| Literature DB >> 32832435 |
Madhu Rengasamy1, Manjunath M Shenoy2, Sunil Dogra3, Neelakandhan Asokan4, Ananta Khurana5, Shital Poojary6, Jyothi Jayaraman7, Ameet R Valia8, Kabir Sardana5, Seetharam Kolalapudi9, Yogesh Marfatia10, P Narasimha Rao11, Ramesh M Bhat7, Mahendra Kura12, Deepika Pandhi13, Shyamanta Barua14, Vibhor Kaushal15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dermatophytosis has always been a common superficial mycosis in India. However, the past 6-7 years have seen an unprecedented increase in the number of patients affected by recurrent, chronic, recalcitrant and steroid modified dermatophytosis involving the glabrous skin (tinea corporis, tinea cruris and tinea faciei). Importantly, there has been a notable decrease in clinical responsiveness to commonly used antifungals given in conventional doses and durations resulting in difficult-to-treat infections. Considering that scientific data on the management of the current epidemic of dermatophytosis in India are inadequate, the Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) Task force Against Recalcitrant Tinea (ITART) has formulated a consensus statement on the management of dermatophytosis in India.Entities:
Keywords: Dermatophytosis; INTACT; glabrous tinea; recalcitrant; recommendations; resistance; task force
Year: 2020 PMID: 32832435 PMCID: PMC7413465 DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_233_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Dermatol Online J ISSN: 2229-5178
Salient clinico-epidemiological features in the current scenario of dermatophytosis in India[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
| Parameters | Probable reasons |
|---|---|
| Greater occurrence of dermatophytosis | Highly contagious infection, poor public awareness and inadequate access to healthcare facilities, inadequate/faulty treatments, rampant abuse of topical corticosteroid antifungal combination creams |
| Increasing frequency of chronic dermatophytosis | Abnormal host cell-mediated immune (CMI) response, inadequate/faulty treatments, fungal species related factors, fomites, rampant abuse of topical corticosteroid antifungal combination creams |
| Increasing frequency of recurrent dermatophytosis | Inadequate/faulty treatments, fungal species related factors, fomites, lifestyle related host factors |
| Higher incidence of infection among family members | Highly contagious infection, poor hygiene, sharing of fomites, sharing of prescriptions |
| Higher incidence among infants and children | Highly contagious infection, poor hygiene, high fomite transmission, inadequate and faulty treatment, topical corticosteroid abuse in the affected family members. |
| Changing fungal species - emergence of | Environment-related factors, host immunity related factors, topical high-potency corticosteroid-antibacterial-antifungal combination cream abuse, altered cutaneous flora, virulence of the fungal species |
| Extensive dermatophytosis | Topical corticosteroid usage, inadequate/faulty treatments, host immunity |
| Frequent involvement of uncommon sites like face and scalp | Autoinoculation from another site, fomite transmission, topical corticosteroid use on the face, misdiagnosis and faulty treatments |
| Inflammatory lesions, bullous/pustular lesions | Abnormal host response, fungal virulence, intermittent topical corticosteroid usage |
| Steroid modified tinea/tinea incognito, Tinea pseudoimbricata, Majocchi granuloma | Topical high potency corticosteroid usage-self-treatment, easy over the counter availability of topical poly-combinations, treatment by unqualified healthcare personnel, lack of awareness and inadequate knowledge of treating physicians |
| Atypical presentations (resembling psoriasis, eczema, impetigo, lupus, rosacea etc.) | Host immunity related factors, agent-related factors, misdiagnosis, corticosteroid application, trauma, secondary infection |
| Inadequate/no response to topical/systemic antifungals | Changing fungal species, poor host immunity, poor compliance, poor quality of drugs, antifungal resistance |
Classification of statements used for Delphi process and the detail of consensus by experts after three rounds of discussion
| Category of statements | 80% agreement (minimum 14 out of 17 experts agreeing with the statement) | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |
| General ( | 7 | 2 |
| Laboratory Diagnosis ( | 13 | 5 |
| General management ( | 16 | 3 |
| Topical therapy ( | 13 | 7 |
| Systemic therapy ( | 27 | 20 |
| Special situations ( | 14 | 5 |
| Total ( | 90 | 42 |
Role of various laboratory methods in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis
| Principle | Method | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Direct microscopic examination | Direct microscopy using potassium hydroxide mount and its modifications | An office procedure with relatively high sensitivity |
| Should be done whenever feasible, especially if there is diagnostic difficulty on clinical examination | ||
