Literature DB >> 35040691

Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollution and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Sensitive Windows of Exposure and Sex Differences.

Md Mostafijur Rahman1, Yu-Hsiang Shu2, Ting Chow2, Frederick W Lurmann3, Xin Yu4, Mayra P Martinez2, Sarah A Carter2, Sandrah P Eckel1, Jiu-Chiuan Chen1, Zhanghua Chen1, Pat Levitt5, Joel Schwartz6,7, Rob McConnell1, Anny H Xiang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that air pollution exposures during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children, and the risk appears to be greater for boys. However, studies assessing gestational windows of susceptibility have been mostly limited by trimesters.
OBJECTIVE: We identified sensitive windows of exposure to regional air pollution and risk of ASD and examined sex differences in a large birth cohort.
METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study included 294,937 mother-child pairs with singleton deliveries in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) hospitals from 2001 to 2014. Children were followed using electronic medical records until clinical ASD diagnosis, non-KPSC membership, death, or 31 December 2019, whichever came first. Weekly mean fine particulate matter [PM with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5μm (PM2.5)], nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) pregnancy exposures were estimated using spatiotemporal prediction models. Cox proportional hazard models with distributed lags were used to estimate weekly pollutant exposure associations with ASD risk for the entire cohort, and separately for boys and for girls. Models were adjusted for child sex (for full cohort), maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age at delivery, parity, maternal education, maternal comorbidities, medical center, census tract median household income, birth year, and season.
RESULTS: There were 5,694 ASD diagnoses (4,636 boys, 1,058 girls). Sensitive PM2.5 exposure windows associated with ASD were found early in pregnancy, statistically significant throughout the first two trimesters [1-27 wk of gestation, cumulative hazard ratio (HR)=1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06, 1.23] per interquartile range (IQR) (7.4-μg/m3) increase]. O3 exposure during 34-37 wk of gestation was associated with increased risk [HR=1.06 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.11) per IQR (17.4 ppb) increase] but with reduced risk during 20-28 wk of gestation [HR=0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.98)]. No associations were observed with NO2. Sex-stratified early gestational PM2.5 associations were stronger among boys [boys HR=1.16 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.26); girls HR=1.06 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.26)]. O3 associations in later gestation were observed only in boys [boys HR=1.10 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.16); girls HR=0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.05)].
CONCLUSIONS: Exposures to PM2.5 in the first two gestational trimesters were associated with increased ASD risk in children, with stronger associations observed for boys. The role of O3 exposure on ASD risk merits further investigation. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9509.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35040691      PMCID: PMC8765363          DOI: 10.1289/EHP9509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a complex neurodevelopmental condition that disproportionately affects boys (Xu et al. 2019), imposes substantial lifetime social and economic costs on affected families and communities (Werling and Geschwind 2013). Although ASD risk is heritable, only of diagnoses are due to spontaneous single gene or chromosomal mutations (Bai et al. 2019; Rylaarsdam and Guemez-Gamboa 2019); the remaining causes are not well understood and are likely multifactorial. Prenatal factors are associated with increased risk of ASD (Stoner et al. 2014); a growing number of epidemiological studies have reported associations between prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter [PM with an aerodynamic diameter of ()] and increased risk for ASD (Chun et al. 2020; Lam et al. 2016). Possible mechanisms may include maternal systemic oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine production (Leni et al. 2020; Xu et al. 2012), resulting in placental and endothelial dysfunction and increased fetal oxidative stress that may disrupt differentiation and organization of the fetal brain (Block et al. 2012; Block and Calderón-Garcidueñas 2009). Fetal brain development occurs through a sequence of carefully orchestrated histogenic events (Fox et al. 2010; Levitt 2003; Molnár et al. 2019), and environmental exposure that disrupts specific processes can have variable impacts, depending on the timing of the exposure as well as dose (Block et al. 2012). Despite this understanding, epidemiological studies have examined associations between air pollution and ASD using pregnancy average exposure or trimester-specific average exposure (Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019; Raz et al. 2015; Ritz et al. 2018); results from these studies may be biased owing to seasonal trends in air pollution exposure (Wilson et al. 2017) and provide limited insight into sensitive exposure windows that may not coincide precisely with the commonly used trimester average exposure (Fox et al. 2010; Tau and Peterson 2010; Wright 2017). For example, neurulation continues up to 6 wk of gestation and cortical neurogenesis begins at 7 wk of gestation and continues through midpregnancy, whereas synaptogenesis begins during mid-gestation and extends through birth (Kast and Levitt 2019; Keeney et al. 2015). Weekly exposure resolution is now available for assessment of effects on transient fetal brain developmental susceptibility (Di et al. 2019, 2020; Requia et al. 2020). The effects of in utero air pollution exposure on ASD risk also may vary by sex. We have reported statistically significant sex differences of first trimester association with ASD risk, stronger among boys (Jo et al. 2019b); other studies also reported sexual dimorphic trends in effect estimates on ASD (Pagalan et al. 2019; Raz et al. 2015; Ritz et al. 2018). Animal studies have shown sexual dimorphism in the developmental neurotoxicity of gestational exposure (Bolton et al. 2013, 2014; McCarthy 2016). The male fetus may be more vulnerable to oxidative injury (Minghetti et al. 2013); thus boys may have an exaggerated response to in utero exposure. Sex-specific prenatal effects are also observed for other neurodevelopmental and health outcomes (Chiu et al. 2016; Hsu et al. 2015; Rosa et al. 2017); decreased intelligence quotient scores in boys, but not in girls, were associated with late gestational exposure (Chiu et al. 2016). The purpose of the present study was to address limitations of previous studies by examining the associations of weekly gestational air pollution [, nitrogen dioxide (), and ozone ()] exposure with ASD risk and sex differences in a large population-based pregnancy cohort. Air pollution exposure was estimated at maternal residential addresses during pregnancy using validated satellite-based spatiotemporally resolved () hybrid models. Results will help provide insight into vulnerable exposure windows and sexual dimorphism potentially related to the 4-fold larger ASD burden among boys (Maenner et al. 2020).

