aligned to reveal the presence of homologous sequences where present in the isolates. Additional investigations used a set of 15 . strains [50, 60–73].

Results and discussion

Microbiological identification

The four isolates collected from human throat swab cultures were identified as being oxidase- and catalase-positive Gram-negative diplococci. Two isolates, KU1003-01 and KU1003-02, came from the same individual and were collected on the same occasion. The other two isolates, RH3002v2f and RH3002v2g, also came from a single volunteer and were collected on the same occasion. No other Gram-negative oxidase- and catalase-positive isolates were identified. The concurrent collection of these isolates supports co-colonization of this human niche with more than one neisserial species at a time, as proposed by Yazdankhah and Caugant [74]. Isolate KU1003-01 presented as large, smooth, round, and moist colonies on GC agar producing a yellowish pigment and having a glistening surface. Isolate KU1003-02 presented as medium, round, and slightly granular colonies on GC agar producing a yellowish pigment and having a rough surface. Isolate RH3002v2f presented as small, round, unpigmented colonies with a glistening surface. Isolate RH3002v2g presented as medium, round, and smooth pigmented colonies with a glistening surface. None of the isolates were determined to be haemolytic; a lack of haemolysis on blood agar indicated that the isolates did not belong to the haemolytic species [75]. Nitrate reduction testing for all four isolates gave negative results, indicating the isolates could not be , , , , N. wadisworthii, or subspecies [76]. All four isolates grew at 35 °C, indicating that they were not , according to the API NH growth criteria [76]. A control strain NCCP11945 culture did not grow under these conditions. API NH results indicated that the best identification of three of the isolates was as spp. (Table 1). Isolate RH3002v2f is most likely to be Neisseria cinerea, based on the result of the API NH test, growth at 35 °C, and its translucent and glistening appearance [77].
Table 1.

Isolate identification using API NH, rMLST, and 16S blast analysis

Isolate

API NH results

rMLST

Top 16S blast hit (NCBI)

KU1003-01

Neisseria spp.

N. flavescens, N. mucosa, N. subflava

N. perflava (99 %, E value 0.0)

KU1003-02

Neisseria spp.

N. mucosa

N. perflava (99 %, E value 0.0); N. cinerea (99%, E value 0.0))

RH3002v2f

Neisseria cinerea

N. cinerea

N. cinerea (99 %, E value 0.0); N. meningitidis (99 %, E value 0.0)

RH3002v2g

Neisseria spp.

N. flavescens, N. mucosa, N. subflava

N. perflava (99 %, E value 0.0)

Isolate identification using API NH, rMLST, and 16S blast analysis Isolate API NH results rMLST Top 16S blast hit (NCBI) KU1003-01 spp. N. flavescens, N. mucosa, N. subflava (99 %, E value 0.0) KU1003-02 spp. (99 %, E value 0.0); (99%, E value 0.0)) RH3002v2f (99 %, E value 0.0); (99 %, E value 0.0) RH3002v2g spp. N. flavescens, N. mucosa, N. subflava (99 %, E value 0.0)

Genome sequencing and assembly

Genome sequencing and assembly for all four isolates was carried out by MicrobesNG. Illumina Mi-seq short reads were de novo assembled into contiguous sequences using SPades. The assembly of sequence reads for KU1003-01 generated 58 contigs with a total genome size of 2 345 197 bp [37]. Isolate KU1003-02 assembled into the greatest number of contigs at 73. Despite this, the overall genome size for this isolate is on a par with the size of its co-isolate at 2 303 261 bp [38]. Isolate RH3002v2f contains the smallest of the three genomes at 1 953 373 bp, which assembled in 26 contigs [39]. By comparison, its co-isolate RH3002v2g has a genome size of 2 193 423 bp across 42 contigs [40].

Genome sequence-based identification

spp. share common ancestry, occupy the same niche, and are able to share genetic material. As a direct result, spp. display high levels of similarity across their genomes [22, 23]. Current molecular identification techniques often struggle to distinguish clearly between different bacterial groups [26] and difficulties can arise when assigning to particular species groups due to their genetic similarity [26]. Analysis of the genome sequence data through rMLST and 16S blast suggested a range of spp. for the four isolates (Table 1). While 16S rRNA analysis was able to classify the isolates used in this study as spp., the results of the rMLST indicated varying results with regard to their identification as one particular species. The result of rMLST for isolate KU1003-01 indicated that it was either , , or , but the top 16S blast hit suggested , which is a biovar of (Table 1). For KU1003-02, rMLST indicated that it was , whilst the 16S disagreed, suggesting or (Table 1). Analysis of RH3002v2f through rMLST indicated that this isolate was and 16S homology also suggested or . Therefore, the sequence-based results support the laboratory results, suggesting that this isolate is (Table 1). The fourth isolate, RH3002v2g, produced the same rMLST and 16S rRNA blast results as KU1003-01, suggesting that it was either , , or , and ( biovar perflava), respectively (Table 1).

Signatures of DNA Uptake Sequences (DUSs) support species assignments

In the pathogenic spp., the spread and increased levels of antibiotic resistance, as well as the evolution of pathogenesis, are as a direct result of their ability to take up and transform DNA from their environment [23, 74, 78, 79]. To identify and locate DUSs, the four isolate genome sequences were subjected to frequent character analyses as described by Davidsen et al. [80]. Within the KU1003-01 genome sequence data, 2009 copies of DUS variant 1 (DUSvar1) [81] were identified. DUSvar1 is also referred to as AG-DUS [82]. Within the KU1003-02 genome sequence data, 2393 copies of DUSvar1/AG-DUS were identified and within RH3002 v2g, 1957 copies of DUSvar1/AG-DUS were identified (Table 2). DUSvar1/AG-DUS are most often associated with , N. flavescens, and [81, 82]. The dialects in neisserial DUS signatures are known to vary in a species-specific manner [12, 81, 82]. There are 2024 copies of DUSvar1/AG-DUS in strain M18660, for example [Data Citation 5]. A significantly lower number of DUS variant 2 (DUSvar2), also known as AG-mucDUS, associated with and [81, 82], were identified in these three isolates (Table 2). These data support the assignment of isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g to biovar perflava. The classical DUS described by Berry et al. [81] and designated AT-DUS by Frye et al. [82] is associated with , , N. lactamica, and . This was the most frequent DUS identified within isolate RH3002v2f, at 1158 copies, and this result is consistent with the API NH and rMLST data for this isolate belonging to the species .
Table 2.

The type and number of DUSs within sequenced isolates and their best match genome sequences for comparison

Classical DUS [81]/AT-DUS [82]

DUSvar1 [81]/AG-DUS [82]

DUSvar2 [81]/AG-mucDUS [82]

ATGCCGTCTGAA

AGGCCGTCTGAA

AGGTCGTCTGAA

KU1003-01

140

2009

99

KU1003-02

172

2393

107

RH3002 vg

137

1909

83

N. subflava M18660

147

2024

98

RH3002 vf

1158

202

74

N. cinerea NCTC10294

1198

212

80

The type and number of DUSs within sequenced isolates and their best match genome sequences for comparison Classical DUS [81]/AT-DUS [82] DUSvar1 [81]/AG-DUS [82] DUSvar2 [81]/AG-mucDUS [82] ATGCCGTCTGAA AGGCCGTCTGAA AGGTCGTCTGAA KU1003-01 140 2009 99 KU1003-02 172 2393 107 RH3002 vg 137 1909 83 147 2024 98 RH3002 vf 1158 202 74 1198 212 80

Comparative genome sequence analysis

To further support the species assignments, phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the genomic sequences of the isolates, compared to complete genome sequence data from 38 spp. in the PubMLST database on Neisseria.org [ 47]. The output was visualized using SplitsTree4 [48], which showed that isolates KU1003-01 and KU1003-02 clustered with strain ATCC 49275, RH3002v2g with strain M18660, and RH3002v2f with strain NCTC10294 (Fig. 1). This adds another level of support to our species assignments for these isolates.
Fig. 1.

