Chiara Negri1, Tommaso Selleri2, Elisa Borfecchia1, Andrea Martini1,3, Kirill A Lomachenko4, Ton V W Janssens5, Michele Cutini1, Silvia Bordiga1, Gloria Berlier1. 1. Department of Chemistry and NIS Centre, University of Turin, Via Giuria 7, I-10125 Turin, Italy. 2. Dipartimento di Energia, Laboratorio di Catalisi e Processi Catalitici, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, I-20156 Milano, Italy. 3. Smart Materials Research Institute, Southern Federal University, Sladkova Street 174/28, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia. 4. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, CS 40220, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. 5. Umicore Denmark ApS, Kogle Allé 1, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark.
Abstract
The NH3-mediated selective catalytic reduction (NH3-SCR) of NOx over Cu-ion-exchanged chabazite (Cu-CHA) catalysts is the basis of the technology for abatement of NOx from diesel vehicles. A crucial step in this reaction is the activation of oxygen. Under conditions for low-temperature NH3-SCR, oxygen only reacts with CuI ions, which are present as mobile CuI diamine complexes [CuI(NH3)2]+. To determine the structure and reactivity of the species formed by oxidation of these CuI diamine complexes with oxygen at 200 °C, we have followed this reaction, using a Cu-CHA catalyst with a Si/Al ratio of 15 and 2.6 wt% Cu, by X-ray absorption spectroscopies (XANES and EXAFS) and diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectroscopy, with the support of DFT calculations and advanced EXAFS wavelet transform analysis. The results provide unprecedented direct evidence for the formation of a [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ mobile complex with a side-on μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino dicopper(II) structure, accounting for 80-90% of the total Cu content. These [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ are completely reduced to [CuI(NH3)2]+ at 200 °C in a mixture of NO and NH3. Some N2 is formed as well, which suggests the role of the dimeric complexes in the low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. The reaction of [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes with NH3 leads to a partial reduction of the Cu without any formation of N2. The reaction with NO results in an almost complete reduction to CuI, under the formation of N2. This indicates that the low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction proceeds via a reaction of these complexes with NO.
TheNH3-mediated selective catalytic reduction (NH3-SCR) of NOx over Cu-ion-exchanged chabazite (Cu-CHA) catalysts is the basis of the technology for abatement of NOx from diesel vehicles. A crucial step in this reaction is the activation of oxygen. Under conditions for low-temperature NH3-SCR, oxygen only reacts with CuI ions, which are present as mobile CuI diamine complexes [CuI(NH3)2]+. To determine the structure and reactivity of the species formed by oxidation of these CuI diamine complexes with oxygen at 200 °C, we have followed this reaction, using a Cu-CHA catalyst with a Si/Al ratio of 15 and 2.6 wt% Cu, by X-ray absorption spectroscopies (XANES and EXAFS) and diffuse reflectance UV-Vis spectroscopy, with the support of DFT calculations and advanced EXAFS wavelet transform analysis. The results provide unprecedented direct evidence for the formation of a [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ mobile complex with a side-on μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) structure, accounting for 80-90% of the totalCu content. These [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ are completely reduced to [CuI(NH3)2]+ at 200 °C in a mixture of NO and NH3. Some N2 is formed as well, which suggests the role of the dimeric complexes in the low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. The reaction of [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes with NH3 leads to a partial reduction of theCu without any formation of N2. The reaction with NO results in an almost complete reduction to CuI, under the formation of N2. This indicates that the low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction proceeds via a reaction of these complexes with NO.
The
selective catalytic reduction of NO by
ammonia (NH3-SCR) to nitrogen and water is the basis
for thecurrent technology for NO abatement
in the exhaust of lean-burn heavy-duty and passenger vehicles. This
technology has already resulted in significant improvements of exhaust
gas emissions from diesel vehicles. Catalysts based on Cu-ion exchanged
chabazite (Cu-CHA) are very effective for this reaction and are commonly
applied today. These catalysts feature a high activity around 200
°C, a good selectivity for N2 formation, and excellent
thermal stability in the harsh conditions of exhaust after-treatment
systems.[1,2]TheNH3-SCR reaction is
a redox reaction following the
equation 4NO + 4NH3 + O2 → 4N2 + 6H2O. TheNH3-SCR activity of Cu-CHA catalysts
is due to the capability of theCu ions to reversibly change the oxidation
state between CuI and CuII.[3−5] In theNH3-SCR reaction cycle, CuII is reduced to CuI, followed by a reoxidation of theCuI to restore
theCuII. The reaction cycle can be performed stepwise,
by alternating a reduction in a mixture of NO and NH3,
and an oxidation in a mixture of NO and O2.[4,6−9] For the reduction half-cycle, there is converging evidence that
the reduction of CuII by NO and NH3 at around
200 °C results in the formation of linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes. These complexes are
weakly bound to thezeolite, and therefore mobile.[3,6,10,11]In the
oxidation half cycle, theCuI species reacts
with O2 to form a CuII species, and at low temperatures,
O2 exclusively reacts with theCuI species.
Therefore, the reaction of O2 with the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes is an essential
step in theNH3-SCR reaction cycle at low temperature.[12] To complete the activation and dissociation
of theO2 molecule, four electrons are required. As a single
CuI is capable of delivering only one electron (no evidence
for CuIII formation has ever been reported in the numerous
studies on NH3-SCR), this means that other electron sources
are required, which can be other CuI ions, NO or other
reaction intermediates.[4−6,13,14] Following these thoughts, it has been shown that the dissociation
of O2 becomes easier when a single O2 molecule
interacts with two CuI ions simultaneously to form Cu-pairs.[3,4,7,15,16] Combining this with the mobility of the
linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes,
a reaction mechanism has been worked out where Cu-pair formation is
facilitated by diffusion of the[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes inside thezeolite.[4,13] Such
a mechanism involving the formation of Cu-pairs is supported by the
observation that theNH3-SCR rate at low temperature is,
for low Cu contents, proportional to the square of theCu content
in the catalyst.[4,12,17,18] At higher temperatures, the[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes decompose,[10,19] and theCuI is then expected to lose its mobility. As
a result, the formation of Cu-pairs, and therefore also the activation
of O2, becomes more difficult. This seems to be the reason
for the often observed decrease in NO conversion with increasing temperatures around 300 °C, which
separates the low- and high-temperature regimes for Cu-CHA catalysts.[4] At high temperatures, the reaction may occur
on isolated ZCuI sites (where Z indicates coordination
to zeoliteoxygens in the proximity of an Al exchange site), possibly
mediated by the formation of Cu-nitrate and Cu-nitrite species,[2,6,15,16,20] which then further reacts with ammonia to
yield N2 and H2O.In a model where the
formation of Cu-pairs is facilitated by diffusion
of [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes,
the actual active center for the activation O2 is not directly
associated with a specific site or location of theCu in thezeolite.
In a fresh Cu-CHA material, the positive Cu ions balance the negative
charges in thezeolite framework induced by theAl substitution; a
CuII ion is anchored by either a single framework Al atom,
as a Z[CuII(OH)] species, or by two framework Al atoms,
to yield a Z2CuII species. These Cu species
are then located either in a double 6-membered ring or an 8-membered
ring. Upon exposure to a reaction gas for NH3-SCR, which
contains NO, NH3, O2 and H2O, these
Z[CuII(OH)] and Z2CuII species become
solvated by NH3 leading to the formation of the mobile
[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes.