Materials and Methods

Study Population

This is a population-based retrospective pregnancy cohort study that included mothers with singleton deliveries at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) hospitals between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2014. KPSC is a large integrated health care system with over members across Southern California. KPSC membership is diverse and similar in socioeconomic characteristics to the region’s census demographics (Koebnick et al. 2012). Information related to the mother, including maternal address history, and to the child was extracted from high-quality, integrated electronic medical records (EMRs) maintained by KPSC. Addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS, and geocodes with SCORE of 90–100 and ADDRESS TYPE of point address or street address were considered suitable. Addresses based only on street name, postal code, locality, or administrative unit usually had SCORES and were considered too uncertain to be geolocated into the correct grid used for exposure assignments. Derivation of study sample size is shown in Figure S1. To ensure complete weekly air pollution exposures up to 37 wk of gestation and the opportunity to be screened for potential ASD risk starting at 18 months of age during their regular well-child visits at KPSC, children who were born singleton at 37–44 wk of gestation at KPSC hospitals and were covered by the KPSC health plan at 1 year of age were eligible (). A total of 48,876 births were excluded; 599 due to missing or data errors in birth weight, sex, maternal race/ethnicity, or age at delivery; 141 due to maternal age at delivery or of age; and 48,136 due to incomplete maternal residential address history in pregnancy or with geocodes not suitable for exposure assignment. The final data analysis included 294,937 mother–child pairs. The excluded children had more missing or incomplete covariates and maternal address history; excluded children’s mothers had more missing medical history before pregnancy and were younger, less educated, and more likely to be nulliparous, suggesting that these mothers were less likely to have joined KPSC before pregnancy (Table S1). Eligible children were followed using EMRs until 31 December 2019. The institutional review boards of both KPSC and the University of Southern California approved this study with waiver of individual subject consent.

Outcome ASD

Outcome measures were presence or absence of ASD during the follow-up period, which were identified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (CDC 2013) codes 299.0, 299.1, 299.8, and 299.9 for EMR records before 1 October 2015 [date of the KPSC implementation of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) (WHO 2016)] and subsequently according to ICD-10 codes F84.0, F84.3, F84.5, F84.8, and F84.9. These codes included autistic disorders, Asperger’s syndrome, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified and excluded childhood disintegrative disorder and Rett’s syndrome. Codes from at least two separate visits were required for ASD diagnosis. This approach has been validated with a positive predictive value of 88% (Coleman et al. 2015) and used in previous studies of ASD in this cohort (Jo et al. 2019b; Xiang et al. 2015, 2018).

