| Literature DB >> 34065538 |
Aurora Reiss1, Nicoleta Cioateră1, Aurelian Dobrițescu1, Mihaela Rotaru2, Alice Carla Carabet3, Filippo Parisi4,5, Anca Gănescu1, Irina Dăbuleanu1, Cezar Ionuț Spînu1, Petre Rotaru3.
Abstract
New Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) complexes were synthesized with the Schiff base ligand obtained by the condensation of sulfathiazole with salicylaldehyde. Their characterization was performed by elemental analysis, molar conductance, spectroscopic techniques (IR, diffuse reflectance and UV-Vis-NIR), magnetic moments, thermal analysis, and calorimetry (thermogravimetry/derivative thermogravimetry/differential scanning calorimetry), while their morphological and crystal systems were explained on the basis of powder X-ray diffraction results. The IR data indicated that the Schiff base ligand is tridentate coordinated to the metallic ion with two N atoms from azomethine group and thiazole ring and one O atom from phenolic group. The composition of the complexes was found to be of the [ML2]∙nH2O (M = Co, n = 1.5 (1); M = Ni, n = 1 (2); M = Cu, n = 4.5 (3)) type, having an octahedral geometry for the Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes and a tetragonally distorted octahedral geometry for the Cu(II) complex. The presence of lattice water molecules was confirmed by thermal analysis. XRD analysis evidenced the polycrystalline nature of the powders, with a monoclinic structure. The unit cell volume of the complexes was found to increase in the order of (2) < (1) < (3). SEM evidenced hard agglomerates with micrometric-range sizes for all the investigated samples (ligand and complexes). EDS analysis showed that the N:S and N:M atomic ratios were close to the theoretical ones (1.5 and 6.0, respectively). The geometric and electronic structures of the Schiff base ligand 4-((2-hydroxybenzylidene) amino)-N-(thiazol-2-yl) benzenesulfonamide (HL) was computationally investigated by the density functional theory (DFT) method. The predictive molecular properties of the chemical reactivity of the HL and Cu(II) complex were determined by a DFT calculation. The Schiff base and its metal complexes were tested against some bacterial strains (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis). The results indicated that the antibacterial activity of all metal complexes is better than that of the Schiff base.Entities:
Keywords: Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes; Schiff base; antibacterial activity; sulfathiazole; thermal behavior
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065538 PMCID: PMC8161335 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26103062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structural formula with the atom numbering of the Schiff base (HL) ligand.
Assignments of the vibrational spectra (frequency: ν, cm−1) of sulfathiazole, the Schiff base, and metal complexes.
| Stz | HL | (1) | (2) | (3) | Assignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 3445 | 3445 | 3445 | νH2O |
| - | 3375 | - | - | - | ν(OH) phenolic |
| 3354 | - | - | - | - | ν(NH2) asym |
| 3321 | - | - | - | - | ν(NH2) sym |
| 3282 | 3282 | 3282 | 3282 | 3282 | ν(SO2 –NH) |
| - | 1617 | 1577 | 1569 | 1569 | ν(C=N) azm |
| 1540 | 1540 | 1485 | 1480 | 1485 | ν(C=N) thiazole ring |
| 1345 | 1345 | 1345 | 1345 | 1345 | ν(SO2) asym |
| - | 1274 | 1295 | 1305 | 1310 | ν(C-O) phenolic |
| 1110 | 1110 | 1110 | 1110 | 1110 | ν(SO2) sym |
| 635 | 635 | 635 | 635 | 635 | ν(C-S) thiazole ring |
| - | - | 560 | 570 | 565 | ν(M-N) |
| - | - | 450 | 450 | 455 | ν(M-O) |
Figure 2Thermoanalytical curves of [CoL2]·1.5H2O.
Figure 3Endothermic peak (∆H = 57.79 J g−1) on the DSC curve at 226.4 °C for [CoL2]·1.5H2O.
Figure 4Exothermic peak (∆H = −10,094.2 J g−1) on the DSC curve at 522.31 °C for [CoL2]·1.5H2O.
Figure 5Thermoanalytical curves of [NiL2]·H2O.
Figure 6Thermoanalytical curves of [CuL2]·4.5H2O.