These complexes are able to diffuse to about 9 Å away from their
anchor point in the time scale of catalytic turnover, which enables
theCu-pair formation necessary for the activation of O2.[4,17] This means that the original location of theCu ions
does not immediately affect the reactivity of theCu, but the different
local environments of theCu ions may affect the solvation of theCu by ammonia. Furthermore, Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations
have shown that the formation of Cu pairs from two [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes becomes more
difficult in areas with two Al atoms located close to each other.[21]The structures that are formed after the
reaction of an O2 molecule and two [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes are Cu complexes containing
two Cu-centers bridged
by oxygen; the general formula of these complexes is [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+. Efforts
to determine the structure of this complex have mainly been based
on DFT calculations. Figure shows three possible structures of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes, which
differ in the way theoxygen molecule is bound to theCu, and whether
dissociation of the O–O bond takes place or not. The stability
of these structures calculated with DFT depends on the functional
chosen in the calculation.[22] Calculations
on ammonia-ligated Cu2O2 cores in the gas phase
have shown how the predicted stability of different structures depends
on the method (DFT vs post-Hartree–Fock), due to the differences
in the description of the electron correlation contribution to the
core conformation.[23,24] More recent DFT calculations
on O2 activation and dissociation by [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes in CHAalso showed a
strong dependence of the calculated stabilities and structural parameters
on the selected functional. DFT calculations using a PBE functional,
with or without van der Waals corrections, often result in the bis-μ-oxo
diamino dicopper(III) complex[17,22] (Figure c), which implies that the reaction of O2 with [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes results in the dissociation of the O–O bond. With
a HSE06 hybrid functional, one finds a μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex (Figure b), in which theO2 molecule binds with theCu-centers in a side-on configuration
without dissociation of the O–O bond.[22] Including a Hubbard-U term of 6 eV in DFT (DFT+U) with a PBE functional,
and van der Waals corrections results in a correct prediction of the
dissociation of the O–O bond in Cu2O2 complexes in enzymes with a structure similar to those expected
in theCu-CHAzeolite.[22] Calculations of
the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex with that method pointed to the formation of the
μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II)
complex (Figure b),[22] just like the HSE06 functional. Clearly, experimental
data for the structure of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex are needed to resolve
this issue.
Figure 1
Pictorial representation of the [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes proposed in ref (17): (a) trans-μ-1,2-peroxo diamino dicopper(II) (end-on), (b) μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino dicopper(II) (side-on),
and c) bis-μ-oxo diamino dicopper(III). Atom color code: Cu,
green; H, white; O, red; N, blue.
Pictorial representation of tn class="Chemical">he [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes proposed in ref (17): (a) trans-μ-1,2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) (end-on), (b) μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) (side-on),
and c) bis-μ-oxo diamino dicopper(III). Atom color code: Cu,
green; H, white; O, red; N, blue.
In this work, we present a spectroscopic investigation of the structure
and reactivity of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes formed upon reaction of O2 with the mobile [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes in a Cu-CHA catalyst for NH3-SCR. The
available X-ray absorption spectroscopy data for Cu-CHA at the end
of the transient O2 oxidation experiment are not conclusive
on the detailed structure of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes.[17] The concept that dissociation of O2 requires
two solvated CuI ions also opens the question whether Cu
pairs play a role beyond O2 activation. Therefore, we also
investigate the reactivity of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes toward NO and NH3. These goals have been pursued by applying X-ray absorption
spectroscopy (XAS), both near-edge (XANES) and extended range (EXAFS),
with a well-established operando setup,[6,10,25] and diffuse reflectance ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared
(DR UV-Vis-NIR) spectroscopy[19,26] using a Cu-CHA catalyst.
DFT calculations were used for optimization of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ structures
illustrated in Figure , which were used as input for the interpretation of the EXAFS data.
To enhance the sensitivity of EXAFS to multicopper moieties, we applied
wavelet transform (WT) analysis, giving unprecedented insights in
the formation and separation of the solvated Cu-pairs in theNH3-SCR reaction cycle over Cu-CHA catalysts.
Experimental Section
The catalyst used
in this study was a Cu-CHA material with Si/Al
= 15 with a Cu content of 2.6 wt%, corresponding to Cu/Al = 0.5, a
Cu density of around 0.4 Cu/1000 Å3 (0.3 Cu per chabazite
cage) and a theoretical mean Cu–Cu distance of 16.6 Å.
At this Cu density, about 90% of CuI ions can be oxidized
by O2, forming the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes.[17] The steps depicted in Scheme have been used to form these complexes and
to study the reactivity toward NO and NH3 experimentally.
These steps are as follow:
Scheme 1
Experimental
Steps Followed by XAS and UV-Vis-NIR DR Spectroscopies
Step 1, pretreatment at 400
°C in pure O2; step 2, reduction in 1000 ppm of NO/1000
ppm of NH3/He; step 3, oxidation in 10% O2/He;
step 4, reaction with 1000 ppm of NH3/He or step 4′,
with 1000 ppm of NO/He. Total gas flow: 100 mL/min for XAS, 50 mL/min
for UV-Vis. The purge step was carried out in He for XAS and in N2 for UV-Vis.
pretreatment in O2 at 400
°C;reduction in
a mixture of 1000 ppm
of NO and 1000 ppm of n class="Chemical">NH3 at 200 °C to form [CuI(NH3)2]+;[4,6,17,27]
oxidation of then class="Chemical">[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes by O2 at 200
°C to form the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes;[17]
reaction of then class="Chemical">[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes
with NO
or NH3 at 200 °C
Experimental
Steps Followed by XAS and UV-Vis-NIR DR Spectroscopies
Step 1, pretreatment at 400
°C in pure O2; step 2, reduction in 1000 ppm of n class="Chemical">NO/1000
ppm of NH3/He; step 3, oxidation in 10% O2/He;
step 4, reaction with 1000 ppm of NH3/He or step 4′,
with 1000 ppm of NO/He. Total gas flow: 100 mL/min for XAS, 50 mL/min
for UV-Vis. The purge step was carried out in He for XAS and in N2 for UV-Vis.
The steps in this protocol
were followed independently by XAS coupled
to an online mass spectrometer for a qualitative effluent gas analysis
(BM23 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility),[28] and by DR UV-Vis-NIR. In this Article, we present
the development of spectra with time under isothermal conditions,
until a steady-state was observed. The DR UV-Vis-NIR spectra are reported
as relative reflectance (R%), to avoid artifacts due to the use of
the Kubelka–Munk function.[26] We
refer to the Supporting Information (SI), section 1, for more experimental details and description of the equipment
used.
