Literature DB >> 32808550

Changing the HTS Paradigm: AI-Driven Iterative Screening for Hit Finding.

Gabriel H S Dreiman1,2, Magda Bictash1, Paul V Fish1, Lewis Griffin2, Fredrik Svensson1.   

Abstract

Iterative screening is a process in which screening is done in batches, with each batch filled by using machine learning to select the most promising compounds from the library based on the previous results. We believe iterative screening is poised to enhance the screening process by improving hit finding while at the same time reducing the number of compounds screened. In addition, we see this process as a key enabler of next-generation high-throughput screening (HTS), which uses more complex assays that better describe the biology but demand more resource per screened compound. To demonstrate the utility of these methods, we retrospectively analyze HTS data from PubChem with a focus on machine learning-based screening strategies that can be readily implemented in practice. Our results show that over a variety of HTS experimental paradigms, an iterative screening setup that screens a total of 35% of the screening collection over as few as three iterations has a median return rate of approximately 70% of the active compounds. Increasing the portion of the library screened to 50% yields median returns of approximately 80% of actives. Using six iterations increases these return rates to 78% and 90%, respectively. The best results were achieved with machine learning models that can be run on a standard desktop. By demonstrating that the utility of iterative screening holds true even with a small number of iterations, and without requiring significant computational resources, we provide a roadmap for the practical implementation of these techniques in hit finding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AI; HTS; iterative screening; machine learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808550      PMCID: PMC7838329          DOI: 10.1177/2472555220949495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SLAS Discov        ISSN: 2472-5552            Impact factor:   3.341


  16 in total

1.  Extended-connectivity fingerprints.

Authors:  David Rogers; Mathew Hahn
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Identifying actives from HTS data sets: practical approaches for the selection of an appropriate HTS data-processing method and quality control review.

Authors:  Tong Ying Shun; John S Lazo; Elizabeth R Sharlow; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2010-12-15

Review 3.  Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ricardo Macarron; Martyn N Banks; Dejan Bojanic; David J Burns; Dragan A Cirovic; Tina Garyantes; Darren V S Green; Robert P Hertzberg; William P Janzen; Jeff W Paslay; Ulrich Schopfer; G Sitta Sittampalam
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks.

Authors:  G W Bemis; M A Murcko
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-07-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Accurate Hit Estimation for Iterative Screening Using Venn-ABERS Predictors.

Authors:  Ruben Buendia; Thierry Kogej; Ola Engkvist; Lars Carlsson; Henrik Linusson; Ulf Johansson; Paolo Toccaceli; Ernst Ahlberg
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Jessica Vamathevan; Dominic Clark; Paul Czodrowski; Ian Dunham; Edgardo Ferran; George Lee; Bin Li; Anant Madabhushi; Parantu Shah; Michaela Spitzer; Shanrong Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease.

Authors:  Peter Horvath; Nathalie Aulner; Marc Bickle; Anthony M Davies; Elaine Del Nery; Daniel Ebner; Maria C Montoya; Päivi Östling; Vilja Pietiäinen; Leo S Price; Spencer L Shorte; Gerardo Turcatti; Carina von Schantz; Neil O Carragher
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 8.  The rise of deep learning in drug discovery.

Authors:  Hongming Chen; Ola Engkvist; Yinhai Wang; Marcus Olivecrona; Thomas Blaschke
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  PubChem's BioAssay Database.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Jewen Xiao; Tugba O Suzek; Jian Zhang; Jiyao Wang; Zhigang Zhou; Lianyi Han; Karen Karapetyan; Svetlana Dracheva; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Evan Bolton; Asta Gindulyte; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning.

Authors:  Zhenqin Wu; Bharath Ramsundar; Evan N Feinberg; Joseph Gomes; Caleb Geniesse; Aneesh S Pappu; Karl Leswing; Vijay Pande
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Debaryomyces hansenii: an old acquaintance for a fresh start in the era of the green biotechnology.

Authors:  Clara Navarrete; Mònica Estrada; José L Martínez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.