Jun Wang1,2, Baswanth Oruganti3, Bo Durbeej1. 1. Division of Theoretical Chemistry, IFM, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden. 2. Institut de Química Computacional i Catàlisi, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat de Girona, ES-17003 Girona, Spain. 3. Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, SE-45041 Kalmar, Sweden.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are performed to explore if isotopic chirality can induce unidirectional rotary motion in molecular motors operated through double-bond photoisomerizations. Using a high-quantum yield motor featuring a chemically asymmetric carbon atom as reference, it is found that isotopically chiral counterparts of this motor sustain such motion almost equally well. Overall, the study reveals a previously unexplored role for isotopic chirality in the design of rotary molecular motors.
Molecular dynamics simulations are performed to explore if isotopic chirality can induce unidirectional rotary motion in molecular motors operated through double-bond photoisomerizations. Using a high-quantum yield motor featuring a chemically asymmetric carbon atom as reference, it is found that isotopically chiral counterparts of this motor sustain such motion almost equally well. Overall, the study reveals a previously unexplored role for isotopic chirality in the design of rotary molecular motors.
Double-bond photoisomerization is the
reaction upon which many different types of synthetic molecular motors
rely to produce 360° unidirectional rotary motion through the
absorption of ultraviolet (UV) or visible light, with examples such
as overcrowded-alkene,[1] hemithioindigo,[2] dibenzofulvene,[3] and N-alkyl-imine[4] motors. Key to
exerting control of the photoinduced rotation of such motors is making
the excited-state dynamics asymmetric with respect to clockwise (CW)
and counterclockwise (CCW) directions for the photoisomerizations.
This asymmetry is usually invoked by introducing chirality into the
motors, for example, by the presence of a stereocenter; however, permanent
point chirality is not an absolute requirement in this regard. In
fact, the occurrence of a chiral-like feature in the form of a pseudoasymmetric
carbon atom has been shown to be sufficient for an overcrowded-alkene
motor to sustain unidirectional rotary motion.[5] Similarly, the incorporation of an axially chiral trityl moiety
has been found to have the same effect for dibenzofulvene motors.[3]Furthermore, on the basis of quantum chemical
calculations and non-adiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) simulations,[6] it has been demonstrated that the CW or CCW rotary
direction of motors featuring Schiff-base and cyclohexenylidene motifs
can be controlled by the intrinsic asymmetry of the ring-puckered
cyclohexenylidene.[7] In addition, besides
exploiting chiral-like molecular features, another approach to direct
the rotary motion of molecular motors is through the chirality of
the photons with which the motors are powered.[8]In this work, we perform NAMD simulations to explore, for
the first time, whether isotopic chirality[9] can be used to achieve the double-bond photoisomerization asymmetry
required for light-driven molecular motors to exhibit unidirectional
rotary motion. This form of chirality results from isotopic substitution
of an otherwise achiral species and has been manifested in many experimental
contexts; however, its consequences are less readily detectable than
those associated with a tetrahedral, asymmetric carbon atom bonded
to four different groups. The first measurement of optical activity
of an isotopically chiral molecule was reported in 1949[10] and was subsequently followed by other measurements[9a,11] and, in 2006, the first theoretical analysis.[12] Furthermore, supramolecular chirality induced by isotopic
substitution has been documented in self-assembly studies,[13] and it has been found possible to trigger asymmetric
autocatalysis (the process by which a chiral reaction product acts
as a catalyst to produce more of itself[14]) through isotopic substitution of hydrogen (2H/1H),[15] carbon (13C/12C),[16] oxygen (18O/16O),[17] and nitrogen (15N/14N)[18] atoms. In addition, recently
the first asymmetric synthesis of 13C/12C isotopically
chiral hydrocarbons was reported.[19]The motor design evaluated in this work is based on a previous design[20] shown in Figure a. This design features a cyclopentadiene motif connected
by an E/Z-isomerizable olefinic
bond to an electron-donating N-methylpyrrolidine
motif, which is chiral due to the presence of an additional methyl
group at the C5 position. Specifically, the idea underlying this design
is that the modest photoisomerization quantum yields that limit the
efficiency of many light-driven molecular motors,[21] can be improved by a motor in which the cleavage of the
isomerizing π-bond in the excited state is coupled to the transformation
of the non-aromatic cyclopentadiene into an aromatic cyclopentadienyl
anion.[20] As confirmed by quantum chemical
calculations, such a transformation does indeed take place in the
bright second excited singlet state (S2) of the motor in
which the E/Z photoisomerizations
occur, through electron donation from the N-methylpyrrolidine
motif.[20a] Furthermore, NAMD simulations
predicted that this process enables the motor to achieve high quantum
yields of ∼75%.[20a]
Figure 1
(a) Heterolytic π-bond
cleavage in the S2 state of a molecular motor promoted
by the onset of excited-state aromaticity.[20] (b) Molecules (shown in their E isomeric form with
respect to the central olefinic bond) studied in this work and definitions
of key dihedral angles.