Results
Oxidation of [CuI(NH3)2]+ Complexes
Oxidation and Coordination State of Cu Ions
The linear
[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes
are the starting point of the experiment discussed in
this section. These complexes are formed by exposure of the pretreated
Cu-CHA catalyst (step 1) to a NO/NH3 mixture at 200 °C
(step 2). The presence of this state is indicated by a characteristic
rising-edge peak at ∼8982.5 eV in theCu K-edge XANES spectrum,
corresponding to the 1s→4p transition of linearly coordinated
CuI centers (Figure a, blue curve) and validated by EXAFS fitting based on the[CuI(NH3)2]+ model (see SI, section 2.2). Upon reaction of this linear
[CuI(NH3)2]+ complex with
a mixture of 10% O2 in He, this distinct peak at 8982.5
eV disappears almost completely, theXANES resembles that observed
after pretreatment in O2 (Figure a, red and gray dashed lines) and the dipole-forbidden
1s→3d transition of CuII becomes visible at 8977.3
eV (Figure b). These
changes clearly indicate that the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complex is oxidized by O2.
After 30 min in O2/He, a small feature at 8982.5 eV is
still recognized, but the spectra do not change any more. This indicates,
that not all [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes are oxidized; in agreement with earlier observations[17] about 10–20% of the[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes do not react, based on
qualitative XANES analysis. The mass spectrometer connected to the
cell did not detect any NH3 desorption during the oxidation,
indicating that theCu does not lose theNH3 ligands in
the oxidation process.
Figure 2
Evolution of the Cu K-edge XANES (a) and DR UV-Vis-NIR
spectra
(c) of Cu-CHA during exposure to 10% O2/He at 200 °C
after reduction in NO/NH3/He at 200 °C. Inset (b)
reports a magnification of the pre-edge peak arising from the CuII 1s →3d transition. Dark blue thick line: after NO/NH3/He exposure; red thick line: final spectrum after exposure
to 10% O2; gray thin lines: intermediates; dark gray dashed
line: Cu-CHA pretreated in O2, by heating in O2 up to 400 °C and subsequently cooling in O2 down
to 200 °C prior to XAS data collection, step 1.
Evolution of theCu K-edge XANES (a) and DR UV-Vis-NIR
spectra
(c) of Cu-CHA during exposure to 10% O2/He at 200 °C
after reduction in NO/NH3/He at 200 °C. Inset (b)
reports a magnification of the pre-edge peak arising from theCuII 1s →3d transition. Dark blue thick line: after NO/NH3/He exposure; red thick line: final spectrum after exposure
to 10% O2; gray thin lines: intermediates; dark gray dashed
line: Cu-CHA pretreated in O2, by heating in O2 up to 400 °C and subsequently cooling in O2 down
to 200 °C prior to XAS data collection, step 1.This evidence points to the presence of different, NH3-solvated CuII species with respect to the framework-coordinated
CuII ions (fw-CuII) known to be present in the
catalyst after pretreatment in O2.[7,25,29−31] To strengthen such indications,
we initially analyzed by linear combination fit (LCF) theXANES after
oxidation in O2 (step 3) using the spectra obtained at
step 1 (pretreated in O2) and at step 2 (reduced in NO/NH3) as references for CuII and CuI components,
respectively (see SI, Figure S11). Overall,
estimates for CuI and CuII percentages are in
reasonable agreement with qualitative analysis. It is also evident
that the rising edge peak at 8982.5 eV diagnostic of CuI species is excellently reproduced, indicating that theCuI component, i.e., linear [CuI(NH3)2]+, is the same at both steps 2 and 3. However, significant
discrepancies between experimental and LCF curve are found when considering
the rising-edge region where CuII 1s→4p transitions
typically occurs, as well as the shape and energy position of the
white-line peak. These discrepancies translate into a structured residual
function, with well-defined maxima and minima well above the noise
level, further indicating that two spectroscopically distinguishable
CuII species are present at steps 1 and 3.In the
UV-Vis-NIR spectra, the oxidation of the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complex is visible
as follows. Due to the d10 closed-shell configuration of
CuI, the typical ligand-field d-d transitions are absent,
and the spectrum is dominated by a ligand-to-metalcharge transfer
(LMCT) transition observed in the range 30 000–45 000
cm–1 (blue curve in Figure c).[26,32] The oxidation of CuI to CuII by O2 is reflected in the development
of an intense d-d absorption centered at 13 850 cm–1 and a red-shift of theLMCT transitions, from ca. 35 000
to 25 000 cm–1 (arbitrarily measured at R = 60%). Thefeatures at 6515 and 4970 cm–1 in theNIR region are due to theovertones and combination modes
of NH3 and NH4+, confirming that
theCuII species after oxidation still contains theNH3 ligands. The spectrum of theCu-CHA catalyst pretreated in
O2 (dark gray dashed curve) is reported for comparison,
showing that the coordination geometry of theCuII species
formed by oxidation of [CuI(NH3)2]+ is different with respect to that of the variety of
framework-coordinated monomeric/multimeric ions (fw-CuII, such as Z[CuII(OH)]/Z[CuII(OO*)] etc.) responsible
for the typicalCu-CHA “quadruplet” (complex absorption
in the d-d region with components at 20 000, 16 350,
13 300, and 10 600 (sh) cm–1).[26,33−36]
Structure of the [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ Complexes
To determine the precise structure of theCuII complex
formed by the oxidation of the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ species with O2, we have analyzed
the Fourier-transformed (FT) EXAFS spectra; Figure a shows these data without phase correction.
The first-shell peak is almost doubled in intensity after O2 interaction (from blue to red), indicating that the coordination
number of Cu in theCuII complexes is higher than in the
linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ complex.
In the next shell, the unstructured feature observed for the mobile
[CuI(NH3)2]+ complex evolves
toward a broad scattering feature peaking at ca. 2.4 Å. Even
though this feature is close to the second-shell EXAFS signature of
framework-coordinated CuII ions after pretreatment in O2 (dashed gray line), it can be clearly distinguished, indicating
that, at least a substantial part of theCuII complex is
still mobile in the cage. Finally, a third peak around 3.2 Å
develops, which could correspond to contributions from a Cu–Cu
scattering in theCuII complexes shown in Figure . All these features in the
FT-EXAFS are consistent with the formation of [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes. However,
a more detailed analysis is required to rule out re-coordination of
CuII ions to zeolite framework and, once this possibility
is excluded, to identify the precise [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ structure, based on the
three possibilities shown in Figure .
Figure 3
(a) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted
FT-EXAFS
curves during exposure of the Cu-CHA catalyst to NO/NH3/He (dark blue thick line), followed by 10% O2 in He (gray
thin lines; red thick line: final spectrum; dark gray dashed line:
pretreatment in O2 by heating in O2 up to 400
°C and subsequently cooling in O2 down to 200 °C
prior to XAS data collection, step 1. (b) Illustration of [Cu(NH3)2]+ and (c) μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino dicopper(II) (side-on) complexes.
Atom color code: Cu, green; H, white; O, red; N, blue. Part (c) also
report selected DFT bond distances in Å.
(a) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted
FT-EXAFS
curves during exposure of theCu-CHA catalyst to NO/NH3/He (dark blue thick line), followed by 10% O2 in He (gray
thin lines; red thick line: final spectrum; dark gray dashed line:
pretreatment in O2 by heating in O2 up to 400
°C and subsequently cooling in O2 down to 200 °C
prior to XAS data collection, step 1. (b) Illustration of [Cu(NH3)2]+ and (c) μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) (side-on) complexes.
