Literature DB >> 27740745

Methane Leaks from Natural Gas Systems Follow Extreme Distributions.

Adam R Brandt1, Garvin A Heath2, Daniel Cooley3.   

Abstract

Future energy systems may rely on natural gas as a low-cost fuel to support variable renewable power. However, leaking natural gas causes climate damage because methane (CH4) has a high global warming potential. In this study, we use extreme-value theory to explore the distribution of natural gas leak sizes. By analyzing ∼15 000 measurements from 18 prior studies, we show that all available natural gas leakage data sets are statistically heavy-tailed, and that gas leaks are more extremely distributed than other natural and social phenomena. A unifying result is that the largest 5% of leaks typically contribute over 50% of the total leakage volume. While prior studies used log-normal model distributions, we show that log-normal functions poorly represent tail behavior. Our results suggest that published uncertainty ranges of CH4 emissions are too narrow, and that larger sample sizes are required in future studies to achieve targeted confidence intervals. Additionally, we find that cross-study aggregation of data sets to increase sample size is not recommended due to apparent deviation between sampled populations. Understanding the nature of leak distributions can improve emission estimates, better illustrate their uncertainty, allow prioritization of source categories, and improve sampling design. Also, these data can be used for more effective design of leak detection technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27740745     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Climate Justice and California's Methane Superemitters: Environmental Equity Assessment of Community Proximity and Exposure Intensity.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Lara Cushing; Nicholas Depsky; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting.

Authors:  Jiayang Lyra Wang; William S Daniels; Dorit M Hammerling; Matthew Harrison; Kaylyn Burmaster; Fiji C George; Arvind P Ravikumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Atmospheric implications of large C2-C5 alkane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Authors:  Z A Tzompa-Sosa; B H Henderson; C A Keller; K Travis; E Mahieu; B Franco; M Estes; D Helmig; A Fried; D Richter; P Weibring; J Walega; D R Blake; J W Hannigan; I Ortega; S Conway; K Strong; E V Fischer
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An open source algorithm to detect natural gas leaks from mobile methane survey data.

Authors:  Zachary D Weller; Duck Keun Yang; Joseph C von Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Katherine A Roberts; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin.

Authors:  Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate; Luis Guanter; Yin-Nian Liu; Daniel J Varon; Joannes D Maasakkers; Yuzhong Zhang; Apisada Chulakadabba; Steven C Wofsy; Andrew K Thorpe; Riley M Duren; Christian Frankenberg; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Daniel H Cusworth; Yongguang Zhang; Karl Segl; Javier Gorroño; Elena Sánchez-García; Melissa P Sulprizio; Kaiqin Cao; Haijian Zhu; Jian Liang; Xun Li; Ilse Aben; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region.

Authors:  Timothy L Vaughn; Clay S Bell; Cody K Pickering; Stefan Schwietzke; Garvin A Heath; Gabrielle Pétron; Daniel J Zimmerle; Russell C Schnell; Dag Nummedal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  On the climate benefit of a coal-to-gas shift in Germany's electric power sector.

Authors:  Stefan Ladage; Martin Blumenberg; Dieter Franke; Andreas Bahr; Rüdiger Lutz; Sandro Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.