| Literature DB >> 32801296 |
Huijun Huang1,2, Changlu Xu2, Jie Gao2, Bing Li1,2,3, Tiejun Qin1,3, Zefeng Xu1,2,3, Sirui Ren2, Yudi Zhang1,2, Meng Jiao1,3, Shiqiang Qu1,3, Lijuan Pan1,3, Naibo Hu1,3, Jinqin Liu2, Wenyu Cai4, Yingnan Zhang2, Dan Wu2, Peihong Zhang4, Robert Peter Gale5, Gang Huang6, Jiaxi Zhou2,3, Lihong Shi7,8, Zhijian Xiao9,10,11.
Abstract
The underlying mechanisms and clinical significance of ineffective erythropoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remain to be fully defined. We conducted the ex vivo erythroid differentiation of megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors (MEPs) from MDS patients and discovered that patient-derived erythroblasts exhibit precocity and premature aging phenotypes, partially by inducing the pro-aging genes, like ERCC1. Absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) was chosen as a biomarker to evaluate the severity of ineffective erythropoiesis in 776 MDS patients. We found that patients with severe ineffective erythropoiesis displaying lower ARC (<20 × 109/L), were more likely to harbor complex karyotypes and high-risk somatic mutations (p < 0.05). Lower ARCs are associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (p < 0.001) and remain significant in multivariable analysis. Regardless of patients of lower-risk who received immunosuppressive therapy or higher-risk who received decitabine treatment, patients with lower ARC had shorter OS (p < 0.001). Whereas no difference in OS was found between patients receiving allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (Allo-HSCT) (p = 0.525). Our study revealed that ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS may be partially caused by premature aging and apoptosis during erythroid differentiation. MDS patients with severe ineffective erythropoiesis have significant shorter OS treated with immunosuppressive or hypo-methylating agents, but may benefit from Allo-HSCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32801296 PMCID: PMC7429953 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-00349-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Cancer J ISSN: 2044-5385 Impact factor: 11.037
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of 776 patients with MDS.
| Characteristics | ARC < 20 × 109/L ( | ARC ≥ 20 × 109/L ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, | 0.046 | |||
| Male | 119 (70.4%) | 375 (61.8%) | 494 (63.7%) | |
| Female | 50 (29.6%) | 232 (38.2%) | 282 (36.35%) | |
| Age, median (range), y | 56 (16–83) | 52 (14–83) | 54 (14–83) | 0.032 |
| Age ≥60 years, | 73 (43.2%) | 199 (32.8%) | 272 (35.1%) | 0.014 |
| WHO classification 2016 | 0.101 | |||
| MDS-SLD | 4 (2.4%) | 30 (4.9%) | 34 (4.4%) | |
| MDS-RS-SLD | 4 (2.4%) | 18 (3.0%) | 22 (2.8%) | |
| MDS-MLD | 71 (42.0%) | 307 (50.6%) | 378 (48.7%) | |
| MDS-RS-MLD | 5 (3.0%) | 10 (1.6%) | 15 (1.9%) | |
| MDS-EB1 | 39 (23.1%) | 114 (18.8%) | 153 (19.7%) | |
| MDS-EB2 | 41 (24.3%) | 104 (17.1%) | 145 (18.7%) | |
| MDS with isolated del (5q) | 0 | 7 (1.2%) | 7 (0.9%) | |
| MDS-U | 5 (3.0%) | 17 (2.8%) | 22 (2.8%) | |
| Hb, median (range), g/L | 64 (31–138) | 83 (38–155) | 78 (31–155) | <0.001 |
| WBC, median (range), ×109/L | 2.51 (0.71–21.17) | 2.83 (0.61–20.42) | 2.75 (0.61–21.17) | 0.007 |
| ANC, median (range), ×109/L | 0.99 (0.04–13.18) | 1.19 (0–17.37) | 1.15 (0–17.37) | 0.002 |
| PLT, median (range), ×109/L | 51 (2–536) | 63 (2–694) | 60 (2–694) | 0.012 |
| BM erythroblasts, median (range), % | 20 (0–75) | 35 (0–92.5) | 31 (0–92.5) | <0.001 |
| Sum of proerythroblast and basophilic erythroblast(E1), median (range), % | 1 (0–30) | 1.5 (0–18.5) | 1.5 (0–30) | 0.009 |
| Sum of polychromatic and orthochromatic erythroblast (E2), median (range), % | 17.5 (0–67) | 32 (0–88) | 29 (0–88) | <0.001 |
| Ratio of E1 to E2, median (range) | 0.052 (0–1.75) | 0.05 (0–2) | 0.05 (0–2) | 0.305 |
| BM blast, median (range), % | 3.5 (0–19.5) | 2.5 (0–19.5) | 2.5 (0–19.5) | 0.005 |
| IPSS-R karyotype, | <0.001 | |||
| Very good | 1 (0.7%) | 7 (1.3%) | 8 (1.2%) | |
| Good | 69 (48.6%) | 313 (58.4%) | 382 (56.3%) | |
| Intermediate | 26 (18.3%) | 138 (25.7%) | 164 (24.2%) | |
| Poor | 11 (7.7%) | 29 (5.4%) | 40 (5.9%) | |
| Very poor | 35 (24.6%) | 49 (9.1%) | 84 (12.4%) | |
| Complex karyotype, | 39 (27.5%) | 68 (12.7%) | 107 (15.8%) | <0.001 |
| IPSS-R risk group, | <0.001 | |||
| Very low | 0 | 21 (3.9%) | 21 (3.1%) | |
| Low | 21 (14.8%) | 148 (27.6%) | 169 (24.9%) | |
| Intermediate | 41 (28.9%) | 175 (32.6%) | 216 (31.9%) | |
| High | 30 (21.1%) | 122 (22.8%) | 152 (22.4%) | |
| Very high | 50 (35.2%) | 70 (13.1%) | 120 (17.7%) | |
| IPSS-R two groups, | <0.001 | |||
| Lower-risk | 40 (28.2%) | 245 (45.7%) | 285 (42.0%) | |
| Higher-risk | 102 (71.8%) | 291 (54.3%) | 393 (58.0%) |
MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, ARC absolute reticulocyte count, MDS-SLD MDS with single lineage dysplasia, MDS-RS-SLD MDS with ring sideroblasts with single lineage dysplasia, MDS-MLD MDS with multilineage dysplasia, MDS-RS-MLD MDS with ring sideroblasts with multilineage dysplasia, MDS-EB1 MDS with excess blasts-1, MDS-EB2 MDS with excess blasts-2, MDS-U MDS unclassifiable, Hb haemoglobin, WBC white blood coun, ANC absolute neutrophil count, PLT platelet count, BM bone marrow, IPSS-R Revised International Prognostic Scoring System.