Exposure Assessment

Air pollution exposures were assigned accounting for change in addresses for each participant during pregnancy. KPSC maintained a consolidated address history table recording changes of address from EMRs. Each address record has a corresponding start and end date. Addresses for each participant corresponding to each address update were interpolated from start to end date. Exposure models are described elsewhere in detail (Di et al. 2019, 2020; Requia et al. 2020). Briefly, three machine learning algorithms (neural network, random forest, and gradient boosting) and multiple predictor variables, including Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer–derived aerosol optical depth measurements at a spatial resolution, measuring instrument and measurements, meteorological variables, land-use variables, chemical transport model predictions, emission inventories, and other variables were used to estimate daily 24-h average , 1-h maximum , and 8-h maximum at a resolution of across the contiguous United States. Performance of each model was evaluated by applying a 10-fold cross-validation technique. Ensemble models produced very good cross-validated values of 0.86 for , 0.79 for , and 0.90 for . To provide stable estimates of exposure, weekly averages of mother’s daily gestational exposure estimates were used for analysis.

Covariates

We selected covariates a priori based on expert knowledge and past literature on air pollution exposures and ASD, and included child sex, maternal race/ethnicity in the KPSC EMR (self-reported from multiple options), maternal age at delivery, parity, education, maternal history of comorbidity [ diagnosis of heart, lung, kidney, liver disease, or cancer], medical center, median family household income in census tract of residence, birth year, and an indicator variable for season (dry from April to October; wet from November to March)] (Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019; Ritz et al. 2018). An indicator variable was created for missing covariates (parity: ; education: ; census tract household income: ). Birth year and season of conception were included to control for potential confounding due to omitting variables correlated with seasonal or time trends in ASD incidence and pollution levels. KPSC medical centers were used to control for spatial confounding or any physician differences in diagnosis between medical centers. ASD is more common in urban areas (Becker 2010), and the population of this cohort is largely urban. We adjusted our models for KPSC medical centers that broadly capture the spatial variation in urbanicity in Southern California. Gestational age and birth weight were not considered as covariates because they may be on the casual pathway between air pollution and ASD (Bekkar et al. 2020; Gardener et al. 2011).

Statistical Analyses

In recent years, distributed lag models (DLMs) have been used in pregnancy studies to examine associations between prenatal weekly air pollution exposures during gestation and child health outcomes (Chiu et al. 2016; Hsu et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2018). To identify sensitive windows for effects of air pollution on ASD, we constructed an exposure lag space by incorporating weekly averages of daily , , and estimates at each mother’s residence throughout the 37-wk gestational period (Gasparrini et al. 2010). Specially, we fit Cox proportional hazard models with a DLM for each pollutant to estimate weekly ASD hazard ratios (HRs) associated with estimated , , and while adjusting for the abovementioned covariates. Follow-up time was calculated from 1 year of age to a clinical diagnosis of ASD, last date of KPSC health plan membership, death, or 31 December 2019, whichever occurred first. Standard errors were estimated using robust sandwich estimators to control for potential correlation for families. Models incorporated data from all weeks simultaneously and estimated associations between outcome and exposure for a given week after controlling for exposure at all other weeks, assuming association varies smoothly as a function of week. We modeled this smooth function using natural splines (Raz et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2018). The degree of freedom (df) for the natural spline was chosen based on the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value. Based on AIC, the linear model provided the best fit for and ; a model with 3 df provided the best fit for . A sensitive window was defined as the 95% confidence interval (CI) of HR that did not contain 1. We ran DLMs stratified by sex to identify sensitive windows of prenatal air pollution exposure on ASD separately for both boys and girls. As a post hoc data analysis, we fitted a multivariable Cox regression model and tested for interaction with sex by including an air interaction term using air pollution level averaged over the DLM-identified sensitive window. The proportional hazards assumption of the Cox proportional hazard model was assessed using the Schoenfeld residual plot of the average entire pregnancy and sensitive window exposures. No clear nonrandom patterns against follow-up time were observed. We conducted several sensitivity analyses: a) censoring follow-up time up to 5 years of age such that all children reached the minimum of 5 years of age with a maximum follow-up until 5 years of age, b) extending prenatal air pollution exposure to full term by restricting the sample to children delivered at wk of gestation, and c) adjusting for prepregnancy obesity and prepregnancy diabetes, which were associated with ASD in this cohort in a previous study (Xiang et al. 2015). DLMs were implemented using the dlnm package (Gasparrini 2011) and all statistical analyses were performed in R (version 3.5; R Development Core Team). The annotated syntax of the R codes are provided in the Supplemental Material in the section “Example R code of DLM modeling.”

