Literature DB >> 32832412

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage.

Marco Solinas1, Giacomo Bianchi1, Francesca Chiaramonti1, Rafik Margaryan1, Enkel Kallushi1, Tommaso Gasbarri1, Filippo Santarelli1, Michele Murzi1, Pierandrea Farneti1, Alessandro Leone1, Simone Simeoni1, Egidio Varone1, Federica Marchi1, Mattia Glauber2, Giovanni Concistrè1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive approach (MIA) reduces mortality and morbidity in patients referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Sutureless technology facilitates a MIA. We describe our experience with the sutureless Perceval (LivaNova, Italy) aortic bioprosthesis through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) approach.
METHODS: Between March 2011 and October 2019, 1,049 patients underwent AVR with Perceval bioprosthesis. Five hundred and three patients (48%) were operated through a RAMT approach in the second intercostal space. Considering only isolated AVR (881), 98% of patients were operated with MIA, and Perceval in RAMT approach was performed in 57% of these patients. Eight patients (1.6%) had previously undergone cardiac surgery. The prosthesis sizes implanted were: S (n=91), M (n=154), L (n=218) and XL (n=40). Concomitant procedures were mitral valve surgery (n=6), tricuspid valve repair (n=1), mitral valve repair and tricuspid valve repair (n=1) and miectomy (n=2). Mean age was 78±4 years (range, 65-89 years), 317 patients were female (63%) and EuroSCORE II was 5.9%±8.4%.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 0.8% (4/503). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times were 81.6±30.8 and 50.3±24.5 minutes respectively for stand-alone procedures. In two patients, early moderate paravalvular leakage appeared as a result of incomplete expansion of the sutureless valve due to oversizing of the bioprosthesis, requiring reoperations at two and nine postoperative days with sutured aortic bioprosthesis implantation. Permanent pacemaker implantation within the first thirty days was necessary in 26 (5.2%) patients. At the mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 month to 8.6 years), survival was 96%, freedom from reoperation was 99.2%, and mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 11.9±4.3 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis in a RAMT approach is a safe and feasible procedure associated with low mortality and excellent hemodynamic performance. Sutureless technology facilitates a RAMT approach. 2020 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement (AVR); biological prosthesis; echocardiography; minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32832412      PMCID: PMC7415694          DOI: 10.21037/acs-2019-surd-172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  29 in total

1.  Sutureless Perceval S aortic valve replacement: a multicenter, prospective pilot trial.

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Thierry Folliguet; Bart Meuris; Alain Dibie; Christoph Bara; Marie-Christine Herregods; Nawid Khaladj; Christian Hagl; Willem Flameng; Francois Laborde; Axel Haverich
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2009-11

2.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  F J Benetti; M A Mariani; J L Rizzardi; I Benetti
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Massimo Bonacchi; Edvin Prifti; Gabriele Giunti; Giacomo Frati; Guido Sani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes?

Authors:  Daniyar Gilmanov; Antonio Miceli; Matteo Ferrarini; Pierandrea Farneti; Michele Murzi; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Denis R Merk; Sven Lehmann; David M Holzhey; Pascal Dohmen; Pascal Candolfi; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr; Michael A Borger
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients.

Authors:  H E Mächler; P Bergmann; M Anelli-Monti; D Dacar; P Rehak; I Knez; L Salaymeh; E Mahla; B Rigler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Antonio Miceli; Daniyar Gilmanov; Matteo Ferrarini; Stefano Bevilacqua; Pier A Farneti; Marco Solinas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  A staged approach towards interventional aortic valve implantation with a sutureless valve: initial human implants.

Authors:  M Shrestha; N Khaladj; C Bara; K Hoeffler; C Hagl; A Haverich
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome.

Authors:  Andre Plass; Hans Scheffel; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp Kaufmann; Michele Genoni; Volkmar Falk; Jürg Grünenfelder
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Aleksander Dokollari; Basel Ramlawi; Gianluca Torregrossa; Michel Pompeu Sá; Serge Sicouri; Edvin Prifti; Sandro Gelsomino; Massimo Bonacchi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

2.  Hemodynamic Performance of Sutureless vs. Conventional Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The 1-Year Core-Lab Results of the Randomized PERSIST-AVR Trial.

Authors:  Theodor Fischlein; Elena Caporali; Federico M Asch; Ferdinand Vogt; Francesco Pollari; Thierry Folliguet; Utz Kappert; Bart Meuris; Malakh L Shrestha; Eric E Roselli; Nikolaos Bonaros; Olivier Fabre; Pierre Corbi; Giovanni Troise; Martin Andreas; Frederic Pinaud; Steffen Pfeiffer; Sami Kueri; Erwin Tan; Pierre Voisine; Evaldas Girdauskas; Filip Rega; Julio García-Puente; Laurent De Kerchove; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 3.  Use of Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Prostheses in Challenging Reoperations.

Authors:  Igor Vendramin; Andrea Lechiancole; Daniela Piani; Gaetano Nucifora; Giovanni Benedetti; Sandro Sponga; Daniele Muser; Uberto Bortolotti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.