Literature DB >> 35380662

Data standards for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart).

Gorav Batra1, Suleman Aktaa2,3,4, Lars Wallentin1, Aldo P Maggioni5, Peter Ludman6, David Erlinge7, Barbara Casadei8, Chris P Gale2,3,4.   

Abstract

Standardized data definitions are essential for monitoring and benchmarking the quality of care and patient outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. There are no contemporary pan-European data standards for the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) project of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aimed to develop such data standards for ACS and PCI. Following a systematic review of the literature on ACS and PCI data standards and evaluation of contemporary ACS and PCI registries, we undertook a modified Delphi process involving clinical and registry experts from 11 European countries, as well as representatives from relevant ESC Associations, including the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC). This resulted in final sets of 68 and 84 'mandatory' variables and several catalogues of optional variables for ACS and PCI, respectively. Data definitions were provided for these variables, which have been programmed as the basis for continuous registration of individual patient data in the online EuroHeart IT platform. By means of a structured process and the interaction with major stakeholders, internationally harmonized data standards for ACS and PCI have been developed. In the context of the EuroHeart project, this will facilitate country-level quality of care improvement, international observational research, registry-based randomized trials, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Data definitions; Data standards; Data variables; EuroHeart; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35380662      PMCID: PMC9209007          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   35.855


Introduction

Standardized data definitions are essential for the reliable investigation of quality of care and outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Heterogeneity in such definitions impedes benchmarking and leads to inconsistencies that directly impact the interpretation of clinical studies and the implementation of their findings.[1] With the advent of large-scale registries, administrative databases, and the widespread use of electronic health records in routine clinical practice, opportunities to deliver cost-efficient investigator-initiated observational and randomized studies of both devices and pharmacological treatments have been realized.[2-4] Yet, between-country comparisons remain challenging. This is often driven by a variation in the variables and their definitions.[5] This restricts the ability to combine and efficiently compare data across databases. In countries where registry-based randomized controlled trials (R-RCTs) are feasible, country-specific definitions of outcomes or disease states that inform patient recruitment can limit the international generalizability of the study findings.[6] Standardized data variables and definitions would provide means to overcome these limitations and enable international R-RCTs and the evaluation of the quality of care according to guideline-recommended quality indicators in multi-country observational cohorts.[7-10] Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for cardiovascular disease. The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS) was developed in 2004 and was the first European initiative to address this gap in knowledge.[11] The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) is an international collaboration initiated and supported by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) that aims to improve the quality of cardiovascular care through continuous capture of individual patient data.[12] EuroHeart is underpinned by a purpose-built IT platform enabling real-time data recording, monitoring of standards of care, data linkages, and the delivery of R-RCTs and observational studies. During the pilot phase, EuroHeart will focus on four clinical domains, the first of which is the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we describe the development process and the resultant standardized data variables and definitions for ACS and PCI based on the EuroHeart methodology for the development of data standards.[13]

Methods

Working Group composition

A Data Science Group under the auspice of EuroHeart was established in August 2019. This comprised a project chair (C.P.G.), two medical experts (G.B. and S.A.), and a project manager. An international ACS/PCI Working Group was established and included 22 ACS/PCI and registry experts, representing 11 European countries. The selection of the Working Group members was based on ACS and/or PCI expertise and experience of national registries.

Defining data standards

The goal of the development process was to select and define a catalogue of ACS/PCI variables, the extent of which was balanced between all-encompassing and parsimonious. For instance, whereas some registries collect up to 370 variables,[14,15] the Data Science Group opted to limit the number of ‘mandatory’ variables to between 50 and 100. Three levels of variables were proposed (). Level 1: ‘mandatory’ variables that also are pre-programmed into the EuroHeart IT platform and include quality indicators and variables pertinent to accountability and public reporting of quality of care. Level 2: ‘additional’ variables that are provided together with definitions, but collection not being mandatory and not pre-programmed into the IT platform. Level 3: country- or centre-specific variables that address local regulatory and/or administrative requirements and that are not defined or programmed into the IT platform. EuroHeart data standards structure.

Literature search and evaluation of registries

A systematic review of the published literature (1 January 2004–4 August 2020) identified 554 ACS/PCI variables with accompanying definitions. Evaluation of contemporary national registries in Sweden [Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart Disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)], UK [Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), National Audit of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NAPCI)], and USA [National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)] was performed.[14-17] Variables defined as quality indicators for ACS were automatically selected as candidate variables.[10] Other variables were assessed according to their evidence base, validity, reliability, feasibility, and applicability. Candidate variables were classified according to the time point of care delivery and, where possible, reconciled with Clinical Practice Guidelines and quality indicators.[7,8,18,19]

Consensus development

The modified Delphi method was used to draw from the candidate variables a final set of ACS/PCI variables. To achieve this, candidate variables were shared with the Working Group, who were asked to assess them for inclusion against the pre-defined criteria and to evaluate the associated definitions. Responses and feedback were evaluated by the Data Science Group and the candidate variable catalogue was updated accordingly. In total, 11 peer-to-peer meetings were held during 2020. The developed variables were thereafter reviewed by the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), ESC Patient Forum, and ESC Committee for Young Cardiovascular Professionals.