Results

Over a median of 9.0 [interquartile range (IQR: ) y of follow-up after birth, 5,694 children (1.9%) were diagnosed with ASD (Table 1). The follow-up time for ASD children (i.e., the median age of first ASD diagnosis) was 3.5 y (IQR: ). Boys were 4.4 times more likely to be diagnosed with ASD than girls (4,636 boys; 1,058 girls). Children diagnosed with ASD were more likely to be born to slightly older with mothers who were nulliparous, had a history of comorbidities, and lived in a census tract with a lower median income (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of children, with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) pregnancy cohort 2001–2014.

CharacteristicsChildren
Overall (n=294,937)With ASD (n=5,694)Without ASD (n=289,243)
Sex [n (%)]
 Male150,009 (50.9)4,636 (81.4)145,373 (50.3)
 Female144,928 (49.1)1,058 (18.6)143,870 (49.7)
Follow-up after birth {y [median (IQR)]}9.0 (5.9–13.1)3.5 (2.6–5.3)9.2 (6.0–13.2)
Gestational age at birth {wk of gestation [median (IQR)]39.0 (38.6–40.0)39.0 (38.0–40.0)39.0 (38.7–40.0)
Maternal age at delivery {y [median (IQR)]}30.3 (26.2–34.2)31.3 (27.5–35.2)30.3 (26.2–34.2)
Parity [n (%)]
 0103,132 (35.0)2,351 (41.3)100,781 (34.8)
 197,611 (33.1)1,858 (32.6)95,753 (33.1)
>277,866 (26.4)1,137 (20.0)76,729 (26.5)
 Unknown16,328 (5.5)348 (6.1)15,980 (5.5)
Maternal Education [n (%)]
 High school or lower103,723 (35.2)1,710 (30.0)102,013 (35.3)
 Some college87,087 (29.5)1,802 (31.6)85,285 (29.5)
 College graduate or higher101,296 (34.3)2,143 (37.6)99,153 (34.3)
 Unknown2,831 (1.0)39 (0.7)2,792 (1.0)
Census tract median household annual income [n (%)]a
<$30,0007,590 (2.6)265 (4.7)7,325 (2.5)
$30,000$49,99971,950 (24.4)1,666 (29.3)70,284 (24.3)
$50,000$69,99998,525 (33.4)1905 (33.5)96,620 (33.4)
$70,000$89,99965,372 (22.2)1,077 (18.9)64,295 (22.2)
>$90,00050,930 (17.3)770 (13.5)50,160 (17.3)
 Unknown570 (0.2)11 (0.2)559 (0.2)
Race/ethnicity [n (%)]
 Non-Hispanic white75,814 (25.7)1,304 (22.9)74,510 (25.8)
 Non-Hispanic black26,933 (9.1)576 (10.1)26,357 (9.1)
 Hispanic149,536 (50.7)2,838 (49.8)146,698 (50.7)
 Asian/Pacific Islander36,629 (12.4)833 (14.6)35,796 (12.4)
 Other6,025 (2.0)143 (2.5)5,882 (2.0)
History of maternal comorbidity [n (%)]b42,452 (14.4)986 (17.3)41,466 (14.3)
Prepregnancy diabetes [n (%)]c8,565 (2.9)282 (5.0)8,283 (2.9)
Prepregnancy obesity [n (%)]d48,410 (16.4)1,205 (21.2)47,205 (16.3)
Year of birth [n (%)]
 2001–200591,714 (31.1)1,632 (28.7)90,082 (31.1)
 2005–2010105,611 (35.8)1900 (33.4)103,711 (35.9)
 2010–201497,612 (33.1)2,162 (38.0)95,450 (33.0)

Note: BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Based on census tract median household income.

diagnosis of heart, lung, kidney, liver disease, or cancer.

Type I and type II diabetes diagnosed before pregnancy.

Prepregnancy .

