Literature DB >> 31272018

An ensemble-based model of PM2.5 concentration across the contiguous United States with high spatiotemporal resolution.

Qian Di1, Heresh Amini2, Liuhua Shi2, Itai Kloog3, Rachel Silvern4, James Kelly5, M Benjamin Sabath6, Christine Choirat6, Petros Koutrakis2, Alexei Lyapustin7, Yujie Wang8, Loretta J Mickley9, Joel Schwartz2.   

Abstract

Various approaches have been proposed to model PM2.5 in the recent decade, with satellite-derived aerosol optical depth, land-use variables, chemical transport model predictions, and several meteorological variables as major predictor variables. Our study used an ensemble model that integrated multiple machine learning algorithms and predictor variables to estimate daily PM2.5 at a resolution of 1 km × 1 km across the contiguous United States. We used a generalized additive model that accounted for geographic difference to combine PM2.5 estimates from neural network, random forest, and gradient boosting. The three machine learning algorithms were based on multiple predictor variables, including satellite data, meteorological variables, land-use variables, elevation, chemical transport model predictions, several reanalysis datasets, and others. The model training results from 2000 to 2015 indicated good model performance with a 10-fold cross-validated R2 of 0.86 for daily PM2.5 predictions. For annual PM2.5 estimates, the cross-validated R2 was 0.89. Our model demonstrated good performance up to 60 μg/m3. Using trained PM2.5 model and predictor variables, we predicted daily PM2.5 from 2000 to 2015 at every 1 km × 1 km grid cell in the contiguous United States. We also used localized land-use variables within 1 km × 1 km grids to downscale PM2.5 predictions to 100 m × 100 m grid cells. To characterize uncertainty, we used meteorological variables, land-use variables, and elevation to model the monthly standard deviation of the difference between daily monitored and predicted PM2.5 for every 1 km × 1 km grid cell. This PM2.5 prediction dataset, including the downscaled and uncertainty predictions, allows epidemiologists to accurately estimate the adverse health effect of PM2.5. Compared with model performance of individual base learners, an ensemble model would achieve a better overall estimation. It is worth exploring other ensemble model formats to synthesize estimations from different models or from different groups to improve overall performance.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble model; Fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)); Gradient boosting; Neural network; Random forest

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31272018      PMCID: PMC7063579          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  43 in total

1.  Daily Estimation of Ground-Level PM2.5 Concentrations over Beijing Using 3 km Resolution MODIS AOD.

Authors:  Yuanyu Xie; Yuxuan Wang; Kai Zhang; Wenhao Dong; Baolei Lv; Yuqi Bai
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  High-Resolution Satellite-Derived PM2.5 from Optimal Estimation and Geographically Weighted Regression over North America.

Authors:  Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Robert J D Spurr; Richard T Burnett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Prediction of daily fine particulate matter concentrations using aerosol optical depth retrievals from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES).

Authors:  Alexandra A Chudnovsky; Hyung Joo Lee; Alex Kostinski; Tanya Kotlov; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Exposure assessment models for elemental components of particulate matter in an urban environment: A comparison of regression and random forest approaches.

Authors:  Cole Brokamp; Roman Jandarov; M B Rao; Grace LeMasters; Patrick Ryan
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Estimating regional spatial and temporal variability of PM(2.5) concentrations using satellite data, meteorology, and land use information.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Christopher J Paciorek; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Using High-Resolution Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth To Estimate Daily PM2.5 Geographical Distribution in Mexico City.

Authors:  Allan C Just; Robert O Wright; Joel Schwartz; Brent A Coull; Andrea A Baccarelli; Martha María Tellez-Rojo; Emily Moody; Yujie Wang; Alexei Lyapustin; Itai Kloog
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach.

Authors:  Xuefei Hu; Jessica H Belle; Xia Meng; Avani Wildani; Lance A Waller; Matthew J Strickland; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Improving retrievals of regional fine particulate matter concentrations from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) and ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) multisatellite observations.

Authors:  A W Strawa; R B Chatfield; M Legg; B Scarnato; R Esswein
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Global Land Use Regression Model for Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution.

Authors:  Andrew Larkin; Jeffrey A Geddes; Randall V Martin; Qingyang Xiao; Yang Liu; Julian D Marshall; Michael Brauer; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  A New Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Model For Estimating Daily Multi-Year PM2.5 Concentrations Across Northeastern USA Using High Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Data.

Authors:  Itai Kloog; Alexandra A Chudnovsky; Allan C Just; Francesco Nordio; Petros Koutrakis; Brent A Coull; Alexei Lyapustin; Yujie Wang; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  66 in total

1.  Causal Effects of Air Pollution on Mortality Rate in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Yaguang Wei; Yan Wang; Xiao Wu; Qian Di; Liuhua Shi; Petros Koutrakis; Antonella Zanobetti; Francesca Dominici; Joel D Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Associations between PM2.5 metal components and QT interval length in the Normative Aging Study.

Authors:  Adjani A Peralta; Joel Schwartz; Diane R Gold; Brent Coull; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Ensemble-based deep learning for estimating PM2.5 over California with multisource big data including wildfire smoke.

Authors:  Lianfa Li; Mariam Girguis; Frederick Lurmann; Nathan Pavlovic; Crystal McClure; Meredith Franklin; Jun Wu; Luke D Oman; Carrie Breton; Frank Gilliland; Rima Habre
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Assessing NO2 Concentration and Model Uncertainty with High Spatiotemporal Resolution across the Contiguous United States Using Ensemble Model Averaging.

Authors:  Qian Di; Heresh Amini; Liuhua Shi; Itai Kloog; Rachel Silvern; James Kelly; M Benjamin Sabath; Christine Choirat; Petros Koutrakis; Alexei Lyapustin; Yujie Wang; Loretta J Mickley; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  An Ensemble Learning Approach for Estimating High Spatiotemporal Resolution of Ground-Level Ozone in the Contiguous United States.

Authors:  Weeberb J Requia; Qian Di; Rachel Silvern; James T Kelly; Petros Koutrakis; Loretta J Mickley; Melissa P Sulprizio; Heresh Amini; Liuhua Shi; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Exposure to Air Pollution and Particle Radioactivity With the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Adjani A Peralta; Mark S Link; Joel Schwartz; Heike Luttmann-Gibson; Douglas W Dockery; Annelise Blomberg; Yaguang Wei; Murray A Mittleman; Diane R Gold; Francine Laden; Brent A Coull; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models.

Authors:  Minghui Diao; Tracey Holloway; Seohyun Choi; Susan M O'Neill; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene M Fiore; Daven K Henze; Forrest Lacey; Patrick L Kinney; Frank Freedman; Narasimhan K Larkin; Yufei Zou; James T Kelly; Ambarish Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Examining PM2.5 concentrations and exposure using multiple models.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Brian Timin; Qian Di; Joel Schwartz; Yang Liu; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Veronica Berrocal; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Associations between acute and long-term exposure to PM2.5 components and temperature with QT interval length in the VA Normative Aging Study.

Authors:  Adjani A Peralta; Joel Schwartz; Diane R Gold; Brent Coull; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.804

10.  Health effects of air pollutant mixtures on overall mortality among the elderly population using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR).

Authors:  Haomin Li; Wenying Deng; Raphael Small; Joel Schwartz; Jeremiah Liu; Liuhua Shi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 7.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.