Results

In total, 302 variables were included in the EuroHeart ACS/PCI catalogue: 152 Level 1 ‘mandatory’ variables (68 for ACS and 84 for PCI) with 20 variables common to both datasets, and 150 Level 2 ‘additional’ variables (). show the ‘mandatory’ variables, with condensed definitions. Detailed information about the ‘mandatory’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, , whereas ‘additional’ variables are provided in Supplementary material online, . Demographics data variables and definitions Female Male Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . Patient characteristics and comorbidities data variables and definitions Never smoked Former smoker Current smoker Unknown No Yes Unknown No Diabetes mellitus Type 1 Diabetes mellitus Type 2 Diabetes mellitus of other/unspecified type Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Ischaemic stroke Haemorrhagic stroke Unspecified stroke Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . Admission data variables and definitions Chest pain/discomfort Dyspnoea Cardiac arrest Other Unknown No Yes Unknown Self-presenter Ambulance from home/community Transportation from another hospital Already in the hospital Unknown Normal ST-segment elevation ST-segment depression T-wave inversion Other Unknown Normal Ventricular paced rhythm Left bundle branch block (LBBB) Right bundle branch block (RBBB) Pathological Q wave Other Unknown Sinus rhythm Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter Ventricular tachycardia Other Unknown Killip Class I Killip Class II Killip Class III Killip Class IV Unknown No Yes Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . In-hospital management data variables and definitions No Yes Unknown Troponin T Troponin I High-sensitivity Troponin T High-sensitivity Troponin I Unknown Not performed Echocardiography Other method Unknown ≥50% 41–49% 30–40% <30% Unknown Not performed Invasive coronary angiography CT coronary angiography CT coronary angiography-FFR Unknown No Unfractionated heparin Low molecular weight heparin Fondaparinux Bivalirudin Other Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes, during hospital stay Yes, planned after discharge Unknown No Yes, during hospital stay Yes, planned after discharge Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Fatal bleeding Intracranial haemorrhage Bleeding requiring surgery Bleeding requiring transfusion Other major bleeding Unknown No Yes Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . Diagnostic coronary angiography data variables and definitions Stable coronary syndrome Unstable angina NSTEMI STEMI Cardiac arrest with STEMI Cardiac arrest without STEMI Staged procedure Rescue PCI Risk assessment after successful thrombolysis Valvular heart disease Arrhythmia Heart failure/cardiomyopathy Post-cardiac transplantation Other Unknown Elective Urgent Emergency Salvage Unknown Killip Class I Killip Class II Killip Class III Killip Class IV Unknown CCS Grade I CCS Grade II CCS Grade III CCS Grade IV Unknown No Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) Cardiopulmonary bypass Impella AutoPulse Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Other Unknown No Yes Unknown Right radial artery Left radial artery Right femoral artery Left femoral artery Right ulnar artery Left ulnar artery Other Unknown Venous graft Arterial graft Segment 1 Segment 20 Normal/atheroma 1 vessel disease, not left main coronary artery 2 vessels, not left main coronary artery 3 vessels, not left main coronary artery Left main coronary artery + 1 vessel disease Left main coronary artery + 2 vessel disease Left main coronary artery + 3 vessel disease Isolated left main coronary artery Inconclusive assessment No Yes Unknown Segment 1 Segment 20 No Yes, lesion restenosis Yes, stent restenosis Unknown Segment 1 Segment 20 No Yes Unknown Segment 1 Segment 20 No Yes Suspected Unknown No Yes Unknown Not performed Hyperaemia-based method (e.g. FFR) Hyperaemia-free method (e.g. iFR, DFR, RFR) Coronary flow reserve (CFR) Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) Other Unknown Segment 1 Segment 20 No Venous graft Arterial graft No Abciximab Eptifibatide Tirofiban Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . Percutaneous coronary intervention and events data variables and definitions No Yes Segment 1 Segment 20 No Venous graft Arterial graft Plain balloon Drug-eluting balloon Stent No Rotablation Orbital atherectomy Lithotripsy Laser Thrombectomy Distal protection device Other Unknown No Yes TIMI 0 TIMI I TIMI II TIMI III Unknown TIMI 0 TIMI I TIMI II TIMI III Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Procedure-related myocardial infarction Vascular access complication Side branch occlusion Coronary perforation Coronary dissection persisting at the end of the procedure Brady-arrhythmia requiring pacing Arrhythmia requiring DC cardioversion Cardiogenic shock Cardiac tamponade Acute surgical intervention from cath lab Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) Death Other Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, . Discharge management data variables and definitions No Yes Unstable angina NSTEMI STEMI Other (including no diagnosis of ACS) I20.0 Unstable angina I21.0 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the anterior wall I21.1 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the inferior wall I21.2 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of other sites I21.3 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the unspecified site I21.4 Acute subendocardial myocardial infarction I21.9 Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified I22.0 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the anterior wall I22.1 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the inferior wall I22.8 Subsequent myocardial infarction of other sites I22.9 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the unspecified site No Yes Unknown No Clopidogrel Prasugrel Ticagrelor Other Unknown No Vitamin K antagonist Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Other Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Yes Unknown No Sacubitril/Valsartan Unknown No Spironolactone Eplerenone Other Unknown No Statins Ezetimibe Fibrates PCSK9 inhibitors Other Unknown No Loop diuretics Thiazide diuretics Unknown No Yes Unknown No Insulin Metformin Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor Sulfonylurea Repaglinide Thiazolidinedione Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor Other Unknown Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Demographics

