Literature DB >> 32818997

Coronavirus disease outbreak: a simple infection prevention measure using a surgical mask during endoscopy.

Hirotsugu Maruyama1, Akira Higashimori1, Kei Yamamoto1, Akinobu Nakata1, Yuki Ishikawa-Kakiya1, Masafumi Yamamura1, Yasuhiro Fujiwara1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32818997      PMCID: PMC7724578          DOI: 10.1055/a-1220-6024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


× No keyword cloud information.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission occurs primarily through direct contact or air droplets 1 2 , and endoscopic procedures are high risk. In this era of “with COVID-19,” establishing simple infection prevention measures within an endoscopy department to protect both patients and personnel is strongly recommended. Hence, we proposed a simple method using a modified surgical mask. We made a hole (10 mm diameter) in the center of a surgical mask ( Fig. 1 ). Next, simulated endoscopy was performed with and without the modified surgical mask using a mannequin with the mouthpiece in place ( Video 1 ).
Fig. 1

 The modified surgical mask.

The modified surgical mask. Video 1  A simple infection prevention measure using a modified surgical mask during endoscopy. Cough was simulated using a 0.4-MPa pressure accumulation sprayer containing 10 mL of fluorescent dye 3 4 5 . An endoscopist (height 173 cm) wearing standard personal protective equipment (PPE) performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A nurse (height 163 cm) wearing standard PPE stood on the other side of the “patient.” The scattered dye droplets produced by the simulated cough were visualized using ultraviolet light. Without the modified surgical mask, contamination of the floor occurred within approximately 1.5 m from the bed, and the dye was clearly identified on the gloves, right arm, upper chest, abdomen, and shoe covers of the endoscopist ( Fig. 2 ). There was no dye on the endoscopist’s eye shield, mask, or cap. The dye was identified on the gloves of the nurse ( Fig. 3 ). When the modified surgical mask was worn by the “patient,” excessive amounts of dye were found inside the mask ( Fig. 4 ). There was no contamination of the floor, and only a minimum amount of dye was found on the endoscopist’s upper chest and abdomen ( Fig. 5 ). No dye was found on the nurse.
Fig. 2

 Contamination of the endoscopist by scattered dye droplets, visualized using ultraviolet light, when the modified surgical mask was not used. a Contamination of the endoscopist’s gloves, right arm, upper chest, and abdomen. b The shoe covers.

Fig. 3

 The dye was identified on the gloves of the nurse when the modified surgical mask was not used.

Fig. 4

 Excessive amounts of dye were found inside the modified surgical mask when worn by the “patient.”

Fig. 5

 Minimal contamination of the endoscopist by scattered dye droplets, visualized using ultraviolet light, when the modified surgical mask was used.

Contamination of the endoscopist by scattered dye droplets, visualized using ultraviolet light, when the modified surgical mask was not used. a Contamination of the endoscopist’s gloves, right arm, upper chest, and abdomen. b The shoe covers. The dye was identified on the gloves of the nurse when the modified surgical mask was not used. Excessive amounts of dye were found inside the modified surgical mask when worn by the “patient.” Minimal contamination of the endoscopist by scattered dye droplets, visualized using ultraviolet light, when the modified surgical mask was used. In summary, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy could be performed on a “patient” wearing a modified surgical mask. This method can substantially reduce contamination by splash and aerosol droplets produced by patients during endoscopy, and is simple and cost-effective. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AU_2AC
  4 in total

1.  Flow dynamics and characterization of a cough.

Authors:  J K Gupta; C-H Lin; Q Chen
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises.

Authors:  J W Tang; Y Li; I Eames; P K S Chan; G L Ridgway
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Endoscopic shield: barrier enclosure during the endoscopy to prevent aerosol droplets during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ryota Sagami; Hidefumi Nishikiori; Takao Sato; Kazunari Murakami
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2020-05-11
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Simple and innovative methods of minimizing risk of aerosol generation during endoscopy.

Authors:  Sumitro Kosasih; Adli Metussin; Norwani Basir; Vui Heng Chong
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  A mask-based infection control method for screening endoscopy may prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and relieve staff anxiety.

Authors:  Yuji Nadatani; Akira Higashimori; Shingo Takashima; Hirotsugu Maruyama; Koji Otani; Shusei Fukunaga; Shuhei Hosomi; Fumio Tanaka; Hideki Fujii; Akemi Nakano; Koichi Taira; Noriko Kamata; Yasuaki Nagami; Tatsuo Kimura; Shinya Fukumoto; Toshio Watanabe; Norifumi Kawada; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-09-20

3.  Commercially available novel device to prevent the diffusion of droplets from subjects undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A pilot study with its prototype.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Endo; Tomoyuki Koike; Noriyuki Obara; Waku Hatta; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-09-01

4.  A Novel Endoscopic Mouthpiece for COVID-19 Prevention.

Authors:  Takuto Hikichi; Nakamura Jun; Koichi Hamada; Daiki Nemoto
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies among endoscopists and their assistants in a university hospital in Tochigi prefecture-A single-center study.

Authors:  Kouichi Miura; Hiroshi Maeda; Naoshi Arai; Mariko Sekiya; Akihiro Miyano; Masako Watanabe; Keijiro Sunada; Koichi Hagiwara; Yuji Morisawa; Toshiyuki Yamada; Naohiro Sata; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Tatsuhiko Kodama; Ryozo Nagai; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-12-03

6.  A comparison of the effectiveness of four aerosol shielding devices in reducing endoscopists' exposure to airborne particles during simulated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Higashimori; Yuji Nadatani; Hirotsugu Maruyama; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-10-21

Review 7.  How should radiation exposure be handled in fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures in the field of gastroenterology?

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.337

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.