Atom color code: Cu, green; H, white; O, red; N, blue. Part (c) also
report selected DFT bond distances in Å.To this aim, we have first performed quantitative EXAFS analysis
of the spectra obtained at step 1 (gray dashed line in Figure ). The adopted fitting model
is based on structuralcharacteristics conserved for most fw-CuII species previously proposed to form in Cu-CHA upon pretreatment
in O2.[7,25,29−31,34] Importantly, it accounts
for a distinctive scattering contribution of charge-balancing Al atoms
(Alfw) located at ca. 2.75 Å range from theCuII center, while maintaining a certain degree of flexibility
to account for fractional contribution from multicopper species (additional
information can be found in SI, section 2.1). As detailed in theSI, the fit resulted
in a good level of reproduction of experimental EXAFS spectrum for
the pretreated catalyst at step 1, with physically meaningful values
for all the refined parameters, as well as for their fitting errors
(see SI, Figure S2 and Table S2).A second stage of our analysis consisted in a test EXAFS fit of
the experimental spectrum of the[Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes oxidized in O2 (step 3, red solid line
in Figure ), using
exactly the same model based on fw-CuII, which guaranteed
a successful fit for the EXAFS of the pretreated catalyst (see SI, section 2.3). While the numerical agreement
between best-fit and experimentalcurve was formally satisfactory,
this was achieved at the expense of the physical meaning of the optimized
parameters (e.g., Debye–Waller factors as high as 0.1 Å2) as well as of their accuracy (unphysically high fitting
errors). Such inconsistencies most severely affect theCu–Alfw coordination shell, representing a diagnostic contribution
for the large majority of fw-coordinated CuII species proposed
so far in theCHA framework. Consistently with the LCF XANES results
in SI, Figure S11, the failure of this
test EXAFS fit strongly supports the spectroscopically detectable
diversity of CuII species formed in Cu-CHA at steps 1 and
3. The state of the catalyst at step 3 is clearly not consistent with
fw-coordinated CuII species, thus paving the way to deeper
structural analysis considering mobile [CuII2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes.To determine the precise structure of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes, first
we have optimized the structures in the gas phase (that is not including
thezeolite effect in the calculations) for the three complexes shown
in Figure by DFT,
including the three main structures proposed in the literature by
different authors: NH3-solvated side-on[22] and end-on[4] peroxides as well
as the bis(μ-oxo)-dicopper core.[17] Then, these structures were used as input to fit the observed EXAFS
features. A detailed description of the DFT and fitting procedures
and results can be found in theSI, section 2.4. Note that, due to the difficulty in determining the relative stabilities
of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes by DFT,[22−24] we have only used the DFT calculations
to provide reasonable structures for the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes as input for fitting
the EXAFS data.The difference in the structures of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes
in Figure lays in
theCu2O2 cores. TheCu2O2 cores
differ in theCu–Cu, Cu–O, and O–O bond lengths,
and in the oxidation state of theCu. Table contains a comparison of our calculated
values for the different possible [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes and the known values
for similar Cu2O2 cores from enzymes, where
the precise structure is determined experimentally.[37−41] From the table, we observe that our calculated values
agree well with the experimentally determined values for enzymes,
which validates our structural models derived from DFT calculations
for further EXAFS analysis.
Table 1
Experimental and
Calculated Structural
Parameters of Cu2O2 Cores
bond length (Å)
Cu–Cu
Cu–O
O–O
Cu oxidation
state
ref
trans (end-on) μ-1,2-peroxo
dicopper(II)
4.36
–
1.43
2+
(38,41)
4.149–4.300
1.860–2.113
1.270–1.449
This worka
(side-on) μ-η2,η2-peroxo dicopper(II)
3.52–3.59
1.97–1.98
1.37–1.54
2+
(38,39,42)
3.059–3.597
1.910–1.983
1.416–1.508
this worka
bis-μ-oxo
dicopper(III)
2.74–2.83
1.80–1.83
2.29–2.37
3+
(37−39,42)
2.644–2.872
1.772–1.870
2.265–2.359
this worka
EXAFS best fit
3.40 ± 0.05
1.911 ± 0.009
–
–
this work
DFT calculations on zeolite-free
molecular complexes with M06-HF-D and M06-L-D functionals.
DFT caln class="Chemical">culations on zeolite-free
molecular complexes with M06-HF-D and M06-L-D functionals.
Fitting the EXAFS data with the
(end-on) trans μ-1,2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) or bis-μ-oxo diamino dicopper(III) models
(Figure a,c) lead
unsatisfactory results (see SI, section 2.4), and therefore, the observed EXAFS features are not consistent
with these structures. Using theside-on μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex (Figure b and Figure c) to fit the EXAFS data, we
find a Cu–O distance of 1.911 ± 0.009 Å, a Cu–N
distance of 2.06 ± 0.02 Å, and a Cu–Cu distance of
3.40 ± 0.05 Å. These results are in excellent agreement
with values calculated by DFT, and also match the values for a similar
Cu2O2 core in enzymes (Figure c and Table ). Furthermore, the EXAFS fit based on the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex also
revealed intense multiple scattering contributions in the 2.5–3.5
Å range—mostly triangular scattering paths involving the
two O atoms of theperoxo group and quasi-collinear paths across theN(NH3)–O(peroxo) diagonal. This points to the fact
that the majority of the formed [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes are characterized by
the μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) structure depicted in Figure c.Having identified the[Cu2(NH3)4(O2)]2+ complex
as μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II), we further refined
the individual contributions of this complex and the unreacted [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes by multi-component
EXAFS fitting (see SI, section 2.4.3 for
details on the procedure). We find that 16 ± 8% of Cu is still
present as [CuI(NH3)2]+, indicating that not all [CuI(NH3)2]+ are oxidized by O2. The amount of unreacted
[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes
we find here is in good agreement with the estimate based on the qualitative
XANES analysis presented above, and with theoretical predictions based
on a limited mobility of the[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes at the studied Cu density.[17]
Validating the Structural
Dynamics of Cu
Species by EXAFS Wavelet Transform (WT) Analysis
The DFT-guided
EXAFS fitting results allow us to define a consistent experimentally
based model for the[Cu2(NH3)4(O2)]2+ complexes previously proposed.[4,17] A conclusive assignment of thefeatures observed in conventional
Fourier transform (FT) EXAFS spectra, however, is hindered by thesimultaneous presence of various types of atomic neighbors surrounding
theCu absorber, especially in the high-R region.
If two or more types of elemental neighbors and/or scattering interactions
are localized at close distances around the absorber, their contributions
in the direct space R overlap and often become indistinguishable.
For theCu-CHAzeolite studied here, these potentially include single
scattering paths from framework Al/Si/O in zeolite-coordinated Cu
moieties as well as Cu in multicopper species, which can be coordinated
to thezeolite or mobile.[29] The intense
multiple scattering paths involving first-shell O/N neighbors in the
proposed μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) moiety mentioned above are also expected to fall in this R-space range.To resolve this, it is possible to
exploit the fact that the contributions from different elemental neighbors
appear at different locations in k-space, because
the backscattering amplitude factor F(k) strongly depends on the atomic number Z. Figure a shows the F(k) curves associated with the elements
relevant in this work, namely O, N, Al, Si, and Cu. It is clear that
signals produced by heavier atoms, such as Cu, are localized at higher k values with respect to lighter atoms. On this background,
a WT analysis allows for a better discrimination of the nature of
the scattering contributions around the absorber, compared to the
classical FT analysis.[30,43−47] The WT analysis results in a 2D representation of
the EXAFS, simultaneously revealing thesignalfeatures in both R- and k-space. Then, one can visually
resolve the scattering contributions originating from atomic neighbors
having enough Z-contrast in their F(k) functions. A more detailed description of the
WT analysis technique is given in theSI, section 3.1.
