Jessica Liu1, Emily M Pang2, Alexandra Iacob3, Aida Simonian4, Ciaran S Phibbs5, Jochen Profit6. 1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, CA. 2. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA. 3. California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, CA; Division of Neonatal/Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA. 4. California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, CA. 5. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Health Economics Resource Center and Center for Implementation to Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA. 6. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: profit@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics of safety net (sn) and non-sn neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in California and evaluate whether the site of care is associated with clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study of 34 snNICUs and 104 non-snNICUs included 22 081 infants born between 2014 and 2018 with a birth weight of 401-1500 g or gestational age of 22-29 weeks. Quality of care as measured by the Baby-MONITOR score and rates of survival without major morbidity were compared between snNICUs and non-snNICUs. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic infants were cared for disproportionately in snNICUs, where care and outcomes varied widely. We found no significant differences in Baby-Measure Of Neonatal InTensive care Outcomes Research (MONITOR) scores (z-score [SD]: snNICUs, -0.31 [1.3]; non-snNICUs, 0.03 [1.1]; P = .1). Among individual components, infants in snNICUs exhibited lower rates of human milk nutrition at discharge (-0.64 [1.0] vs 0.27 [0.9]), lower rates of no health care-associated infection (-0.27 [1.1] vs 0.14 [0.9]), and higher rates of no hypothermia on admission (0.39 [0.7] vs -0.25 [1.1]). We found small but significant differences in survival without major morbidity (adjusted rate, 65.9% [95% CI, 63.9%-67.9%] for snNICUs vs 68.3% [95% CI, 67.0%-69.6%] for non-snNICUs; P = .02) and in some of its components; snNICUs had higher rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (3.8% [3.4%-4.3%] vs 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8%-3.4%]) and mortality (95% CI, 7.1% [6.5%-7.7%] vs 6.6% [6.2%-7.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: snNICUs achieved similar performance as non-snNICUs in quality of care except for small but significant differences in any human milk at discharge, infection, hypothermia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and mortality.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics of safety net (sn) and non-sn neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in California and evaluate whether the site of care is associated with clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study of 34 snNICUs and 104 non-snNICUs included 22 081 infants born between 2014 and 2018 with a birth weight of 401-1500 g or gestational age of 22-29 weeks. Quality of care as measured by the Baby-MONITOR score and rates of survival without major morbidity were compared between snNICUs and non-snNICUs. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic infants were cared for disproportionately in snNICUs, where care and outcomes varied widely. We found no significant differences in Baby-Measure Of Neonatal InTensive care Outcomes Research (MONITOR) scores (z-score [SD]: snNICUs, -0.31 [1.3]; non-snNICUs, 0.03 [1.1]; P = .1). Among individual components, infants in snNICUs exhibited lower rates of human milk nutrition at discharge (-0.64 [1.0] vs 0.27 [0.9]), lower rates of no health care-associated infection (-0.27 [1.1] vs 0.14 [0.9]), and higher rates of no hypothermia on admission (0.39 [0.7] vs -0.25 [1.1]). We found small but significant differences in survival without major morbidity (adjusted rate, 65.9% [95% CI, 63.9%-67.9%] for snNICUs vs 68.3% [95% CI, 67.0%-69.6%] for non-snNICUs; P = .02) and in some of its components; snNICUs had higher rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (3.8% [3.4%-4.3%] vs 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8%-3.4%]) and mortality (95% CI, 7.1% [6.5%-7.7%] vs 6.6% [6.2%-7.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: snNICUs achieved similar performance as non-snNICUs in quality of care except for small but significant differences in any human milk at discharge, infection, hypothermia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and mortality.
Authors: Eileen T Lake; Douglas Staiger; Jeffrey Horbar; Michael J Kenny; Thelma Patrick; Jeannette A Rogowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: J Profit; J B Gould; J A F Zupancic; A R Stark; K M Wall; M A Kowalkowski; M Mei; K Pietz; E J Thomas; L A Petersen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Brittany Riley; Michael Schoeny; Laura Rogers; Ifeyinwa V Asiodu; Harold R Bigger; Paula P Meier; Aloka L Patel Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Elizabeth A Howell; Paul Hebert; Samprit Chatterjee; Lawrence C Kleinman; Mark R Chassin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David K Stevenson; Ronald J Wong; Jochen Profit; Gary M Shaw; C Jason Wang; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Margaret G Parker; Lucy T Greenberg; Erika M Edwards; Danielle Ehret; Mandy B Belfort; Jeffrey D Horbar Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 16.193