Neighbour-joining cladogram tree of the four spp. isolates sequenced. Generated using the PubMLST Genome Comparator tool at Neisseria.org [47] and SplitsTree4 [[48]] with the complete genome sequences of 38 spp. and the sequence data from isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, RH3002v2f, and RH3002v2g.

Neighbour-joining cladogram tree of the four spp. isolates sequenced. Generated using the PubMLST Genome Comparator tool at Neisseria.org [47] and SplitsTree4 [[48]] with the complete genome sequences of 38 spp. and the sequence data from isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, RH3002v2f, and RH3002v2g. The genome sequences and annotations for each of the four isolates, KU1003-01, KU1003-02, RH3002v2f, and RH3002v2g, were imported into Mauve and compared against commensal spp. reference sequences to identify and align homologous regions. To facilitate comparative analyses between the genomes, the contigs for each isolate were reordered against a reference genome believed to be most similar to the isolate using the Mauve contig mover (MCM) tool (Fig. 2). KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002 v2g aligned closely to the completed genome for M18660 [50] rather than strain FDAARGOS_260 [51] or strain ATCC 13120 [52]. RH3002v2f aligned closely to the completed genome for NCTC 10294 [53]. These alignments strongly support KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002 v2g being biovar perflava, and RH3002 v2f being , agreeing with the laboratory and other genetic analyses. Comparisons between the co-isolated genomes also indicated that despite originating from the same host, KU1003-01 and KU1003-02, identified as biovar perflava, came from two distinct lineages.
Fig. 2.

Whole-genome progressive Mauve pairwise alignments of ordered contigs against complete genome sequences that are similar to those of the isolates. Blocks that are the same colour between the aligned pairs show regions of genome sequence data that share homology. Three of the isolates aligned well to the complete genome sequence for strain M18660, as shown in pairs A (KU1003-01 and strain M18660), B (KU1003-02 and strain M18660), and C (RH3002v3g and strain M18660). One isolate, RH3002v2f, aligned well with NCTC10294, as in pair D.

Whole-genome progressive Mauve pairwise alignments of ordered contigs against complete genome sequences that are similar to those of the isolates. Blocks that are the same colour between the aligned pairs show regions of genome sequence data that share homology. Three of the isolates aligned well to the complete genome sequence for strain M18660, as shown in pairs A (KU1003-01 and strain M18660), B (KU1003-02 and strain M18660), and C (RH3002v3g and strain M18660). One isolate, RH3002v2f, aligned well with NCTC10294, as in pair D. Genome sequence comparison is considered to be an effective tool for identifying putative virulence genes [83] and regions of difference between species. Mauve alignments against strains MC58 [54], FAM18 [55], and Z2491 [56], strains FA 1090 [57] and NCCP11945 [58], and strain 020–06 [59] were used to assess similarities with other spp. reference sequences, including the pathogens. These comparisons revealed regions of similarity for further investigation (Table 3), as well as regions of difference that were also investigated (Table 4), some of which were unique to a particular isolate.
Table 3.