Figure 4
(a) Backscattering amplitude factors associated with the elements
present in the system under study. Moduli of EXAFS WTs magnified in
the 2–4 Å R-space range for the following
reaction steps: (b) step 1, pretreatment in O2; (c) step
2, reduction in NO/NH3/He; (d) step 3, oxidation in 10%
O2/He; (e) step 4, exposure to NO/He or (f) step 4′,
exposure to NH3/He. For all the WTs a common intensity
scale is employed. Part (d) also shows the corresponding EXAFS spectra
in k-space and R-space (conventional
FT) in the relevant ranges, as well as the k-space
range characteristic of low-Z (O/N, Si/Al) and high-Z scatterers (Cu). All spectra measured at 200 °C.
(a) Backscattering amplitude factors associated with the elements
present in the system under study. Moduli of EXAFS WTs magnified in
the 2–4 Å R-space range for the following
reaction steps: (b) step 1, pretreatment in O2; (c) step
2, reduction in NO/NH3/He; (d) step 3, oxidation in 10%
O2/He; (e) step 4, exposure to NO/He or (f) step 4′,
exposure to NH3/He. For all the WTs a common intensity
scale is employed. Part (d) also shows the corresponding EXAFS spectra
in k-space and R-space (conventional
FT) in the relevant ranges, as well as the k-space
range characteristic of low-Z (O/N, Si/Al) and high-Z scatterers (Cu). All spectra measured at 200 °C.Figure b–f
reports the moduli of EXAFS WTs for the key reaction steps explored
in this work, measured in steady-state conditions at 200 °C.
Here, EXAFS WTs are magnified in the 2–4 Å R-space range, where signal interpretation with conventional FT-EXAFS
approach is mostly complicated by overlapping contributions. Corresponding
full-range EXAFS-WTs are reported and discussed in detail in theSI, section 3.3.In the relevant R-space range, EXAFS WT for the
spectrum collected in O2 at 200 °C after pretreatment
in O2 at 400 °C (Figure b), clearly splits in two lobes. The first
sub-lobe, localized in the k range 1–5 Å–1 and R range 2–2.8 Å
is associated with the framework atoms: O, Si and Al. The second one,
localized at higher k values (i.e., 6–8 Å–1), is principally related to Cu–Cu contributions
in oxygen-bridged Cu dimers or, more in general, multicopper moieties.
WT analysis further validate the previously mentioned EXAFS fitting
results for step 1 based on a prototypical fw-CuII model
(see SI, section 2.1), confirming thesimultaneous
presence of Cu–Al, Cu–O/Si, and Cu–Cu scattering
contributions in the high-R EXAFS range for the pretreated
catalyst. The presence of Cu-oxo dimeric/polymeric cores in oxygen
activated Cu-CHA catalysts represents a novelty with respect to previous
literature in the context of theNH3-SCR reaction.[25] This aspect has been recently established by
different authors studying the nature of Cu-oxo species in Cu-CHA
for the direct methane to methanol conversion.[26,29,30,34,35,43,47] While from the EXAFS fit in SI, section 2.1 an average Cu–Cu coordination number NCu = 0.5
± 0.3 is estimated, a more precise identification of the nature
and amount of these dimeric/polymeric structures in theoxygen activated
Cu-CHA is outside the scope of this manuscript and probably beyond
the possibilities of the technique. However, the contrast between F(k) function for Cu and for the rest of
relevant elements in the system is sufficient to reveal the presence
of (a fraction) of multicopper moieties.Indeed, the EXAFS backscattering
amplitude factors in Figure a show that the F(k) functions
of lighter elements, such
as O/N and Si/Al, have maxima at around 3–4 Å–1, while for Cu, the position of the main peak significantly shifts
to a k-value of around 7 Å–1. These differences lead to the observed lobe splitting, enabling
an unambiguous, visual discrimination of contributions stemming from
Cu or framework atomic contributions. Due to the substantial overlap
of the related backscattering amplitude functions, it is not possible
to discriminate by means of WT among O/N and Si/Al contributions.A WT analysis of the EXAFS spectrum for the mobile [CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes (Figure c), which is obtained after
exposure of the catalyst pretreated in O2 to theNO/NH3 gas mixture at 200 °C (step 2), shows a complete reduction
and mobilization of theCu ions in the system.[6,10,17,19,48] The second-shell peak in the conventional FT-EXAFS
disappears (Figure a and SI, Figure S6) and all the high-R
features are substantially decreased in the corresponding WT map in Figure c. Even though the
sub-lobe at k = 7 Å–1 associated
with theCu–Cusignal is completely lost at this step, a low-intensity
feature is still visible in the k-space range 1–5
Å–1, which is most likely due to multiple scattering
paths involving the first-shell N ligands in the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ moieties.The crucial
step for the activation of oxygen is the isothermal
oxidation of the[CuI(NH3)2]+ complexes, and the corresponding WT analysis is shown in Figure d. The most important
observation here is the appearance of a sub-lobe at around k = 7 Å–1 indicating a contribution
of Cu–Cu scattering. The presence of this feature unambiguously
demonstrates the formation of a Cu complex containing more than one
Cu atom. This agrees well with the formation of [Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes, and is
in line with our EXAFS results (section ) and earlier work.[4,16−18] The second sub-lobe occurs in the same k-space range observed in the EXAFS WT after pretreatment in O2. However, we note a different morphology of the WT along
the R direction in the two probed states, indicating
that there is a difference in Cu–Cu coordination after pretreatment
in O2 or oxidation of [CuI(NH3)2]+ at 200 °C. After oxidation of [CuI(NH3)2]+ (step 3, Figure d), the WT intensity is rather
localized in R-space. It peaks at ca. 2.8 Å
in the phase-uncorrected R-axis, pointing to a uniform
Cu–Cu interatomic distance around 3.5 Å. This indicates,
that the reaction of [CuI(NH3)2]+ with O2 results in a well-defined structure, compatible
with theside-on μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex shown in Figure b and Figure c. In contrast, after heating in O2 at 400
°C and subsequent cooling to 200 °C in O2 (step
1, Figure b), a broader
intensity distribution in R-space is observed in
the k-space region characteristic of Cu–Cu
scattering, in agreement with the presence of more heterogeneous multicopper
species in the pretreated Cu-CHA catalyst.[29,34,35]Figure also reports
the EXAFS-WTs related to the reactivity of the formed μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes
with the key SCR reactants, NO (step 4, Figure e) and NH3 (step 4′, Figure f). In both cases,
the sub-lobe at k = 7 Å–1 is
clearly lost, providing direct structural evidence for the cleavage
of dicopper cores upon separate exposure to NO or NH3 at
200 °C. A moderately intense sub-lobe is instead still visible
in the low-k range, characteristic of low-Z scatterers. As argued before, this feature most likely
stems from multiple scattering contributions involving N and O atoms.Finally, to comparatively assess the presence of Cu–Cu scattering
contributions throughout the investigated reaction steps, we computed
the power density function Φ of
the WT representation.[45] This quantity
was obtained integrating the square of the modulus of the WT over
the R-range 2–4 Å, that should contain
theCu–Cusignal contribution. Φ is given by the following expression:where Rmin = 2
Å, Rmax = 4, and Wψ(k,R) is the
wavelet transform representation of the EXAFS signal depending on
the mother function used (see SI, section 3.1 for details).Figure presents
the results of these calculations, summarizing the above observations
about EXAFS WTs. A common first peak, for all the steps, is localized
in the 0.0–5.5 Å–1 range: it corresponds
to the WT low-k sub-lobe, collectively accounting
for the contributions from O, N, Si and Al atoms. The second main
peak is present only in catalyst pretreated in O2 (curve
1) and after [CuI(NH3)2]+ reaction with O2 (curve 3). The position of this peak
exactly corresponds to the maximum of theCu backscattering amplitude
function shown in Figure a, clearly indicating the formation of [Cu2(NH3)4(O2)]2+ complexes.
