Literature DB >> 32845314

European Society of Cardiology methodology for the development of quality indicators for the quantification of cardiovascular care and outcomes.

Suleman Aktaa1,2,3, Gorav Batra4, Lars Wallentin4, Colin Baigent5, David Erlinge6, Stefan James4, Peter Ludman7, Aldo P Maggioni8, Susanna Price9, Clive Weston10, Barbara Casadei11, Chris P Gale1,2,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: It is increasingly recognized that tools are required for assessing and benchmarking quality of care in order to improve it. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) is developing a suite of quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate cardiovascular care and support the delivery of evidence-based care. This paper describes the methodology used for their development. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We propose a four-step process for the development of the ESC QIs. For a specific clinical area with a gap in care delivery, the QI development process includes: (i) the identification of key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of care; (ii) the construction of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature; (iii) the selection of a final set of QIs by obtaining expert opinions using the modified Delphi method; and (iv) the undertaking of a feasibility assessment by evaluating different ways of defining the QI specifications for the proposed data collection source. For each of the four steps, key methodological areas need to be addressed to inform the implementation process and avoid misinterpretation of the measurement results.
CONCLUSION: Detailing the methodology for the ESC QIs construction enables healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care. As such, high-quality evidence may be translated into clinical practice and the 'evidence-practice' gap closed. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Clinical practice guidelines; Quality improvement; Quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32845314      PMCID: PMC8727982          DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes        ISSN: 2058-1742


  40 in total

1.  Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; H Gilbert Welch; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Trial and error. How to avoid commonly encountered limitations of published clinical trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Kaul; George A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Kim A Eagle; Harlan M Krumholz; Kristi R Mitchell; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Performance measurement and improvement frameworks in health, education and social services systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Klassen; Anton Miller; Nancy Anderson; Jane Shen; Veronica Schiariti; Maureen O'Donnell
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 5.  Consensus methods for medical and health services research.

Authors:  J Jones; D Hunter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

6.  Trajectories of Health-Related Quality of Life in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Meng Wang; Oluwagbohunmi Awosoga; Maria Santana; Danielle Southern; Zhiying Liang; Diane Galbraith; Stephen B Wilton; Hude Quan; Michelle M Graham; Matthew T James; William A Ghali; Merrill L Knudtson; Colleen Norris
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-03

7.  Health Care Spending, Utilization, and Quality 8 Years into Global Payment.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Yunan Ji; Dana G Safran; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  International comparison of acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes using quality indicators.

Authors:  Oren Zusman; Owen Bebb; Marlous Hall; Tatendashe Bernadette Dondo; Adam Timmis; Francois Schiele; Keith Aa Fox; Ran Kornowski; Chris P Gale; Zaza Iakobishvili
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  How, in what contexts, and why do quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality in acute hospitals? Protocol for a realist feasibility evaluation.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Lynn McVey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Robert M West; Amanda Farrin; Chris Gale; Roger Parslow; Justin Keen; Mai Elshehaly; Roy A Ruddle; Julia Lake; Mamas Mamas; Richard Feltbower; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Selecting Performance Indicators and Targets in Health Care: An International Scoping Review and Standardized Process Framework.

Authors:  Michael A Heenan; Glen E Randall; Jenna M Evans
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Suleman Aktaa; Amr Abdin; Elena Arbelo; Haran Burri; Kevin Vernooy; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Giuseppe Boriani; Pascal Defaye; Jean-Claude Deharo; Inga Drossart; Dan Foldager; Michael R Gold; Jens Brock Johansen; Francisco Leyva; Cecilia Linde; Yoav Michowitz; Mads Brix Kronborg; David Slotwiner; Torkel Steen; José Maria Tolosana; Stylianos Tzeis; Niraj Varma; Michael Glikson; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 3.  Data standards for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart).

Authors:  Gorav Batra; Suleman Aktaa; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Peter Ludman; David Erlinge; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 35.855

4.  Data standards for heart failure: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).

Authors:  Suleman Aktaa; Gorav Batra; John G F Cleland; Andrew Coats; Lars H Lund; Theresa McDonagh; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Peter Vasko; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 35.855

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.