Characteristics of children, with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) pregnancy cohort 2001–2014. Note: BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range. Based on census tract median household income. diagnosis of heart, lung, kidney, liver disease, or cancer. Type I and type II diabetes diagnosed before pregnancy. Prepregnancy . and concentrations during the study period decreased over time, whereas concentration remained relatively stable (Figure S2). exposure was higher in the wet season [ (IQR: ) vs. ] as was [ (IQR: ) vs. 32.2 (IQR: ) ppb] (Table S2). In contrast, exposure was higher during the dry season [ (IQR: ) vs. 50.1 ]. The average weekly , , and levels at mothers’ residential addresses across all years were (), (), and (), respectively (Table S2). Moderate correlation was observed between weekly and levels () (Table S3). No correlation was observed between yearly average and levels (), although there was a moderate negative correlation in the wet season () (Table S3). Weekly was positively associated with ASD: The association was strongest early in pregnancy and decreased linearly to birth; associations were significant throughout the first two trimesters (1–27 wk) of pregnancy (Figure 1). The cumulative HR for the first two trimesters was 1.14 per IQR () increase in (95% CI: 106, 123) (Table 2). In sex-stratified analyses, we observed a sensitive exposure window between gestation weeks 1 and 28 among boys [ (95% CI: 1.08, 1.26) per IQR increase in ], but smaller and wider CIs and statistically nonsignificant estimates among girls [ (95% CI: 0.89, 1.26)] (Table 2). From a post hoc Cox analysis using an interaction term for sex and averaged exposure over this sensitive window, we found significant interaction between sex and (). Table 2 also provides the cumulative HR (95% CI) estimates associated with for the entire pregnancy: (95% CI: 1.08, 1.27) overall, (95% CI: 1.09, 1.31) for boys, and (95% CI: 0.86, 1.29) for girls.
Figure 1.

Weekly associated hazard ratios (HRs) associated with weekly , , and exposures over gestation with risk of ASD in the overall cohort (), and separately among boys () and girls (). Gray shade indicates 95% confidence intervals; dashed vertical lines demarcate trimesters. All the models were adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age at delivery, parity, education, maternal comorbidities, medical centers, household income, birth year, and season; the model for the Overall cohort was further adjusted for child sex. Note: ASD, autism spectrum disorder; , nitrogen dioxide; , ozone; , fine particulate matter.

Table 2

Cumulative hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ASD for prenatal exposures to , , and for the entire pregnancy and DLM-identified sensitive windows.

PollutantHR (95% CI)
Overall (n=294,937)Boys (n=150,009)Girls (n=144,928) pInteraction a
PM2.5 (per IQR=7.4μg/m3 increase)
 Entire pregnancy1.17 (1.08, 1.27)1.19 (1.09, 1.31)1.06 (0.86, 1.29)
 Sensitive windows1.14 (1.06, 1.23)b1.16 (1.08, 1.26)c1.06 (0.89, 1.26)d0.01
NO2 (per IQR=17.4 ppb increase)
 Entire pregnancy0.99 (0.90, 1.09)1.00 (0.90, 1.11)0.93 (0.73, 1.15)
 Sensitive windowse
O3 (per IQR=19.3 ppb increase)
 Entire pregnancy0.97 (0.85, 1.10)0.99 (0.86, 1.15)0.86 (0.64, 1.15)
 Sensitive windows1.06 (1.01, 1.11)f1.10 (1.04, 1.16)g0.94 (0.84, 1.05)h0.007
0.93 (0.89, 0.98)i0.92 (0.87, 0.98)j0.98 (0.87, 1.10)k0.68

Note: All the models were adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age at delivery, parity, education, maternal comorbidities, medical centers, census tract household income, birth year, and season; the model for the Overall cohort was further adjusted for child sex. Results were scaled to per IQR increase in (), (), and (). —, Not applicable; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; DLM, distributed lag model; IQR, interquartile range; , nitrogen dioxide; , ozone; , fine particulate matter;

was calculated by including an air interaction term using air pollution level averaged over the DLM-identified sensitive window.

HR for the DLM-identified overall sensitive windows 1–27 wk of gestation.

HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 1–28 wk of gestation for boys.

HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (1–28 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure.

No sensitive windows were identified for exposure.

HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 34–37 wk of gestation.

HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 33–37 wk of gestation for boys.

HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (33–37 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure.

HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 20–28 wk of gestation.

HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 20–28 wk of gestation for boys.

HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (20–28 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure.