There are seven ‘mandatory’ variables in this section, all of which are common between the ACS and PCI data standards (). The section will be replicated in the other EuroHeart clinical domains so that time-independent patient information (e.g. date of birth) may be collected once and applied to all subsequent episodes of care. This section allows the use of permanent unique personal identification numbers to identify patients.[20] When matching the identification number with other data sources, information such as forename, surname, sex, and postal code may be extracted automatically. The EuroHeart IT platform will generate unique patient identifiers for those countries that do not use them, which once assigned may not be changed or reassigned to other patients. Each patient’s geolocation is collected as their current residential postal code.

Patient characteristics and comorbidities

The patient characteristics and comorbidities section comprises 13 ‘mandatory’ variables collecting comorbidities relevant to ACS and/or PCI (). The choice of comorbidities was prioritized according to what the Working Group perceived to be information available in an average medical case record. Many of the variables are also relevant when characterizing the patient’s risk and are essential when reporting underlying medical history in observational and randomized trials, when understanding trends in quality improvement, and when assessing treatment strategies.

Admission

depicts the ‘mandatory’ variables for the admission section. Information about care time points can be difficult to collect but is important given it is used for the derivation of quality indicators.[7,8] Medications at the time of admission form ‘additional’ variables and are defined in Supplementary material online, .

In-hospital management

This section collects information concerning investigations, treatments, and events occurring in-hospital (). Laboratory results for diagnosis (e.g. cardiac biomarkers), risk stratification (e.g. serum creatinine), and risk factors modification (e.g. low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) are ‘mandatory’ variables.[7,8,18] Laboratory results for specific situations or subgroups (e.g. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, cholesterol, glucose, and haemoglobin A1c) are ‘additional’ variables and are detailed in Supplementary material online, . The 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation recommends the assessment of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the hospital stay, and thus forms a ‘mandatory’ variable.[7] Categorization of LVEF aligns with the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.[21] Given that reperfusion is the cornerstone for the management of patients with ACS, five ‘mandatory’ variables are dedicated to the evaluation of the coronary artery anatomy and reperfusion strategy.[7,8]

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

This section has two parts. The first part captures information about invasive coronary angiography (ICA) () and includes an interactive diagram of the coronary tree (). It provides a solution for the fact that there are international differences in the extent of information recorded in registries (e.g. all ICA procedures in Sweden[14] vs. all PCI procedures in the UK[16]). Equally, the Data Science Group reviewed coronary anatomy visualization tools including the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation (BARI) and the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) schemes describing coronary anatomy.[22,23] The consensus of the Working Group was to adopt a simplified 20-segment system adapted from the SWEDEHEART registry, which enables interactive reporting of stenoses found in major coronary arteries ().[14] The EuroHeart IT platform and the EuroHeart-percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery segments. The second part captures information about the procedural indication, urgency, findings, and complications (). It collects information such as date, time, and type of the arterial access, given the use of radial access is recommended as a quality indicator in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of ACSs in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.[7] In addition, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grades before and following the procedure, and intracoronary equipment and devices used are captured in this section.

Discharge

This section collects information about the final ACS diagnosis and medications prescribed at the time of discharge from the hospital (). The final diagnosis includes ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina [with accompanying World Health Organisations (WHO) standardized International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes]. Medication information includes Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes and drug dosages as ‘additional’ variables (Supplementary material online, ).

