Literature DB >> 30337767

NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.

Ashton M Verdery1, Jacob C Fisher2, Nalyn Siripong3, Kahina Abdesselam4, Shawn Bauldry5.   

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a popular method for sampling hard-to-survey populations that leverages social network connections through peer recruitment. While RDS is most frequently applied to estimate the prevalence of infections and risk behaviors of interest to public health, such as HIV/AIDS or condom use, it is rarely used to draw inferences about the structural properties of social networks among such populations because it does not typically collect the necessary data. Drawing on recent advances in computer science, we introduce a set of data collection instruments and RDS estimators for network clustering, an important topological property that has been linked to a network's potential for diffusion of information, disease, and health behaviors. We use simulations to explore how these estimators, originally developed for random walk samples of computer networks, perform when applied to RDS samples with characteristics encountered in realistic field settings that depart from random walks. In particular, we explore the effects of multiple seeds, without replacement versus with replacement, branching chains, imperfect response rates, preferential recruitment, and misreporting of ties. We find that clustering coefficient estimators retain desirable properties in RDS samples. This paper takes an important step toward calculating network characteristics using nontraditional sampling methods, and it expands the potential of RDS to tell researchers more about hidden populations and the social factors driving disease prevalence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV/AIDS; clustering coefficient; estimation; hidden populations; respondent-driven sampling (RDS); sampling; small world model; social networks; transitivity; triad

Year:  2017        PMID: 30337767      PMCID: PMC6191199          DOI: 10.1177/0081175017716489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  43 in total

1.  The density of social networks and fertility decisions: evidence from South Nyanza district, Kenya.

Authors:  H P Kohler; J R Behrman; S C Watkins
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2001-02

2.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice.

Authors:  Martina Morris; Ann E Kurth; Deven T Hamilton; James Moody; Steve Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Putting respondent-driven sampling on the map: insights from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Lidiane Toledo; Cláudia T Codeço; Neilane Bertoni; Elizabeth Albuquerque; Monica Malta; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA: A STUDY OF RACIAL INTEGRATION ON CAMPUS.

Authors:  Cyprian Wejnert
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Challenges to recruiting population representative samples of female sex workers in China using Respondent Driven Sampling.

Authors:  M Giovanna Merli; James Moody; Jeffrey Smith; Jing Li; Sharon Weir; Xiangsheng Chen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: "STROBE-RDS" statement.

Authors:  Richard G White; Avi J Hakim; Matthew J Salganik; Michael W Spiller; Lisa G Johnston; Ligia Kerr; Carl Kendall; Amy Drake; David Wilson; Kate Orroth; Matthias Egger; Wolfgang Hladik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  A comparison of respondent-driven and venue-based sampling of female sex workers in Liuzhou, China.

Authors:  Sharon S Weir; M Giovanna Merli; Jing Li; Anisha D Gandhi; William W Neely; Jessie K Edwards; Chirayath M Suchindran; Gail E Henderson; Xiang-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Network Structure and Biased Variance Estimation in Respondent Driven Sampling.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Ted Mouw; Shawn Bauldry; Peter J Mucha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating Contextual Effects from Ego Network Data.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Smith; G Robin Gauthier
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2020-06-02

2.  One-step estimation of networked population size: Respondent-driven capture-recapture with anonymity.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Hsuan-Wei Lee; Ian Fellows; Kirk Dombrowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimating Hidden Population Sizes with Venue-based Sampling: Extensions of the Generalized Network Scale-up Estimator.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Sharon Weir; Zahra Reynolds; Grace Mulholland; Jessie K Edwards
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.