Thermal behavior of metal complexes.
| Stage | Metal Complex | DSC Parameters | ∆ | ∆ | Assignment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆ | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | CoC32 H27S4O7.5N6 | 23–205 | Weakly endothermic | 3.49 | 3.36 | Loss of lattice water molecule |
| ↓-1.5H2O | ||||||
| 2 | CoC32 H24S4O6N6 | 205–242 | 57.79; 226.4 | 2.68 | 2.14 | Loss of ammonia molecule |
| ↓-NH3 | ||||||
| 3 | CoC32 H21S4O6N5 | 242–1000 | −10094.2; 522.31 | 92.56 | 92.65 | Loss of organic moieties and a part of Co(II) |
| ↓-organic moieties1/4Co | 1.14 | 1.75 | residue (1/4CoO) | |||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | NiC32 H26 S4O7N6 | 22–62 | 75.93; 47.9 | 5.36 | - | Water humidity |
| ↓-humidity | ||||||
| 2 | NiC32 H26S4O7N6 | 62–102 | 40.92; 90.2 | 2.52 | 2.12 | Loss of lattice water molecule |
| ↓-H2O | ||||||
| 3 | NiC32H24 S4O6N6 | 106–560 | −6420.7; 514.4 | 75.22 | 75.81 | Loss of organic moieties |
| ↓-organic moieties NiO and 4C | 16.89 | 16.64 | Residue (NiO and 4C) | |||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | CuC32 H33 S4O10.5N6 | 20–60 | Weakly endothermic | 1.09 | - | Water humidity |
| ↓-humidity | ||||||
| 2 | CuC32 H33S4O10.5N6 | 60–110 | 176.37; 84.4 | 9.89 | 9.41 | Loss of lattice water molecules |
| ↓-4.5H2O | ||||||
| 3 | CuC32 H24 S4O6N6 | 110–700 | −428.25; 371.2 | 74.40 | 74.78 | Loss of organic moieties |
| ↓-organic moietiesCuO and 4C | −7.11; 403.1 | 14.12 | 14.86 | Residue (CuO and 4C) | ||
Figure 7XRD patterns of polycrystalline powders corresponding to ligand and complexes.
Structural parameters of the Schiff base (HL) and metal complexes (1–3).
| Parameter | (HL) | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.22 (1) | 9.29 (1) | 9.29 (9) | 9.34 (9) | |
| 11.34 (1) | 11.39 (6) | 11.44 (1) | 11.45 (3) | |
| 28.41 (7) | 28.64 (5) | 28.46 (2) | 28.56 (3) | |
| 90.00 | 90.00 | 90.00 | 90.00 | |
| 91.8 (3) | 92.1 (4) | 92.4 (1) | 92.0 (3) | |
| 90.00 | 90.00 | 90.00 | 90.00 | |
| 2970.0 (8) | 3030.8 (4) | 3025.5 (9) | 3056.6 (7) |
Elemental composition of the investigated Schiff base (HL) and metal complexes (from EDS analysis).
| Compound | N, % at | S, % at | Co, % at | Cu, % at | Ni, % at | N:S | N:M(II) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL | 11.0 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 1.52 | - |
| (1) | 9.2 | 6.0 | 1.5 | - | - | 1.53 | 6.1 |
| (2) | 3.5 | 2.4 | - | - | 0.7 | 1.45 | 5.0 |
| (3) | 6.1 | 4.0 | - | 1.1 | - | 1.52 | 5.5 |
Figure 8Schiff base optimized geometry in the singlet ground state (color codes are white: H; red: O; blue: N; black: C; and yellow: S).
Figure 9Frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) of the Schiff base ligand.
Figure 10Isosurface of the molecular electrostatic potential of the Schiff base ligand (a); molecular electrostatic potential mapped on the surface of the total charge density (b).
Figure 11Isosurface of the ionization potential of the Schiff base ligand (a); ionization potential mapped on the surface of the total charge density (b).
Figure 12Optimized geometry of copper(II) complex (color codes are white: H; red: O; blue: N; black: C; yellow: S; and green: Cu).
The calculated quantum chemical parameters of the Schiff base (HL) and Cu(II) complex.
| Compound | Δ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL | −5.98 | −1.69 | 4.29 | 3.84 | −3.84 | 2.14 | 0.23 | 3.43 |
| Cu(II) complex | −5.90 | −2.65 | 3.25 | 4.28 | −4.28 | 1.62 | 0.31 | 5.62 |
The inhibition diameter zone (mm) of the Schiff base and metal complexes against bacterial strains.
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL | 32 | 35 | 30 | 35 |
| (1) | 35 | 40 | 37 | 38 |
| (2) | 33 | 37 | 36 | 37 |
| (3) | 40 | 45 | 42 | 43 |
| Amoxicillin | 30 | 35 | 32 | 30 |
| DMSO | - | - | - | - |
Figure 13Activity index values of compounds.