Discussion

The adoption of harmonized data collections is central for the continuous improvement of cardiovascular care.[24] The lack of internationally recognized data standards has led to large inequalities in monitoring and standards of care within and between European countries and also resulted in expensive and inefficiently coordinated and delivered studies of cardiovascular treatments.[25] Currently, there are no contemporary pan-European data standards for ACS and PCI. The EuroHeart project of the ESC, by means of a structured methodology, has defined a catalogue of data standards for ACS and PCI, which will be implemented into a bespoke IT platform to facilitate harmonized country-level quality improvement, international observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies. The existing European national cardiovascular registries comprise distinct and discordant entities with differing data variables and definitions.[26] This substantially limits their usability in collaborative large-scale studies. Data standards and case report forms presented by CARDS, the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP), and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have been used in national registries and in clinical trials,[11,27,28] but differ in their data variables and definitions. Furthermore, no previous international cardiovascular data standards initiative has provided the means by which data may be efficiently collected in ‘real-world’ settings. Moreover, the ACC/AHA data standards for coronary artery disease and PCI contain over 300 variables that make it difficult to implement in a pragmatic registry.[28,29] In contrast, the EuroHeart data standards presented in this article have a restricted number of mandatory ACS/PCI variables, bolted onto an IT platform for effective data collection. After years of steady decline, the reduction of mortality rates post-myocardial infarction has plateaued in many countries; cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of death worldwide and its burden is increasing in low- to middle-income economies.[30] The standardized collection of cardiovascular data and the understanding of how to use observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine is a clear unmet need and an important next step towards defining variation in cardiovascular care and facilitating continuous quality improvement.[4] The emergence of new devices and drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease provides opportunities for improved outcomes but requires post-marketing surveillance. In addition, the growing complexity and financial burden of traditional randomized controlled trials create a need to develop innovative ways to conduct high-quality, yet cost-effective research. National registries which implement uniform data standards will facilitate rapid and efficient post-marketing surveillance of device therapies and pragmatic R-RCT with pooled data from multiple geographical locations.[6] Since 2021, the EuroHeart IT platform collects all ‘mandatory’ variables and supports the development of ‘additional’ variables in participating countries. Furthermore, the EuroHeart IT infrastructure includes applications for clinical reporting in the local healthcare system and provides tools for observational research, R-RCTs, and post-marketing surveillance of drugs and devices. Patient data are collected continuously in the healthcare system on a country level, and the national or regional registry centres are responsible for the storage and data protection according to the existing legal framework. Signed informed consent will not be required for data collection for quality development in most countries. For planned reports presenting the standards of care in different countries participating in EuroHeart, only deidentified and aggregated data will be shared by the participating registries/countries. Thus, for the collaboration on the development of quality of care, no individual patient-level data will be transferred outside the local country/region. However, for prospective research projects, such as R-RCTs or drug and device monitoring, informed consent from participants’ will be required as for any clinical trial. In these cases, selected anonymized individual study data may be transferred for analysis to a central repository according to clinical trial protocols. Finally, as part of mutually agreed international epidemiological research projects and based on ethical and regulatory approval, anonymized retrospective registry cohorts may be transferred to a central repository for pre-defined statistical analysis. In all cases, the national/regional registry parties are responsible for defining the legal framework applicable to their participation in EuroHeart and its various features, and for ensuring that they do not violate either local or international law. We recognize the limitations of the EuroHeart data standards development process. This includes the use of expert opinion (which may be biased) for the selection of the final data variables and definitions from those identified in the literature review. However, the EuroHeart ACS and PCI data standards were developed using a structured and recognized methodology for selecting the expert panel and for obtaining their opining and feedback. Likewise, the inclusiveness of the Working Group, which comprised experts from many European countries, provided a robustness and transparent framework for the development of the variables and definitions. Despite the data standards being reviewed by the ESC Patient Forum, future Working Groups may benefit from the inclusion of patients and wider members of the multidisciplinary team for ACS and PCI such as nurses and pharmacists. Of note, the data standards proposed in this document are based on the evidence available at the time of development. Accordingly, updates may be required as more and new knowledge becomes available.

Conclusions

This document presents the first set of data standards, developed as part of the EuroHeart project, which aims to harmonize data variables and definitions across common cardiovascular domains. In total, 68 and 84 ‘mandatory’ variables for ACS and PCI domains have been proposed, respectively. Also, several ‘additional’ variables have been defined. Once fully adopted into the EuroHeart IT platform, the data standards will facilitate country-level quality improvement, observational and registry-based randomized research, and post-marketing surveillance of new devices and pharmacotherapies.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

Demographics data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
Patient identification numberACS/PCIEnter the patient’s national identification number or a registry generated unique patient identification number
Hospital identification numberACS/PCIEnter the hospital’s unique identification number
Date of birthACS/PCIEnter the patient’s date of birth
ForenameACS/PCIEnter the patient’s forename
Surname(s)ACS/PCIEnter the patient’s surname(s)
SexACS/PCIEnter the patient’s sex at birth as either female or male

Female

Male

Postal codeACS/PCIEnter the postal code for the patient’s current residence

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 2

Patient characteristics and comorbidities data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
HeightACS/PCIEnter the patient’s height on admission (in cm)
WeightACS/PCIEnter the patient’s weight on admission (in kg)
SmokingACS/PCIEnter patient’s tobacco smoking status

Never smoked

Former smoker

Current smoker

Unknown

HypertensionACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of hypertension made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Diabetes mellitusACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter

No

Diabetes mellitus Type 1

Diabetes mellitus Type 2

Diabetes mellitus of other/unspecified type

Unknown

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Moderate or severe chronic kidney diseaseACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a moderate or severe chronic kidney disease prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Prior strokeACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have had a stroke prior to this care encounter. More than one option can be selected

No

Ischaemic stroke

Haemorrhagic stroke

Unspecified stroke

Unknown

Prior myocardial infarctionACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have had a myocardial infarction prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Heart failureACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of heart failure made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutterACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) made by a healthcare professional prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Prior percutaneous coronary interventionACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of any type (not diagnostic angiography) performed prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Prior coronary artery bypass graftingACS/PCIEnter whether the patient is known to have had a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed prior to this care encounter

No

Yes

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 3

Admission data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
Presenting symptomsACSEnter the patient’s symptoms that prompted this presentation. Select the main reason for presentation

Chest pain/discomfort

Dyspnoea

Cardiac arrest

Other

Unknown

Cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrivalACSEnter whether the patient had a cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival

No

Yes

Unknown

Symptom onset, date/timeACSEnter the date and time of symptom onset
Arrival methodACSEnter the method of current hospital arrival

Self-presenter

Ambulance from home/community

Transportation from another hospital

Already in the hospital

Unknown

First contact with ambulance, date/timeACSEnter the date and time of when the ambulance arrived to the patient
Hospital arrival, date/timeACSEnter the date and time when the patient arrived in the hospital
Diagnostic ECG, ST/T morphologyACSEnter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the ST/T morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected

Normal

ST-segment elevation

ST-segment depression

T-wave inversion

Other

Unknown

Diagnostic ECG, QRS morphologyACSEnter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the QRS morphology. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected

Normal

Ventricular paced rhythm

Left bundle branch block (LBBB)

Right bundle branch block (RBBB)

Pathological Q wave

Other

Unknown

Diagnostic ECG, rhythmACSEnter the findings of the diagnostic ECG regarding the rhythm. The first option that best describes the findings should be selected

Sinus rhythm

Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Ventricular tachycardia

Other

Unknown

ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/timeACSEnter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization. In cases where imminent revascularization was not indicated, enter the date and time of the first ECG (either before or after hospital arrival)
Heart rateACSEnter the patient's heart rate (in b.p.m.)
Systolic blood pressureACSEnter the patient's systolic blood pressure (in millimetres of mercury)
Killip classACSEnter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission

Killip Class I

Killip Class II

Killip Class III

Killip Class IV

Unknown

Thrombolysis, prehospitalACSEnter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered prior to hospital arrival

No

Yes

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 4

In-hospital management data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
Troponin, elevatedACSEnter whether cardiac troponin was elevated during the hospital stay

No

Yes

Unknown

Troponin assayACSEnter the assay used for analysis of cardiac troponin levels

Troponin T

Troponin I

High-sensitivity Troponin T

High-sensitivity Troponin I

Unknown

HaemoglobinACSEnter the first recorded level of haemoglobin during the hospital stay (in g/L)
CreatinineACSEnter the first recorded level of creatinine during the hospital stay (in µmol/L)
LDL cholesterolACSEnter the first recorded level of LDL cholesterol during the hospital stay (in mmol/L). This is not necessarily fasting LDL cholesterol
Left ventricular ejection fraction, assessment methodACSEnter the method used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during hospital stay

Not performed

Echocardiography

Other method

Unknown

Left ventricular ejection fractionACSEnter the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured during the hospital stay by echocardiography, angiography, radionuclide, magnetic resonance imaging, or by other methods

≥50%

41–49%

30–40%

<30%

Unknown

Coronary anatomy, assessment methodACSEnter the method used to assess the coronary anatomy during the hospital stay

Not performed

Invasive coronary angiography

CT coronary angiography

CT coronary angiography-FFR

Unknown

Anticoagulants, i.v. or s.c.ACSEnter whether treatment dose anticoagulant therapy was administered during the hospital stay. This should not include prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or intra-procedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) or intra-procedural bivalirudin

No

Unfractionated heparin

Low molecular weight heparin

Fondaparinux

Bivalirudin

Other

Unknown

Thrombolysis, in-hospitalACSEnter whether thrombolysis therapy was initiated or administered during the hospital stay (after hospital arrival)

No

Yes

Unknown

Percutaneous coronary interventionACSEnter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge

No

Yes, during hospital stay

Yes, planned after discharge

Unknown

Coronary artery bypass graftingACSEnter whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed during the hospital stay or is planned after discharge

No

Yes, during hospital stay

Yes, planned after discharge

Unknown

Reperfusion treatment, date/timeACSEnter the date and time of the first reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis, PCI, or CABG) that was administered/performed during the hospital stay
In-hospital events, myocardial re-infarctionACSEnter whether the patient had a myocardial re-infarction during the hospital stay

