| Literature DB >> 32804310 |
Alexandra G May1,2, Ryan A Orizondo2,3, Brian J Frankowski2, Sang-Ho Ye2,4, Ergin Kocyildirim2,5, William R Wagner1,2,4,6, Jonathan D'Cunha7, William J Federspiel8,9,10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive and lung-protective ventilation techniques may improve outcomes for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing airway pressures. These less invasive techniques can fail due to hypercapnia and require transitioning patients to invasive mechanical ventilation. Extracorporeal CO2 removal devices remove CO2 independent of the lungs thereby controlling the hypercapnia and permitting non-invasive or lung-protective ventilation techniques. We are developing the Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System as a platform technology capable of providing three levels of respiratory assist: adult and pediatric full respiratory support and adult low-flow CO2 removal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of our device to achieve low-flow CO2 removal.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon dioxide; Extracorporeal CO2 removal; Hypercapnia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32804310 PMCID: PMC7429452 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00329-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Fig. 1Prototype of the adult low-flow ECCO2R ModELAS device showing the blood and gas flow pathways (a). All three respiratory assist applications utilize an identical pumping compartment. Cannulation and HFM bundle size differentiate each respiratory assist configuration. Photograph of a study animal wearing the holstered device (b)
Fig. 2Raw and normalized CO2 removal rates (a) and daily extracorporeal blood flow rate (b). When compared to the POD 0 data, neither parameter significantly changed over duration of the study (p > 0.05). an = 5, bn = 4
Hemodynamic and device parameters
| Parameter | POD 0 | POD 1 | POD 2 | POD 3 | POD 4 | POD 5 | POD 6 | POD 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean arterial pressure [mmHg] | 91 ± 5 | 91 ± 7 | 89 ± 7 | 93 ± 5 | 96 ± 8 | 104 ± 5 | 100 ± 7 | 96 ± 7 |
| Central venous pressure [mmHg] | − 1 ± 2 | − 2 ±2 | − 2 ± 2 | − 2 ± 1 | − 1 ± 2 | − 3 ± 2 | − 1 ± 3 | − 2 ± 2 |
| Heart rate [BPM] | 94 ± 2 | 85 ± 13 | 92 ± 23 | 107 ± 25 | 124 ± 31 | 111 ± 19 | 119 ± 27 | 119 ± 44 |
| Speed [RPM] | 1208 ± 80 | 1212 ± 47 | 1223 ± 54 | 1231 ± 53 | 1225 ± 54 | 1228 ± 59 | 1227 ± 62 | 1227 ± 60 |
| Torque [mN-m] | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 10 ± 2 | 11 ± 3 |
Animal 4 data not collected due to early termination
Statistically significant compared to POD 0 (p < 0.05)
Hematologic and end organ function parameters
| Parameter | Pre-Op | POD 0 | POD 1 | POD 3 | POD 6 | POD 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAF activated [%] | 71 ± 9 | 70 ± 10 | 77 ± 11 | 72 ± 11 | 75 ± 12 | 76 ± 3 |
| CD62P [%] | 3 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 5 ± 5 | 5 ± 3 | 4 ± 2 |
| Platelet count [k/μL] | 576 ± 252 | 397 ± 110 | 499 ± 186 | 703 ± 281 | 520 ± 115 | 552 ± 198 |
| WBC [K/μL] | 9 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 12 ± 4 | 11 ± 4 | 12 ± 5 | 12 ± 1.7 |
| HCT [%] | 36 ± 3 | 24 ± 2 | 29 ± 2 | 27 ± 6 | 24 ± 4 | 27 ± 7 |
| Creatinine [mg/dL] | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 2 ± 1 | 3 ± 3 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 |
| BUN [mg/dL] | 11 ± 2 | 11 ± 3 | 11 ± 5 | 27 ± 21 | 26 ± 16 | 14 ± 4 |
| CK [U/L] | 103 ± 23 | 155 ± 51 | 143 ± 72 | 71 ± 11 | 149 ± 88 | 126 ± 80 |
| ALT [U/L] | 12 ± 5 | 9 ± 3 | 9 ± 4 | 5 ± 3 | 5 ± 2 | 5 ± 5 |
| AST [U/L] | 71 ± 14 | 58 ± 11 | 73 ± 19 | 56 ± 10 | 53 ± 12 | 59 ± 9 |
| ALP [U/L] | 218 ± 56 | 165 ± 55 | 158 ± 41 | 141 ± 33 | 101 ± 26 | 128 ± 64 |
ALT alanine transferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CK creatine kinase, HCT hematocrit, PAF platelet-activating factor, WBC white blood cell count
Missing platelet count from animal 6
Missing platelet count from animals 2, 5, and 6
Missing all data, except HCT, for animals 3, 4, and 6
Missing all data, except HCT, for animals 4 and 5
Missing CD62P and PAF activated for animal 3
Statistically significant compared to pre-op value (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Plasma-free hemoglobin generated during the adult low-flow ECCO2R ModELAS in vivo study. Legend: ● animal 1; ■ animal 2; ▲ animal 3; ▼ animal trial 4; ♦ animal 5; ○ animal 6
Fig. 4(a) Images of the explanted hollow fiber membrane bundle inlet (top row) and outlet (bottom row) faces and the (b) impeller top (top row) and bottom (bottom row) pivots. The animal 2 (right) bundle and pivots had significant thrombus formation due to low ACT. All other animals were free of significant thrombi (left)