| Literature DB >> 32835372 |
Jacob S Montgomery1, Darci Giacomini1, Bridgit Waithaka2, Christa Lanz2, Brent P Murphy1, Ruth Campe3, Jens Lerchl3, Andreas Landes3, Fanny Gatzmann4, Antoine Janssen5, Rudie Antonise5, Eric Patterson6, Detlef Weigel2, Patrick J Tranel1.
Abstract
Amaranthus tuberculatus, Amaranthus hybridus, and Amaranthus palmeri are agronomically important weed species. Here, we present the most contiguous draft assemblies of these three species to date. We utilized a combination of Pacific Biosciences long-read sequencing and chromatin contact mapping information to assemble and order sequences of A. palmeri to near-chromosome-level resolution, with scaffold N50 of 20.1 Mb. To resolve the issues of heterozygosity and coassembly of alleles in diploid species, we adapted the trio binning approach to produce haplotype assemblies of A. tuberculatus and A. hybridus. This approach resulted in an improved assembly of A. tuberculatus, and the first genome assembly for A. hybridus, with contig N50s of 2.58 and 2.26 Mb, respectively. Species-specific transcriptomes and information from related species were used to predict transcripts within each assembly. Syntenic comparisons of these species and Amaranthus hypochondriacus identified sites of genomic rearrangement, including duplication and translocation, whereas genetic map construction within A. tuberculatus highlighted the need for further ordering of the A. hybridus and A. tuberculatus contigs. These multiple reference genomes will accelerate genomic studies in these species to further our understanding of weedy evolution within Amaranthus.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Amaranthuszzm321990 ; chromatin contact mapping; genome evolution; linkage mapping; trio binning; weed genomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32835372 PMCID: PMC7643611 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
Summary Statistics of Amaranthus palmeri, Amaranthus tuberculatus, and Amaranthus hybridus Draft Genome Assemblies
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated genome size ( | 421.8 | 675.6 | 675.6 | 503.8 |
| Assembly size (Mb) | 408.1 | 572.9 | 663.7 | 403.0 |
| Number of contigs | 638 | 841 | 2,514 | 640 |
| Number of scaffolds | 303 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 2.54 | 2.58 | 1.74 | 2.26 |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 20.11 | 34.7 | 43.1 | 24.5 |
| Annotated genes | 29,758 | 26,784 | 56,936 | 24,325 |
| Complete BUSCO | 84.2% | 81.9% | 88% | 89.8% |
Genome size estimates from cytological studies by Stetter and Schmid (2017).
Scaffolded with respect to Amaranthus hypochondriacus pseudochromosomes (Lightfoot et al. 2017).
. 1.Dot plots demonstrating synteny between the genome of Amaranthus hypochondriacus and itself (A), the contigs of Amaranthus hybridus (B), and Amaranthus tuberculatus (C) as well as the scaffolds of Amaranthus palmeri (D). Panel (E) is an analogous plot comparing the A. tuberculatus contigs arranged according to linkage map generated from POP1 and the scaffolds of A. hypochondriacus. Within each panel, the 16 pseudochromosomes of A. hypochondriacus are represented along the X axis, separated by vertical lines. The contigs/scaffolds of genome assemblies from each other species are represented along the Y axis of their respective panes, separated by horizontal lines. Each green dot represents one syntenic gene, and obvious diagonals indicate syntenic regions between the two compared species.