No

Yes

Unknown

In-hospital events, cardiogenic shockACSEnter whether the patient had an episode of cardiogenic shock during the hospital stay

No

Yes

Unknown

In-hospital events, cardiac arrestACSEnter whether the patient had cardiac arrest during the hospital stay

No

Yes

Unknown

In-hospital events, major bleedingACSEnter whether the patient had a major bleeding event during the hospital stay. More than one option can be selected

No

Fatal bleeding

Intracranial haemorrhage

Bleeding requiring surgery

Bleeding requiring transfusion

Other major bleeding

Unknown

In-hospital events, new-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutterACSEnter whether a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) was made during the hospital stay for patients with no prior history of AF or AFL

No

Yes

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 5

Diagnostic coronary angiography data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
Procedure indicationPCIEnter the main indication for performing the coronary angiography

Stable coronary syndrome

Unstable angina

NSTEMI

STEMI

Cardiac arrest with STEMI

Cardiac arrest without STEMI

Staged procedure

Rescue PCI

Risk assessment after successful thrombolysis

Valvular heart disease

Arrhythmia

Heart failure/cardiomyopathy

Post-cardiac transplantation

Other

Unknown

Procedure urgencyPCIEnter the procedure urgency

Elective

Urgent

Emergency

Salvage

Unknown

ECG establishing need for revascularization, date/timePCIEnter the date and time of the first ECG establishing need for coronary revascularization
Killip classPCIEnter the patient’s Killip class at the time of hospital admission or during the hospital stay (prior to the procedure)

Killip Class I

Killip Class II

Killip Class III

Killip Class IV

Unknown

CCS angina gradePCIEnter the grade of angina pectoris according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading scale

CCS Grade I

CCS Grade II

CCS Grade III

CCS Grade IV

Unknown

CreatininePCIEnter the most recent level of creatinine, but within the last 3 months (in µmol/L)
Circulatory supportPCIEnter whether any circulatory support was used during the hospital stay prior to the procedure. More than one option can be selected

No

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)

Cardiopulmonary bypass

Impella

AutoPulse

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Other

Unknown

InotropesPCIEnter whether inotropic therapy was administered during the hospital stay prior to the procedure

No

Yes

Unknown

Arterial accessPCIEnter the arterial access(es) punctured/attempted during the procedure. More than one option can be selected

Right radial artery

Left radial artery

Right femoral artery

Left femoral artery

Right ulnar artery

Left ulnar artery

Other

Unknown

Arterial access, date/timePCIEnter the date and time when the arterial access for the procedure was accomplished
Segments 1–20PCIEnter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in Segments 1–20 as determined by coronary angiography. This does not include collateral circulation. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized
CABG graft, typePCIEnter whether a CAGB graft is present and enter the type of the graft

Venous graft

Arterial graft

CABG graft, anastomoses segmentPCIEnter the coronary segment to which the bypass graft is attached

Segment 1

Segment 20

CABG graft, lesion findingPCIEnter the per cent estimate (0–29, 30–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–99, 100%, N/A) of the most severe stenosis in the graft selected as determined by coronary angiography. Not applicable (N/A) may be selected when the segment is not visualized
Overall finding in the native coronary arteriesPCIAutomatically generated overall finding in the native coronary arteries based on the responses in Segments 1–20

Normal/atheroma

1 vessel disease, not left main coronary artery

2 vessels, not left main coronary artery

3 vessels, not left main coronary artery

Left main coronary artery + 1 vessel disease

Left main coronary artery + 2 vessel disease

Left main coronary artery + 3 vessel disease

Isolated left main coronary artery

Inconclusive assessment

Chronic total occlusionPCIEnter whether the lesion in the current segment is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)

No

Yes

Unknown

Chronic total occlusion, segmentPCIEnter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a chronic total occlusion (CTO)

Segment 1

Segment 20

RestenosisPCIEnter whether the lesion in the current segment is a restenosis

No

Yes, lesion restenosis

Yes, stent restenosis

Unknown

Restenosis, segmentPCIEnter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a restenosis

Segment 1

Segment 20

Stent thrombosisPCIEnter whether the lesion in the current segment is a stent thrombosis

No

Yes

Unknown

Stent thrombosis, segmentPCIEnter the coronary segment in which the lesion is a stent thrombosis

Segment 1

Segment 20

Spontaneous coronary artery dissectionPCIEnter whether there was a spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD)

No

Yes

Suspected

Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnosticsPCIEnter whether any invasive intracoronary diagnostic assessment was performed before the PCI procedure

No

Yes

Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, methodPCIEnter what invasive intracoronary diagnostics method(s) were performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected

Not performed

Hyperaemia-based method (e.g. FFR)

Hyperaemia-free method (e.g. iFR, DFR, RFR)