Figure 5
Density power
function Φ calculated
for the WT representations showed in Figure b–f. k-Space ranges
diagnostic for light-Z scatterers (O/N, Si/Al) and
high-Z scatterers (Cu), based on backscattering amplitude
factors F(k) reported in Figure a, are indicated.
Density power
function Φ calculated
for the WT representations showed in Figure b–f. k-Space ranges
diagnostic for light-Z scatterers (O/N, Si/Al) and
high-Z scatterers (Cu), based on backscattering amplitude
factors F(k) reported in Figure a, are indicated.
Reactivity of [Cu2(NH3)4(O2)]2+ Species
toward NH3 and NO
To determine the reactivity
of μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) complexes
toward NO and NH3, which are the main reactants in NH3-SCR, we have exposed them to NO and NH3 separately,
and in a 1:1 mixture. Exposure to a mixture of NO and NH3 results in a complete restoration of a CuI oxidation
state as [CuI(NH3)2]+ with
formation of theN2 product, confirming theNH3-SCR reaction and the reversibility of the oxidation of the[CuI(NH3)2]+ species (see SI, Figure S12 and qualitative mass spectrometry
analysis in SI, Figure S16). This observation
provides experimental evidence that it is possible to close theNH3-SCR reaction cycle between the above-discussed and identified
“homogeneous-like” μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) and [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes.
Reactivity toward NH3: Structural
Changes
As shown by EXAFS-WT analysis above (Figure f), exposure of the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes
to NH3 results in the separation of thecopper centers.
No significant N2 evolution is observed during this transformation
(see SI, Figure S17). In this section,
we focus on the structuralchanges of the resulting Cu complexes.Figure reports the
XAS and UV-Vis-NIR spectra for the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes during exposure to
NH3 at 200 °C. Thecharacteristic CuI transition
at ∼8982.5 eV for the linear [CuI(NH3)2]+ appears, but does not reach the intensity
observed in the fully reduced catalyst (dashed dark-blue curve in Figure a). The intensity
of the 1s→3d pre-edge peak (Figure c) decreases, corroborating that some reduction
of theCu takes place. In the corresponding UV-Vis-NIR spectra, the
intense d-d transition, which appears at around 14 000 cm–1 (Figure d) becomes less intense and shifts from 13 800 to 14 400
cm–1, without substantialchange in the peak shape.
The fact that this peak does not disappear completely, indicates that
a part of theCu remains in theCuII state. The shift is
in agreement with a change in the ligands bonding theCuII ions, affecting the d-d orbital splitting.[19,32,34,49] This is also
testified by the progressive consumption of theLMCT absorption between
27 000 and 31 000 cm–1, which is consistent
with the disappearance of theperoxo group in thediamino dicopper(II)
complex.[26,34,35] Thus, exposure
of the μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) complexes to NH3 leads to a change in the
ligands of theCu and to a partial reduction to a CuI species.
Figure 6
Exposure
to NH3/He at 200 °C of Cu-CHA catalyst
after step 3. (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted FT EXAFS curves. (c) Magnification
of CuII 1s →3d transition. (d) UV-Vis-NIR DR spectra.
Red thick line: spectrum collected in step 3 (same as Figures and 3); blue thick line: after NH3/He exposure; gray thin lines:
intermediates; dashed dark blue line : step 2 (NO/NH3 at
200 °C after pretreatment in O2, same as dark blue
in Figures and 3). (e) Illustration of Cu species proposed to be
formed upon reaction of the μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino dicopper(II) complexes with NH3. Atom color code: Cu, green; H, white; O, red; N, blue.
Exposure
to NH3/He at 200 °C of Cu-CHA catalyst
after step 3. (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted FT EXAFS curves. (c) Magnification
of CuII 1s →3d transition. (d) UV-Vis-NIR DR spectra.
Red thick line: spectrum collected in step 3 (same as Figures and 3); blue thick line: after NH3/He exposure; gray thin lines:
intermediates; dashed dark blue line : step 2 (NO/NH3 at
200 °C after pretreatment in O2, same as dark blue
in Figures and 3). (e) Illustration of Cu species proposed to be
formed upon reaction of the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes with NH3. Atom color code: Cu, green; H, white; O, red; N, blue.The UV-Vis features described above only indicate thechanges
in
the coordination sphere of CuII ions, CuI ions
being essentially silent. On the other hand, XANES and EXAFS give
average information on all copper species formed in this reaction
step. A decrease in the average number of ligands surrounding Cu ions
is indicated by the reduced intensity of the EXAFS first shell peak
(Figure b). The intensity,
shape and energy position of theXANESfeatures suggest the presence
of a mixture of [CuI(NH3)2]+ and [CuII(NH3)3(X)]+ complexes, with a geometry similar to the [CuII(NH3)3(OH)]2+ species, as reported earlier.[19,32] A XANES linear combination fit (see SI, Figure S13) indicates that the fractions of [CuI(NH3)2]+ and [CuII(NH3)3(X)]+ at equilibrium are 65% and 35%, respectively.
Considering that we have 16% CuI and 84% CuII before exposure to NH3 (see section ), this means that approximately 58% of
the amount of thecopper ions in the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes are reduced to CuI.