Weekly associated hazard ratios (HRs) associated with weekly , , and exposures over gestation with risk of ASD in the overall cohort (), and separately among boys () and girls (). Gray shade indicates 95% confidence intervals; dashed vertical lines demarcate trimesters. All the models were adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age at delivery, parity, education, maternal comorbidities, medical centers, household income, birth year, and season; the model for the Overall cohort was further adjusted for child sex. Note: ASD, autism spectrum disorder; , nitrogen dioxide; , ozone; , fine particulate matter. Cumulative hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ASD for prenatal exposures to , , and for the entire pregnancy and DLM-identified sensitive windows. Note: All the models were adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age at delivery, parity, education, maternal comorbidities, medical centers, census tract household income, birth year, and season; the model for the Overall cohort was further adjusted for child sex. Results were scaled to per IQR increase in (), (), and (). —, Not applicable; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; DLM, distributed lag model; IQR, interquartile range; , nitrogen dioxide; , ozone; , fine particulate matter; was calculated by including an air interaction term using air pollution level averaged over the DLM-identified sensitive window. HR for the DLM-identified overall sensitive windows 1–27 wk of gestation. HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 1–28 wk of gestation for boys. HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (1–28 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure. No sensitive windows were identified for exposure. HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 34–37 wk of gestation. HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 33–37 wk of gestation for boys. HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (33–37 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure. HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 20–28 wk of gestation. HR for the DLM-identified sensitive windows 20–28 wk of gestation for boys. HR for the sensitive windows identified for boys (20–28 wk of gestation). No sensitive windows were identified for girls for exposure. No sensitive window of exposure was identified for exposure (Figure 1). The cumulative HR over entire pregnancy for exposure was 0.99 per IQR () increase (95% CI: 0.90, 1.09) (Table 2). We did not find any sensitive windows within any subgroup in sex-stratified analyses (Figure 1). The weekly exposure association with ASD was curvilinear, with statistically significant increased risk between gestation weeks 34 and 37 but reduced risk between gestation weeks 20 and 28 (Figure 1). The exposure during entire pregnancy was not associated with ASD [cumulative per IQR () increase (95% CI: 0.85, 1.10)] (Table 2). However, the cumulative HR for the sensitive window of 34–37 wk of gestation was 1.06 per IQR increase (95% CI: 1.01, 1.11). The cumulative HR for the sensitive window of 20–28 wk of gestation was 0.93 per IQR increase (95% CI: 0.89, 0.98) (Table 2). In sex-stratified analyses, we observed a sensitive exposure window between gestation weeks 33 and 37 among boys [ (95% CI: 1.04, 1.16) per IQR increase in ], but an inverse association between gestation weeks 20 and 28, and no overall association (Table 2, Figure 1). No association was seen in girls. Post hoc analysis using interaction terms between sex and level averaged over DLM-identified windows (33–37 wk of gestation) also showed significant interaction between sex and (), but not for windows of 20–28 wk of gestation (). Sensitivity analysis censoring follow-up time at 5 years of age produced results similar to those from the primary analyses (Figure S3). Sensitivity analysis including only births at wk of gestation (total 220,981 singleton children) also identified substantively similar critical windows of exposure (Figure S4). Results from a sensitivity analysis adjusting for prepregnancy obesity and diabetes were similar to those from the primary analyses (Figure S5).