Coronary flow reserve (CFR)

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)

Other

Unknown

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, segmentPCIEnter what segment(s) intracoronary diagnostics was performed before the PCI procedure. More than one option can be selected

Segment 1

Segment 20

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, graftPCIEnter whether invasive intracoronary diagnostics was performed in a graft lesion before the PCI procedure

No

Venous graft

Arterial graft

Invasive intracoronary diagnostics, resultsPCIEnter the results of the lowest intracoronary physiology measurement (gradient), the minimal lumen area (mm2) as measured by intracoronary imaging methods, or maximum lipid core burden index (max LCBI4mm) for near-infrared spectroscopy before any treatment interventions
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsPCIEnter whether Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was administered during the procedure

No

Abciximab

Eptifibatide

Tirofiban

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 6

Percutaneous coronary intervention and events data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
PCI attemptedPCIEnter whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was attempted

No

Yes

Passage of wire, date/timePCIEnter the date and time when the first guidewire successfully crossed the culprit lesion, not the date when flow was restored
Segment attemptedPCIEnter the segment attempted during PCI

Segment 1

Segment 20

Graft attemptedPCIEnter whether a graft lesion was attempted during PCI

No

Venous graft

Arterial graft

Type of PCI attemptPCIEnter the type of the procedure performed. More than one option can be selected

Plain balloon

Drug-eluting balloon

Stent

Drug-eluting balloon, typePCIEnter the drug-eluting balloon that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of drug-eluting balloons used in the specific country)
Drug-eluting balloon, diameterPCIEnter the diameter of the drug-eluting balloon. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the drug-eluting balloon that is used should be entered
Stent, typePCIEnter the stent that was used in the specific segment. (Device names of stents used in the specific country)
Stent, diameterPCIEnter the diameter of the stent. Nominal diameter (in mm) of the stent balloon should be entered
Stent, lengthPCIEnter the length of the stent (in mm)
Adjuvant therapies/equipmentPCIEnter if any adjuvant therapies were used during the procedure. More than one option can be selected

No

Rotablation

Orbital atherectomy

Lithotripsy

Laser

Thrombectomy

Distal protection device

Other

Unknown

Lesion successPCIEnter whether the attempted lesion was successfully treated

No

Yes

TIMI flow, prior to PCIPCIEnter the TIMI flow prior to the PCI procedure

TIMI 0

TIMI I

TIMI II

TIMI III

Unknown

TIMI flow, after PCIPCIEnter the TIMI flow after the PCI procedure

TIMI 0

TIMI I

TIMI II

TIMI III

Unknown

Complete revascularizationPCIEnter whether a complete revascularization was achieved by the end of the current procedure

No

Yes

Unknown

Additional PCI procedures plannedPCIEnter whether any additional PCI procedure(s) is planned (either during this hospital stay or after discharge)

No

Yes

Unknown

Peri-procedural eventsPCIEnter whether any events occurred during the procedure. More than one option can be selected

No

Procedure-related myocardial infarction

Vascular access complication

Side branch occlusion

Coronary perforation

Coronary dissection persisting at the end of the procedure

Brady-arrhythmia requiring pacing

Arrhythmia requiring DC cardioversion

Cardiogenic shock

Cardiac tamponade

Acute surgical intervention from cath lab

Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)

Death

Other

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

Table 7

Discharge management data variables and definitions

VariableRegistryDefinition and permissible values
Hospital discharge, dateACSEnter the date when the patient was discharged from the hospital or died during this hospital stay
In-hospital deathACSEnter whether the patient died during the hospital stay

No

Yes

Final diagnosis at dischargeACSEnter the final diagnosis at discharge

Unstable angina

NSTEMI

STEMI

Other (including no diagnosis of ACS)

Final diagnosis at discharge, ICD-10 codeACSEnter the main final diagnosis at discharge according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 standard.

I20.0 Unstable angina

I21.0 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the anterior wall

I21.1 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the inferior wall

I21.2 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of other sites

I21.3 Acute transmural myocardial infarction of the unspecified site

I21.4 Acute subendocardial myocardial infarction

I21.9 Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified

I22.0 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the anterior wall

I22.1 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the inferior wall

I22.8 Subsequent myocardial infarction of other sites

I22.9 Subsequent myocardial infarction of the unspecified site

Aspirin at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin)

No

Yes

Unknown

P2Y12 inhibitors at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on P2Y12 inhibitors

No

Clopidogrel

Prasugrel

Ticagrelor

Other

Unknown

Oral anticoagulants at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on oral anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists include warfarin

No

Vitamin K antagonist

Dabigatran

Rivaroxaban

Apixaban

Edoxaban

Other

Unknown

Beta-blockers at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on beta-blockers

No

Yes

Unknown

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes

No

Yes

Unknown

Angiotensin II receptor blocker at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). For combination drugs (except angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors), enter details about both drug classes

