Literature DB >> 20580785

Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading.

Y Luo1, Y Zhang, X Feng, X Zhou.   

Abstract

How prosodic information is processed at the neural level during silent sentence reading is an unsolved issue. In this study, we investigate whether and how the processing of prosodic constraints can be distinguished from the processing of semantic constraints by measuring changes in event-related electroencephalogram (EEG) power. We visually presented Chinese sentences containing verb-noun combinations that were semantically congruent or incongruent and that had normal or abnormal rhythmic patterns and asked participants to judge whether the sentences were semantically and rhythmically acceptable. In Chinese, the rhythmic pattern refers to the combination of words with different syllable lengths. While the [1+1] pattern is normal for a verb-noun combination, the [2+1] pattern is abnormal. With the critical nouns, we found that the violation of semantic constraints was associated with the low beta (16-20 Hz) decrease in the early window (0-200 ms post onset) and the alpha (10-15 Hz) and low beta decrease in the later window (400-657 ms) while the processing of the abnormal rhythmic pattern was associated with the theta (4-6 Hz) and the alpha increase in the early window and the alpha and upper beta (20-24 Hz) decrease in the later window. These findings suggest that although the processing of semantic constraints and the processing of rhythmic pattern may partially share neuro-cognitive processes, as reflected by the similar decreases in alpha band power, they can nevertheless be differentiated in EEG responses during sentence reading. Copyright (c) 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580785     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  15 in total

1.  EEG oscillations reflect task effects for the change detection in vocal emotion.

Authors:  Xuhai Chen; Zhihui Pan; Ping Wang; Lijie Zhang; Jiajin Yuan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.

Authors:  Yadira Roa Romero; Daniel Senkowski; Julian Keil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spectral and spatial changes of brain rhythmic activity in response to the sustained thermal pain stimulation.

Authors:  Clara Huishi Zhang; Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Bin He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy.

Authors:  Joost Rommers; Danielle S Dickson; James J S Norton; Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Role of joint language control during cross-language communication: evidence from cross-frequency coupling.

Authors:  Huanhuan Liu; Baike Li; Xin Wang; Yuying He
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  EEG theta responses induced by emoji semantic violations.

Authors:  Mengmeng Tang; Xiufeng Zhao; Bingfei Chen; Lun Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The non-stop road from concrete to abstract: high concreteness causes the activation of long-range networks.

Authors:  Sabine Weiss; Horst M Müller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  "Too Many betas do not Spoil the Broth": The Role of Beta Brain Oscillations in Language Processing.

Authors:  Sabine Weiss; Horst M Mueller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-25

9.  N400 amplitude, latency, and variability reflect temporal integration of beat gesture and pitch accent during language processing.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Nicole Landi; Julia Irwin; James C McPartland
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.610

10.  Oscillatory Brain Dynamics during Sentence Reading: A Fixation-Related Spectral Perturbation Analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Vignali; Nicole A Himmelstoss; Stefan Hawelka; Fabio Richlan; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.