| Histopathology | Histopathology with special stain with periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stain | Indicated in suspected Majocchi granuloma or deep dermatophytosis |
| Isolation by culture and species identification | Fungal culture on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar and other selective media, biochemical tests and hair perforation test | Sensitivity is low, but specificity is high; considered as the gold standard in the diagnosis |
| May be performed whenever feasible for confirmation of clinical diagnosis and to understand the epidemiological trends in a region | ||
| Identification of species and subspecies by molecular diagnostic methods | Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA) restriction analysis, Sequencing of protein-encoding genes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting[ | Requires specially equipped laboratory with trained manpower |
| Currently utilised for research purposes but may find a place in conventional diagnosis in future | ||
| Identification of species and subspecies by proteomic signature | Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry | Requires specially equipped laboratory with trained manpower |
| Currently used for research purposes but may find a place in conventional diagnosis in future | ||
| Antifungal sensitivity testing (AFST) | Microbroth dilution method | Tedious procedure requiring trained manpower |
| Lack of reference data on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antifungal drugs used against dermatophytes[ | ||
| If facilities are available, it should be considered whenever there is a strong suspicion of antifungal resistance | ||
| Identification of mutation causing antifungal resistance | Real Time Polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR), Sequencing of DNA | Requires equipped laboratory with trained manpower; currently utilised for research purpose |
| Whenever there is strong suspicion of antifungal resistance it may be considered |
Consensus on points for counselling patients with dermatophytosis
| Points for discussion with patients | Expected impact |
|---|---|
| Current scenario of dermatophytosis in India | Patients will understand the gravity of the situation and follow medical advice accurately |
| Taking regular bath (at least once a day) | Reduces fungal load due to exfoliation of scales |
| Wiping the body dry (especially intertriginous area and toe clefts) | Prevents high moisture in those parts, minimizing chances of fungal colonization |
| Regular washing of clothes in hot water and drying in sunlight inside out | Reduces chances of re-infection from infected clothes |
| Storing and washing clothes of infected patients separately | Reduces chances of transmission to contacts and family members |
| Regular washing of bed linen (at least once a week) | Minimizes chances of re-infection from infected linen |
| Avoidance of sharing of fomites like clothes, towels and soaps with others | Reduces transmission to contacts and family members |
| Avoidance of synthetic tight garments | Prevents occlusion, maceration, friction and barrier dysfunction |
| Avoidance of wearing bands, threads, draw strings and rings | Reduces chances of re-infection from such infected materials |
| Regular mopping and cleaning of the house | Reduces chances of persistence of dermatophytes in the environment |
| Losing weight in obese patients | Reduces chances of intertriginous fungal infections |
| Avoidance of contact with pets | May reduce zoophilic infection and transmission |
| Avoidance of application of topical corticosteroids | Reduces chances of unusual presentations, diagnostic difficulty and treatment failure |
| Strict adherence to treatment | Enhances chances of complete cure and reduces recurrence |
| Simultaneous treatment of other infected house members and close contacts (prophylactic treatment is not required) | Reduces chances of transmission to each other and recurrence |
| Avoidance of self-medication, over the counter(OTC) medications and sharing of prescriptions | Reduces chances of inadequate treatment, topical corticosteroid misuse and treatment failure |
Consensus points on topical therapy in patients with glabrous tinea infections
| Consensus point | Justification/comments |
|---|---|
| Topical therapy can be used as a standalone or an adjuvant therapy | Topical therapy attains high antifungal concentration at the site of infection |
| Antifungal preparation alone without any corticosteroid or antibacterial component should be used | Corticosteroid application can result in treatment failure and local adverse effects |
| Topical corticosteroid containing antifungal preparation should be avoided even for an inflammatory lesion | Topical antifungals with anti-inflammatory effect can be used |
| Keratolytics and Whitfield’s ointment can be used in the treatment of glabrous tinea | Should be avoided if there is local inflammation |
| Antifungal (with few exceptions) should be applied twice a day | Twice a day application is required to achieve good clinical response |
