Literature DB >> 27496924

Age- and sex-related differences in use of guideline-recommended care and mortality among patients with incident heart failure in Denmark.

Anne Nakano1, Kenneth Egstrup2, Marie Louise Svendsen1, Inge Schjødt3, Lars Jakobsen3, Frank Mehnert1, Søren Paaske Johnsen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: data are sparse on age- and sex-related differences in use of guideline-recommended care and subsequent mortality among patients with heart failure (HF).
METHODS: we identified 24,308 incident patients with a verified primary diagnosis of HF recorded during 2003-2010 in the Danish Heart Failure Registry. The registry monitors guideline-recommended processes of care: echocardiography, New York Heart Association Classification, treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, betablockers, physical training and patient education.
RESULTS: older age was associated with lower use of recommended processes of care. Relative risk (RR) for receiving processes of care varied for men >80 years from 0.52 to 0.91 compared with men ≤65 years. Corresponding RRs among women >80 years varied from 0.55 to 0.89 compared with women ≤65 years. Older age was as expected associated with higher 1 year mortality (32.6% among men >80 years versus 5.4% among men ≤65 years and 33.8% among women >80 years versus 6.6% among women ≤65 years). The corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) were 4.54 (95% CI 3.93-5.25) and 4.08 (95% CI 3.51-4.75) for the oldest versus youngest men and women, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Adjustment for differences in care lowered HRs among the oldest age groups (adjusted HR 3.87 for men and 3.48 for women, respectively). The findings were also confirmed when stratifying the patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and >40%.
CONCLUSION: older patients with HF were less likely to receive guideline-recommended processes of care, irrespective of sex. Lower level of care may contribute to an excess mortality observed among the older patients.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender differences; heart failure; older people; performance measures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496924     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  3 in total

1.  Heart failure and multimorbidity in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Clare J Taylor; Christopher Harrison; Helena Britt; Graeme Miller; Fd Richard Hobbs
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2017-04-28

2.  A systematic approach for introduction of novel treatments to a chronic patient group: sacubitril-valsartan as a case study.

Authors:  Helena Norberg; Ellinor Bergdahl; Karin Hellström Ängerud; Krister Lindmark
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Inequalities in heart failure care in a tax-financed universal healthcare system: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Inge Schjødt; Søren P Johnsen; Anna Strömberg; Jan B Valentin; Brian B Løgstrup
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.