| Literature DB >> 27380283 |
Hisashi Matsuda1, Seikou Nakamura2, Toshio Morikawa3, Osamu Muraoka3, Masayuki Yoshikawa2.
Abstract
We review the biofunctional effects of the flower buds of Camellia sinensis and C. sinensis var. assamica, such as antihyperlipidemic, antihyperglycemic, antiobesity, and gastroprotective effects in vivo, and antiallergic, pancreatic lipase inhibitory, and amyloid β (Aβ) aggregation inhibitory activities in vitro. Although the biofunctional effects of tea leaves have been extensively studied, less attention has been given to those of the flowers and seeds of the tea plant. Our studies focused on the saponin constituents of the extracts of the flower buds of C. sinensis cultivated in Japan and China, and C. sinensis var. assamica cultivated in India, and we review their beneficial biofunctions for health promotion.Entities:
Keywords: Biofunctional effect; Camellia sinensis; Camellia sinensis var. assamica; Chakasaponin; Floraassamsaponin; Floratheasaponin; Flower buds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27380283 PMCID: PMC5114335 DOI: 10.1007/s11418-016-1021-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nat Med ISSN: 1340-3443 Impact factor: 2.343
Fig. 1Chemical structures of acylated oleanane-type triterpene oligoglycosides from the flower buds of C. sinensis cultivated in Japan and China, and C. sinensis var. assamica cultivated in India
Effects of floratheasaponins A (1)–C (3) on serum triglyceride (TG) elevation in olive oil-loaded mice and serum glucose elevation in sucrose-loaded rats.
Data were taken and reproduced from references [11] and [13]
| Treatment | Dose | Serum TG | Serum glucose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | – | 140.8 ± 5.9** | 80.3 ± 2.7** |
| Control | – | 566.6 ± 22.2 | 147.6 ± 3.0 |
| Floratheasaponin A ( | 25 | 411.0 ± 34.3 | – |
| 50 | 387.4 ± 74.7* | 122.5 ± 8.8 | |
| 100 | 158.3 ± 31.9** | 107.3 ± 3.6** | |
| Floratheasaponin B ( | 25 | 411.7 ± 50.6 | – |
| 50 | 316.9 ± 63.0** | 120.3 ± 10.5 | |
| 100 | 161.9 ± 11.9** | 98.4 ± 7.2** | |
| Floratheasaponin C ( | 25 | 348.5 ± 83.7** | – |
| 50 | 204.1 ± 40.3** | 119.8 ± 7.9** | |
| 100 | 143.1 ± 11.3** | 87.7 ± 5.5** | |
| Normal | – | 154.3 ± 9.3** | – |
| Control | – | 387.1 ± 39.2 | – |
| Orlistat | 6.25 | 266.4 ± 31.1* | – |
| 12.5 | 187.9 ± 25.5** | – | |
| 25 | 158.9 ± 28.7** | – | |
| Normal | – | – | 85.6 ± 3.6** |
| Control | – | – | 159.6 ± 7.0 |
| Metoformin hydrochloride | 50 | – | 134.8 ± 4.3* |
| 100 | – | 124.1 ± 5.5** |
Effects on serum TG levels in mice: each test sample was given orally to fasted ddY male mice, and olive oil (5 mL/kg, p.o.) was given 30 min later. Blood samples were collected at 2, 4, and 6 h after olive oil treatment. Serum TG levels were determined by an enzymatic method using a commercially available kit
Effects on serum glucose levels in rats: each test sample was given orally to fasted male Wistar rats, and a 20 % (w/v) sucrose solution (5 mL/kg, p.o.) was given 30 min later. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1, and 2 h after sucrose loading. Serum glucose levels were determined by an enzymatic method using a commercially available kit
Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 5–15)
Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls
Inhibitory effects of floratheasaponins A (1)–C (3) on gastric lesions induced by ethanol in rats.
Data were taken and reproduced from reference [13]
| Treatment | Dose | Gastric lesions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | Inhibition (%) | ||
| Control | – | 157.0 ± 15.5 | – |
| Floratheasaponin A ( | 5 | 80.2 ± 14.7 | 48.9 |
| 10 | 72.9 ± 11.1** | 57.7 | |
| 20 | 24.2 ± 10.2** | 88.4 | |
| 50 | 0.0 ± 0.0** | 100.0 | |
| Floratheasaponin B ( | 5 | 92.8 ± 24.2 | 40.9 |
| 10 | 55.4 ± 12.2** | 64.7 | |
| 20 | 24.9 ± 10.5** | 84.1 | |
| 50 | 11.5 ± 7.7** | 92.7 | |
| Control | – | 163.3 ± 10.3 | – |
| Floratheasaponin C ( | 5 | 38.0 ± 7.1** | 76.7 |
| 10 | 22.3 ± 6.8** | 86.3 | |
| 20 | 18.5 ± 7.2** | 88.7 | |
| 50 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 | |
| Control | – | 148.4 ± 9.8 | – |
| Cetraxate hydrochloride | 75 | 87.2 ± 7.4** | 41.2 |
| 150 | 51.0 ± 4.0** | 65.6 | |
| 300 | 30.5 ± 8.3** | 79.4 | |
Ethanol (99.5 %, 1.5 mL/rat, p.o.) was given to fasted male Sprague–Dawley rats 1 h before removal of the stomach, which was previously inflated by an injection of 10 ml of 1.5 % formalin to fix the inner and outer layers of the gastric walls. Subsequently, the stomach was incised along the greater curvature and the lengths of gastric lesions were measured, and the total length (mm) was expressed as a lesion index. The test sample was administered 1 h before the ethanol treatment
Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 6–12)
Significant difference where **p < 0.01 was compared with controls
Effects of chakasaponins I (11)—III (13) and escin IIa on plasma triglyceride (TG) and glucose elevations in olive oil and sucrose-loaded mice.