A comparison of the presence of virulence genes across the isolates

Virulence factors

Related genes

Neisseria spp. KU1003-01

Neisseria spp. KU1003-02

Neisseria spp. RH3002v2f

Neisseria spp. RH3002v2g

Adherence

Adhesion and penetration protein

app/hap

np

np

np

np

LOS sialylation

lst

np

np

np

np

LOS synthesis

lgtA

np

np

BBW69_00125

np

lgtB

np

np

BBW69_00130

np

lgtC

np

np

np

np

lgtD

np

np

np

np

lgtE

np

np

BBW69_00135

np

lgtF

np

BBP28_02055

BBW69_04775

np

lgtG

np

np

BBW69_09635, BBW69_09640‡

np

rfaK

np

BBP28_02060

BBW69_04770

np

rfaF

BBW80_07160

BBP28_02020

BBW69_06390

BBP27_02875

kdtA/waaA

BBW80_02890

BBP28_00140

BBW69_08680

BBP27_08930

rfaC

BBW80_03315

BBP28_01425

BBW69_08770

BBP27_00620

rfaD*

BBW80_06690

BBP28_07150

BBW69_01995

BBP27_00270

rfaE *

BBW80_06685

BBP28_07145

BBW69_01990

BBP27_00265

lpxA *

BBW80_02940

BBP28_00185

BBW69_08210

BBP27_04090

lpxB *

BBW80_02935

BBP28_00180

BBW69_08320

BBP27_04085

lpxD *

BBW80_02950

BBP28_00195

BBW69_08220

BBP27_04100

pgm *

BBW80_07200

BBP28_01980

BBW69_01850

BBP27_02915

misR *

BBW80_10070

BBP28_05700

BBW69_00920

BBP27_05185

misS *

BBW80_10075

BBP28_05695

BBW69_00915

BBP27_05190

fabZ *

BBW80_02945

BBP28_00190

BBW69_08215

BBP27_04095

kdsA

BBW80_07275

BBP28_00980

BBW69_02905

BBP27_03005

kdsB

BBW80_03730

BBP28_07120

BBW69_01220

BBP27_00240

Neisseria adhesion A NadA

nadA

BBW80_10475

np

BBP27_04320

Type IV pili

pilC1

BBW80_01810

BBP28_10510

BBW69_04085

BBP27_07165

pilC2

np

np

BBW69_04075

np

pilE

BBW80_10385

BBP28_05385

BBW69_08575

BBP27_05490

pilS

BBW80_10390

BBP28_05390

np

BBP27_05495

pilD

BBW80_01845

BBP28_10475

BBW69_05880

BBP27_07235

pilF

BBW80_01835

BBP28_10485

BBW69_05895

BBP27_07225

pilG

BBW80_01840

BBP28_10480

BBW69_05875

BBP27_07230

pilX

BBW80_07320

BBP28_01030

BBW69_07215

BBP27_03050

pilW

BBW80_07325

BBP28_01035

BBW69_07210

BBP27_03055

pilM

BBW80_06120

BBP28_04890

BBW69_05370

BBP27_05990

pilN

BBW80_06125

BBP28_04895

BBW69_05375

BBP27_05985

pilO

BBW80_06130

BBP28_04900

BBW69_05380

BBP27_05980

pilP

BBW80_06135

BBP28_04905

BBW69_05385

BBP27_05975

pilQ

BBW80_06140

BBP28_04910

BBW69_05390

BBP27_05970

pilT

BBW80_03545

BBP28_03915

BBW69_08555

BBP27_04600

pilT2

BBW80_03550

BBW80_03550

BBW69_08560

BBP27_04605

pilU

BBW80_09540

BBP28_08495

BBW69_01715

BBP27_08040

pilH

BBW80_07335

BBP28_01045

BBW69_07200

BBP27_03065

pilV

BBW80_07330

BBP28_01040

BBW69_07205

BBP27_03060

pilZ

BBW80_03840

BBP28_07015

BBW69_01725

BBP27_00140

Pilus-associated genes

pglA *

np

np

np

np

pglB *

np

np

BBW69_05440

np

pglB2 *

BBW80_06065

BBP28_04835

np

BBP27_09005

pglB2b *

BBW80_06060

BBP28_04830

np

BBP27_09000

pglC *

BBW80_06045

BBP28_04815

BBW69_05445

BBP27_09025

pglD *

BBW80_06040

BBP28_04810

BBW69_05450

BBP27_09030

pglE *

np

np

np

np

pglF*

BBW80_06085

BBP28_04855

BBW69_05425

BBP27_08985

pglG *

BBW80_06075

BBP28_04845

BBW69_05430

BBP27_08995

pglH *

BBW80_06070

BBP28_04840

BBW69_05435

BBP27_09000

Efflux pump systems

FarAB

farA

BBW80_10400

BBP28_04660

BBW69_05945

BBP27_04245

farB

BBW80_10395

BBP28_04655

BBW69_05940

BBP27_04240

MtrCDE

mtrC

BBW80_00055

BBP28_10630

BBW69_04715

BBP27_01915

mtrD

BBW80_00060

BBP28_10625

BBW69_04720

BBP27_01910

mtrE

BBW80_00065

BBP28_10620

BBW69_04725

BBP27_01905

mtrR *

BBW80_00050

BBP28_10635

BBW69_04710

BBP27_01920

Immune evasion

Capsule

ctrA

BBW80_02740

BBP28_10005

np

BBP27_08790

ctrB

BBW80_02735

BBP28_10000

np

BBP27_08785

ctrC

BBW80_02730

BBP28_09995

np

BBP27_08780

ctrD

BBW80_02725

BBP28_09990

np

BBP27_08775

lipA

BBW80_08850

BBP28_09040

np

BBP27_03705

lipB

BBW80_08845

BBP28_09045

np

BBP27_03710

siaA / synA

np

np

np

np

siaB/synB

np

np

np

np

siaC/synC

np

np

np

np

siaD/synD

np

np

np

np

synE

np

np

np

np

mynA / sacA

np

np

np

np

mynB/sacB

np

np

np

np

mynC/sacC

np

np

np

np

mynD/sacD

np

np

np

np

Immune modulators

Factor H binding

fHbp

BBW80_06745

np

BBW69_06045

np

Neisserial surface protein A

nspA

np

np

BBW69_01155

np

Invasion

Class 5 outer protein

opc

np

np

np

np

Opacity protein

opa

np

np

BBW69_01160

np

PorA

porA

np

np

np

np

PorB

porB

BBW80_10465

BBP28_04620

BBW69_04225

BBP27_04310

Other surface proteins

omph *

BBW80_02955

BBP28_00200

BBW69_08225

BBP27_04105

omp85 *

BBW80_02960

BBP28_00205

BBW69_08230

BBP27_04110

Heparin-binding antigen NHBA

nhba

np

np

np

np

Iron uptake systems

ABC transporter

fbpA

np

np

BBW69_01085

np

fbpB

np

np

BBW69_01080

np

fbpC

np

np

BBW69_01075

np

Ferric enterobactin transport protein A/ferric-repressed protein B

fetA / frpB

BBW80_05725

BBP28_00435

BBW69_09195

BBP27_09310

Haemoglobin receptor

hmbR

BBW80_00620

BBP28_10830

np

BBP27_01375

Haem uptake

hpuA

np

np

np

np

hpuB

np

np

BBW69_08435

np

Lactoferrin-binding protein

lbpA

np

np

BBW69_01315

np

lbpB

np

np

BBW69_01310

np

Ton system

tonB

BBW80_02960

BBP28_00205

BBW69_08230

BBP27_04110

exbB

BBW80_01265

BBP28_01625

BBW69_04660

BBP27_06930

exbD

BBW80_01260

BBP28_01620

BBW69_04665

BBP27_06925

Transferrin-binding protein

tbpA

BBW80_03495

BBP28_03865

BBW69_08600

BBP27_04660

tbpB

BBW80_04640

np

np

np

Other iron acquisition genes

bcp *

BBW80_04540

BBP28_06595

BBW69_01630

BBP27_09650

bfrA *

BBW80_08395

BBP28_02745

BBW69_03245

BBP27_06475

bfrB *

BBW80_08400

BBP28_02740

BBW69_03240

BBP27_06480

hemH *

BBW80_04410

BBP28_06720

BBW69_01460

BBP27_09780

Protease

IgA protease

Iga

np

np

np

np

Stress proteins

Catalase

katA

BBW80_05740

BBP28_00450

BBW69_04130

BBP27_09245

Manganese transport system

mntA

BBW80_00475

BBP28_10980

BBW69_00885

BBP27_01220

mntB

BBW80_00480

BBP28_10975

BBW69_00880

BBP27_01225

mntC

BBW80_00485

BBP28_10970

BBW69_00875

BBP27_01230

Methionine sulphoxide reductase

msrA / msrB (pilB)

BBW80_03270

BBP28_01380

BBW69_08590

BBP27_00665

Recombinational repair protein

recN

BBW80_04510

BBP28_06620

BBW69_01565

BBP27_09675

Toxin

RTX toxin

frpA

np

np

np

np

frpC

np

np

np

np

 Two comp reg sys

basR

BBW80_06160

BBP28_04930

BBW69_05315

BBP27_05950

basS

BBW80_06155

BBP28_04925

BBW69_05310

BBP27_05955

Cell separation

nlpD

BBW80_08360

BBP28_02780

BBW69_06215

BBP27_06440

Nitric oxide reductase

norB

BBW80_04740

BBP28_06390

BBW69_06810

BBP27_01665

*Previously reported as pathogen-specific.

†nadA homologue of Yersinia yadA was predicted by RAST as a partial gene at the end of 2 contigs

‡Two adjacent CDSs align.

np, not present.

Table 4.

