Literature DB >> 32818527

N400 amplitude, latency, and variability reflect temporal integration of beat gesture and pitch accent during language processing.

Laura M Morett1, Nicole Landi2, Julia Irwin3, James C McPartland4.   

Abstract

This study examines how across-trial (average) and trial-by-trial (variability in) amplitude and latency of the N400 event-related potential (ERP) reflect temporal integration of pitch accent and beat gesture. Thirty native English speakers viewed videos of a talker producing sentences with beat gesture co-occurring with a pitch accented focus word (synchronous), beat gesture co-occurring with the onset of a subsequent non-focused word (asynchronous), or the absence of beat gesture (no beat). Across trials, increased amplitude and earlier latency were observed when beat gesture was temporally asynchronous with pitch accenting than when it was temporally synchronous with pitch accenting or absent. Moreover, temporal asynchrony of beat gesture relative to pitch accent increased trial-by-trial variability of N400 amplitude and latency and influenced the relationship between across-trial and trial-by-trial N400 latency. These results indicate that across-trial and trial-by-trial amplitude and latency of the N400 ERP reflect temporal integration of beat gesture and pitch accent during language comprehension, supporting extension of the integrated systems hypothesis of gesture-speech processing and neural noise theories to focus processing in typical adult populations.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beat gesture; Evoked response variability; N400; Pitch accent; Temporal integration

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32818527      PMCID: PMC7493208          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.610


  75 in total

1.  Pitch accent type affects the N400 during referential processing.

Authors:  Petra B Schumacher; Stefan Baumann
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading.

Authors:  Y Luo; Y Zhang; X Feng; X Zhou
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Listeners consider alternative speaker productions in discourse comprehension and memory: Evidence from beat gesture and pitch accenting.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Scott H Fraundorf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

4.  Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates irony processing as indexed by the N400.

Authors:  Nathalia Ishikawa Baptista; Mirella Manfredi; Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Beat that Word: How Listeners Integrate Beat Gesture and Focus in Multimodal Speech Discourse.

Authors:  Diana Dimitrova; Mingyuan Chu; Lin Wang; Asli Özyürek; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

7.  Individual Differences in Reading Skill Are Related to Trial-by-Trial Neural Activation Variability in the Reading Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Malins; Kenneth R Pugh; Bonnie Buis; Stephen J Frost; Fumiko Hoeft; Nicole Landi; W Einar Mencl; Anish Kurian; Ryan Staples; Peter J Molfese; Rose Sevcik; Robin Morris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhonglin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Echoes of the spoken past: how auditory cortex hears context during speech perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Hearing and seeing meaning in noise: Alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations predict gestural enhancement of degraded speech comprehension.

Authors:  Linda Drijvers; Asli Özyürek; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  More than words: word predictability, prosody, gesture and mouth movements in natural language comprehension.

Authors:  Ye Zhang; Diego Frassinelli; Jyrki Tuomainen; Jeremy I Skipper; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.