| Treatment may be continued for about 2 weeks after clinical resolution | Clinical cure may not correspond with mycological cure |
| Topical formulation could be chosen according to the site involved | There are advantages of certain preparations; Eg. lotions in hair-bearing area |
| There is no added advantage in the efficacy of various formulations like lotions and sprays over the creams | Most of these preparations have advantage of being user friendly but not of added efficacy |
| Various classes of topical antifungals currently available are nearly equipotent | Few studies on head-to-head comparison of topical antifungals are published, but still the evidence is not sufficient to consider one molecule is superior to the other |
| No role for use of combination of two topical antifungals | No studies to substantiate benefits of such a combination approach and it is not practiced routinely |
Recommendation of Systemic treatment of glabrous tinea (tinea corporis, tinea cruris and tinea faciei)
| Antifungal | Dose | Minimum duration | Precautions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Adults | |||
| Itraconazole | 3-5mg/kg/day | Naïve: 100 mg 1 or 2 capsules od | 3 weeks | Drug interactions, hepatotoxicity |
| CH/SMT/RCL: 100mg bd/ 100 mg 2 od | 4 weeks | |||
| Terbinafine | 10-20 kg - 62.5 mg | Naïve: 250mg/day | 4 weeks | Skin rash, hepatotoxicity |
| 20-40 kg- 125 mg | CH/SMT/RCL: 250 mg bd / day | 4 weeks | ||
| Griseofulvin | 10-20 mg/kg/day | Naïve: 500 mg/day | 8 weeks | GI intolerance, head ache |
| CH/SMT/RCL: 750 -1000 mg/ day | 8 weeks | |||
| Fluconazole | 3-6 mg/kg/day | Naïve: 50-100 mg/day | 4 weeks | Hepatotoxicity |
| 150-300 once weekly | 8 weeks | |||
| CH/SMT/RCL: 100 mg/day | 6 weeks | |||
| 150 mg /thrice weekly* | 8 weeks | |||
Note: Some of the dose schedules in children have been extrapolated from their uses in conditions like tinea capitis. Paediatric dose should not exceed the adult dose. References hold good for some of the drug dosages and not the duration. Duration of therapy is best individualised based on the clinical response. *Dosage in current practice and not evidence based. CH- Chronic; SMT - Steroid modified tinea ; RCL -Recalcitrant
Consensus recommendation for the various facets of treatment of glabrous tinea
| Comments | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|
| Glabrous tinea | Most cases in the current scenario require systemic therapy | Involvement of multiple sites |
| Extensive disease based on clinical judgement | ||
| Chronic dermatophytosis | ||
| Recurrent dermatophytosis | ||
| Steroid modified dermatophytosis/ Tinea incognito | ||
| Failure of topical therapy | ||
| Associated nail and hair involvement | ||
| Immunocompromised states like hematological malignancies and therapy with immunosuppressive drugs | ||
| First line | Best option considering overall efficacy and safety | Itraconazole, Terbinafine, |
| Alternate drugs | Prolonged duration of treatment required | Griseofulvin, Fluconazole |
| Complementary topical therapy | ||
| Choice and rationale | Topical antifungal without corticosteroid and antibacterial components. | Systemic antifungal therapy should preferably be combined with topical antifungal therapy which may be of same or different class |
| There are limited laboratory/clinical studies on the efficacy and utility of combination antifungals (systemic with topical OR two systemic) for dermatophytosis of the glabrous skin | ||
| Failure | No improvement or worsening of symptoms and signs at 3 weeks | Assessment of factors responsible for it and if detected to be corrected; if not, antifungal therapy to be changed |
| Total response | Complete subsidence of symptoms and signs with or without post-inflammatory changes anytime during the treatment | Completion of therapy for the stipulated period or as per the individual response |
| Partial Response | Partial subsidence of symptoms and signs at the end of 3 weeks | Extended duration of treatment to be considered with appropriate laboratory monitoring; double dosing of terbinafine may be considered |
| Clinical cure | Complete subsidence of symptoms and signs with or without post-inflammatory changes at the end of treatment | Follow up must be at 4 weeks after apparent clinical cure to look for recurrence |
| Mycological cure | Complete subsidence of symptoms and signs with negative mycology reports (direct microscopy with/without culture) at the end of the treatment | Follow up must be at 4 weeks after apparent clinical cure to look for recurrence |
| Hepatotoxicity | All systemic antifungals are hepatotoxic | Monitoring hepatic function if the treatment is extended or if the dose is doubled |
| Renal toxicity | Systemic drugs used in the management of dermatophytosis do not commonly cause renal toxicity | Renal monitoring may be considered if indicated on clinical grounds |
| First follow up visit | To assess clinical response | At 3 weeks, if inadequate response |
