Literature DB >> 31600592

Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults.

Bernhard Ross1, Kelly L Tremblay2, Claude Alain3.   

Abstract

The frequency-following response with origin in the auditory brainstem represents the pitch contour of voice and can be recorded with electrodes from the scalp. MEG studies also revealed a cortical contribution to the high gamma oscillations at the fundamental frequency (f0) of a vowel stimulus. Therefore, studying the cortical component of the frequency-following response could provide insights into how pitch information is encoded at the cortical level. Comparing how aging affects the different responses may help to uncover the neural mechanisms underlying speech understanding deficits in older age. We simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG responses to the syllable /ba/. MEG beamformer analysis localized sources in bilateral auditory cortices and the midbrain. Time-frequency analysis showed a faithful representation of the pitch contour between 106 Hz and 138 Hz in the cortical activity. A cross-correlation revealed a latency of 20 ms. Furthermore, stimulus onsets elicited cortical 40-Hz responses. Both the 40-Hz and the f0 response amplitudes increased in older age and were larger in the right hemisphere. The effects of aging and laterality of the f0 response were evident in the MEG only, suggesting that both effects were characteristics of the cortical response. After comparing f0 and N1 responses in EEG and MEG, we estimated that approximately one-third of the scalp-recorded f0 response could be cortical in origin. We attributed the significance of the cortical f0 response to the precise timing of cortical neurons that serve as a time-sensitive code for pitch.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem responses; Auditory cortex; Beamformer source analysis; Frequency-following response; High gamma oscillations; Pitch encoding

Year:  2019        PMID: 31600592     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Isabelle Arseneau-Bruneau; Xiaochen Zhang; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Steven Aiken; Krystal Beh; Emma McGrath; Mary Galloy; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Smell-induced gamma oscillations in human olfactory cortex are required for accurate perception of odor identity.

Authors:  Qiaohan Yang; Guangyu Zhou; Torben Noto; Jessica W Templer; Stephan U Schuele; Joshua M Rosenow; Gregory Lane; Christina Zelano
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Causal Relationship between the Right Auditory Cortex and Speech-Evoked Envelope-Following Response: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Stimulation and Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Guangting Mai; Peter Howell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural Generators Underlying Temporal Envelope Processing Show Altered Responses and Hemispheric Asymmetry Across Age.

Authors:  Ehsan Darestani Farahani; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Listening to Preferred Music Alters Cortical Speech Processing in Older Adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ricky Chow; Alix Noly-Gandon; Jennifer D Ryan; Karen L Bell; Rose Rizzi; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Joshua P Kulasingham; Christian Brodbeck; Alessandro Presacco; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Fran López-Caballero; Pablo Martin-Trias; Teresa Ribas-Prats; Natàlia Gorina-Careta; David Bartrés-Faz; Carles Escera
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings.

Authors:  Ahmet Levent Kandemir; Vladimir Litvak; Esther Florin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.