| Literature DB >> 32825286 |
Yuh-Shin Chang1,2, Ming-Cheng Tai3, Shih-Feng Weng4, Jhi-Joung Wang5, Sung-Huei Tseng1,6, Ren-Long Jan2,7.
Abstract
This retrospective, nationwide, matched-cohort study included 4488 new-onset keratoconus (KCN) patients, ≥12 years old, recruited between 2004 and 2011 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The control group included 26,928 non-KCN patients selected from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000. Information for each patient was collected and tracked from the index date until December 2013. The incidence rate of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was 1.77 times (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-2.88; p = 0.0206) higher in KCN patients ≥40 years old and 1.49 times (95% CI = 1.12-1.98; p = 0.0060) higher in female KCN patients than in controls. After using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to adjust for potential confounders, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and congestive heart failure, KCN maintained an independent risk factor, MVP being 1.77 times (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.09-2.88) and 1.48 times (adjusted HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.11-1.97) more likely to develop in patients ≥40 years old and female patients in the study cohort, respectively. We found that KCN patients ≥40 years of age and female KCN patients have increased risks of MVP. Therefore, it is recommended that KCN patients should be alerted to MVP.Entities:
Keywords: Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database; keratoconus; mitral valve prolapse
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825286 PMCID: PMC7503773 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic characteristics and comorbid disorders between the keratoconus group and controls.
| Characteristics | Keratoconus (N = 4488) | Controls (N = 26,928) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Age | 27.38 ± 13.08 | 27.50 ± 12.88 | 0.5513 |
| Age group | |||
| 12–19 years | 1250 (27.85) | 7450 (27.67) | 0.9892 |
| 20–29 years | 1830 (40.78) | 11,024 (40.94) | |
| 30–39 years | 873 (19.45) | 5216 (19.37) | |
| ≥40 years | 535 (11.92) | 3238 (12.02) | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 2468 (54.99) | 14,548 (54.03) | 0.2294 |
| Female | 2020 (45.01) | 12,380 (45.97) | |
| Baseline comorbidity | |||
| Hypertension | 145 (3.23) | 871 (3.23) | 0.9896 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 66 (1.47) | 403 (1.50) | 0.8942 |
| Congestive heart failure | 7 (0.16) | 30 (0.10) | 0.4203 |
Note: The demographic characteristics and comorbid disorders between the keratoconus and control groups were compared by Pearson chi-square tests.
Risk of mitral valve prolapse for the keratoconus group and the control group.
| Characteristics | Keratoconus | Controls | IRR (95% CI) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | MVP | PYs | Rate a | N | MVP | PYs | Rate a | |||
| All | 4488 | 88 | 24,658 | 35.69 | 26,928 | 433 | 149,769 | 28.91 | 1.23 (0.98–1.55) | 0.0717 |
| Age | ||||||||||
| 12–19 years | 1250 | 17 | 6884 | 24.69 | 7450 | 115 | 42,431 | 27.10 | 0.91 (0.55–1.52) | 0.7202 |
| 20–29 years | 1830 | 36 | 10,353 | 34.77 | 11,024 | 174 | 62,462 | 27.86 | 1.25 (0.87–1.79) | 0.2259 |
| 30–39 years | 873 | 14 | 4555 | 30.74 | 5216 | 71 | 27,204 | 26.10 | 1.18 (0.66–2.09) | 0.5760 |
| ≥40 years | 535 | 21 | 2866 | 73.27 | 3238 | 73 | 17,672 | 41.31 | 1.77 (1.09–2.88) | 0.0206 |
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Male | 2468 | 29 | 13,790 | 21.03 | 14,548 | 185 | 81,775 | 22.62 | 0.93 (0.63–1.38) | 0.7146 |
| Female | 2020 | 59 | 10,868 | 54.29 | 12,380 | 248 | 67,994 | 36.47 | 1.49 (1.12–1.98) | 0.0060 |
| Comorbidity | ||||||||||
| Hypertension | 145 | 2 | 782 | 25.58 | 871 | 27 | 4708 | 57.35 | 0.45 (0.11–1.88) | 0.2705 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 66 | 1 | 310 | 32.26 | 403 | 5 | 2006 | 24.93 | 1.29 (0.15–11.07) | 0.8146 |
| Congestive heart failure | 7 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 155 | 129.03 | - | - |
Note: A Poisson regression analysis was performed to calculate the incidence rate ratio. Abbreviations: MVP, mitral valve prolapse; IRR, incidence rate ratio; PYs: person-years; a rate per 10,000 person-years.
Figure 1Cumulative incidence of mitral valve prolapse in keratoconus patients ≥40 years old and controls during the follow-up period.
Figure 2Cumulative incidence of mitral valve prolapse in female keratoconus patients and controls during the follow-up period.
Crude and adjusted hazard ratios of Cox proportional hazard regressions and 95% confidence intervals for mitral valve prolapse at age ≥40 years during the follow-up period.
| Cohort | Crude Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Keratoconus | ||
| Yes | 1.77 * (1.09–2.88) | 1.77 * (1.09–2.88) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Female | 1.88 * (1.20–2.96) | 1.89 * (1.20–2.97) |
| Comorbidity | ||
| Hypertension | ||
| Yes | 1.15 (0.72–1.83) | 1.24 (0.76–2.03) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||
| Yes | 0.64 (0.26–1.58) | 0.58 (0.23–1.47) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Congestive heart failure | ||
| Yes | 1.34 (0.19–9.58) | 1.26 (0.17–9.15) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Note: The adjusted hazard ratio for developing mitral valve prolapse at age ≥40 years was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; * p < 0.05
Crude and adjusted hazard ratios of Cox proportional hazard regressions and 95% confidence intervals for mitral valve prolapse in females during the follow-up period.
| Cohort | Crude Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Keratoconus | ||
| Yes | 1.49 * (1.12–1.98) | 1.48 * (1.11–1.97) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Age | ||
| 12–19 years | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 20–29 years | 1.33 (0.96–1.83) | 1.32 (0.96–1.81) |
| 30–39 years | 1.37 (0.96–1.94) | 1.35 (0.95–1.93) |
| ≥40 years | 1.98 * (1.39–2.82) | 1.85 * (1.26–2.71) |
| Comorbidity | ||
| Hypertension | ||
| Yes | 1.79 * (1.14–2.82) | 1.40 (0.82–2.30) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||
| Yes | 0.91 (0.34–2.45) | 0.55 (0.19–1.54) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Congestive heart failure | ||
| Yes | 5.73 * (1.43–23.02) | 3.63 (0.88–15.00) |
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Note: The adjusted hazard ratio for developing mitral valve prolapse in females was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; * p < 0.05.