Literature DB >> 15315999

Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.

Justin B Dimick1, H Gilbert Welch, John D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Surgical mortality rates are increasingly used to measure hospital quality. It is not clear, however, how many hospitals have sufficient caseloads to reliably identify quality problems.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 7 operations for which mortality has been advocated as a quality indicator by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery, repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, pancreatic resection, esophageal resection, pediatric heart surgery, craniotomy, hip replacement) are performed frequently enough to reliably identify hospitals with increased mortality rates. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The US national average mortality rates and hospital caseloads of the 7 operations were determined using the 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), and sample size calculations were performed to determine the minimum caseload necessary to reliably detect increased mortality rates in poorly performing hospitals. A 3-year hospital caseload was used for the baseline analysis, and poor performance was defined as a mortality rate double the national average. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of hospitals in the United States that performed more than the minimum caseload for each operation.
RESULTS: The national average mortality rates for the 7 procedures examined ranged from 0.3% for hip replacement to 10.7% for craniotomy. Minimum hospital caseloads necessary to detect a doubling of the mortality rate were 64 cases for craniotomy, 77 for esophageal resection, 86 for pancreatic resection, 138 for pediatric heart surgery, 195 for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, 219 for CABG surgery, and 2668 for hip replacement. For only 1 operation did the majority of hospitals exceed the minimum caseload, with 90% of hospitals performing CABG surgery having a caseload of 219 or higher. For the remaining operations, only a small proportion of hospitals met the minimum caseload: craniotomy (33%), pediatric heart surgery (25%), repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (8%), pancreatic resection (2%), esophageal resection (1%), and hip replacement (<1%).
CONCLUSION: Except for CABG surgery, the operations for which surgical mortality has been advocated as a quality indicator are not performed frequently enough to judge hospital quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15315999     DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.7.847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  106 in total

1.  NAFLD and insulin resistance do not increase the risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing bariatric surgery--a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Tarsila Ribeireiro; James Swain; Michael Sarr; Michael Kendrick; Florencia Que; Schuyler Sanderson; Anuradha Krishnan; Kimberly Viker; Kymberly Watt; Michael Charlton
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Estimating and reporting on the quality of inpatient stroke care by Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.

Authors:  Greg Arling; Mathew Reeves; Joseph Ross; Linda S Williams; Salomeh Keyhani; Neale Chumbler; Michael S Phipps; Christianne Roumie; Laura J Myers; Amanda H Salanitro; Diana L Ordin; Jennifer Myers; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

3.  Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Douglas O Staiger; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

5.  Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable?

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Jonathan F Finks; Wayne J English; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with BMI <35 kg/m2: an integrative review of early studies.

Authors:  M Fried; G Ribaric; J N Buchwald; S Svacina; K Dolezalova; N Scopinaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Monitoring surgical mortality.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-14

8.  Are mortality rates for different operations related?: implications for measuring the quality of noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Douglas O Staiger; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  The unintended consequences of quality improvement.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Michael D Cabana
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.856

10.  Identifying Performance Outliers for Stroke Care Based on Composite Score of Process Indicators: an Observational Study in China.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Shaofei Su; Xi Li; Jingkun Li; Xiaoqiang Bao; Meina Liu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.