(a) Heterolytic π-bond
cleavage in the S2 state of a molecular motor promoted
by the onset of excited-state aromaticity.[20] (b) Molecules (shown in their E isomeric form with
respect to the central olefinic bond) studied in this work and definitions
of key dihedral angles.Deriving from the chiral
motor design in Figure a, which is hereafter denoted 4, the systems considered
in this work are shown in Figure b. In 1, the C5 methyl group of 4 is replaced by 1H, whereby this molecule becomes
achiral. In 2 and 3, the methyl is replaced
by 2H and 3H, respectively, and consequently,
these molecules are isotopically chiral. Overall, 1–3 are sufficiently small to allow for the type of demanding NAMD simulations
that will be presented herein. Moreover, because of the large mass
ratios of 3H and 2H over 1H (compared
to isotopes of other elements), these systems appear to be ideal for
exploring whether isotopic chirality can be exploited to accomplish
unidirectional rotary motion in molecular motors.First, as
a control that 1–3 retain the electronic features
of 4, the complete active space second-order perturbation
theory (CASPT2)[22] and the approximate coupled-cluster
singles and doubles (CC2)[23] methods were
used to calculate vertical transition energies from the ground state
(S0) to the two lowest excited singlet states (S1 and S2) of the E and Z isomers of 1–4. For the former method, and for
all other CAS-based modeling in this work, an (8,7) active space comprising
the full π-system of the cyclopentadiene–pyrrolidine
skeleton and the nitrogen lone pair of 1–4 was
employed. Notably, within the standard adiabatic Born–Oppenheimer
(BO) approximation used for the calculations, nuclear masses do not
enter the electronic Hamiltonian, which means that (presumably small)
electronic differences among 1–3 are not accounted
for. The results of the calculations, carried out with the cc-pVTZ
basis set (used for all calculations in this work except where otherwise
noted), are listed in Table S1. Pleasingly,
both CASPT2 and CC2 predict that the S1 and S2 states of 1–3 are very similar to those of 4, with S1 being a dark state and S2 a bright state (oscillator strength of 0.6–0.7) populated
by absorption of UV photons.Subsequently, as a test of whether
excitation to the S2 state triggers E/Z photoisomerizations of 1–3 around
the central olefinic bond, minimum energy path (MEP) calculations
starting from the vertically excited S2 Franck–Condon
(FC) points of their E and Z isomers
were performed by using the complete active space self-consistent
field (CASSCF) method.[24] The results are
presented in Figure .
Figure 2
MEPs from the S2 FC points of the (a) E and (b) Z isomers of 1–3. Also
shown are molecular geometries at the FC point, the seventh MEP point,
and the final MEP point, as well as the corresponding ω dihedral
angles (defined in Figure b). Encircled points are presumably close to conical intersection
seams.
MEPs from the S2 FC points of the (a) E and (b) Z isomers of 1–3. Also
shown are molecular geometries at the FC point, the seventh MEP point,
and the final MEP point, as well as the corresponding ω dihedral
angles (defined in Figure b). Encircled points are presumably close to conical intersection
seams.From the MEPs in Figure , it is clear that the S2 state can evolve through a torsional reaction coordinate
that describes E/Z photoisomerizations,
as shown by the pronounced and barrierless changes in the ω
dihedral angle (defined in Figure b) along the MEPs. Furthermore, from the localization
of molecular geometries for both isomers with small S2/S1 (∼1–2 kcal mol–1) and S1/S0 (5 kcal mol–1) energy gaps,
the MEP calculations also detect possible funnels for the photoisomerization
of the E (Z) species to form the
ground-state Z (E) species, by successively
reaching presumed S2/S1 and S1/S0 conical intersection seams.With regard to the character
of the S2 state, in turn, Figure S2 summarizes geometric[25] and electronic[26] aromaticity indices that were calculated for
the cyclopentadiene motif of the E and Z isomers of 1–3 along the MEPs. These results,
which are discussed in the Supporting Information (in connection to Figure S2), clearly
show that this motif becomes aromatic as the E/Z photoisomerizations proceed in the S2 state,
as a consequence of electron donation from the N-methylpyrrolidine
moiety and heterolytic π-bond cleavage (see Figure a).Although the MEP
calculations reveal a propensity for 1–3 to undergo E/Z photoisomerizations, the static nature
of these calculations and their reliance on the adiabatic BO approximation
preclude an assessment of what role the isotopic chirality of 2 and 3 might play for the reactions. In particular,
the MEP calculations do not provide any information about whether
the isotopically chiral 2 and 3 are better
able than the achiral 1 to achieve the asymmetry that
would allow consecutive E → Z and Z → E photoisomerizations
to produce a full, unidirectional 360° rotation around the central
olefinic bond. Importantly, it is this very characteristic that is
the hallmark of synthetic rotary molecular motors.[27]To address this issue, NAMD simulations were carried
out by using Tully’s fewest switches algorithm[28] with the CASSCF method and the 6-31G(d) basis set, as further
detailed in the Supporting Information.