No

Yes

Unknown

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)

No

Sacubitril/Valsartan

Unknown

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA)

No

Spironolactone

Eplerenone

Other

Unknown

Lipid-lowering treatment at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on lipid-lowering treatment. More than one option can be selected

No

Statins

Ezetimibe

Fibrates

PCSK9 inhibitors

Other

Unknown

Diuretics at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on diuretics. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes. More than one option can be selected

No

Loop diuretics

Thiazide diuretics

Unknown

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. For combination drugs, enter details about both drug classes

No

Yes

Unknown

Oral/subcutaneous antidiabetics at dischargeACSEnter whether the patient was discharged on oral or subcutaneous antidiabetic medications. More than one option can be selected. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are entered separately

No

Insulin

Metformin

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor

Sulfonylurea

Repaglinide

Thiazolidinedione

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor

Other

Unknown

Additional details and complete definitions are available in Supplementary material online, .

  30 in total

1.  Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ole Fröbert; Bo Lagerqvist; Göran K Olivecrona; Elmir Omerovic; Thorarinn Gudnason; Michael Maeng; Mikael Aasa; Oskar Angerås; Fredrik Calais; Mikael Danielewicz; David Erlinge; Lars Hellsten; Ulf Jensen; Agneta C Johansson; Amra Kåregren; Johan Nilsson; Lotta Robertson; Lennart Sandhall; Iwar Sjögren; Ollie Ostlund; Jan Harnek; Stefan K James
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm.

Authors:  Stefan James; Sunil V Rao; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012.

Authors:  John C Messenger; Kalon K L Ho; Christopher H Young; Lara E Slattery; Jasmine C Draoui; Jeptha P Curtis; Gregory J Dehmer; Frederick L Grover; Michael J Mirro; Matthew R Reynolds; Ivan C Rokos; John A Spertus; Tracy Y Wang; Stuart A Winston; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Acute Coronary Syndromes and Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Data Standards).

Authors:  Christopher P Cannon; Ralph G Brindis; Bernard R Chaitman; David J Cohen; J Thomas Cross; Joseph P Drozda; Francis M Fesmire; Dan J Fintel; Gregg C Fonarow; Keith A Fox; Darryl T Gray; Robert A Harrington; Karen A Hicks; Judd E Hollander; Harlan Krumholz; Darwin R Labarthe; Janet B Long; Alice M Mascette; Connie Meyer; Eric D Peterson; Martha J Radford; Matthew T Roe; James B Richmann; Harry P Selker; David M Shahian; Richard E Shaw; Sharon Sprenger; Robert Swor; James A Underberg; Frans Van de Werf; Bonnie H Weiner; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Background and design of the ACCA-EAPCI registry on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Peter Ludman; Nicolas Danchin; Petr Kala; Aldo P Maggioni; Franz Weidinger
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Theresa A McDonagh; Marco Metra; Marianna Adamo; Roy S Gardner; Andreas Baumbach; Michael Böhm; Haran Burri; Javed Butler; Jelena Čelutkienė; Ovidiu Chioncel; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Dimitrios Farmakis; Martine Gilard; Stephane Heymans; Arno W Hoes; Tiny Jaarsma; Ewa A Jankowska; Mitja Lainscak; Carolyn S P Lam; Alexander R Lyon; John J V McMurray; Alexandre Mebazaa; Richard Mindham; Claudio Muneretto; Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Susanna Price; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Frank Ruschitzka; Anne Kathrine Skibelund
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  EuroHeart: European Unified Registries On Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Lars Wallentin; Chris P Gale; Aldo Maggioni; Isabel Bardinet; Barbara Casadei
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  European Society of Cardiology methodology for the development of quality indicators for the quantification of cardiovascular care and outcomes.

Authors:  Suleman Aktaa; Gorav Batra; Lars Wallentin; Colin Baigent; David Erlinge; Stefan James; Peter Ludman; Aldo P Maggioni; Susanna Price; Clive Weston; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-05

10.  Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eleni Rapsomaniki; Marcus Thuresson; Erru Yang; Patrick Blin; Phillip Hunt; Sheng-Chia Chung; Dimitris Stogiannis; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Adam Timmis; Spiros C Denaxas; Nicolas Danchin; Michael Stokes; Florence Thomas-Delecourt; Cathy Emmas; Pål Hasvold; Em Jennings; Saga Johansson; David J Cohen; Tomas Jernberg; Nicholas Moore; Magnus Janzon; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2016-07-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Cohort Study of the Effects of Integrated Medical and Nursing Rounds Combined with AIDET Communication Mode on Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Lan Li; Yongheng Li; Tao Yin; Jinglin Chen; Fengjiao Shi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Data standards for heart failure: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).

Authors:  Suleman Aktaa; Gorav Batra; John G F Cleland; Andrew Coats; Lars H Lund; Theresa McDonagh; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Peter Vasko; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 35.855

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.