Data were taken and reproduced from reference [12]
| Treatment | Dose | Plasma TG | Plasma glucose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | – | 115.5 ± 12.4** | 128.5 ± 5.3** |
| Control | – | 440.5 ± 45.2 | 226.9 ± 8.2 |
| Chakasaponin I ( | 25 | 435.7 ± 67.4 | – |
| 50 | 284.2 ± 9.6** | 199.6 ± 8.7** | |
| 100 | – | 196.8 ± 8.2** | |
| Normal | – | 152.4 ± 13.5** | 116.5 ± 7.9** |
| Control | – | 553.8 ± 49.8 | 221.5 ± 14.4 |
| Chakasaponin II ( | 25 | 431.8 ± 49.8** | – |
| 50 | 249.5 ± 31.1** | 185.7 ± 9.9** | |
| 100 | – | 178.5 ± 8.3** | |
| Normal | – | 124.0 ± 8.4** | 126.5 ± 4.0** |
| Control | – | 407.2 ± 73.0 | 238.7 ± 5.9 |
| Chakasaponin III ( | 25 | 394.1 ± 81.4 | – |
| 50 | 214.4 ± 62.7* | 215.9 ± 10.6** | |
| 100 | – | 189.0 ± 10.2** | |
| Normal | – | 91.9 ± 9.4** | – |
| Control | – | 440.3 ± 60.2 | – |
| Orlistat | 5 | 371.3 ± 41.5 | – |
| 10 | 203.8 ± 52.1** | – | |
| Normal | – | – | 124.8 ± 7.3** |
| Control | – | – | 218.7 ± 4.0 |
| Acarbose | 10 | – | 162.4 ± 11.7** |
| 20 | – | 153.8 ± 10.2** | |
| Normal | – | 114.9 ± 18.1** | 122.2 ± 6.3** |
| Control | – | 546.7 ± 59.4 | 263.3 ± 16.2 |
| Escin IIa | 50 | 464.2 ± 45.3 | 254.2 ± 14.0 |
| 100 | 308.9 ± 61.4* | 206.4 ± 12.9** |
Effects on plasma TG levels in mice: each test sample was given orally to fasted male ddY mice and olive oil (5 mL/kg, p.o.) was given 30 min later. Blood samples were collected at 2, 4, and 6 h after olive oil treatment. Plasma TG levels were determined by an enzymatic method using a commercially available kit
Effects on plasma glucose levels in mice: each test sample was given orally to fasted male ddY mice, and a 10 (w/v) % sucrose solution (10 mL/kg, p.o.) was given 30 min later. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1, and 2 h after sucrose loading. Plasma glucose levels were determined by an enzymatic method using a commercially available kit
Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 5–9)
Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls
Fig. 2Effects of the MeOH extract of Fujian Chaka on body weight gain in high-fat diet-fed mice and Tsumura Suzuki Obese Diabetes (TSOD) mice. a Male ddY mice were fed a high-fat diet (45 kcal % fat, D12451; Research Diet, Inc.) or normal diet (10 kcal % fat, D12450B; Research Diet, Inc.) for 14 days. The test sample was given orally once a day. b TSOD and Tsumura Suzuki Non-obesity (TSNO) mice were fed a standard laboratory chow MF (Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd.) for 28 days. The test sample was given orally once a day. Each value represents the mean with SEM (n = 6–10). Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls.
Data were taken from reference [14]
Fig. 3Effects of the MeOH extract of Fujian Chaka on food intake in high-fat diet-fed mice and TSOD mice. a Male ddY mice were fed a high-fat diet (45 kcal % fat) or normal diet (10 kcal % fat) for 14 days. The test sample was given orally once a day. b TSOD and TSNO mice were fed a standard laboratory chow MF (Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd.) for 28 days. The test sample was given orally once a day. Each value represents the mean for 6–10 mice. Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls. Refer to Fig. 2 for other abbreviations.
Data were taken from reference [14]
Fig. 4Effects of the BuOH-soluble fraction of Fujian Chaka, chakasaponin II (12), desacyl-floratheasaponin B, and 5-HT on food intake in normal mice and/or capsaicin-pretreated mice. Male ddY mice were fed a standard laboratory chow MF (Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd.) for 8 days. The test sample was given orally once a day. b, c These doses are equivalent to approximately 0.2–0.4 mg/kg serotonin. Each value represents the mean of 5 or 6 mice. Significant differences where **p < 0.01 and † p < 0.05 or †† p < 0.01 were compared with controls and capsaicin-treated group, respectively.
