Literature DB >> 25375308

Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements.

Halley L Brantley1, Eben D Thoma, William C Squier, Birnur B Guven, David Lyon.   

Abstract

A new mobile methane emissions inspection approach, Other Test Method (OTM) 33A, was used to quantify short-term emission rates from 210 oil and gas production pads during eight two-week field studies in Texas, Colorado, and Wyoming from 2010 to 2013. Emission rates were log-normally distributed with geometric means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.33 (0.23, 0.48), 0.14 (0.11, 0.19), and 0.59 (0.47, 0.74) g/s in the Barnett, Denver-Julesburg, and Pinedale basins, respectively. This study focused on sites with emission rates above 0.01 g/s and included short-term (i.e., condensate tank flashing) and maintenance-related emissions. The results fell within the upper ranges of the distributions observed in recent onsite direct measurement studies. Considering data across all basins, a multivariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship of methane emissions to well age, gas production, and hydrocarbon liquids (oil or condensate) production. Methane emissions were positively correlated with gas production, but only approximately 10% of the variation in emission rates was explained by variation in production levels. The weak correlation between emission and production rates may indicate that maintenance-related stochastic variables and design of production and control equipment are factors determining emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25375308     DOI: 10.1021/es503070q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Atmospheric implications of large C2-C5 alkane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Authors:  Z A Tzompa-Sosa; B H Henderson; C A Keller; K Travis; E Mahieu; B Franco; M Estes; D Helmig; A Fried; D Richter; P Weibring; J Walega; D R Blake; J W Hannigan; I Ortega; S Conway; K Strong; E V Fischer
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.261

3.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  South Philadelphia passive sampler and sensor study.

Authors:  Eben D Thoma; Halley L Brantley; Karen D Oliver; Donald A Whitaker; Shaibal Mukerjee; Bill Mitchell; Tai Wu; Bill Squier; Elsy Escobar; Tamira A Cousett; Carol Ann Gross-Davis; Howard Schmidt; Dennis Sosna; Hallie Weiss
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin.

Authors:  John C Lin; Ryan Bares; Benjamin Fasoli; Maria Garcia; Erik Crosman; Seth Lyman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Katherine A Roberts; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver-Julesburg Basin.

Authors:  Stuart N Riddick; Fancy Cheptonui; Kexin Yuan; Mercy Mbua; Rachel Day; Timothy L Vaughn; Aidan Duggan; Kristine E Bennett; Daniel J Zimmerle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cavity Ring-Down Methane Sensor for Small Unmanned Aerial Systems.

Authors:  Benjamin Martinez; Thomas W Miller; Azer P Yalin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.