Literature DB >> 29417633

Mutations and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes: karyotype-adjusted analysis of targeted sequencing in 300 consecutive cases and development of a genetic risk model.

Naseema Gangat1, Mythri Mudireddy1, Terra L Lasho1, Christy M Finke1, Maura Nicolosi1, Natasha Szuber1, Mrinal M Patnaik1, Animesh Pardanani1, Curtis A Hanson2, Rhett P Ketterling3, Ayalew Tefferi1.   

Abstract

To develop a genetic risk model for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), we queried the prognostic significance of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-derived mutations, in the context of the Mayo cytogenetic risk stratification, which includes high-risk (monosomal karyotype; MK), intermediate-risk (non-MK, classified as intermediate/poor/very poor, per the revised international prognostic scoring system; IPSS-R), and low-risk (classified as good/very good, per IPSS-R). Univariate analysis in 300 consecutive patients with primary MDS identified TP53, RUNX1, U2AF1, ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2 mutations as "unfavorable" and SF3B1 as "favorable" risk factors for survival; for the purposes of the current study, the absence of SF3B1 mutation was accordingly dubbed as an "adverse" mutation. Analysis adjusted for age and MK, based on our previous observation of significant clustering between MK and TP53 mutations, confirmed independent prognostic contribution from RUNX1, ASXL1, and SF3B1 mutations. Multivariable analysis that included age, the Mayo cytogenetics risk model and the number of adverse mutations resulted in HRs (95% CI) of 5.3 (2.5-10.3) for presence of three adverse mutations, 2.4 (1.6-3.7) for presence of two adverse mutations, 1.5 (1.02-2.2) for presence of one adverse mutation, 5.6 (3.4-9.1) for high-risk karyotype, 1.5 (1.1-2.2) for intermediate-risk karyotype and 2.4 (1.8-3.3) for age >70 years; HR-weighted risk point assignment generated a three-tiered genetic risk model: high (N = 65; 5-year survival 2%), intermediate (N = 100; 5-year survival 18%), and low (N = 135; 5-year survival 56%). The current study provides a practically simple risk model in MDS that is based on age, karyotype, and mutations only.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29417633     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  13 in total

Review 1.  Roles and mechanisms of alternative splicing in cancer - implications for care.

Authors:  Sophie C Bonnal; Irene López-Oreja; Juan Valcárcel
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Improving Treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients.

Authors:  Julia Montoro; Aslihan Yerlikaya; Abdullah Ali; Azra Raza
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  [Clonal evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome].

Authors:  B Q Luo; F Dong; M X F Ema
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-14

4.  Response of high-risk MDS to azacitidine and lenalidomide is impacted by baseline and acquired mutations in a cluster of three inositide-specific genes.

Authors:  Matilde Y Follo; Andrea Pellagatti; Richard N Armstrong; Stefano Ratti; Sara Mongiorgi; Sara De Fanti; Maria Teresa Bochicchio; Domenico Russo; Marco Gobbi; Maurizio Miglino; Sarah Parisi; Giovanni Martinelli; Michele Cavo; Donata Luiselli; James A McCubrey; Pann-Ghill Suh; Lucia Manzoli; Jacqueline Boultwood; Carlo Finelli; Lucio Cocco
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Cytogenetic characteristics of 665 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in China: A single-center report.

Authors:  Xueying Wang; Weiyi Liu; Mingjing Wang; Teng Fan; Yumeng Li; Xiaoqing Guo; Xiupeng Yang; Hongzhi Wang; Haiyan Xiao; Shanshan Zhang; Richeng Quan; Chi Liu; Xudong Tang; Yan Lv; Zhuo Chen; Liu Li; Yonggang Xu; Rou Ma; Xiaomei Hu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  [How I treat myelodysplastic syndromes with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Authors:  E L Jiang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-14

7.  Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Technique Generating Valuable Risk-Stratification Information for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Xia Xiao; Xiaoyuan He; Qing Li; Wei Zhang; Haibo Zhu; Weihong Yang; Yuming Li; Li Geng; Hui Liu; Lijuan Li; Huaquan Wang; Rong Fu; Mingfeng Zhao; Zhong Chen; Zonghong Shao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Polycomb complexes in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Valerio Di Carlo; Ivano Mocavini; Luciano Di Croce
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  TP53 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Recent Biological and Clinical Findings.

Authors:  Cosimo Cumbo; Giuseppina Tota; Luisa Anelli; Antonella Zagaria; Giorgina Specchia; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Severe ineffective erythropoiesis discriminates prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis based on 776 patients from a single centre.

Authors:  Huijun Huang; Changlu Xu; Jie Gao; Bing Li; Tiejun Qin; Zefeng Xu; Sirui Ren; Yudi Zhang; Meng Jiao; Shiqiang Qu; Lijuan Pan; Naibo Hu; Jinqin Liu; Wenyu Cai; Yingnan Zhang; Dan Wu; Peihong Zhang; Robert Peter Gale; Gang Huang; Jiaxi Zhou; Lihong Shi; Zhijian Xiao
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.