Literature DB >> 32798461

Birth hospital and racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity in the state of California.

Mahasin S Mujahid1, Peiyi Kan2, Stephanie A Leonard3, Elleni M Hailu4, Elizabeth Wall-Wieler2, Barbara Abrams4, Elliott Main5, Jochen Profit2, Suzan L Carmichael3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Birth hospital has recently emerged as a potential key contributor to disparities in severe maternal morbidity, but investigations on its contribution to racial and ethnic differences remain limited.
OBJECTIVE: We leveraged statewide data from California to examine whether birth hospital explained racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: This cohort study used data on all births at ≥20 weeks gestation in California (2007-2012). Severe maternal morbidity during birth hospitalization was measured using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention index of having at least 1 of the 21 diagnoses and procedures (eg, eclampsia, blood transfusion, hysterectomy). Mixed-effects logistic regression models (ie, women nested within hospitals) were used to compare racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity before and after adjustment for maternal sociodemographic and pregnancy-related factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We also estimated the risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity rates for each hospital (N=245) and the percentage reduction in severe maternal morbidity if each group of racially and ethnically minoritized women gave birth at the same distribution of hospitals as non-Hispanic white women.
RESULTS: Of the 3,020,525 women who gave birth, 39,192 (1.3%) had severe maternal morbidity (2.1% Black; 1.3% US-born Hispanic; 1.3% foreign-born Hispanic; 1.3% Asian and Pacific Islander; 1.1% white; 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native, and Mixed-race referred to as Other). Risk-standardized rates of severe maternal morbidity ranged from 0.3 to 4.0 per 100 births across hospitals. After adjusting for covariates, the odds of severe maternal morbidity were greater among nonwhite women than white women in a given hospital (Black: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.31); US-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.29; foreign-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.24; Asian and Pacific Islander: odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.32; Other: odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.50). Among the studied hospital factors, only teaching status was associated with severe maternal morbidity in fully adjusted models. Although 33% of white women delivered in hospitals with the highest tertile of severe maternal morbidity rates compared with 53% of Black women, birth hospital only accounted for 7.8% of the differences in severe maternal morbidity comparing Black and white women and accounted for 16.1% to 24.2% of the differences for all other racial and ethnic groups.
CONCLUSION: In California, excess odds of severe maternal morbidity among racially and ethnically minoritized women were not fully explained by birth hospital. Structural causes of racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity may vary by region, which warrants further examination to inform effective policies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health equity; hospital-level factors; racial and ethnic disparities; severe maternal morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32798461      PMCID: PMC7855283          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  30 in total

Review 1.  When can odds ratios mislead?

Authors:  H T Davies; I K Crombie; M Tavakoli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

Review 2.  Improving hospital quality to reduce disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Methods for Measuring Racial Differences in Hospitals Outcomes Attributable to Disparities in Use of High-Quality Hospital Care.

Authors:  Paul L Hebert; Elizabeth A Howell; Edwin S Wong; Susan E Hernandez; Seppo T Rinne; Christine A Sulc; Emily L Neely; Chuan-Fen Liu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Black Lives Matter: Claiming a Space for Evidence-Based Outrage in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Kacey Y Eichelberger; Kemi Doll; Geraldine E Ekpo; Matthew L Zerden
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Epidemiology of racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Sarah J Holdt Somer; Rachel G Sinkey; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Healthy people: a 2020 vision for the social determinants approach.

Authors:  Howard K Koh; Julie J Piotrowski; Shiriki Kumanyika; Jonathan E Fielding
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-12

7.  Site of delivery contribution to black-white severe maternal morbidity disparity.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Natalia N Egorova; Amy Balbierz; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Reduction of Peripartum Racial and Ethnic Disparities: A Conceptual Framework and Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Haywood Brown; Jessica Brumley; Allison S Bryant; Aaron B Caughey; Andria M Cornell; Jacqueline H Grant; Kimberly D Gregory; Susan M Gullo; Katy B Kozhimannil; Jill M Mhyre; Paloma Toledo; Robyn D'Oria; Martha Ngoh; William A Grobman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2018-04-24

9.  Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.

Authors:  Kelly M Hoffman; Sophie Trawalter; Jordan R Axt; M Norman Oliver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The impact of socioeconomic position on severe maternal morbidity outcomes among women in Australia: a national case-control study.

Authors:  A Lindquist; N Noor; E Sullivan; M Knight
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating Care in Safety Net Hospitals: Clinical Outcomes and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Quality of Care in California.

Authors:  Jessica Liu; Emily M Pang; Alexandra Iacob; Aida Simonian; Ciaran S Phibbs; Jochen Profit
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Maternal Morbidity Predicted by an Intersectional Social Determinants of Health Phenotype: A Secondary Analysis of the NuMoM2b Dataset.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Nicole S Carlson
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among Pregnant Individuals With Gestational Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2014-2020.

Authors:  Kartik K Venkatesh; Courtney D Lynch; Camille E Powe; Maged M Costantine; Stephen F Thung; Steven G Gabbe; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 157.335

Review 4.  Access to risk-appropriate hospital care and disparities in neonatal outcomes in racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban populations.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Jeannette Rogowski; Jochen Profit; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.311

5.  Disparities in Kangaroo Care for Premature Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Edith Brignoni-Pérez; Melissa Scala; Heidi M Feldman; Virginia A Marchman; Katherine E Travis
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The effect of severe maternal morbidity on infant costs and lengths of stay.

Authors:  Claire M Phibbs; Katy B Kozhimannil; Stephanie A Leonard; Scott A Lorch; Elliott K Main; Susan K Schmitt; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.