Reactivity toward NH3: Interpretation
The results described above indicate
that NH3 is reacting
with the μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) complexes, breaking thecopper dimer and reducing a consistent
fraction of theCuII ions to CuI. No N2 is observed during this reaction, in agreement with the fact that
direct oxidation of ammonia (eq ), only occurs on Cu-CHA at higher temperature.[50]TheXANES and UV-Vis spectra
(light blue curves
in Figure a,d) are
consistent with the presence of CuII ions in a pseudo-square-planar
geometry, similar to the [CuII(NH3)3(OH)] + species predicted by Paolucci et al. and experimentally
observed by Borfecchia et al.[7,19] We could thus hypothesize
that the corresponding CuII ions are in the form of a superoxo
amino [CuII(NH3)3(OO*)]+ complex, as depicted in Figure e. This geometry is consistent with the relatively
high intensity of the low-k sub-lobe in EXAFS WT
data (Figure f and
curve 4′ in Figure ), related to multiple scattering contributions from N/O ligand
atoms.Thesuperoxo [CuII(NH3)3(OO*)]+ complex could be formed by a one-electron transfer
from the bridged peroxo group in the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes to one of theCuII ions, with consequent formation of CuI ions and
of thesuperoxo ligand. The resulting CuI ions are thus
stabilized as [CuI(NH3)2]+. This could be rationalized with eq , which should result in the reduction of 50% of theCuII ions in the dimer to CuI.Our XANES linear
combination fitting indicates
a higher efficiency of theCuII-to-CuI reduction
with NH3 (ca. 58% of CuII reduced) with respect
to what is expected on the basis of eq . This could be related to a further reduction of thesuperoxo [CuII(NH3)3(OO*)]+ complexes by the available NH3 present in the system,
with formation of [CuI(NH3)2]+. Interestingly, DFT simulations using the M06-HF-D3 functional
predict that reaction is exothermic at the experimental conditions. The computed variation
of internal energy is −4.6 kJ/mol; see SI for further details. Despite the clear indications provided
by the linear combination fitting and DFT simulations, the associated
uncertainties are too high to use them as an ultimate proof for the reaction , so this may be
investigated in further works. Interestingly, the reaction tentatively
proposed in ( could
provide clues as to the origin of the observed NH3-inhibition
effect and negative apparent NH3 rate orders, observed
by different authors.[12,51,52]
Reactivity toward NO: Experimental Evidence
The reaction of the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes with NO results in the separation
of thecopper centers, as shown by EXAFS-WT analysis (see above, Figure e). This is accompanied
by some formation of N2, as monitored by online mass spectrometry
(see SI, Figure S18). Due to the used experimental
setup, the acquired mass spectrometry data are not accurate enough
to be used for quantitative considerations. This section provides
information about the dynamics of the reaction and summarizes the
main experimental findings.Figure reports the XAS and UV-Vis-NIR spectra collected
when contacting the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes formed in step 3 with NO at
200 °C. Thechanges in the pre-edge features at theCu K-edge
in XANES reveals a fast and effective CuII-to-CuI transformation. Thecharacteristic 1s→4p transition at ∼8982.5
eV reappears in the spectrum (Figure a), and the weak 1s→3d transition at 8977.3
eV, indicative of a CuII species, disappears (Figure c). To illustrate
the differences in the formation of CuI species in the
reactions of the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes with NO and NH3, we have
compared the temporal evolution of the 1s→4p transition at
∼8982.5 eV in the two cases (Figure f). These data show that the reduction of
the μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) complex is faster and more efficient with NO than with
NH3, since theCuI peak reaches about 76% of
the intensity observed for the fully reduced reference state, i.e.,
[CuI(NH3)2]+, as formed
in step 2 (dark blue dashed line in Figure a) after only 5 min, stabilizing at about
84% after 35 min. In the case of reduction in NH3, the
intensity is about 43% after 5 min, and reaches about 62% after 35
min. We note that the intensity of theCuI rising-edge
peak can be affected by the geometry of Cu complexes.[43] However, even though these data cannot be used to obtain
precise kinetics of the reaction, they clearly show a difference in
the reduction behavior in the two cases.
Figure 7
Exposure to NO/He at
200 °C of Cu-CHA catalyst after step
3. (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted FT EXAFS curves. (c) Magnification of CuII 1s→3d transition. (d) Initial and (e) subsequent
evolution of DR UV-Vis-NIR spectra. Red thick line: spectrum collected
in step 3 (same as Figures and 3); light blue thick line: after
of NO/He exposure; gray thin lines: intermediates; dashed dark blue
line: step 2 (NO/NH3 at 200 °C after pretreatment
in O2, same as dark blue in Figures and 3); orange thick
line is the final spectrum in the panel (d) and initial one in the
panel (e). (f) Temporal evolution of the intensity of the CuI 1s →4p transition at ∼8982.5 eV during exposure to
NO or NH3 after step 3. (g) Illustration of Cu species
proposed to be formed upon reaction with NO. Atom color code: Cu,
green; H, white; O, red; N, blue; Si, yellow; Al, pink.
Exposure to NO/He at
200 °C of Cu-CHA catalyst after step
3. (a) Cu K-edge XANES spectra. (b) Phase-uncorrected k2-weighted FT EXAFS curves. (c) Magnification of CuII 1s→3d transition. (d) Initial and (e) subsequent
evolution of DR UV-Vis-NIR spectra. Red thick line: spectrum collected
in step 3 (same as Figures and 3); light blue thick line: after
of NO/He exposure; gray thin lines: intermediates; dashed dark blue
line: step 2 (NO/NH3 at 200 °C after pretreatment
in O2, same as dark blue in Figures and 3); orange thick
line is the final spectrum in the panel (d) and initial one in the
panel (e). (f) Temporal evolution of the intensity of theCuI 1s →4p transition at ∼8982.5 eV during exposure to
NO or NH3 after step 3. (g) Illustration of Cu species
proposed to be formed upon reaction with NO. Atom color code: Cu,
green; H, white; O, red; N, blue; Si, yellow; Al, pink.In the DR UV-Vis-NIR spectra, the reaction with NO is visible
in
the symmetrical d-d absorption at around 13850 cm–1, corresponding to theCuII sites in a pseudo-square-planar
geometry in the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex. In the first minutes of NO exposure,
the intensity reaches a minimum (Figure d, from red to orange curve), followed by
the development of a complex absorption with maxima at 20 000,
16 350, 13 300, and 10 600 cm–1 (shoulder), associated with CuII in a different local
environment (Figure e, from orange to light blue). These new features resemble the typical
“quadruplet”, as often observed in Cu-CHA samples after
pretreatment in O2 (see Figure and SI, Figure S14), which are assigned to the formation of a variety of monomeric
and multimeric framework-coordinated CuII ions, such as
Z[CuII(OH)]/Z[CuII(OO*)] sites etc.[26,33,34] This indicates the formation
of some oxidic CuII species during the reaction. TheLMCT
absorption between 27 000 and 31 000 cm –1 (Figure d), related
to the bridged peroxo groups in the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex, also shows a rapid decrease
in intensity in the reaction with NO. The subsequent change in the
geometry of remaining CuII sites is reflected in a small
blue-shift in theLMCT position (Figure e). We note that theXANES data do not reveal
the presence of a CuII species after reaction with NO,
suggesting that the observed CuII fraction remains below
the XAS detection limit under our experimental conditions, which is
estimated at around 10% of the totalCu content. This would then indicate
that DR UV-Vis is very sensitive to the formation of this oxidic CuII species, due to the strong influence of the local geometry
on the corresponding extinction coefficient.The structure of
theCuI ions formed during the reaction
of μ-η2,η2-peroxo diamino
dicopper(II) complex with NO is different from those observed after
reduction in NO/NH3 at 200 °C or in the reaction with
NH3. The shape of theXANES rising-edge and white-line
peaks clearly differ from those of the linear [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes, as indicated by the light blue and