Fig. 1Inducing ex vivo erythroid lineage differentiation from MDS patients derived megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors (MEPs).
a Representative cytospin staining images of erythroid cells derived from MDS patients and healthy donors (HD) cultured for 4 days and 8 days. The cells indicated by red arrows refer to dysplastic erythrocytes, benzidine-positive and β-galactosidase-positive cells, respectively, in MDS patients which suggested the precocity and prematuring aging in erythroid differentiation of MDS. Scale bar = 20 μm. b Cell proliferation curve was drawn according to cell counts at each stage.
Fig. 2Aging-associated genes were upregulated in MDS-derived erythroid cells during ex vivo differentiation.
a Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of aging and apoptotic_signaling_pathway in hematopoietic cells at various differentiation stages from MDS patients and HD, respectively. Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) and Nominal p-value are shown in each plot. b Aging Score was calculated based on FPKM of aging genes. Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test (Paired) was used to analyze the statistical significance and p values are shown in the plot. c The expression of ERCC1, one of the aging-associated genes, at day 8, 11 and 14 of erythroid differentiation in MDS patients and HD by qRT-PCR. d The expression of ERCC1 was measured by qRT-PCR and WB, respectively, in primary erythroid cells at day 8 of differentiation after lentiviral-mediated knockdown. e The representative β-galactosidase staining images of day 8-differentiated primary erythroid cells in ERCC1 diminished or scramble control cells (Scale bar = 20 μm). f The bar graph showing the percentage of β-galactosidase positive cells in control and ERCC1-diminished cells at day 8 of erythroid differentiation derived from cord blood CD34+ cells.
Fig. 3Associations between ineffective erythropoiesis and genetic abnormalities.
a The percentage of complex karyotype in patients with different degree of ineffective erythropoiesis (stratified by lower and higher ARC). b The genetic distributions in MDS patients with lower and higher ARC.
Fig. 4Prognostic impact of ineffective erythropoiesis (assessed by ARC) in MDS patients.
a–c Survival analyses of ARC in the total cohort, IPSS-R lower-risk patients and IPSS-R higher-risk patients, respectively. d Survival analyses of MDS patients stratified by IPSS-R risk group and ARC. e, f Survival analyses of ARC in younger (<60 years) and older (≥60 years) patients. g–i Survival analyses of ARC in IPSS-R lower-risk patients who received immunosupressive treatment and IPSS-R higher-risk patients who received decitabine therapy or in both categories who received Allo-HSCT.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in the total cohort.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Adjusted by molecular profiles | All-inclusive multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Age ≥60 years | 1.939 | 1.493–2.518 | <0.001 | 2.472 | 1.844–3.315 | <0.001 | |||
| IPSS-R higher-risk group | 3.397 | 2.436–4.736 | <0.001 | 3.047 | 2.159–4.300 | <0.001 | |||
| ARC < 20 × 109/L | 2.685 | 2.045–3.525 | <0.001 | 2.675 | 2.021–3.541 | <0.001 | 2.118 | 1.563–2.870 | <0.001 |
| 1.368 | 0.995–1.879 | 0.053 | 1.407 | 1.018–1.945 | 0.039 | ||||
| 1.081 | 0.702–1.664 | 0.724 | |||||||
| 1.705 | 0.953–3.052 | 0.072 | 2.229 | 1.228–4.048 | 0.008 | ||||
| 1.844 | 1.217–2.795 | 0.004 | 2.102 | 1.378–3.207 | 0.001 | ||||
| 1.653 | 1.033–2.647 | 0.036 | 2.110 | 1.200–3.712 | 0.010 | ||||
| 2.915 | 1.967–4.320 | <0.001 | 2.911 | 1.937–4.374 | <0.001 | ||||
| 1.837 | 1.134–2.976 | 0.014 | |||||||
| 2.481 | 1.350–4.559 | 0.003 | 1.988 | 1.058–3.735 | 0.033 | 2.206 | 1.108–4.390 | 0.024 | |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.
Fig. 5The pattern of ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS patients.
A spectrum of somatic mutations occurs in partial HSCs, generating the malignant clone. With the accumulation of genetic lesions in HSPCs during their lifespan, usually accompanied by alterations of BM niche, the disorders of erythropoiesis, including differentiation arrest, precocity and premature aging of erythroid cells and increased apoptosis of erythroid precursors, aggravate gradually and eventually lead to ineffective erythropoiesis and a remarkable decrease in ARC and RBCs in peripheral blood.