Literature DB >> 32822509

It's COVID o'clock.

Arcangelo Picciariello1, Giuseppe Gagliardi2, Donato Francesco Altomare1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32822509      PMCID: PMC7461391          DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   11.122


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor COVID‐19 pandemic is an unforeseen disaster, shaking health systems worldwide but is also an unforeseen opportunity to do research in all fields. In addition to studies concerning the virologic and basic‐science information on the coronavirus, there have been a plethora of clinical studies and case reports in the field of surgery because of the possible implications for patient management and the risk of infection . However one is taken aback when looking at the plethora of repetitive papers dealing with recommendations , use of surgical equipment , management of cancer patients and surgical training problems . A search on PubMed using the keyword Covid‐19 identifies about 27,500 papers published in around 3 months, 3,600 of which are related to surgery. Most of them are guidelines by surgical societies based on the epidemiologic data and on common sense and therefore all resembling each other. An editorial published in JAMA , underlies that 2/3 of submitted COVID19‐related papers represent mere opinions. The pressure felt by the editors to publish time sensitive information brought changes to the editorial process, often skipping the expert reviewer evaluation with final decisions taken by the Editor‐in‐Chief. It would be interesting to know the rejection rate of journals for COVID related peer reviewed articles. Actually, the majority of peer reviewed studies dealing with COVID and surgery contain only retrospective information on how, rather predictably, the disease disrupted hospital activity and come to the same repetitive conclusions, without scientific impact representing an easy loophole for authors to improve their visibility. It seems that, just like Alibaba and the forty thieves used the magic words “open sesame” to enter the treasure cave, in 2020 researchers worldwide are using” COVID‐19” to crack into scientific journals. Even this letter, with self‐irony prevailing over self‐righteous indignation, could be interpreted as an opportunistic attempt to score another publication.
  5 in total

1.  Editorial Evaluation and Peer Review During a Pandemic: How Journals Maintain Standards.

Authors:  Howard Bauchner; Phil B Fontanarosa; Robert M Golub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: operating room suggestions from an international Delphi process.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Medical education: COVID-19 and surgery.

Authors:  S Khan; A Mian
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Personal protective equipment for surgeons during COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of availability, usage and rationing.

Authors:  Z M Jessop; T D Dobbs; S R Ali; E Combellack; R Clancy; N Ibrahim; T H Jovic; A J Kaur; A Nijran; T B O'Neill; I S Whitaker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.939

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  The impact of "COVID-mania" on medical scientific literature. Are we facing a publication pandemic?

Authors:  Maria Sotiropoulou; Dimitrios Schizas; Francesk Mulita; Ioannis Maroulis; Michail Vailas
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 0.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.