Discussion

Data from this large and population-based multiethnic birth cohort study showed that increased prenatal exposure early in pregnancy was associated with increased risk of ASD in childhood; risk declined throughout pregnancy, and this association was statistically significant through 27 wk of gestation. The significant associations were primarily observed in boys. exposure had a varying relationship with ASD risk throughout pregnancy; was associated with increased risk of ASD in late pregnancy (34–37 wk of gestation) but with reduced risk in midpregnancy (20–28 wk of gestation); and the significant increased risk associated with was observed only in boys. We did not find associations between ASD and exposure. To our knowledge, this is the first study to combine temporally resolved ambient prenatal , , and exposure estimates at maternal residential addresses with DLM to identify sex-specific susceptible exposure windows associated with ASD risk. The cumulative HR observed in this study for increased exposure during pregnancy was larger than reported in a recent meta-analysis [ (95% CI: 1.08, 1.27) vs. 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) for a increase in ] (Chun et al. 2020), but it was consistent with the results of our previous analysis in a subgroup of this cohort (Jo et al. 2019b). The absence of an association with ASD is consistent with some prior studies (Becerra et al. 2013; Goodrich et al. 2018; Guxens et al. 2016; Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019) but not with others that observed prenatal exposure was associated with increased ASD risk (Ritz et al. 2018; Volk et al. 2013). One study also using temporally resolved exposure data in a DLM found an inverse association of gestational exposure with ASD during the first and second trimester (Raz et al. 2018). Although previous studies have linked prenatal exposure with increased ASD risk in children (Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019; Raz et al. 2015), fetal sex-specific windows of vulnerability have not been well defined. Most prior studies used trimester average exposure, which can introduce bias in estimates because season can covary with these predefined periods (Wilson et al. 2017). Susceptible trimesters identified by prior studies have not been consistent (Becerra et al. 2013; Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019; Raz et al. 2015; Talbott et al. 2015; Volk et al. 2013). Two studies reported significant association across all three trimesters, with the largest association in the third trimester (Raz et al. 2015; Volk et al. 2013). Two studies did not identify a susceptible trimester (Pagalan et al. 2019; Talbott et al. 2015). However, trimester-specific average exposures may not align well with the critical timing of specific histogenic events, such as neuron production, cell migration, and the initial laying of major fiber tracts by mid-gestation or with narrow windows of developmental susceptibility (Chiu et al. 2016; Levitt 2003). In contrast, the DLMs produced weekly risk estimates that varied smoothly over time and demonstrated the largest estimated effects of exposure early in pregnancy. Fetal brain development begins early in utero, with neuron production evident by 4–6 wk of gestation, and then proceeds through a sequence of orchestrated, orderly events (Levitt 2003). Thus, identifying the timing of fetal brain development perturbation may clarify the underlying mechanisms of air pollution-mediated disruptions. The observed association between exposure and ASD—strongest early in pregnancy and declining over the course of pregnancy—suggests that the association, if causal, occurred early during gestation but continued at least during 1–27 wk of gestation, spanning neurulation early in pregnancy, neurogenesis, and synaptogenesis (Rice and Barone 2000; Tau and Peterson 2010). These results also suggest that there was no discrete neurodevelopment event occurring in a specific narrow window of exposure that was the target for effects. Disruption by PM exposure has been shown in rodent studies to lead to neuropathological and morphological changes in the brain that adversely impact behavioral function (Cory-Slechta et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2019). Microglial cells, which serve in part as innate immune cells of the brain, colonize the developing brain by 4 wk of gestation and proliferate extensively through mid-gestation (Menassa and Gomez-Nicola 2018). There is substantial experimental evidence that exposure results in disrupted brain development and neuroinflammatory responses (Kulas et al. 2018; Woodward et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2018). This aligns with human molecular and anatomical neuropathology studies of brains from individuals with ASD, identifying reactive microglial accumulation and an increase in related gene expression (Gupta et al. 2014; Morgan et al. 2012; Pinto et al. 2014; Vargas et al. 2005; Voineagu et al. 2011). This convergence on microglia and developmental neuroinflammation as risks for ASD reflects an important role for this immunocompetent cell in typical brain development, with disruption altering connectivity and functions that are related to characteristics of ASD (Hong and Stevens 2016; Prinz and Priller 2014; Zhan et al. 2014). exposure also may increase ASD risk by its impact on placental health, which is essential for proper fetal brain development (Zeltser and Leibel 2011). Pathological cellular and molecular placental responses to early pregnancy exposure have been reported (Familari et al. 2019; Maghbooli et al. 2018; Saenen et al. 2015). is a reactive gas, so developing fetal tissue is not exposed directly during gestation (Frampton et al. 1999). However, a rodent study demonstrated that respiratory oxidative stress and inflammation caused by can affect distant organs (Martínez-Lazcano et al. 2018). Increased exposure has resulted in oxidative stress in brains and altered nervous system function in adult rats (Kodavanti et al. 2021; Martínez-Lazcano et al. 2018). Therefore, associations of with increased ASD risk are biologically plausible. At least five previous epidemiological studies have examined ASD associations with (Becerra et al. 2013; Jo et al. 2019a, 2019b; Kaufman et al. 2019; Volk et al. 2013). Only one reported statistically significant associations: largest with third trimester exposure, consistent with our results (Becerra et al. 2013). One other study reported the strongest associations in the third trimester, albeit with wide CIs (Kaufman et al. 2019). We previously reported that among mothers with gestational diabetes, first trimester exposure was associated with increased ASD risk; however, among the general population of nondiabetic mothers, the third trimester exposure had the largest effect estimate (Jo et al. 2019a). In the present study, we also observed an inverse association between ASD risk and exposure during 20–28 wk of gestation; the biological plausibility of this association is not clear. However, if caused early fetal loss among fetuses that were at high risk for ASD, it is possible that an artifactual protective association with ASD might be observed among surviving children. These results warrant additional epidemiological and animal studies to identify the potential role of gestational exposure timing on risk of ASD. Our study did not identify sensitive windows of exposure for ASD risk among girls, consistent with prior studies that found larger associations between prenatal exposure and ASD risk in boys (Jo et al. 2019b; Pagalan et al. 2019; Raz et al. 2015; Ritz et al. 2018). Animal studies also support sexual dimorphism in the neurotoxicity of prenatal exposure (Bolton et al. 2013, 2014). Higher rates of ASD in boys compared with girls is a central feature of ASD (Werling and Geschwind 2013). Our results are consistent with exposure contributing to this dimorphism; however, mechanisms of dimorphism for ASD, and specific contributions to this sex difference, remain to be determined. This study has several strengths that provide additional evidence for the occurrence of exposure during prenatal development being a key contributor to ASD risk. Genetic variation is also a strong determinant of ASD risk, and the combination of the three elements () likely underlies many pediatric disorders (Boyce et al. 2021). The present study leverages a) a large population-based pregnancy cohort with standard diagnostic criteria for ASD; b) high-quality EMRs providing relevant confounders in an ethnically diverse sample of children; c) state-of-the-art hybrid spatiotemporal exposure models with weekly and resolution; and d) change of addresses during pregnancy used to assign air pollution exposures at home. We also acknowledge some limitations. Data on dietary foliate, which has been associated with ASD (Surén et al. 2013), was unavailable. To our knowledge, there is no evidence that maternal folate intake is associated with air pollution, and thus folate is unlikely to be a confounder of air pollution effects on ASD risk. There may be other environmental factors that covary with air pollution, such as noise and temperature; however, to our knowledge, their association with ASD have not been assessed. Mothers’ time–activity patterns were not available. Although we took advantage of the EMRs to identify ASD cases in a large birth cohort, we acknowledge some diagnostic misclassification cannot be avoided. In conclusion, increased exposure in the first two trimesters and exposure in the late third trimester of pregnancy were associated with ASD risk in children, largely among boys. These results are consistent with experimental animal and human molecular and neuropathology epidemiological studies. The identified sensitive exposure window coincides with early sensitive periods of brain development when the massive diversity of neuronal populations and regional specialization are being established. This early temporal vulnerability to environmental toxicants, when foundational brain architecture is being established, is likely to have the greatest impact on disruption of complex behavior and function. exposure in midpregnancy was found to be associated with reduced ASD risk; the role of exposure on ASD risk merits further investigation. A more definitive characterization of the windows of susceptibility for neurotoxicants will enhance insight into underlying mechanisms. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  73 in total

