Literature DB >> 32817464

Estimating the genome-wide contribution of selection to temporal allele frequency change.

Vince Buffalo1,2, Graham Coop2.   

Abstract

Rapid phenotypic adaptation is often observed in natural populations and selection experiments. However, detecting the genome-wide impact of this selection is difficult since adaptation often proceeds from standing variation and selection on polygenic traits, both of which may leave faint genomic signals indistinguishable from a noisy background of genetic drift. One promising signal comes from the genome-wide covariance between allele frequency changes observable from temporal genomic data (e.g., evolve-and-resequence studies). These temporal covariances reflect how heritable fitness variation in the population leads changes in allele frequencies at one time point to be predictive of the changes at later time points, as alleles are indirectly selected due to remaining associations with selected alleles. Since genetic drift does not lead to temporal covariance, we can use these covariances to estimate what fraction of the variation in allele frequency change through time is driven by linked selection. Here, we reanalyze three selection experiments to quantify the effects of linked selection over short timescales using covariance among time points and across replicates. We estimate that at least 17 to 37% of allele frequency change is driven by selection in these experiments. Against this background of positive genome-wide temporal covariances, we also identify signals of negative temporal covariance corresponding to reversals in the direction of selection for a reasonable proportion of loci over the time course of a selection experiment. Overall, we find that in the three studies we analyzed, linked selection has a large impact on short-term allele frequency dynamics that is readily distinguishable from genetic drift.

Keywords:  adaptation; experimental evolution; linked selection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32817464      PMCID: PMC7456072          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1919039117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Estimating the genome-wide contribution of selection to temporal allele frequency change.

Authors:  Vince Buffalo; Graham Coop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution.

Authors:  Ryan D Hernandez; Joanna L Kelley; Eyal Elyashiv; S Cord Melton; Adam Auton; Gilean McVean; Guy Sella; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Magnus Nordborg; Tina T Hu; Yoko Ishino; Jinal Jhaveri; Christopher Toomajian; Honggang Zheng; Erica Bakker; Peter Calabrese; Jean Gladstone; Rana Goyal; Mattias Jakobsson; Sung Kim; Yuri Morozov; Badri Padhukasahasram; Vincent Plagnol; Noah A Rosenberg; Chitiksha Shah; Jeffrey D Wall; Jue Wang; Keyan Zhao; Theodore Kalbfleisch; Vincent Schulz; Martin Kreitman; Joy Bergelson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Selection for complex traits leaves little or no classic signatures of selection.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Sarah J Saxton; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Benjamin J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Evidence for widespread positive and negative selection in coding and conserved noncoding regions of Capsella grandiflora.

Authors:  Robert J Williamson; Emily B Josephs; Adrian E Platts; Khaled M Hazzouri; Annabelle Haudry; Mathieu Blanchette; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Daniel L Hartl; Timothy B Sackton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Michael J McDonald; Jeffrey E Barrick; Richard E Lenski; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Estimating the genome-wide contribution of selection to temporal allele frequency change.

Authors:  Vince Buffalo; Graham Coop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temperature effects on cellular host-microbe interactions explain continent-wide endosymbiont prevalence.

Authors:  Michael T J Hague; J Dylan Shropshire; Chelsey N Caldwell; John P Statz; Kimberly A Stanek; William R Conner; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Experimental evolution reveals the synergistic genomic mechanisms of adaptation to ocean warming and acidification in a marine copepod.

Authors:  Reid S Brennan; James A deMayo; Hans G Dam; Michael Finiguerra; Hannes Baumann; Vince Buffalo; Melissa H Pespeni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Allele frequency divergence reveals ubiquitous influence of positive selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jason Bertram
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Genome-wide evolutionary response of European oaks during the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Dounia Saleh; Jun Chen; Jean-Charles Leplé; Thibault Leroy; Laura Truffaut; Benjamin Dencausse; Céline Lalanne; Karine Labadie; Isabelle Lesur; Didier Bert; Frédéric Lagane; François Morneau; Jean-Marc Aury; Christophe Plomion; Martin Lascoux; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-01-05

6.  The neural crest cell hypothesis: no unified explanation for domestication.

Authors:  Martin Johnsson; Rie Henriksen; Dominic Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Pollinator loss causes rapid adaptive evolution of selfing and dramatically reduces genome-wide genetic variability.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Busch; Sarah Bodbyl-Roels; Sharif Tusuubira; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Extensive standing genetic variation from a small number of founders enables rapid adaptation in Daphnia.

Authors:  Anurag Chaturvedi; Jiarui Zhou; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Till Czypionka; Luisa Orsini; Craig E Jackson; Katina I Spanier; Joseph R Shaw; John K Colbourne; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Gene Flow and Genetic Structure Reveal Reduced Diversity between Generations of a Tropical Tree, Manilkara multifida Penn., in Atlantic Forest Fragments.

Authors:  Zubaria Waqar; Ramiris César Souza Moraes; Maíra Benchimol; José Carlos Morante-Filho; Eduardo Mariano-Neto; Fernanda Amato Gaiotto
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Sexual Antagonism, Temporally Fluctuating Selection, and Variable Dominance Affect a Regulatory Polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda Glaser-Schmitt; Meike J Wittmann; Timothy J S Ramnarine; John Parsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.