| Literature DB >> 32825156 |
Arpad Mihai Rostas1, Mihaela Badea2, Lavinia L Ruta3, Ileana C Farcasanu3, Catalin Maxim2, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc4, Marcela Popa4, Mirela Luca2, Natasa Celan Korosin5, Romana Cerc Korosec5, Mihaela Bacalum6, Mina Raileanu6,7, Rodica Olar2.
Abstract
Complexes with mixed ligands [Cu(N-N)2(pmtp)](ClO4)2 ((1) N-N: 2,2'-bipyridine; (2) L: 1,10-phenanthroline and pmpt: 5-phenyl-7-methyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine) were synthesized and structurally and biologically characterized. Compound (1) crystallizes into space group Pa and (2) in P-1. Both complexes display an intermediate stereochemistry between the two five-coordinated ones. The biological tests indicated that the two compounds exhibited superoxide scavenging capacity, intercalative DNA properties, and metallonuclease activity. Tests on various cell systems indicated that the two complexes neither interfere with the proliferation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or BJ healthy skin cells, nor cause hemolysis in the active concentration range. Nevertheless, the compounds showed antibacterial potential, with complex (2) being significantly more active than complex (1) against all tested bacterial strains, both in planktonic and biofilm growth state. Both complexes exhibited a very good activity against B16 melanoma cells, with a higher specificity being displayed by compound (1). Taken together, the results indicate that complexes (1) and (2) have specific biological relevance, with potential for the development of antitumor or antimicrobial drugs.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine; Biofilm; Copper(II) complex; Cytotoxicity; DNA intercalation; Metallonuclease activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825156 PMCID: PMC7504215 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25173777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1The route of complexes synthesis.
Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds (1) and (2).
| Compound | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C32H26Cl2CuN8O8 | C37H27Cl2CuN7O8 |
| Formula weight | 785.05 | 832.09 |
| Temperature/K | 293 | 293 |
| Crystal system | monoclinic | triclinic |
| Space group | ||
| a/Å | 19.4489(2) | 9.0469(2) |
| b/Å | 8.1324(3) | 13.4858(3) |
| c/Å | 21.7298(4) | 14.3149(4) |
| α/° | 90 | 93.628(3) |
| β/° | 102.445(3) | 95.081(2) |
| γ/° | 90 | 95.071(4) |
| Volume/Å3 | 3356.16(15) | 1728.36(7) |
| Z | 4 | 2 |
| ρcalcg/cm3 | 1.554 | 1.599 |
| μ/mm−1 | 0.874 | 0.853 |
| F(000) | 1604.0 | 850.0 |
| Radiation | MoKα (λ = 0.71073) | MoKα (λ = 0.71073) |
| Reflections collected | 15462 | 20217 |
| Independent reflections | 9420 [Rint = 0.0933, | 6042 [Rint = 0.0719, |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 9420/2/921 | 6042/7/498 |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.065 | 1.126 |
| Final R indexes [I ≥ 2σ (I)] | R1 = 0.0910, wR2 = 0.2222 | R1 = 0.0639, wR2 = 0.1782 |
| Final R indexes [all data] | R1 = 0.1436, wR2 = 0.2679 | R1 = 0.0721, wR2 = 0.1885 |
| Largest diff. | 2.66/−0.61 | 1.794/−1.076 |
| Flack parameter | −0.04(4) |
Figure 1The asymmetric unit of two crystallographically non-equivalent mononuclear [Cu(bpy)2(pmtp)](ClO4)2 (1) complex along b axes.
Selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles (°) for (1) and (2).
| (1) | (2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu1 | N2 | 1.971(15) | N2 | Cu1 | N4 | 176.8(7) | Cu1 | N2 | 1.999(4) | N2 | Cu1 | N4 | 173.26(14) |
| Cu1 | N4 | 1.968(16) | N2 | Cu1 | N1 | 80.6(6) | Cu1 | N4 | 2.001(3) | N2 | Cu1 | N1 | 95.30(15) |
| Cu1 | N1 | 2.112(16) | N2 | Cu1 | N5 | 90.8(6) | Cu1 | N1 | 2.020(3) | N2 | Cu1 | N3 | 81.11(13) |
| Cu1 | N5 | 2.013(14) | N2 | Cu1 | N3 | 95.8(7) | Cu1 | N3 | 2.045(3) | N2 | Cu1 | N5 | 97.20(12) |
| Cu1 | N3 | 2.072(18) | N4 | Cu1 | N1 | 98.8(6) | Cu1 | N5 | 2.203(3) | N4 | Cu1 | N1 | 91.29(14) |
| Cu2 | N12 | 2.071(17) | N4 | Cu1 | N5 | 92.1(6) | N4 | Cu1 | N3 | 93.70(12) | |||
| Cu2 | N9 | 1.995(15) | N4 | Cu1 | N3 | 81.4(7) | N4 | Cu1 | N5 | 79.49(12) | |||
| Cu2 | N13 | 1.958(15) | N5 | Cu1 | N1 | 121.9(6) | N1 | Cu1 | N3 | 150.86(12) | |||
| Cu2 | N10 | 1.987(15) | N5 | Cu1 | N3 | 130.0(6) | N1 | Cu1 | N5 | 108.61(13) | |||
| Cu2 | N11 | 2.056(16) | N3 | Cu1 | N1 | 108.0(7) | |||||||
| N9 | Cu2 | N12 | 122.2(7) | ||||||||||
| N9 | Cu2 | N11 | 129.6(6) | ||||||||||
| N13 | Cu2 | N12 | 81.2(7) | ||||||||||
| N13 | Cu2 | N9 | 90.6(6) | ||||||||||
| N13 | Cu2 | N10 | 176.9(7) | ||||||||||
| N13 | Cu2 | N11 | 97.7(7) | ||||||||||
| N10 | Cu2 | N12 | 98.8(7) | ||||||||||
| N10 | Cu2 | N9 | 92.0(6) | ||||||||||
Figure 2Crystal structure of [Cu(phen)2(pmtp)](ClO4)2 (2) along a axes.