Simulations of this type, which have been reported for a number of
different molecular motors,[7,20a,29] describe the simultaneous dynamics of electronic (treated quantum
mechanically) and nuclear (treated classically) degrees of freedom
during photochemical reactions. Accordingly, they are sensitive to
nuclear masses and can probe isotope effects on such reactions (see,
for example, studies of isotope effects on excited-state proton transfer
reactions by Thiel and co-workers[30]). The
simulations were started in the S2 state of the E and Z isomers of 1–3 and were run for maximally 800 fs with 20 different initial nuclear
configurations and velocities for each species. For reference purposes,
simulations were also performed for the E and Z isomers of the chemically chiral motor design 4. The results of all 160 simulations are presented in Figure .
Figure 3
Photoinduced torsional
motion around the central olefinic bond during the first 400 fs of
all 20 NAMD trajectories run for each of the E and Z isomers of 1–4. In each panel, the
two values to the right indicate the number of successful (black font)
and unsuccessful (red font) trajectories that undergo and fail to
undergo a complete photoisomerization, respectively, within 800 fs.
Notice that the successful trajectories of 1–3 are faster than those of 4 (see also Table S5), but have the same overall shape.
Photoinduced torsional
motion around the central olefinic bond during the first 400 fs of
all 20 NAMD trajectories run for each of the E and Z isomers of 1–4. In each panel, the
two values to the right indicate the number of successful (black font)
and unsuccessful (red font) trajectories that undergo and fail to
undergo a complete photoisomerization, respectively, within 800 fs.
Notice that the successful trajectories of 1–3 are faster than those of 4 (see also Table S5), but have the same overall shape.Defining a successful NAMD trajectory as one that reaches
the S0 state and completes a photoisomerization by undergoing
a full 180° rotation around the central olefinic bond within
800 fs, one can first see that the ratio of successful trajectories
shown by 4 is high, amounting to 31 of 40. Furthermore,
all of these 31 trajectories are perfectly unidirectional, with the
associated rotations exclusively occurring toward decreasing ω
values. Thus, 4 has the same ability as many different
synthetic molecular motors[1−4] to produce a full 360° rotation from two consecutive E → Z and Z → E photoisomerizations. As for the nine unsuccessful trajectories,
these include situations in which the photoexcited system remains
in the S2 state without isomerizing, or in which decay
to the S0 state is followed by re-formation of the starting
isomer.Turning to the results for 1, the 19/40
ratio of successful trajectories for this achiral species is markedly
lower than that attained by 4 (31/40). This illustrates
how the chemical chirality of 4 introduces the asymmetry
needed for the overall excited-state dynamics of its E and Z isomers to better sustain unidirectional
rotary motion. However, continuing with the results for 2 and 3, it is remarkable that the isotopic chirality
of these species realizes the very same objective to an almost comparable
degree: for 2 (2H/1H chiral), the
ratio is 26/40, and for 3 (3H/1H chiral), it is 29/40. Moreover, 2 and 3 photoisomerize faster than 4 (see also Table S5), which is likely due to the smaller
moments of inertia with respect to the rotation axis along the central
olefinic bond that come from replacing the C5 methyl group of 4 with 2H and 3H in 2 and 3, respectively. Taken together, the results in Figure identify a previously unknown
but potential key role for isotopic chirality in the future development
of light-driven rotary molecular motors. Furthermore, and more generally,
the findings show that the control of asymmetric autocatalysis[14c,15−18] and deracemization processes[31] that isotopic
chirality has proven able to afford, also extends to an isomerization
reaction ubiquitous in organic chemistry.
Authors: Robert Berger; Guido Laubender; Martin Quack; Achim Sieben; Jürgen Stohner; Martin Willeke Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2005-06-06 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Seda Cantekin; Diederik W R Balkenende; Maarten M J Smulders; Anja R A Palmans; E W Meijer Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 24.427