Suleman Aktaa1,2,3, Gorav Batra4, Lars Wallentin4, Colin Baigent5, David Erlinge6, Stefan James4, Peter Ludman7, Aldo P Maggioni8, Susanna Price9, Clive Weston10, Barbara Casadei11, Chris P Gale1,2,3. 1. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. 2. Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. 3. Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. 4. Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 85, Sweden. 5. MRC Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. 6. Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund SE-221 85, Sweden. 7. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. 8. National Association of Hospital Cardiologists Research Center (ANMCO), Florence 50121, Italy. 9. Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Brompton Hospital, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London SW3 6NP, UK. 10. Department of Cardiology, Hywel Dda University Health Board, Wales SA6 6NL, UK. 11. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: It is increasingly recognized that tools are required for assessing and benchmarking quality of care in order to improve it. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) is developing a suite of quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate cardiovascular care and support the delivery of evidence-based care. This paper describes the methodology used for their development. METHODS AND RESULTS: We propose a four-step process for the development of the ESC QIs. For a specific clinical area with a gap in care delivery, the QI development process includes: (i) the identification of key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of care; (ii) the construction of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature; (iii) the selection of a final set of QIs by obtaining expert opinions using the modified Delphi method; and (iv) the undertaking of a feasibility assessment by evaluating different ways of defining the QI specifications for the proposed data collection source. For each of the four steps, key methodological areas need to be addressed to inform the implementation process and avoid misinterpretation of the measurement results. CONCLUSION: Detailing the methodology for the ESC QIs construction enables healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care. As such, high-quality evidence may be translated into clinical practice and the 'evidence-practice' gap closed. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: It is increasingly recognized that tools are required for assessing and benchmarking quality of care in order to improve it. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) is developing a suite of quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate cardiovascular care and support the delivery of evidence-based care. This paper describes the methodology used for their development. METHODS AND RESULTS: We propose a four-step process for the development of the ESC QIs. For a specific clinical area with a gap in care delivery, the QI development process includes: (i) the identification of key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of care; (ii) the construction of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature; (iii) the selection of a final set of QIs by obtaining expert opinions using the modified Delphi method; and (iv) the undertaking of a feasibility assessment by evaluating different ways of defining the QI specifications for the proposed data collection source. For each of the four steps, key methodological areas need to be addressed to inform the implementation process and avoid misinterpretation of the measurement results. CONCLUSION: Detailing the methodology for the ESC QIs construction enables healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care. As such, high-quality evidence may be translated into clinical practice and the 'evidence-practice' gap closed. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: John A Spertus; Kim A Eagle; Harlan M Krumholz; Kristi R Mitchell; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anne Klassen; Anton Miller; Nancy Anderson; Jane Shen; Veronica Schiariti; Maureen O'Donnell Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Tolulope T Sajobi; Meng Wang; Oluwagbohunmi Awosoga; Maria Santana; Danielle Southern; Zhiying Liang; Diane Galbraith; Stephen B Wilton; Hude Quan; Michelle M Graham; Matthew T James; William A Ghali; Merrill L Knudtson; Colleen Norris Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-03
Authors: Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Lynn McVey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Robert M West; Amanda Farrin; Chris Gale; Roger Parslow; Justin Keen; Mai Elshehaly; Roy A Ruddle; Julia Lake; Mamas Mamas; Richard Feltbower; Dawn Dowding Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Suleman Aktaa; Amr Abdin; Elena Arbelo; Haran Burri; Kevin Vernooy; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Giuseppe Boriani; Pascal Defaye; Jean-Claude Deharo; Inga Drossart; Dan Foldager; Michael R Gold; Jens Brock Johansen; Francisco Leyva; Cecilia Linde; Yoav Michowitz; Mads Brix Kronborg; David Slotwiner; Torkel Steen; José Maria Tolosana; Stylianos Tzeis; Niraj Varma; Michael Glikson; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Chris P Gale Journal: Europace Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Gorav Batra; Suleman Aktaa; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Peter Ludman; David Erlinge; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 35.855
Authors: Suleman Aktaa; Gorav Batra; John G F Cleland; Andrew Coats; Lars H Lund; Theresa McDonagh; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Peter Vasko; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 35.855