| Literature DB >> 32837313 |
Yuanxin Qiu1, Di He1, Jingxian Yang1, Lukai Ma1, Kaiqi Zhu1, Yong Cao2.
Abstract
Natural biologically active substances have received continuous attention for the potentially beneficial health properties against chronic diseases. In this study, bacteriostatic active substance from Camellia oleifera meal, which is a major by-product of the Camellia oil processing industry, were extracted with continuous phase change extraction (CPCE) method and separated by HSCCC. Compared with traditional extraction methods, CPCE possessed higher extraction efficiency. Two main substances were separated and purified (above 90.0%). The structure of them were further identified by UV, LC-ESI-MS-MS, 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR as flavonoids F2 kaempferol 3-O-[β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 6)]-β-d-glucopyranoside and J2 kaempferol 3-O-[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 6)]-β-d-glucopyranoside for the first time in C. Oleifera meal. The results of antibacterial activity measurement showed that both compounds have excellent antibacterial activity. And the antibacterial stability of F2 were finally confirmed: F2 showed broad spectrum antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enteriditis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus nigricans. Besides, F2 exhibited relatively high stable property even at high temperature, acid and metal ion solutions. The findings of this work suggest the possibility of employing C. oleifera meal as an attractive source of health-promoting compounds, and at the same time facilitate its high-value reuse and reduction of environmental burden. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Camellia oleifera meal; High-speed countercurrent chromatography; Kaempferol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32837313 PMCID: PMC7415335 DOI: 10.1007/s00217-020-03582-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Food Res Technol ISSN: 1438-2377 Impact factor: 3.498
L9 (34) factors and levels of orthogonal experiment
| Level | Factor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Ethanol concentration (%) | (B) Extraction time (h) | (C) Extraction pressure (MPa) | (D) Extraction temperature (°C) | |
| 1 | 70 | 1 | 0.4 | 70 |
| 2 | 80 | 2 | 0.5 | 80 |
| 3 | 90 | 3 | 0.6 | 90 |
Antibacterial activity of different polarity (X ± SD, n = 3)
| Test strain | Inhibition zone size diameter(mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL2 | SYM | YSYZ | ZDC | SZF | |
| 13.6 ± 0.13 | 11.3 ± 0.09 | 11.4 ± 0.09 | 14.2 ± 0.15 | 13.5 ± 0.12 | |
| 15.1 ± 0.11 | 11.5 ± 0.12 | 13.2 ± 0.11 | 15.3 ± 0.21 | 13.9 ± 0.15 | |
| 13.8 ± 0.14 | 9.3 ± 0.08 | 12.5 ± 0.15 | 14.0 ± 0.13 | 13.3 ± 0.05 | |
Fig. 1HSCCC spectra of optimal operating conditions
Fig. 2The HPLC chromatograms of NL2, F2 and F3
Antibacterial activity of NL2 components and its isolates (X ± SD, n = 3)
| Test strain | MIC (μg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL2 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
| 35.23 ± 0.08 | 42.56 ± 0.13 | 20.71 ± 0.11 | 22.23 ± 0.17 | |
| 55.87 ± 0.11 | 69.04 ± − 0.08 | 35.82 ± 0.14 | 38.35 ± 0.17 | |
| 79.0 ± 0.14 | – | 47.43 ± 0.16 | 44.65 ± 0.18 | |
“–” means no obvious antibacterial effect
Antibacterial activity of component F3 and its isolates (X ± SD, n = 3)
| Test strain | MIC (μg/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| F3 | J1 | J2 | |
| 22.23 ± 0.10 | 132.44 ± 0.25 | 18.33 ± 0.7 | |
| 38.35 ± 0.13 | 139.04 ± 0.23 | 25.68 ± 0.12 | |
| 44.65 ± 0.15 | – | 42.63 ± 0.22 | |
13C NMR and partial 1H NMR spectral data for compounds F2 and J2
| C | F2 | J2 | Ref. [ | H | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 158.83 | 158.47 | 154.66 | |||
| 3 | 135.89 | 134.82 | 132.59 | |||
| 4 | 180.32 | 179.47 | 176.94 | |||
| 5 | 162.46 | 162.98 | 161.07 | |||
| 6 | 101.38 | 99.94 | 99.31 | 6 | 3.798 | 3.998 |
| 7 | 165.57 | 165.76 | 165.05 | |||
| 8 | 96.99 | 94.91 | 93.85 | 8 | 3.793 | 3.987 |
| 9 | 160.47 | 158.86 | 156.48 | |||
| 10 | 106.88 | 105.78 | 102.78 | |||
| 1′ | 123.97 | 122.93 | 120.89 | |||
| 2′ | 133.65 | 132.39 | 130.71 | 2′ | 4.983 | 5.40 |
| 3′ | 117.69 | 116.24 | 115.13 | 3′ | 4.796 | 4.794 |
| 4′ | 161.11 | 161.37 | 161.00 | |||
| 5′ | 117.69 | 116.24 | 115.13 | 5′ | 4.796 | 4.794 |
| 6′ | 133.65 | 132.39 | 130.71 | 6′ | 4.983 | 5.40 |
The reference substance is kaempferol 3-O-β-d-glucose-(2 → 1)β-d-xyloside; 13C NMR, 125 MHz, solution CD3OD; 1H NMR, 500 MHz, solution CD3OD
Fig. 3Chemical structure of F2
Fig. 4Chemical structure of J2
Fig. 5Antibacterial effect of antibacterial substance F2 on some bacteria and mold
Antibacterial effect of F2 on common bacteria/mold (μg/ml) (X ± SD, n = 3)
| Test sample | Test strain | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kanamycin | 21.25 ± 0.13 | 62.5 ± 0.21 | 57.95 ± 0.15 | 45.5 ± 0.23 | 55 ± 0.23 | 50 ± 0.15 |
| F2 | 20.71 ± 0.14 | 31.25 ± 0.22 | 15.90 ± 0.09 | 35.82 ± 0.17 | 47.43 ± 0.12 | 150 ± 0.24 |
Fig. 6Effect of heat treatment on the antibacterial activity of F2. (Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05), the same below)
Fig. 7Effects of different pH on the inhibitory activity of F2
Fig. 8Effect of UV irradiation on the antibacterial activity of F2
Fig. 9Effect of light on the antibacterial activity of F2
Fig. 10Effect of different metal ions on the antibacterial activity of F2