Figure 3EPR spectra in Q-band and X-band with rotation along the main magnetic field of complex (1) (top) and complex (2) (bottom).
Figure 4Absorption spectra of (1) (A) and (2) (B) in the absence of DNA (black dotted line) or in the presence of increasing DNA concentration (colored lines) (arrow indicates the directionality of [DNA] increase for 3 µM complex concentration).
Figure 5Emission spectra of λ-DNA/EB in Tris/HCl/NaCl buffer, pH = 8, in the absence (black curves) or in the presence of increasing concentrations of (1) (A) and (2) (B) (arrows indicate increase in [complex]. Insets: plots of emission intensity versus [DNA]/[Complex]. I0 = fluorescence intensity in the absence of complex. I = fluorescence intensity in the presence of complex).
Figure 6Gel electrophoresis image of pRSII425 (100 ng/μL) after incubation for 1 h at 37 °C with the compounds, except for EcoRI (5 min). Line 1: pRSII325; Line 2: pRSII325/EcoRI (partial digestion); Line 3: pRSII325 + 1 mM ascorbate; Line 4: pRSII325 + 1 mM H2O2; Line 5: pRSII325 + 1 mM ascorbate + 3 µM (1); Line 6: pRSII325 + 1 mM ascorbate + 3 µM (2); Line 7: pRSII325 + 1 mM H2O2 + 3 µM (1); Line 8: pRSII325 + 1 mM H2O2 + 3 µM (2); Line 9: pRSII325 + 3 µM (1); Line 10: pRSII325 + 3 µM (2); Line 11: molecular marker (λDNA/StyI).
The MIC values (mM) for ligand and complexes.
| Bacterial Strain | pmtp | bpy | *CuBP | (1) | phen | **CuPP | (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.00 | 4.00 | 0.54 | 0.20 | 3.50 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| 3.00 | 4.00 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 0.03 | 0.05 | |
| 3.00 | 8.00 | 1.09 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.50 | 0.09 | |
| 3.00 | 4.00 | 1.09 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 0.09 | |
| 6.00 | 8.00 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| 3.00 | 8.00 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.03 | 0.09 | |
| MRSA | 6.00 | 8.00 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.12 | 0.05 |
*CuBP: {[Cu(bpy)2(μ2OClO3)]·ClO4}n; **CuPP: [Cu(phen)2(OH2)](ClO4)2.
The compounds influence on biofilm formation (MBEC value, mM).
| Bacterial Strain | pmtp | bpy | CuBP | (1) | phen | CuPP | (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.00 | 8.00 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.10 | 0.02 | |
| 3.00 | 8.00 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 0.30 | 0.05 | |
| 3.00 | 8.00 | 1.09 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.50 | 0.09 | |
| 1.50 | 4.00 | 1.09 | 0.20 | 3.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | |
| 6.00 | 4.00 | 0.14 | 0.80 | 7.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| 3.00 | 8.00 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 7.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| MRSA | 6.00 | 8.00 | 0.27 | 0.40 | 7.00 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
Figure 7The cytotoxic effect of compounds (1) (A), (2) (B) and pmtp (C) on BJ and B16 cells evaluated at 24 and 48 h (each value represents the mean ± SD).
The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and hemolysis data for compounds.
| Compound | IC50 (µg/mL; mM) | Hemolysis (%) | TI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B16 Cells | BJ Cells | ||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | ||
| pmtp | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.61 ± 0.05 | - | - |
| ( | ND | 15.46; 0.02 | ND | ND | 0.59 ± 0.18 | - | 3.23 |
| ( | 6.25; 0.0075 | 3.72; 0.004 | 5.98; 0.007 | 3.30; 0.004 | 0.77 ± 0.14 | 0.95 | 0.88 |
ND: not determined; TI: therapeutic index.
Figure 8The cytoskeleton alteration for B16 cells: (A) control cells, (B) cells treated with pmtp, (C) cells treated with (1), (D) cells treated with (2).
Figure 9The cytoskeleton alteration for BJ cells: (A) control cells, (B) cells treated with pmtp, (C) cells treated with (1), (D) cells treated with (2).