Literature DB >> 32832312

Atmospheric implications of large C2-C5 alkane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Z A Tzompa-Sosa1, B H Henderson2, C A Keller3,4, K Travis5, E Mahieu6, B Franco7, M Estes8, D Helmig9, A Fried9, D Richter9, P Weibring9, J Walega9, D R Blake10, J W Hannigan11, I Ortega11, S Conway12, K Strong12, E V Fischer1.   

Abstract

Emissions of C2-C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS-Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface and column observations to 1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric abundances of C2-C5 alkanes over the U.S., and 2) estimate the contribution of emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry to these patterns. The oil and gas sector in the updated 2011NEI contributes over 80% of the total U.S. emissions of ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), and emissions of these species are largest in the central U.S. Observed mixing ratios of C2-C5 alkanes show enhancements over the central U.S. below 2 km. A nested GEOS-Chem simulation underpredicts observed C3H8 mixing ratios in the boundary layer over several U.S. regions and the relative underprediction is not consistent, suggesting C3H8 emissions should receive more attention moving forward. Our decision to consider only C4-C5 alkane emissions as a single lumped species produces a geographic distribution similar to observations. Due to the increasing importance of oil and gas emissions in the U.S., we recommend continued support of existing long-term measurements of C2-C5 alkanes. We suggest additional monitoring of C2-C5 alkanes downwind of northeastern Colorado, Wyoming and western North Dakota to capture changes in these regions. The atmospheric chemistry modeling community should also evaluate whether chemical mechanisms that lump larger alkanes are sufficient to understand air quality issues in regions with large emissions of these species.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32832312      PMCID: PMC7433792          DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos        ISSN: 2169-897X            Impact factor:   4.261


  16 in total

1.  Regional ozone impacts of increased natural gas use in the Texas power sector and development in the Eagle Ford shale.

Authors:  Adam P Pacsi; Yosuke Kimura; Gary McGaughey; Elena C McDonald-Buller; David T Allen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Direct measurements of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Cynthia M Kanno; Matthew C Reid; Xin Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Michael A Celia; Yuheng Chen; Tullis C Onstott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessment of volatile organic compound and hazardous air pollutant emissions from oil and natural gas well pads using mobile remote and on-site direct measurements.

Authors:  Halley L Brantley; Eben D Thoma; Adam P Eisele
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Reaction CH3 + CH3 → C2H6 Studied over the 292-714 K Temperature and 1-100 bar Pressure Ranges.

Authors:  Manuvesh Sangwan; Chao Yan; Evgeni N Chesnokov; Lev N Krasnoperov
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Energy and environment. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems.

Authors:  A R Brandt; G A Heath; E A Kort; F O'Sullivan; G Pétron; S M Jordaan; P Tans; J Wilcox; A M Gopstein; D Arent; S Wofsy; N J Brown; R Bradley; G D Stucky; D Eardley; R Harriss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Methane Leaks from Natural Gas Systems Follow Extreme Distributions.

Authors:  Adam R Brandt; Garvin A Heath; Daniel Cooley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Modeling to Evaluate Contribution of Oil and Gas Emissions to Air Pollution.

Authors:  Tammy M Thompson; Donald Shepherd; Andrea Stacy; Michael G Barna; Bret A Schichtel
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements.

Authors:  Halley L Brantley; Eben D Thoma; William C Squier; Birnur B Guven; David Lyon
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Source signature of volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas operations in northeastern Colorado.

Authors:  J B Gilman; B M Lerner; W C Kuster; J A de Gouw
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Highly elevated atmospheric levels of volatile organic compounds in the Uintah Basin, Utah.

Authors:  D Helmig; C R Thompson; J Evans; P Boylan; J Hueber; J-H Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.