A Lindquist1,2, N Noor1, E Sullivan3, M Knight1. 1. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 3. Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies in other developed countries have suggested that socioeconomic position may be a risk factor for poorer pregnancy outcomes. This analysis aimed to explore the independent impact of socioeconomic position on selected severe maternal morbidities among women in Australia. DESIGN: A case-control study using data on severe maternal morbidities associated with direct maternal death collected through the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System. SETTING: Australia. POPULATION: 623 cases, 820 controls. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis to investigate differences in outcomes among different socioeconomic groups, classified by Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) quintile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe maternal morbidity (amniotic fluid embolism, placenta accreta, peripartum hysterectomy, eclampsia or pulmonary embolism). RESULTS: SEIFA quintile was statistically significantly associated with maternal morbidity, with cases being twice as likely as controls to reside in the most disadvantaged areas (adjusted OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.29-3.10). Maternal age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.20 for women aged 35 or over compared with women aged 25-29, 95%CI 1.64-3.15] and previous pregnancy complications (aOR 1.30, 95%CI 1.21-1.87) were significantly associated with morbidity. A parity of 1 or 2 was protective (aOR 0.58, 95%CI 0.43-0.79), whereas previous caesarean delivery was associated with maternal morbidity (aOR 2.20 for women with one caesarean delivery, 95%CI 1.44-2.85, compared with women with no caesareans). CONCLUSION: The risk of severe maternal morbidity among women in Australia is significantly increased by social disadvantage. This study suggests that future efforts in improving maternity care provision and maternal outcomes in Australia should include socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for adverse outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Studies in other developed countries have suggested that socioeconomic position may be a risk factor for poorer pregnancy outcomes. This analysis aimed to explore the independent impact of socioeconomic position on selected severe maternal morbidities among women in Australia. DESIGN: A case-control study using data on severe maternal morbidities associated with direct maternal death collected through the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System. SETTING: Australia. POPULATION: 623 cases, 820 controls. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis to investigate differences in outcomes among different socioeconomic groups, classified by Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) quintile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe maternal morbidity (amniotic fluid embolism, placenta accreta, peripartum hysterectomy, eclampsia or pulmonary embolism). RESULTS: SEIFA quintile was statistically significantly associated with maternal morbidity, with cases being twice as likely as controls to reside in the most disadvantaged areas (adjusted OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.29-3.10). Maternal age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.20 for women aged 35 or over compared with women aged 25-29, 95%CI 1.64-3.15] and previous pregnancy complications (aOR 1.30, 95%CI 1.21-1.87) were significantly associated with morbidity. A parity of 1 or 2 was protective (aOR 0.58, 95%CI 0.43-0.79), whereas previous caesarean delivery was associated with maternal morbidity (aOR 2.20 for women with one caesarean delivery, 95%CI 1.44-2.85, compared with women with no caesareans). CONCLUSION: The risk of severe maternal morbidity among women in Australia is significantly increased by social disadvantage. This study suggests that future efforts in improving maternity care provision and maternal outcomes in Australia should include socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for adverse outcome.
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Peiyi Kan; Stephanie A Leonard; Elleni M Hailu; Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Barbara Abrams; Elliott Main; Jochen Profit; Suzan L Carmichael Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Elizabeth A Sullivan; Jan E Dickinson; Geraldine A Vaughan; Michael J Peek; David Ellwood; Caroline S E Homer; Marian Knight; Claire McLintock; Alex Wang; Wendy Pollock; Lisa Jackson Pulver; Zhuoyang Li; Nasrin Javid; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Leonie Callaway Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Helen D Bailey; Carrington C J Shepherd; Akilew A Adane; Brad M Farrant; Rhonda Marriott; Scott W White Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 2.692