Literature DB >> 32840111

Conformational Ensembles of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Consistent with NMR, SAXS, and Single-Molecule FRET.

Gregory-Neal W Gomes1,2, Mickaël Krzeminski3,4, Ashley Namini1,2, Erik W Martin5, Tanja Mittag5, Teresa Head-Gordon6, Julie D Forman-Kay3,4, Claudiu C Gradinaru1,2.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have fluctuating heterogeneous conformations, which makes their structural characterization challenging. Although challenging, characterization of the conformational ensembles of IDPs is of great interest, since their conformational ensembles are the link between their sequences and functions. An accurate description of IDP conformational ensembles depends crucially on the amount and quality of the experimental data, how it is integrated, and if it supports a consistent structural picture. We used integrative modeling and validation to apply conformational restraints and assess agreement with the most common structural techniques for IDPs: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, Small-angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS), and single-molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (smFRET). Agreement with such a diverse set of experimental data suggests that details of the generated ensembles can now be examined with a high degree of confidence. Using the disordered N-terminal region of the Sic1 protein as a test case, we examined relationships between average global polymeric descriptions and higher-moments of their distributions. To resolve apparent discrepancies between smFRET and SAXS inferences, we integrated SAXS data with NMR data and reserved the smFRET data for independent validation. Consistency with smFRET, which was not guaranteed a priori, indicates that, globally, the perturbative effects of NMR or smFRET labels on the Sic1 ensemble are minimal. Analysis of the ensembles revealed distinguishing features of Sic1, such as overall compactness and large end-to-end distance fluctuations, which are consistent with biophysical models of Sic1's ultrasensitive binding to its partner Cdc4. Our results underscore the importance of integrative modeling and validation in generating and drawing conclusions from IDP conformational ensembles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32840111     DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c02088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  24 in total

1.  Accurate model of liquid-liquid phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins from optimization of single-chain properties.

Authors:  Giulio Tesei; Thea K Schulze; Ramon Crehuet; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multisite phosphorylation and binding alter conformational dynamics of the 4E-BP2 protein.

Authors:  Spencer Smyth; Zhenfu Zhang; Alaji Bah; Thomas E Tsangaris; Jennifer Dawson; Julie D Forman-Kay; Claudiu C Gradinaru
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  Physics-driven coarse-grained model for biomolecular phase separation with near-quantitative accuracy.

Authors:  Jerelle A Joseph; Aleks Reinhardt; Anne Aguirre; Pin Yu Chew; Kieran O Russell; Jorge R Espinosa; Adiran Garaizar; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara
Journal:  Nat Comput Sci       Date:  2021-11-22

4.  Integrative structure determination of histones H3 and H4 using genetic interactions.

Authors:  Ignacia Echeverria; Hannes Braberg; Nevan J Krogan; Andrej Sali
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.622

Review 5.  FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices.

Authors:  Eitan Lerner; Anders Barth; Jelle Hendrix; Benjamin Ambrose; Victoria Birkedal; Scott C Blanchard; Richard Börner; Hoi Sung Chung; Thorben Cordes; Timothy D Craggs; Ashok A Deniz; Jiajie Diao; Jingyi Fei; Ruben L Gonzalez; Irina V Gopich; Taekjip Ha; Christian A Hanke; Gilad Haran; Nikos S Hatzakis; Sungchul Hohng; Seok-Cheol Hong; Thorsten Hugel; Antonino Ingargiola; Chirlmin Joo; Achillefs N Kapanidis; Harold D Kim; Ted Laurence; Nam Ki Lee; Tae-Hee Lee; Edward A Lemke; Emmanuel Margeat; Jens Michaelis; Xavier Michalet; Sua Myong; Daniel Nettels; Thomas-Otavio Peulen; Evelyn Ploetz; Yair Razvag; Nicole C Robb; Benjamin Schuler; Hamid Soleimaninejad; Chun Tang; Reza Vafabakhsh; Don C Lamb; Claus Am Seidel; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Single-Molecular Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Measurement on Structures and Interactions of Biomolecules.

Authors:  Yi Qiao; Yuhan Luo; Naiyun Long; Yi Xing; Jing Tu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 7.  Biophysical studies of phase separation integrating experimental and computational methods.

Authors:  Nicolas L Fawzi; Sapun H Parekh; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 8.  The Protein Folding Problem: The Role of Theory.

Authors:  Roy Nassar; Gregory L Dignon; Rostam M Razban; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 6.151

Review 9.  NMR illuminates intrinsic disorder.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 10.  Generating Ensembles of Dynamic Misfolding Proteins.

Authors:  Theodoros K Karamanos; Arnout P Kalverda; Sheena E Radford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.