Specific regions of difference identified across the four isolates

Isolate

Annotated CDSs

Annotated functions

KU1003-01

BBW80_02625 to BBW80_02655

Type VI secretion system

KU1003-01

BBW80_00155 to BBW80_00225

CRISPR system

KU1003-02

BBP28_10015 to BBP25_10115

Type IV secretion system

RH3002v2f

BBW69_00525 to BBW69_00530

Two-partner putative haemolysin secretion system

RH3002v2g

BBP27_06840 to BBP27_06885

TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization

A comparison of the presence of virulence genes across the isolates Virulence factors Related genes spp. KU1003-01 spp. KU1003-02 spp. RH3002v2f spp. RH3002v2g Adherence Adhesion and penetration protein app/hap np np np np LOS sialylation lst np np np np LOS synthesis lgtA np np BBW69_00125 np lgtB np np BBW69_00130 np lgtC np np np np lgtD np np np np lgtE np np BBW69_00135 np lgtF np BBP28_02055 BBW69_04775 np lgtG np np BBW69_09635, BBW69_09640‡ np rfaK np BBP28_02060 BBW69_04770 np rfaF BBW80_07160 BBP28_02020 BBW69_06390 BBP27_02875 kdtA/waaA BBW80_02890 BBP28_00140 BBW69_08680 BBP27_08930 rfaC BBW80_03315 BBP28_01425 BBW69_08770 BBP27_00620 rfaD* BBW80_06690 BBP28_07150 BBW69_01995 BBP27_00270 rfaE * BBW80_06685 BBP28_07145 BBW69_01990 BBP27_00265 lpxA * BBW80_02940 BBP28_00185 BBW69_08210 BBP27_04090 lpxB * BBW80_02935 BBP28_00180 BBW69_08320 BBP27_04085 lpxD * BBW80_02950 BBP28_00195 BBW69_08220 BBP27_04100 pgm * BBW80_07200 BBP28_01980 BBW69_01850 BBP27_02915 misR * BBW80_10070 BBP28_05700 BBW69_00920 BBP27_05185 misS * BBW80_10075 BBP28_05695 BBW69_00915 BBP27_05190 fabZ * BBW80_02945 BBP28_00190 BBW69_08215 BBP27_04095 kdsA BBW80_07275 BBP28_00980 BBW69_02905 BBP27_03005 kdsB BBW80_03730 BBP28_07120 BBW69_01220 BBP27_00240 adhesion A NadA nadA BBW80_10475 np BBP27_04320 Type IV pili pilC1 BBW80_01810 BBP28_10510 BBW69_04085 BBP27_07165 pilC2 np np BBW69_04075 np pilE BBW80_10385 BBP28_05385 BBW69_08575 BBP27_05490 pilS BBW80_10390 BBP28_05390 np BBP27_05495 pilD BBW80_01845 BBP28_10475 BBW69_05880 BBP27_07235 pilF BBW80_01835 BBP28_10485 BBW69_05895 BBP27_07225 pilG BBW80_01840 BBP28_10480 BBW69_05875 BBP27_07230 pilX BBW80_07320 BBP28_01030 BBW69_07215 BBP27_03050 pilW BBW80_07325 BBP28_01035 BBW69_07210 BBP27_03055 pilM BBW80_06120 BBP28_04890 BBW69_05370 BBP27_05990 pilN BBW80_06125 BBP28_04895 BBW69_05375 BBP27_05985 pilO BBW80_06130 BBP28_04900 BBW69_05380 BBP27_05980 pilP BBW80_06135 BBP28_04905 BBW69_05385 BBP27_05975 pilQ BBW80_06140 BBP28_04910 BBW69_05390 BBP27_05970 pilT BBW80_03545 BBP28_03915 BBW69_08555 BBP27_04600 pilT2 BBW80_03550 BBW80_03550 BBW69_08560 BBP27_04605 pilU BBW80_09540 BBP28_08495 BBW69_01715 BBP27_08040 pilH BBW80_07335 BBP28_01045 BBW69_07200 BBP27_03065 pilV BBW80_07330 BBP28_01040 BBW69_07205 BBP27_03060 pilZ BBW80_03840 BBP28_07015 BBW69_01725 BBP27_00140 Pilus-associated genes pglA * np np np np pglB * np np BBW69_05440 np pglB2 * BBW80_06065 BBP28_04835 np BBP27_09005 pglB2b * BBW80_06060 BBP28_04830 np BBP27_09000 pglC * BBW80_06045 BBP28_04815 BBW69_05445 BBP27_09025 pglD * BBW80_06040 BBP28_04810 BBW69_05450 BBP27_09030 pglE * np np np np pglF* BBW80_06085 BBP28_04855 BBW69_05425 BBP27_08985 pglG * BBW80_06075 BBP28_04845 BBW69_05430 BBP27_08995 pglH * BBW80_06070 BBP28_04840 BBW69_05435 BBP27_09000 Efflux pump systems FarAB farA BBW80_10400 BBP28_04660 BBW69_05945 BBP27_04245 farB BBW80_10395 BBP28_04655 BBW69_05940 BBP27_04240 MtrCDE mtrC BBW80_00055 BBP28_10630 BBW69_04715 BBP27_01915 mtrD BBW80_00060 BBP28_10625 BBW69_04720 BBP27_01910 mtrE BBW80_00065 BBP28_10620 BBW69_04725 BBP27_01905 mtrR * BBW80_00050 BBP28_10635 BBW69_04710 BBP27_01920 Immune evasion Capsule ctrA BBW80_02740 BBP28_10005 np BBP27_08790 ctrB BBW80_02735 BBP28_10000 np BBP27_08785 ctrC BBW80_02730 BBP28_09995 np BBP27_08780 ctrD BBW80_02725 BBP28_09990 np BBP27_08775 lipA BBW80_08850 BBP28_09040 np BBP27_03705 lipB BBW80_08845 BBP28_09045 np BBP27_03710 siaA / synA np np np np siaB/synB np np np np siaC/synC np np np np siaD/synD np np np np synE np np np np mynA / sacA np np np np mynB/sacB np np np np mynC/sacC np np np np mynD/sacD np np np np Immune modulators Factor H binding fHbp BBW80_06745 np BBW69_06045 np Neisserial surface protein A nspA np np BBW69_01155 np Invasion Class 5 outer protein opc np np np np Opacity protein opa np np BBW69_01160 np PorA porA np np np np PorB porB BBW80_10465 BBP28_04620 BBW69_04225 BBP27_04310 Other surface proteins omph * BBW80_02955 BBP28_00200 BBW69_08225 BBP27_04105 omp85 * BBW80_02960 BBP28_00205 BBW69_08230 BBP27_04110 Heparin-binding antigen NHBA nhba np np np np Iron uptake systems ABC transporter fbpA np np BBW69_01085 np fbpB np np BBW69_01080 np fbpC np np BBW69_01075 np Ferric enterobactin transport protein A/ferric-repressed protein B fetA / frpB BBW80_05725 BBP28_00435 BBW69_09195 BBP27_09310 Haemoglobin receptor hmbR BBW80_00620 BBP28_10830 np BBP27_01375 Haem uptake hpuA np np np np hpuB np np BBW69_08435 np Lactoferrin-binding protein lbpA np np BBW69_01315 np lbpB np np BBW69_01310 np Ton system tonB BBW80_02960 BBP28_00205 BBW69_08230 BBP27_04110 exbB BBW80_01265 BBP28_01625 BBW69_04660 BBP27_06930 exbD BBW80_01260 BBP28_01620 BBW69_04665 BBP27_06925 Transferrin-binding protein tbpA BBW80_03495 BBP28_03865 BBW69_08600 BBP27_04660 tbpB BBW80_04640 np np np Other iron acquisition genes bcp * BBW80_04540 BBP28_06595 BBW69_01630 BBP27_09650 bfrA * BBW80_08395 BBP28_02745 BBW69_03245 BBP27_06475 bfrB * BBW80_08400 BBP28_02740 BBW69_03240 BBP27_06480 hemH * BBW80_04410 BBP28_06720 BBW69_01460 BBP27_09780 Protease IgA protease Iga np np np np Stress proteins Catalase katA BBW80_05740 BBP28_00450 BBW69_04130 BBP27_09245 Manganese transport system mntA BBW80_00475 BBP28_10980 BBW69_00885 BBP27_01220 mntB BBW80_00480 BBP28_10975 BBW69_00880 BBP27_01225 mntC BBW80_00485 BBP28_10970 BBW69_00875 BBP27_01230 Methionine sulphoxide reductase msrA / msrB (pilB) BBW80_03270 BBP28_01380 BBW69_08590 BBP27_00665 Recombinational repair protein recN BBW80_04510 BBP28_06620 BBW69_01565 BBP27_09675 Toxin RTX toxin frpA np np np np frpC np np np np Two comp reg sys basR BBW80_06160 BBP28_04930 BBW69_05315 BBP27_05950 basS BBW80_06155 BBP28_04925 BBW69_05310 BBP27_05955 Cell separation nlpD BBW80_08360 BBP28_02780 BBW69_06215 BBP27_06440 Nitric oxide reductase norB BBW80_04740 BBP28_06390 BBW69_06810 BBP27_01665 *Previously reported as pathogen-specific. nadA homologue of Yersinia yadA was predicted by RAST as a partial gene at the end of 2 contigs ‡Two adjacent CDSs align. np, not present. Specific regions of difference identified across the four isolates Isolate Annotated CDSs Annotated functions KU1003-01 BBW80_02625 to BBW80_02655 Type VI secretion system KU1003-01 BBW80_00155 to BBW80_00225 CRISPR system KU1003-02 BBP28_10015 to BBP25_10115 Type IV secretion system RH3002v2f BBW69_00525 to BBW69_00530 Two-partner putative haemolysin secretion system RH3002v2g BBP27_06840 to BBP27_06885 TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization

Virulence genes present in the commensal isolates

Many virulence factors in the pathogenic have been identified to date and this has been the focus of a great deal of research due to their importance in public health [6, 84–86]. Within the regions of similarity identified in comparative genome analysis, the presence of a set of 117 virulence genes was assessed in each of the 4 isolates by comparison against the pathogen genome sequences in Mauve. Of the 117 virulence genes investigated, 94 are present in 1 or more of the isolate genome sequences (Table 3). There is some strain-to-strain variation in the presence of homologous sequences, but for some they are present across all of the isolate genomes. For example, there are homologous sequences for the majority of the neisserial type IV pilus genes (Table 3). As has been reported previously [21], it is likely that some of what have been identified as ‘virulence genes’ require reclassification in light of their presence in the non-pathogenic spp. genomes and the role for some of these in niche survival, rather than pathogenicity. Virulence genes shared between the commensal and pathogenic species include those involved in host adhesion, invasion, and immune response evasion, with adhesion being critical for successful host colonization [87, 88]. Coding sequences (CDSs) for two efflux pump systems, MtrCDE and FarAB, were identified; these have been investigated in for their roles in survival against mucosal surface fatty acids and bile salts [89-91].

Possession of type IV pili sequences

Initial binding to host cells, which is important for colonization and microcolony formation, is achieved through the actions of the type IV pili in the pathogenic spp. [92]. Commensal spp. are also known to be able to produce these structures; electron microscopy confirmed their presence decades ago within and [93], and the pili of some commensal spp. have been demonstrated to have the capacity to adhere to human epithelial cells [94]. The majority of the neisserial pilus genes were identified in all four isolates (Table 3), including those necessary for its biogenesis. Similar to the observations of Marri et al. [12], the pilC sequences identified in the four isolates appear to be orthologues of those found in the pathogens. In the pathogens, PilC is known to be involved in pilus-mediated adhesion as well as pilus biogenesis and is normally present in two copies [95]. A single CDS with homology to pilC was identified in the assembled genomic data for isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g, while isolate RH3002v2f has two copies. Although the function of the commensal pilC orthologue has not yet been elucidated [12], its presence as an intact CDS within the isolates indicates that these commensals likely have the capacity to produce pili. All four isolates possess CDSs with homology to the major pilus structural subunit PilE, which associates to form the pilus fibre [96]. In the pathogens, pilE is also responsible for mediating antigenic variation, achieved through recombination with silent pilS pilin sequences [97]. A single copy of pilE was identified in the isolates and a single copy of pilS could be found in the assembled genomic data. In general, the commensals are thought to only have 2–5 copies of pilS, but in the pathogenic Neisseria, up to 19 copies have previously been reported [12]. Pathogen-specific pilus gene sequences were also identified in all four isolates, including pglB, pglC, pglD, pglF, pglG, and pglH. These genes are believed to be necessary for complement-mediated lysis resistance in meningococci through pilin glycosylation [98]. Within the three isolates, RH3002v2f has CDSs for pglB, pglC, pglD, pglF, pglG, and pglH, at one locus. In KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g, two alleles of pglB were identified (pglB2 and pglB2b). Similar to the observations made by Kahler et al. in [98], a CDS was found to be inserted between pglB2 and pglC in these three isolates.

Presence of previously unreported capsule loci sequences

This investigation is the first to identify within the non-pathogenic , capsule gene loci sequences that have not previously been characterized (Fig. 3). Analysis of the genome sequence data for KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g (Table 3) indicates that these isolates contain a number of capsule CDSs homologous to those found in (Fig. 3). While no capsule CDSs were identified within RH3002v2f, this isolate was found to contain sequences with similarities to those found in strain 020–06 at the syntenic genomic region (Fig. 3) [51, 99].
Fig. 3.

The capsule loci of the four commensal isolates were each different and distinct. For KU1003-01 (line 1), KU1003-02 (line 2) and RH3002v2g (line 4) there are ctr capsule transport genes (yellow) and potentially capsular serogroup defining genes (red) between galE and tex, as in . An example of a serogroup A meningococcal capsular locus is shown (Nm A line 5). The sequence for KU1003-02 is across two contigs, indicated by \\. RH3002v2f (line 3) does not have ctr or potential capsule biosynthesis genes, rather having a similar locus to the capsule null loci (cnl) found in some meningococci and strain 020–06. a d-ala-d-ala ligase; b acetyltransferase; c glycosyl transferase. d, e are from [100], as is the colour scheme of regions defined previously: D (black); A (red); C (yellow); and E (purple).

The capsule loci of the four commensal isolates were each different and distinct. For KU1003-01 (line 1), KU1003-02 (line 2) and RH3002v2g (line 4) there are ctr capsule transport genes (yellow) and potentially capsular serogroup defining genes (red) between galE and tex, as in . An example of a serogroup A meningococcal capsular locus is shown (Nm A line 5). The sequence for KU1003-02 is across two contigs, indicated by \\. RH3002v2f (line 3) does not have ctr or potential capsule biosynthesis genes, rather having a similar locus to the capsule null loci (cnl) found in some meningococci and strain 020–06. a d-ala-d-ala ligase; b acetyltransferase; c glycosyl transferase. d, e are from [100], as is the colour scheme of regions defined previously: D (black); A (red); C (yellow); and E (purple). The structure of the capsule locus is well characterized and conserved in [100, 101] and phylogenetic analysis of spp. capsule genes carried out by Clemence et al. [7] highlighted that was the closest encapsulated relative of . Putative capsule genes with synthesis, transport, and translocation functions have previously been reported in the non-pathogenic spp. [7] and similar to the previous findings for N. subflava, these putative regions were found to be contiguous in isolates KU1003-01 and RH3002v2g and one contig break in the locus occurs in KU1003-02 (Fig. 3). While the capsule loci of the four commensal isolates were each different and distinct from those in the pathogenic , capsular synthesis and potential serogroup-defining genes were identified within isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g (Fig. 3). Similar to the organization of the capsule loci in serogroup A, the genes involved in capsular synthesis and serogroup definition were identified in isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g, flanked on both sides by genes involved in capsule transport and capsule translocation. Homology of capsule loci shared between and other commensal genomes has indicated that some non-pathogens could represent a reservoir for capsule switching [6, 102, 103]. The acquisition of the capsular genes by from the non-pathogenic spp. evolutionarily [7, 101] and the recent discovery of meningococcal capsule genes in the newly described putatively named Neisseria brasiliensis [103] support the capacity for interspecies transfer of capsular genes between the non-pathogens and . Although new meningococcal serogroups have not been identified in N. meningitidis, capsule switching could provide a means for circumventing the serogroup specific vaccines directed against it. This would, however, be dependent on the pathogen horizontally acquiring capsular gene sequences from a co-colonizing commensal species in combination with retaining its pathogenicity. Capsule switching in combination with the acquisition of alleles for other vaccine targets, such as sequences for fHbp and NadA (Table 3), that are divergent from the alleles represented in the Bexsero vaccine [104, 105], could provide routes for vaccine escape via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from these commensal genomes. Vaccine targets NHBA and PorA were not found in these isolate genome sequences (Table 3). The capsule of some serotypes are considered to be a major pathogenicity factor and its anti-phagocytic properties are essential for growth in the host’s bloodstream [106]. Despite the defined role of the capsule in virulence, its ecological role is not as well defined, as non-encapsulated strains are able to grow and survive within the human nasopharynx as well as encapsulated strains, likely better [6, 74, 101]. Further research is needed to determine the role and nature of the potential capsules in the commensal isolates.