1.  Abnormal microglial-neuronal spatial organization in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in autism.

Authors:  John T Morgan; Gursharan Chana; Ian Abramson; Katerina Semendeferi; Eric Courchesne; Ian P Everall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Autism and urbanization.

Authors:  Kevin G Becker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Gestational diabetes mellitus, prenatal air pollution exposure, and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Heejoo Jo; Sandrah P Eckel; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Myles Cockburn; Mayra P Martinez; Ting Chow; Frederick W Lurmann; William E Funk; Anny H Xiang; Rob McConnell
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Genes, Environments, and Time: The Biology of Adversity and Resilience.

Authors:  W Thomas Boyce; Pat Levitt; Fernando D Martinez; Bruce S McEwen; Jack P Shonkoff
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Microglia: Phagocytosing to Clear, Sculpt, and Eliminate.

Authors:  Soyon Hong; Beth Stevens
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Early-life sex-dependent vulnerability to oxidative stress: the natural twining model.

Authors:  Luisa Minghetti; Anita Greco; Vincenzo Zanardo; Agnese Suppiej
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-10-19

7.  Association of Air Pollution and Heat Exposure With Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Stillbirth in the US: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bruce Bekkar; Susan Pacheco; Rupa Basu; Nathaniel DeNicola
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  Transcriptome analysis reveals dysregulation of innate immune response genes and neuronal activity-dependent genes in autism.

Authors:  Simone Gupta; Shannon E Ellis; Foram N Ashar; Anna Moes; Joel S Bader; Jianan Zhan; Andrew B West; Dan E Arking
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Juleen Lam; Patrice Sutton; Amy Kalkbrenner; Gayle Windham; Alycia Halladay; Erica Koustas; Cindy Lawler; Lisette Davidson; Natalyn Daniels; Craig Newschaffer; Tracey Woodruff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gestational Exposure to Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5) Leads to Spatial Memory Dysfunction and Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Hippocampus of Mice Offspring.

Authors:  Xinrui Zheng; Xia Wang; Tingting Wang; Hongxia Zhang; Hongjuan Wu; Can Zhang; Li Yu; Yingjun Guan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal Diet as a Modifier of Environmental Risk Factors for Autism and Related Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.

Authors:  Megan Bragg; Jorge E Chavarro; Ghassan B Hamra; Jaime E Hart; Loni Philip Tabb; Marc G Weisskopf; Heather E Volk; Kristen Lyall
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-03-19

2.  Invited Perspective: Air Pollution and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Raanan Raz; Youssef Oulhote
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.035

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.