| Literature DB >> 32808786 |
Weeberb J Requia1,2, Qian Di1,3, Rachel Silvern4, James T Kelly5, Petros Koutrakis1, Loretta J Mickley4, Melissa P Sulprizio4, Heresh Amini1,6, Liuhua Shi1,7, Joel Schwartz1.
Abstract
In this paper, we integrated multiple types of predictor variables and three types of machine learners (neural network, random forest, and gradient boosting) into a geographically weighted ensemble model to estimate the daily maximum 8 h O3 with high resolution over both space (at 1 km × 1 km grid cells covering the contiguous United States) and time (daily estimates between 2000 and 2016). We further quantify monthly model uncertainty for our 1 km × 1 km gridded domain. The results demonstrate high overall model performance with an average cross-validated R2 (coefficient of determination) against observations of 0.90 and 0.86 for annual averages. Overall, the model performance of the three machine learning algorithms was quite similar. The overall model performance from the ensemble model outperformed those from any single algorithm. The East North Central region of the United States had the highest R2, 0.93, and performance was weakest for the western mountainous regions (R2 of 0.86) and New England (R2 of 0.87). For the cross validation by season, our model had the best performance during summer with an R2 of 0.88. This study can be useful for the environmental health community to more accurately estimate the health impacts of O3 over space and time, especially in health studies at an intra-urban scale.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32808786 PMCID: PMC7498146 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028