Presence of vaccine antigen target sequences that demonstrate diversity in the gene pool of the genus

An adhesin/invasin similar to adhesin A (NadA) is present in the genome sequences of isolates KU1003-01 and RH3002v2g, with a yadA homologue in KU1003-02 (Table 3). Submission of these CDSs to Bexsero Antigen Sequence Typing through PUBMLST (https://pubmlst.org/neisseria/NadA/) indicates that the closest match for the protein sequences is NadA-1, with E values of 2e-08 and 8e-10, respectively. Therefore, although present, the NadA that would be expressed in these biovar perflava isolates is predicted to be distinct from those in the Bexsero meningococcal vaccine. In , nadA assembles at the cell surface and promotes tight adherence followed by invasion of host epithelial cells [107]. Previous investigations into found no CDSs with homology to nadA or Bexsero target fHbp [108], both of which are found in these commensal isolates (Table 3). This analysis demonstrates additional reservoirs for antigenic variant alleles of NadA and Fhbp not represented in the vaccine that may allow to escape vaccine-mediated control via HGT from commensal spp. In concert with the potential role for commensal capsule loci to provide genetic material for capsule switching [6, 101], the scope for evolution of this pathogen, and also for pharyngeal , through their natural competence preference for the neisserial DNA uptake sequence [78, 81, 82] likely contributes to genome plasticity [109].

Regions of difference within the commensal isolates contain previously explored sequences

Mauve alignments also revealed previously unexplored regions of difference between the four isolate genome sequences. These included both regions that were not present in the other sequenced commensal isolates and regions that were not present in the pathogens and reference strains against which they were compared. Five key regions were identified (Table 4), which were investigated in further detail. Similar to the presence of virulence genes within commensal spp., some of these systems are more often associated with pathogens.

Presence of a different Type IV Secretion System

Horizontal exchange of genetic material in is facilitated through a multicomponent Type IV Secretion System (T4SS), encoded within the Gonococcal Genetic Island (GGI), present in around 80 % of gonococcal strains [27]. This GGI T4SS has also been identified in some [28], with different capsular serogroup strains containing both complete and partial versions of the GGI [110]. In , however, this system does not secrete DNA, although its GGI T4SS may be responsible for secreting other effectors [111]. T4SSs in the non-pathogenic spp. have not previously been characterized within any of the commensal spp. [27]. A T4SS system similar to VirB/D in (i.e. VirB9 1e-42 at 93 % coverage and VirB11 7e-55 at 90 % coverage) was identified within the genome sequence of isolate KU1003-02 (Table 4). blastp revealed no similarity between the T4SS components found in isolate KU1003-02 and the GGI T4SS. blastn of the individual VirB/D components could not identify the same system in the other three isolates, or in any , , or the vast majority of other spp. in the sequence databases. Orthologues were detected in two of the investigated biovar perflava genomes [67, 72]. The T4SS in KU1003-02 contains CDSs potentially encoding 11 out of the 12 core proteins (VirB1–VirB11 and VirD4) normally associated with this type of secretion system [112]. The Browse by Replicon function within the SecReT4 database identified organizational synteny between the KU1003-02 T4SS and the VirB/D system in [113]. A CDS with homology to virB7 could not be identified within KU1003-02, although a hypothetical protein was predicted at the syntenic location. Although it is clear that this T4SS has an independent origin from that within the GGI in the pathogenic spp., the role of the T4SS in isolate KU1003-02 is currently unclear from the data, and therefore further investigation is required.

Presence of CRISPR systems

Individual species need mechanisms for maintaining their genetic identity [114] and preventing the loss of advantageous genes necessary for their survival and proliferation. CRISPR systems have been proposed as one mechanism by which this is possible and genome size as well as the ability to acquire new genes have been shown to differ between strains that either possess or lack CRISPR systems [115]. CRISPR systems are present in around 40 % of sequenced bacterial genomes, including spp. [116], and provide acquired, heritable immunity against the acquisition and genomic incorporation of DNA from invading plasmids and bacteriophages [117]. CRISPR use enzymes to degrade foreign DNA that is either identical or very closely related to previously acquired short DNA sequences [117, 118]. A region of difference was identified in the genome sequence of isolate KU1003-01, annotated as a CRISPR locus (Table 4). To investigate CRISPR sequences in the isolates in more depth, the genome sequences for all four isolates were uploaded to CRISPRminer (http://www.microbiome-bigdata.com/CRISPRminer) [43] and CRISPRfinder (https://crispr.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/Server/) [44]. Isolate KU1003-01 was found to have three confirmed CRISPR loci with a total of 109 spacers (Table 5) according to CRISPRfinder. CRISPRminer identified at least one of the spacers in isolate KU1003-01 as being complementary to phage HY01, with another being identified as self-targeting. The remainder of the spacers for KU1003-01 did not yield any blast hits through the NCBI database. KU1003-02 was found to have two confirmed CRISPR loci with a total of 111 spacers according to CRISPRfinder (Table 5). One spacer was identified as being self-targeting and no phage complement spacers were identified within isolate KU1003-02 according to CRISPRminer. Isolates RH3002v2f and RH3002 v2g were not identified as having CRISPR using these tools, although Cas proteins were identified within their genomic sequences. Lack of bacteriophage hits and inability to identify CRISPR in genome sequences containing Cas protein homologues suggest that these tools may not be able to recognize the diverse nature of the neisserial CRISPR and bacteriophages.
Table 5.

A comparison of genome size and GC content (%) as well as the number of CRISPR loci, spacer number and type across the four isolates

Strain/isolate

Genome size (bp)

% G+C

CRISPR loci

Self-targeting

Phage spacer

Spacer no.

