| Literature DB >> 32818817 |
Shruti Mukherjee1, Dipita Bhattacharyya1, Anirban Bhunia2.
Abstract
The Envelope (E) protein inEntities:
Keywords: Amyloidogenesis; Covid-19; Membrane; SARS CoV E protein; Structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32818817 PMCID: PMC7418743 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biophys Chem ISSN: 0301-4622 Impact factor: 2.352
Fig. 1The amino acid sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 E Protein, with defined N-terminal, TMD and C-terminal. Conserved sequence motifs are FxxFxxF, CxxC, YVYSRVK. The figure specifically highlights the unique residual composition from the C-terminus that hint at the immense possible functional roles of this segment.
Proposed topologies of CoV E proteins based on in vivo investigations.
| System | Protein condition | TOPOLOGY | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-ter | C-ter | ||||
| TGEV E | Cell | Surface of Non-permeabilized infected cells | Cyto | Exo | [ |
| IBV E | Cell | Radiolabeled | Golgi lumen | Cyto | [ |
| MHV E | Cell | FLAG-tagged protein in the infected cell | Cyto | Cyto | [ |
| SARS CoV E | Cell | N- or C- terminally FLAG-tagged | Cyto | Cyto | [ |
| Expressed protein found to have N-linked oligosaccharides at the C-ter. | Cyto | ER lumen | |||
| Untagged protein expressed in the infected cell | Intracellular lumen (ERGIC) | Cyto | [ | ||
List of predicted topologies of SARS CoV-2 Envelope protein using in silico prediction servers.
| Prediction server | N-ter (1−10) | HD (11–38) | C-ter (39–75) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMHMM | Cyto | Transmembrane | lumen |
| MEMSAT | Lumen | Transmembrane | Lumen |
| PHOBIUS | Cyto | Transmembrane | Lumen |
| TMPred | Lumen | Transmembrane | Cyto |
Fig. 2Experimentally evaluated and virtually predicted topologies of the CoV E protein. Orientation 1 represents a typical type III membrane protein; while 2 shows a membrane hairpin structure, 3 represents a type II membrane protein topology.
Fig. 3E protein-host membrane interactions. The stepwise functional interactions of the E protein with the host membranous interfaces in hijacking the cellular protein synthesis machinery to prompt viral propagation. The entry step of virus requires receptor binding followed by cell fusion that allows the entry of the viral genome into the host cellular environment. Once inside, the viral replication machinery is consolidated within the membranous compartments of host intracellular-trafficking system including the ER-ERGIC-Golgi complexes. Being in a protective environment of the host organelles, the viral structural proteins are transcribed, translated and eventually hijack the entire machinery to the benefit of the virus. The membrane-directed interactions prompt dynamic changes in the membranes of the secretory organelles, resulting in the eventual packaging and release or budding off of the new viral particles from the host cell. The figure was prepared with https://biorender.com.
Fig. 4The amyloidogenic propensity of the C-terminal segment of the SARS CoV E-protein that have a definite functional role at the membrane-interacting interface. The sequence comparison between the CoV-2 and CoV E protein C-terminal, highlights the conserved amyloidogenic segment, with a difference in only a few residues. The underlined segment in either protein can account for the fibrillation propensity. Previous studies by Bhunia et al. have highlighted the functional significance of the TK9 segment (colored residues) in SARS-CoV. The peptide-based studies have demonstrated the amyloidogenic aggregates in solution. Alternatively, the segment has been studied for the differential membrane-directed functioning. The peptide undergoes a helical conformation when in association with membranous environments. Comparison between bacterial and mammalian model membrane mimicking systems showed the different orientation of the peptide. This suggested the specific functional role of this peptide segment and its membrane-directed structural change. Preliminary studies with the TY5 peptide segment (underlined) had also shown the significance of the “FYxY” sequence, characteristic of amyloid proteins, and peptides [15,25]. The figure was prepared with https://biorender.com.
Fig. 5The conserved sequence analyses of the SARS-CoV-2 E protein with other members of the family. The left panel shows a multiple sequence alignment of several different CoV E proteins. The highly conserved Cysteine and Proline residues are labeled and represented with a sphere. The amyloidogenic SK9 fragment and TMD are highlighted in the figure. The multiple sequence alignment of proteins were carried out using ClustalW2 at the European Bioinformatics Institutes server, and WebLogo 3 was used to generate the figure. The right panel represents a Phylogenetic tree, based on amino acid sequences for E proteins of the CoV family. The tree was built using Mega X software based on maximum likelihood. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the clustal method. The following full length amino acid sequences were used: Human coronavirus 229E (HCV-229E), Human coronavirus NL63 (HCV-NL63), Miniopterus bat coronavirus 1 (MBCV-1), Miniopterus bat coronavirus HKU8 (MBCV-HKU8), Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), Rhinolophus bat coronavirus HKU2 (RBC-HKU2), Scotophilus bat coronavirus 512 (SBCV-512), Murine hepatitis virus strain JHM (MHCV), Bovine coronavirus (BCV), Human coronavirus OC43 (HCV-OC43), Betacoronavirus Erinaceus/VMC/DEU/2012 (BetaCV-Erinaceus), Human coronavirus HKU1 (HCV-HKU1), Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS), Rousettus bat coronavirus HKU9 (RBCV-HKU9), Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Tylonycteris bat CoV HKU4 (TBCV-HKU4), Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), Turkey coronavirus (TCV), Bottlenose dolphin coronavirus HKU22 (BDCV-HKU22), Bulbul coronavirus HKU11–934 (BCV-HKU-934), Porcine coronavirus HKU15 (PCV-HKU15). Genus of the viruses is colour coded in the figure.