| Literature DB >> 34201997 |
Igor Vendramin1, Andrea Lechiancole1, Daniela Piani1, Gaetano Nucifora2, Giovanni Benedetti1, Sandro Sponga1, Daniele Muser1, Uberto Bortolotti1, Ugolino Livi1,3.
Abstract
Sutureless and rapid-deployment bioprostheses have been introduced as alternatives to traditional prosthetic valves to reduce cardiopulmonary and aortic cross-clamp times during aortic valve replacement. These devices have also been employed in extremely demanding surgical settings, as underlined in the present review. Searches on the PubMed and Medline databases aimed to identify, from the English-language literature, the reported cases where both sutureless and rapid-deployment prostheses were employed in challenging surgical situations, usually complex reoperations sometimes even performed as bailout procedures. We have identified 25 patients for whom a sutureless or rapid-deployment prosthesis was used in complex redo procedures: 17 patients with a failing stentless bioprosthesis, 6 patients with a failing homograft, and 2 patients with the failure of a valve-sparing procedure. All patients survived reoperation and were reported to be alive 3 months to 4 years postoperatively. Sutureless and rapid-deployment bioprostheses have proved effective in replacing degenerated stentless bioprostheses and homografts in challenging redo procedures. In these settings, they should be considered as a valid alternative not only to traditional prostheses but also in selected cases to transcatheter valve-in-valve solutions.Entities:
Keywords: Sutureless valve prosthesis; challenging operations; rapid-deployment valve prosthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34201997 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd8070074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ISSN: 2308-3425