KU1003-01

2 345 197

49.00

3

1

1

109

KU1003-02

2 303 261

49.40

2

1

0

111

RH3002v2f

1 953 373

50.60

0

0

0

0

RH3002v2g

2 193 423

49.60

0

0

0

0

A comparison of genome size and GC content (%) as well as the number of CRISPR loci, spacer number and type across the four isolates Strain/isolate Genome size (bp) % G+C CRISPR loci Self-targeting Phage spacer Spacer no. KU1003-01 2 345 197 49.00 3 1 1 109 KU1003-02 2 303 261 49.40 2 1 0 111 RH3002v2f 1 953 373 50.60 0 0 0 0 RH3002v2g 2 193 423 49.60 0 0 0 0 While CRISPRs are known to provide adaptive immunity through the incorporation of spacers from invading plasmids and bacteriophages, analysis of these systems across a large number of archaea and bacteria genomes also identified CRISPR spacers that were derived from chromosomal DNA [119]. These ‘self-targeting’ spacers are complementary to non-CRISPR genomic regions within the species in which they were found. While it is currently thought that the most likely outcome for cells containing a complementary self-targeting spacer is death through host autoimmune suicide [117, 119], these spacers may also play a role in maintaining host genome integrity [118-120]. It may be that the CRISPR systems identified in isolates KU1003-01 and KU1003-02 have a role in maintaining their genome integrity during co-colonization with other spp.

First identification of a Type VI Secretion System in the spp

One region of difference found in KU1003-01 included annotated CDSs for a Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) [121, 122], encoding proteins such as EvpB (TssB), Hcp (TssD), ImpG (TssF), VgrG, and PAAR (Table 6). This region was investigated further, identifying a full complement of T6SS sequences across contigs, suggesting that KU1003-01 is able to make a functional T6SS. This is the first report of the potential for Type VI Secretion in this genus.
Table 6.

CDSs with homology to T6SS components present in three of the isolates

Name

KU1003-01

KU1003-02

RH3002v2g

T6SS component

TssA

BBW80_02650

BBP28_06040

BBP27_04500

Cytosolic protein

TssB/EvpB

BBW80_01505

BBP28_06045

BBP27_04505

Contractile sheath – small subunit

TssC

BBW80_01510

BBP28_06050

BBP27_04510

Contractile sheath – large subunit

TssD/Hcp

BBW80_01485

BBP28_06055

BBP27_04515

Puncturing device inner tube

TssE

BBW80_02630

BBP27_04525

T6SS baseplate component

TssF/ImpG

BBW80_02645

BBP28_07375

BBP27_04530

T6SS baseplate component

TssG

BBW80_02640

BBP28_06155

BBP27_04535

T6SS baseplate component

TssH/ClpB

BBW80_01480

BBP28_06150

BBP27_04540

AAA ATPase

TssI/VgrG

*

BBP28_06090

BBP27_04565

Puncturing device tip protein

PAAR

BBW80_01515

BBP28_06085

BBP27_04575

PAAR domain-containing protein

TssJ

BBW80_02635

np

BBP27_04545

Outer-membrane lipoprotein

TssK

BBW80_01500

BBP28_08095

BBP27_04550

T6SS baseplate component

TssL

BBW80_01495

np

BBP27_04555

Inner membrane, 1 TM, membrane complex

TssM/IcmF

BBW80_02655

BBP28_06095

BBP27_04560

Inner membrane, 3 TMs, membrane complex

*Up to four VgrG with specific effector immunity (EI) pairs are predicted to be within isolate KU1003-01.

†CDS is present across the ends of two contigs.

np, not present.

CDSs with homology to T6SS components present in three of the isolates Name KU1003-01 KU1003-02 RH3002v2g T6SS component TssA BBW80_02650 BBP28_06040 BBP27_04500 Cytosolic protein TssB/EvpB BBW80_01505 BBP28_06045 BBP27_04505 Contractile sheath – small subunit TssC BBW80_01510 BBP28_06050 BBP27_04510 Contractile sheath – large subunit TssD/Hcp BBW80_01485 BBP28_06055 BBP27_04515 Puncturing device inner tube TssE BBW80_02630 BBP27_04525 T6SS baseplate component TssF/ImpG BBW80_02645 BBP28_07375 BBP27_04530 T6SS baseplate component TssG BBW80_02640 BBP28_06155 BBP27_04535 T6SS baseplate component TssH/ClpB BBW80_01480 BBP28_06150 BBP27_04540 AAA ATPase TssI/VgrG * BBP28_06090 BBP27_04565 Puncturing device tip protein PAAR BBW80_01515 BBP28_06085 BBP27_04575 PAAR domain-containing protein TssJ BBW80_02635 np BBP27_04545 Outer-membrane lipoprotein TssK BBW80_01500 BBP28_08095 BBP27_04550 T6SS baseplate component TssL BBW80_01495 np BBP27_04555 Inner membrane, 1 TM, membrane complex TssM/IcmF BBW80_02655 BBP28_06095 BBP27_04560 Inner membrane, 3 TMs, membrane complex *Up to four VgrG with specific effector immunity (EI) pairs are predicted to be within isolate KU1003-01. †CDS is present across the ends of two contigs. np, not present. To expand this discovery to the other isolates, Mauve alignment and nucleotide blastn homology searches were conducted for each of the T6SS components. These revealed that KU1003-02 and RH3002v2g also possess homologues of the T6SS. However, the T6SS in these isolates is different from that seen in KU1003-01. Confirmation of these two different T6SS types was achieved through amino acid sequence alignments using clustal Omega (data not shown). Annotations for T6SS functions were confirmed against the SecRet6 database [46]. No T6SS was identified in isolate RH3002v2f (), and therefore the T6SS was only found here in the isolates identified as biovar perflava. Analysis of 15 draft and complete genome sequences in the NCBI database indicated that the majority of these (8 out of 15) possess T6SSs. The most commonly identified T6SS was the type identified within isolates KU1003-02 and RH3002v2g, with 5 out of 15 genome sequences from the database that were analysed possessing this type and the remaining 3 matching KU1003-01. The T6SS in isolate KU1003-01 appears to have all of the 13 core components necessary to produce a functioning system [121]. These were identified on putative genomic islands at two different loci with tssE, tssJ, tssG, tssF, tssA, and tssM being identified in one cluster and tssH, tssD, tssL, tssK, tssB, tssC, vgrG, and PAAR at a separate locus. Isolate KU1003-01 is predicted to have up to four vgrG each with different effector–immunity (EI) pairs. The T6SS identified in isolates KU1003-02 and RH3002 v2g, by comparison, were located at a single locus and were predicted to have only one vgrG. Bioinformatic studies have so far identified the T6SS in around 25 % of Gram-negative bacteria [121] and the products of the genes involved in its assembly are evolutionarily well conserved [122]. It is believed that one function of the T6SS is to aid bacteria in successful colonization and survival within competitive niches and it has been proposed that this system is responsible for shaping the composition of microbial populations [123-125]. It is likely that naturally competent spp. colonizing the same niche acquire DNA from one another [12] and the T6SS has been shown to aid this process. T6SS-positive species have been shown to acquire new effector–immunity pairs from their neighbours through this mechanism [126]. In species other than , the T6SS has also been shown to play a role in nutrient acquisition [127]. It is possible that the co-isolated KU1003-01 and KU1003-02 have shared T6SS immunity genes, which has allowed them to co-exist together, although further investigation is needed to determine if this is the case. By carrying out further study into the mechanisms of the T6SS, novel therapeutic interventions could be developed with regard to pathogen-related infections. One possible intervention, as suggested by Unterweger et al. [128], would allow non-pathogenic commensal bacteria such as these biovar perflava possessing the T6SS to outcompete pathogens such as and within a specific niche. The T6SS effector proteins, which are antibacterial to competitor species, have also been proposed to be developed as therapeutic agents against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens [129].

Similar iron acquisition systems to those of the pathogens, as well as systems not previously seen in spp.