| Final follow up visit | To assess recurrence | At 4 weeks after apparent clinical cure |
| Pregnancy | Teratogenicity of the drugs should be addressed | Topical antifungals with established safety [Table 8] |
| Oral terbinafine (routine use should be avoided) | ||
| Lactating mother | Safety of the infant should be addressed | Topical antifungals |
| Oral fluconazole | ||
| Children under 2 years | Safety with respect to hepatotoxicity, GI intolerance and other adverse effects should be addressed | Topical antifungals with established safety |
| Oral fluconazole | ||
| Children above 2 years | Safety with respect to hepatotoxicity, GI intolerance and other adverse effects should be assessed | Topical antifungals with established safety |
| Oral terbinafine, itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin | ||
| Hepatic dysfunction | Monitoring of the hepatic function is mandatory | Topical antifungals |
| Oral fluconazole | ||
| Renal dysfunction | Renal function monitoring if terbinafine is used (dose reduction if creatinine clearance is <50 ml/ min) | Topical antifungals |
| Oral itraconazole | ||
| Cardiac dysfunction | Cardiotoxicity of drugs should be addressed | Topical antifungals |
| Oral terbinafine | ||
Topical antifungal preparations available in India
| Class | Drug name | Preparations | FDA Pregnancy Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imidazoles | Ketoconazole | 2 % cream, powder, lotion (with or without1% zinc pyrithione), soap | C |
| Miconazole nitrate | 2 % cream, gel, powder | C | |
| Clotrimazole | 1 % cream, lotion, powder, soap | B | |
| Oxiconazole | 1 % cream, lotion | B | |
| Fenticonazole | 2 % cream | Not categorised | |
| Bifonazole | 1 % cream | B | |
| Eberconazole | 1 % cream | C | |
| Sertaconazole nitrate | 2 % cream, lotion | C | |
| Luliconazole | 1 % cream, lotion, spray | C | |
| Triazoles | Fluconazole | 0.5 % gel, powder | C |
| Allylamines | Terbinafine hydrochloride | 1% cream, gel, powder, lotion | B |
| Benzylamines | Butenafine | 1% cream | B |
| Morpholenes | Amorolfine hydrochloride | 0.25 % cream, 5 % nail lacquer | Not categorized |
| Hydroxy-pyridinone | Ciclopirox olamine | 8% Nail lacquer, 1% cream, 1% shampoo | B |
| Others | Tolnaftate | Solution(10mg/ml), cream (10mg/g) | Not assigned. To be used if benefits outweigh risk. |
| Whitfield’s ointment | 3% salicylic acid and 6% benzoic acid in ointment base | C (due to risk of absorption of salicylic acid) WHO allows application, especially if benefits outweigh risks |
Specific characterhalistics of relatively newer select topical antifungals available in India[79][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]
| Drug | Class | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Terbinafine | Allylamine | Fungicidal antifungal as compared to fungistatic nature of most other antifungals[ |
| Butenafine | Benzylamine | Fungicidal antifungal as compared to fungistatic nature of most other antifungals[ |
| Bifonazole | Imidazole | Dual mode of action by inhibition of 14α-demethylase and microsomal HMG-CoA-reductase leading to fungicidal effect.[ |
| Sertaconazole | Imidazole | Anti-inflammatory action. Contains a benzothiophene ring which mimics tryptophan and increases the drug’s ability to form pores in the fungal cell membrane. |
| Eberconazole | Imidazole | Potent anti-inflammatory activity[ |
| Luliconazole | Imidazole | Reservoir effect. Highest antifungal activity against |
| Fenticonazole | Imidazole | Additional action of blocking cytochrome oxidases and peroxidises.[ |
| Amorolfine | Morpholine | New class of antifungal with different mechanism of action mediated through inhibition of two different enzymes.[ |
| Ciclopirox olamine | Hydroxypyridinone | Acts through chelation of metal ions (Fe3+); inhibits cytochrome oxidase, catalase and peroxidase resulting in intracellular degradation of toxic peroxides; inhibits cellular uptake of essential compounds and alters cell permeability.[ |
Clinically relevant drug interactions with antifungals[111][141][142][143][144]
| Antifungal drug | Drug level is decreased by | Decreases level of these drugs | Increases level of these drugs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Griseofulvin | Phenobarbital | Anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, Cyclosporin | Potentiates action of alcohol-Disufiram like reaction |
| Terbinafine | Rifampicin | - | Anti-depressants beta blockers, |
| Antiarrthymics class 1c, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. | |||
| Caution when used with anticoagulants. | |||
| Itraconazole | H2 histamine blockers, proton pump inhibitors, rifampicin, rifabutin, INH, ritonavir, nevirapine, nortriptyline, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital | Oral contraceptives | Glibenclamide, phenytoin, warfarin, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, digoxin, lovastatin, midazolam, triazolam, methylprednisolone, Saquinavir |
| Fluconazole | Rifampicin | Oral contraceptives | Sulfanylurea, nifedipine, theophylline, NSAID, warfarin, cyclosporine |