dotted dark blue curves in Figure a, and those of ligand-free, framework-coordinated
ZCuI.[25] Overall, theCu K-edge
XANES resembles that observed after desorption of NH3 (see SI, Figure S15), which has been assigned to framework-coordinated
linear CuI amino complexes, Z[CuI(NH3)].[19] This assignment is supported by
theNH3/NH4+ vibrational modes still
present in theNIR region (Figure d and e) and by the decrease observed in the first-shell
peak in EXAFS (Figure b), indicating a change from a four- to a two-fold coordination of
Cu (Figures e and 7g). The broadening of the second and third shell
regions can be moreover connected to the relatively high degree of
freedom (in terms of bond length and angles) of the proposed Z[CuI(NH3)] entities with respect to [Cu(NH3)2]+ or “bare” ZCuI species.[6,10,19]
Reactivity toward NO: Interpretation
The results in Figure d show that NO reaction
causes a fast disaggregation of theside-on
μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II)
complexes. TheCuII species are almost completely reduced
to CuI, while the bridging peroxo groups are consumed and
N2 is formed. The formation of N2 is fast (see SI, Figure S18), indicating that μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes
are very reactive toward NO. These results provide experimental support
for the conclusion from DFT calculations, that NO facilitates the
dissociation of the O–O bond in oxygen.[4,13,15,16]According
to our interpretation of theXANES results (Figure a), theCuI species after reaction
with NO consists of framework-coordinated Z[CuI(NH3)] moieties, implying that each Cu ion in the dimer loses
only one amino ligand during the reduction. Starting from the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complexes,
theNH3-SCR reaction requires stoichiometrically two NH3 molecules per Cu for a complete reduction of theCuII,[8] and therefore the second NH3 molecule is a nonligand NH3. In a recent DFT study, it
is proposed that theNH3-SCR reaction proceeds via the
decomposition of HONO and H2NNO intermediates to N2 and H2O, over Brønsted NH4+(or H+/NH3(g)) sites.[13] This would be a way to include a second nonligand NH3 molecule in the SCR cycle, but such a role of Brønsted
sites in theNH3-SCR cycle still needs experimental verification.[53]Even though theXANES results point to
a complete reduction of
theCuII, a minor fraction of CuII is still
present after reaction with NO, which remains below the detection
limit of XANES under our experimental conditions. The presence of
these CuII moieties in the XAS experiment is indicated
by the small amount of N2 that is formed upon adding NH3 to theNO feed after step 4, to restore the fully reduced
state consisting of [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes
(SI, Figure S19). The formation of N2 indicates that some reduction of CuII takes place,
thus proving that the reduction with NO alone was not complete. We
expect the amount of this residualCuII fraction to depend
on theCu content and Si/Al ratio of theCu-CHA material.Thefeatures in the UV-Vis observed at 20 000, 16 350,
13 300, and 10 600 (sh) cm–1 after
the reaction with NO is completed resemble the UV–Vis “quadruplet”,
that is often observed for CuII in Cu-CHA and other small
pore zeolites.[26,33−36,54] These features have been assigned to CuII species attached
to thezeolite framework, such as Z[CuII(OH)], Z[CuII(OO*)], framework-coordinated Cu dimers with O/OH bridging
moieties, or even larger Cu clusters.[34] This suggests that theCuII species that remains after
reaction of the μ-η2,η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex with NO is attached to thezeolite framework
as well. We also note that the high intensity of these features is
comparable to that observed in fully oxidized Cu-CHA samples (see SI, Figure S14), despite the low fraction of
CuII. This puzzling finding could be related to the fact
that this spectroscopic feature is the result of a variety of CuII ions with similar but not identical local environments affecting
the d-splitting,[55,56] as recently predicted by Li et
al.[34]
Conclusions
We have studied the activation of n class="Chemical">oxygen over the mobile linear
[Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes in a Cu-CHA
catalyst for NH3-SCR (Si/Al ratio = 15 and 2.6 wt% Cu),
which is a crucial step in theNH3-SCR reaction, by combining
X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and diffuse reflectance UV-Vis-NIR
spectroscopy.
The reaction of the linear [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes with O2 at 200 °C
results in the
formation of a side-on μ-η2, η2-peroxodiamino dicopper(II) complex ([Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+) as shown in Figure b, indicating a reaction of
O2 with a pair of [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes. About 84% of theCu present is oxidized by O2, the remaining 16% stays present as linear [Cu(NH3)2]+ species. The structure of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex
also indicates that an O–O bond is retained in this reaction.
We have also successfully applied a wavelet transform analysis of
the EXAFS data to identify Cu–Cu scattering contributions after
the reaction with O2, providing unprecedented direct spectroscopic
evidence for the formation of Cu-pairs in theNH3-SCR reaction.Then class="Chemical">[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes show a different reactivity toward NH3, NO, or a mixture of NO and NH3 at 200 °C. The reaction
with a mixture of NO and NH3 leads to a complete reduction
of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes with evolution of N2, and the linear
[Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes are restored,
confirming that the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex plays a role in theNH3-SCR
reaction cycle.
In the reaction of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex with NH3, in the absence
of NO, about 58% of theCuII species is reduced to CuI, while no N2 is formed. The[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes dissociate
and a variety of mononuclear Cu complexes is formed, consisting of
CuI and CuII species with NH3 and
oxidic ligands.In the reaction with NO, some N2 is
formed, and the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes are almost completely reduced. The formation of N2 indicates that theNH3-SCR cycle involves a reaction
of the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complex with NO. TheCuI species formed in this
reaction is probably a Z[CuI(NH3)], which is
attached to thezeolite framework. A minor part (<10%) of theCu
remains in a CuII state, due to a lack of reactive NH3 in the catalyst. Addition of NH3 at this stage
leads to the restoration of the linear [Cu(NH3)2]+ complexes with N2 evolution, further confirming
the role of the reaction of NO with the[Cu2(NH3)4O2]2+ complexes in theNH3-SCR reaction cycle.
Authors: I Lezcano-Gonzalez; U Deka; B Arstad; A Van Yperen-De Deyne; K Hemelsoet; M Waroquier; V Van Speybroeck; B M Weckhuysen; A M Beale Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Filippo Giordanino; Peter N R Vennestrøm; Lars F Lundegaard; Frederick N Stappen; Susanne Mossin; Pablo Beato; Silvia Bordiga; Carlo Lamberti Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Christopher Paolucci; Atish A Parekh; Ishant Khurana; John R Di Iorio; Hui Li; Jonatan D Albarracin Caballero; Arthur J Shih; Trunojoyo Anggara; W Nicholas Delgass; Jeffrey T Miller; Fabio H Ribeiro; Rajamani Gounder; William F Schneider Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anastasia Yu Molokova; Elisa Borfecchia; Andrea Martini; Ilia A Pankin; Cesare Atzori; Olivier Mathon; Silvia Bordiga; Fei Wen; Peter N R Vennestrøm; Gloria Berlier; Ton V W Janssens; Kirill A Lomachenko Journal: JACS Au Date: 2022-04-11
Authors: Andrea Martini; Chiara Negri; Luca Bugarin; Gabriele Deplano; Reza K Abasabadi; Kirill A Lomachenko; Ton V W Janssens; Silvia Bordiga; Gloria Berlier; Elisa Borfecchia Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.888
Authors: Paolo Cleto Bruzzese; Enrico Salvadori; Stefan Jäger; Martin Hartmann; Bartolomeo Civalleri; Andreas Pöppl; Mario Chiesa Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Reisel Millan; Pieter Cnudde; Alexander E J Hoffman; Christian W Lopes; Patricia Concepción; Veronique van Speybroeck; Mercedes Boronat Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 6.475