In order to establish an infection, pathogenic bacteria must be able to obtain iron from a host and in the case of the pathogenic spp. it is considered to be a major virulence determinant [8-11]. It is believed that diversity in iron uptake genes aids colonization of different spp. within the same niche where host antibodies are targeted towards a variety of iron acquisition components from different bacterial species [12]. Isolate RH3002v2f was found to contain CDSs homologous to fbpA, fbpB, and fbpC for an ABC-type Fe3+ transport system (FbpABC) and lbpA and lbpB for lactoferrin-binding proteins (Table 3), which were not present in the other isolates. CDSs with homology to hmbR were identified in isolates KU1003-01, KU1003-02, and RH3002v2g for haemoglobin receptor (Table 3). This specificity in differential iron utilization for the biovar perflava isolates versus the isolate agrees with earlier results [12].

A two-partner secretion system, not previously identified in spp

While none of the isolates were determined to be haemolytic, a two-partner secretion system (TPSS) was identified within isolate RH3002v2f that was predicted to encode a putative haemolysin secretion system (Table 4). This system could not be identified in any of the other isolates. This TPSS is similar to the ShlA/ShlB system of [130], which only secretes its haemolysin in low-iron conditions [131], which may explain our observations here. In , shlA encodes a haemolysin and shlB an outer-membrane protein required for the secretion and activation of ShlA [130]. The TPSS identified in isolate RH3002v2f has orthologues in a very small number of other commensal neisserial genomes, including [53]. Many pathogens, including and , are known to possess a wide range of mechanisms for iron acquisition [11] and are able to utilize haem released by haemolysis as an iron source. Heme constitutes the largest source of iron within a human host [132] and while there is normally a limited supply within the nasopharynx, meningococci are thought to be able to take up small amounts through the expression of TonB-dependent receptors [133].

A heme system, not previously identified in spp.

An operon containing a TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization system was identified within the genome for isolate RH3002v2g, similar to the hutWXZ system in [134]. The same system was also identified in the genome sequence data for isolate KU1003-01, as well as in the 15  spp. investigated and in a number of , , N. elongata, and genomes. Within , the genes surrounding the TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization system fell into two groups, consistent with the type of T6SS they possessed. In the first group, the TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization system was identified next to CDSs encoding a T6SS VgrG protein with a predicted anti-eukaryotic effector. T6SS effects have previously been shown to be involved in metal acquisition [135] in and iron acquisition in P. aeruginosa [125]. It is possible that under conditions of iron starvation, the T6SS and TonB-dependent haem acquisition and utilization systems act together for the purpose of iron acquisition in some of the commensal spp. In the second group, which consisted of the second neisserial T6SS type, as well as all T6SS-negative , the haem acquisition and utilization system is associated with a zonula occludens toxin-like protein (Zot) homologue; Zot disrupts mucosal tight junctions in and orthologues have been found in and [136, 137].

Conclusions

In-depth investigations of the genome sequences of non-pathogenic spp. are of interest in their own right, revealing themselves to not only be reservoirs of a large gene pool for the naturally competent genus, but also to contain genetic features not previously seen, such as the first reported T6SS. A wealth of new biological insight into this genus can be gained by further investigating the functions of the previously unexplored features described here in this and its TPSS and three biovar perflava and their T6SSs. In addition to the potential of the antibacterial activity of the T6SS expressed by these isolates, the individual T6SS effectors identified in these genome sequences might also be promising avenues for development of antibacterials against multidrug-resistant pathogens.
  108 in total

Review 1.  The CRISPR-Cas9 system in Neisseria spp.

Authors:  Yan Zhang
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  The Agrobacterium VirB/VirD4 T4SS: Mechanism and Architecture Defined Through In Vivo Mutagenesis and Chimeric Systems.

Authors:  Yang Grace Li; Peter J Christie
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Secretion and activation of the Serratia marcescens hemolysin by structurally defined ShlB mutants.

Authors:  Avijit Pramanik; Ulrich Könninger; Arun Selvam; Volkmar Braun
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  DNA uptake sequences in Neisseria gonorrhoeae as intrinsic transcriptional terminators and markers of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Russell Spencer-Smith; Sabrina Roberts; Neesha Gurung; Lori A S Snyder
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2016-08-25

5.  A genomic approach to bacterial taxonomy: an examination and proposed reclassification of species within the genus Neisseria.

Authors:  Julia S Bennett; Keith A Jolley; Sarah G Earle; Craig Corton; Stephen D Bentley; Julian Parkhill; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 6.  Mechanism of meningeal invasion by Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  Mathieu Coureuil; Olivier Join-Lambert; Hervé Lécuyer; Sandrine Bourdoulous; Stefano Marullo; Xavier Nassif
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 7.  The rise of the Type VI secretion system.

Authors:  Alain Filloux
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2013-12-03

8.  Type VI Secretion System Transports Zn2+ to Combat Multiple Stresses and Host Immunity.

Authors:  Tietao Wang; Meiru Si; Yunhong Song; Wenhan Zhu; Fen Gao; Yao Wang; Lei Zhang; Weipeng Zhang; Gehong Wei; Zhao-Qing Luo; Xihui Shen
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 9.  Population genomics: diversity and virulence in the Neisseria.

Authors:  Martin Cj Maiden
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 7.934

10.  Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England, February 2018.

Authors:  David W Eyre; Nicholas D Sanderson; Emily Lord; Natasha Regisford-Reimmer; Kevin Chau; Leanne Barker; Markus Morgan; Robert Newnham; Daniel Golparian; Magnus Unemo; Derrick W Crook; Tim Ea Peto; Gwenda Hughes; Michelle J Cole; Helen Fifer; Anne Edwards; Monique I Andersson
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2018-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Global genomic and proteomic analysis indicates co-evolution of Neisseria species and with their human host.

Authors:  Indrani Sarkar; Prateek Dey; Saurabh Singh Rathore; Gyan Dev Singh; Ram Pratap Singh
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Et tu, Neisseria? Conflicts of Interest Between Neisseria Species.

Authors:  Rene Baerentsen; Christoph M Tang; Rachel M Exley
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.073

3.  Prediction of Prophages and Their Host Ranges in Pathogenic and Commensal Neisseria Species.

Authors:  Giulia Orazi; Alan J Collins; Rachel J Whitaker
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 4.  The Host-Pathogen Interactions and Epicellular Lifestyle of Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  August Mikucki; Nicolie R McCluskey; Charlene M Kahler
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.073

5.  DNA Blocks the Lethal Effect of Human Beta-Defensin 2 Against Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  Gabriela M Wassing; Kenny Lidberg; Sara Sigurlásdóttir; Jonas Frey; Kristen Schroeder; Nathalie Ilehag; Ann-Christin Lindås; Kristina Jonas; Ann-Beth Jonsson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Comparison of the Respiratory Resistomes and Microbiota in Children Receiving Short versus Standard Course Treatment for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  M M Pettigrew; J Kwon; J F Gent; Y Kong; M Wade; D J Williams; C B Creech; S Evans; Q Pan; E B Walter; J M Martin; J S Gerber; J G Newland; M E Hofto; M A Staat; V G Fowler; H F Chambers; W C Huskins
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 7.786

7.  Type VI secretion system killing by commensal Neisseria is influenced by expression of type four pili.

Authors:  Rafael Custodio; Rhian M Ford; Cara J Ellison; Guangyu Liu; Gerda Mickute; Christoph M Tang; Rachel M Exley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.