Literature DB >> 22435369

A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.

Mark Parsons1, Neil Spratt, Andrew Bivard, Bruce Campbell, Kong Chung, Ferdinand Miteff, Bill O'Brien, Christopher Bladin, Patrick McElduff, Chris Allen, Grant Bateman, Geoffrey Donnan, Stephen Davis, Christopher Levi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous alteplase is the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Tenecteplase, a genetically engineered mutant tissue plasminogen activator, is an alternative thrombolytic agent.
METHODS: In this phase 2B trial, we randomly assigned 75 patients to receive alteplase (0.9 mg per kilogram of body weight) or tenecteplase (0.1 mg per kilogram or 0.25 mg per kilogram) less than 6 hours after the onset of ischemic stroke. To favor the selection of patients most likely to benefit from thrombolytic therapy, the eligibility criteria were a perfusion lesion at least 20% greater than the infarct core on computed tomographic (CT) perfusion imaging at baseline and an associated vessel occlusion on CT angiography. The coprimary end points were the proportion of the perfusion lesion that was reperfused at 24 hours on perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the extent of clinical improvement at 24 hours as assessed on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, a 42-point scale on which higher scores indicate more severe neurologic deficits).
RESULTS: The three treatment groups each comprised 25 patients. The mean (±SD) NIHSS score at baseline for all patients was 14.4±2.6, and the time to treatment was 2.9±0.8 hours. Together, the two tenecteplase groups had greater reperfusion (P=0.004) and clinical improvement (P<0.001) at 24 hours than the alteplase group. There were no significant between-group differences in intracranial bleeding or other serious adverse events. The higher dose of tenecteplase (0.25 mg per kilogram) was superior to the lower dose and to alteplase for all efficacy outcomes, including absence of serious disability at 90 days (in 72% of patients, vs. 40% with alteplase; P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase was associated with significantly better reperfusion and clinical outcomes than alteplase in patients with stroke who were selected on the basis of CT perfusion imaging. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12608000466347.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22435369     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  144 in total

1.  Emergency and critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen A Figueroa; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Therapeutic Potential of Tenecteplase in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Nicola Logallo; Christopher E Kvistad; Lars Thomassen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Multimodal Computed Tomography Based Definition of Cerebral Imaging Profiles for Acute Stroke Reperfusion Therapy (CT-DEFINE): Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  K Barlinn; J Seibt; K Engellandt; J Gerber; V Puetz; J Kepplinger; O Wunderlich; L-P Pallesen; U Bodechtel; R Koch; R von Kummer; I Dzialowski
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Fast neuroprotection (fast-NPRX) for acute ischemic stroke victims: the time for treatment is now.

Authors:  Paul A Lapchak
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 5.  Drug treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Sameer Bansal; Kiranpal S Sangha; Pooja Khatri
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.571

6.  An Outcome Model for Intravenous rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Shreyansh D Shah; Anand K Sarma; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  Advances in stroke: Imaging 2013.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Imaging Biomarkers for Intra-arterial Stroke Therapy.

Authors:  Olvert A Berkhemer; Shervin Kamalian; R Gilberto González; Charles B L M Majoie; Albert J Yoo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.495

9.  Stroke: Expanded indications for stroke thrombolysis--what next?

Authors:  Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 10.  Plasminogen activators and ischemic stroke: conditions for acute delivery.

Authors:  Gregory J del Zoppo
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.180

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.