Data were taken from reference [14]
Fig. 5Effects of n-BuOH-soluble fraction and chakasaponin II (12) on neuropeptide Y (NPY) mRNA levels in mice. The test sample was given orally to male ddY mice once a day. Four days later, the hypothalamus was dissected out, and the NPY mRNA levels were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls
Data were taken and reproduced from reference [14].
Effects of chakasaponin II (12) on plasma GLP-1 and CCK levels in mice
| Treatments | Dose | Food intake | Plasma GLP-1 | Plasma CCK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 1.31 ± 0.06 | 20.0 ± 3.4 | 419 ± 25 |
| Chakasaponin II ( | 25 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | 25.3 ± 4.6 | 681 ± 70** |
| 50 | 1.02 ± 0.06** | 37.3 ± 9.9* | 702 ± 112** |
Male ddY mice (6 weeks old) were fed a high-fat diet (45 kcal % fat, D12451; Research Diets Inc.) for 7 days before the experiments. Test samples were given orally to the fasted mice 45 min before the mid-light satiety test. The high-fat diet was then given to the mice for 30 min, and the food intake within the 30-min period was measured for each group. A blood sample was collected from the portal vein under anesthesia, and plasma GLP-1 and CCK levels were measured by ELISA kits. Refer to Fig. 6 for abbreviations
Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 7 or 8)
Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 was compared with controls
Fig. 6Appetite signals in the gastrointestinal−brain system. NPY neuropeptide Y, AgRP agouti-related protein, MSH melanocyte-stimulating hormone, POMC proopiomelanocortin, NTS nucleus tractus solitaries, ARC arcuate nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, LHA lateral hypothalamic area, CCK cholescystokinin, GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide 1. CCK and GLP-1 secreted from the intestinal I-cells and L-cells stimulate each receptor and the signals are mediated through the afferent vagal nerves and NTS to reduce the expression of NPY and AgRP, and finally reduce the appetite. Stimulation of 5-HT2B receptor in the stomach by 5-HT from chromaffin cells in the intestine inhibits the release of ghrelin which stimulates the appetite through the afferent vagal nerves, and stimulation of the 5HT2C receptor in the hypothalamus stimulates POMC neurons to reduce the appetite
Effects of chakasaponins I (11)–III (13) on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in mice.
Data were taken and reproduced from references [12] and [16]
| Treatment | Dose | Gastric emptying | Gastrointestinal transit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 75.0 ± 4.1 | 40.0 ± 2.5 |
| Chakasaponin I ( | 25 | 68.5 ± 5.0 | 43.8 ± 1.3 |
| 50 | 50.2 ± 3.0** | 49.1 ± 4.3 | |
| 100 | 37.9 ± 1.4** | 81.6 ± 3.3** | |
| Control | – | 73.1 ± 2.1 | – |
| Chakasaponin II ( | 25 | 65.2 ± 3.9 | 64.9 ± 10.8 |
| 50 | 56.9 ± 2.7* | 52.1 ± 5.8 | |
| 100 | 40.5 ± 6.7** | 75.6 ± 11.1** | |
| Control | – | 76.8 ± 2.4 | – |
| Chakasaponin III ( | 25 | 70.7 ± 1.9 | 51.0 ± 3.4 |
| 50 | 52.0 ± 2.7** | 64.2 ± 6.3* | |
| 100 | 39.8 ± 1.7** | 68.5 ± 2.5** | |
| Control | – | 86.2 ± 1.3 | – |
| Escin IIa | 25 | 81.7 ± 6.5 | – |
| 50 | 69.6 ± 3.0* | – | |
| 100 | 53.8 ± 4.0** | – |
Effects on gastric emptying: a solution of 1.5 % carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) containing 0.05 % phenol red as a marker was given (0.3 mL/mouse, p.o.) to fasted male ddY mice 30 min before being killed by cervical dislocation under anesthesia. The abdominal cavity was opened, the gastroesophageal junction and pylorus were clamped, and the stomach was removed, weighed, and placed in 10 mL of 0.1 M NaOH prior to homogenization, followed by the addition of 5 mL of the supernatant to 0.5 mL of 20 % trichloroacetic acid (w/v) for centrifugation. Next, 4 mL of supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of 0.5 M NaOH, and the amount of phenol red was determined by 560 nm absorbance. The test sample was given orally 30 min before the administration of the CMC-Na solution
Gastric emptying (%) = (1− amount of phenol red in test sample-treated group/amount of administered phenol red) × 100
Effects on gastrointestinal transit: a charcoal meal containing 1.5 % CMC-Na solution and 5 % charcoal as a marker was given (0.2 mL/mouse, p.o.) to fasted male ddY mice. Fifteen minutes later, the abdominal cavity was opened, and the gastrointestinal tract was removed. The traveled distance of the marker was measured and expressed as a percentage of the total length of the small intestine from the pylorus to the cecum. The test samples were given orally 1 h before administration of the charcoal meal
Values represent the means ± SEM (n = 5–10)
Significant difference where *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 is compared with controls