Oscar Castro1, Ineke Vergeer2, Jason Bennie2, Jonathan Cagas2,3, Stuart J H Biddle2. 1. Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, 4300, Australia. Oscar.CastroSerrano@usq.edu.au. 2. Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, 4300, Australia. 3. Department of Sports Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, 1101, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several national public health guidelines recommend individuals to minimize time spent in prolonged, continuous periods of sitting. Developing effective interventions to break up sitting, however, requires in-depth understanding of the behavior as well as identification of the key elements that need to be targeted to achieve change. This qualitative study focused on university students-a highly sedentary group-with the aim of the following: (i) exploring the factors influencing prolonged sitting time in this population; and (ii) identifying potential avenues for future intervention, based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework. METHOD: Eighteen ambulatory undergraduate students participated in semi-structured one-on-one interviews, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model and the complementary Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the theoretical framework. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, followed by inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: All COM-B components and eight TDF domains were identified as relevant for influencing the target behavior. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that interventions and policies aimed at reducing prolonged sitting time in university students should (i) raise awareness about negative health implications; (ii) address productivity concerns; (iii) provide training in behavioral self-regulation; (iv) use external reminders; (v) implement habit formation techniques; and (vi) promote social acceptability for breaking up sitting.
BACKGROUND: Several national public health guidelines recommend individuals to minimize time spent in prolonged, continuous periods of sitting. Developing effective interventions to break up sitting, however, requires in-depth understanding of the behavior as well as identification of the key elements that need to be targeted to achieve change. This qualitative study focused on university students-a highly sedentary group-with the aim of the following: (i) exploring the factors influencing prolonged sitting time in this population; and (ii) identifying potential avenues for future intervention, based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework. METHOD: Eighteen ambulatory undergraduate students participated in semi-structured one-on-one interviews, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model and the complementary Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the theoretical framework. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, followed by inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: All COM-B components and eight TDF domains were identified as relevant for influencing the target behavior. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that interventions and policies aimed at reducing prolonged sitting time in university students should (i) raise awareness about negative health implications; (ii) address productivity concerns; (iii) provide training in behavioral self-regulation; (iv) use external reminders; (v) implement habit formation techniques; and (vi) promote social acceptability for breaking up sitting.
Keywords:
College students; Implementation research; Intervention mapping; Sedentary behavior; Sedentary time
Authors: E G Wilmot; C L Edwardson; F A Achana; M J Davies; T Gorely; L J Gray; K Khunti; T Yates; S J H Biddle Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Aviroop Biswas; Paul I Oh; Guy E Faulkner; Ravi R Bajaj; Michael A Silver; Marc S Mitchell; David A Alter Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Salomé Aubert; Joel D Barnes; Travis J Saunders; Valerie Carson; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Sebastien F M Chastin; Teatske M Altenburg; Mai J M Chinapaw Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Keith M Diaz; Virginia J Howard; Brent Hutto; Natalie Colabianchi; John E Vena; Monika M Safford; Steven N Blair; Steven P Hooker Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Richard Patterson; Eoin McNamara; Marko Tainio; Thiago Hérick de Sá; Andrea D Smith; Stephen J Sharp; Phil Edwards; James Woodcock; Søren Brage; Katrien Wijndaele Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Casey L Peiris; Gráinne O'Donoghue; Lewis Rippon; Dominic Meyers; Andrew Hahne; Marcos De Noronha; Julia Lynch; Lisa C Hanson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390